BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Preferred Options for Sites
ID sylw: 64311
Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014
Ymatebydd: Mr Gordon Williamson
Does not comply with criteria.
Access not safe situated alongside busy A429 with 60mph speed limit. Pedestrians/schoolchildren would have to cross road to get to village. History of serious accidents, some fatal.
Provision of utilities not cost effective
Physical aspect of site detrimental being situated on trunk road from Warwick to Cotswolds, a popular tourist route.
Integration into landscape difficult and natural environment destroyed.
No doctor's surgery.
Whilst I understand the need for these pitches, I object to Site GT12 Westham Lane as it does not comply with your own criteria on page 13 of the Preferred Options document where it states "the council has applied consistent criteria".
1. Access is not safe in any way. It is situated alongside the very busy A429 (Barford bypass) with a speed limit of 60 mph. Pedestrians and potential schoolchildren would have to cross this road to get access to the village. This road unfortunately has a history of too many serious accidents, some fatal.
2. Provision of utilities would be expensive, not cost effective
3. The physical aspect of this site would be extremely detrimental as it is situated on the main trunk road from historic Warwick to the Cotswolds, a very popular tourist route.
4. Integration into the landscape would be very difficult and the natural environment around the pretty River Avon would be destroyed.
5. There is no doctor's surgery nearby.
A much more obvious choice would be GTalt01 Brookside Willows.
It is still located at the edge of Warwick with all its advantages but
1. Is screened form the Banbury Road
2. Has a good and safe access already built
3. Safe pedestrian access to town
4. Choice of good schools, surgeries and transport readily available
5. A pleasant environment and no issues with noise (either way).
6. It is a larger area and potentially could hold more pitches, making it more sense economically.
A longer term solution, surely, would be to provide larger G & T sites within the planning of new, larger mixed developments which will surely happen with the introduction of the Local Plan.
This makes sense both economically and from a planning point of view.