BASE HEADER

2.10 - COMMENT
The GTAA was actually published in November 2012, so this does not bode well for the professionalism or competence of the Council's approach
2.13 - COMMENT
The public deserves more information on why conversations with neighbouring authorities over several years have not yielded any results.
6. Criteria
6.3 - COMMENT
A fundamental flaw in this draft policy is that there is no explanation of why some 'green' sites are in Preferred Sites and others are Alternative Sites. You should be more transparent.
Please therefore provide me with further information on this point.
10. Summary of Alternative Sites - COMMENT
Why are no photographs of the Alternative Sites provided, unlike for the Preferred Sites in section 9? This is arguably prejudicial as all sites should be given the same treatment in the documentation.
Please could Council officers explain this inconsistency?