BASE HEADER

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

ID sylw: 69800

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Bubbenhall Parish Council

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Proposing Green Belt locations for development on the edge of built-up areas is contrary to established Green Belt policies. A purpose of the Green Belt is to curb urban sprawl but the proposed policies include 'urban extension' which is the same. The SA Addendum recognizes that proposed urban extensions would have cumulative and potentially major negative effects on landscape, visual amenity and openness through loss of Green Belt and that these would remain even after so-called mitigation.
The Joint Green Belt Study, 2015 states the proposed site at Kings Hill (H43), comprises Green Belt assessed as making a considerable contribution.
The combination of unjustified sub-regional employment site (Policy DS16) and excessive housing proposals would devastate the Green Belt south of Coventry, extending Coventry's sprawl around Baginton, towards Stoneleigh and Bubbenhall.

Testun llawn:

See attached

Atodiadau: