BASE HEADER
Gwrthwynebu
Proposed Modifications January 2016
ID sylw: 68515
Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016
Ymatebydd: Mrs P Mackay
Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi
Cadarn? Nac Ydi
Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi
I object to the density of homes being proposed:
1 - as there is no provision to extend current amenities i.e. doctors or school.
2 - as there is no provision to improve road infrastructure, which already struggles to cope with large volumes of traffic generated from Warwick Parkway and current residents.
3 - as I do not consider this proposal to be a sustainable or effective amendment to the use of green-belt land.
I object to the density of homes being proposed:
1 - as there is no provision to extend current amenities (doctors or school). By 2020 there will be a shortfall of approximately 10,000 primary school places. My concern is that my own son will not actually be able to attend our primary school, thus we will be forced to travel outside of the village to go elsewhere.
2 - as there is no provision to improve road infrastructure, which already struggles to cope with large volumes of traffic generated from Warwick Parkway and our own residents, particularly at peak times. The three roads into the village all reduce to a single lane in parts and will become more dangerous and congested. The plan will not encourage more people to cycle or walk to their destination - unless it is within the village limits or to the train station I imagine.
3 - as I disagree that this is an effective or sustainable amendment to the use of green-belt land.