BASE HEADER

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87182

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Babs Gisborne-Land

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Destroying greenfield land shows no regard for the environment, existing wild life, air quality and well being of existing residents. In no way can this A2 be viewed as sustainable. Concrete, tar and bricks versus woods, fields and pockets of fresh air.

OTHER REPS SUBMITTED:

03/03/2025 via Web
Absolutely not as it would not meet 'a well connected Warwickshire' as the A34, M42 and M40 tend to be saturated in the rush hour/busy 24:7. SG24 cannot be 'biodiverse', Ch11, will be destroyed. No way can it be 'healthy, safe and inclusive' with its location away from hospitals that are closing and have over capacity, poor medical provison, education and transport links (an hourly bus to Stratford). Noise and pollution spreading from the vehicle routes mentioned, removal of 'trees, hedges and woodland' for housing all add to increasing the carbon footprint and loss of biodiversity, compromising current wildlife.

03/03/2025 via Web
SG24 is far too north of Stratford and Warwick and eats into farmland and woodland, that is currently used for leisure and sustains a wide range of birds and animals. Unfortunately it appears to go against the principles laid out in Chs 6,7, 9,10 and 11. Not only will it throttle the village, Hockley Heath environmentally with increased car fumes, it will worsen the already saturated medical, educational and refuse facilities. Hockley Heath suffers from traffic congestion, difficulties crossing A34, problems with power cuts and fluctuatng water supplies, flooding on the A34 and the appearance of sewage in some gardens.

24/02/2025 via Email
The SG24 plan, covering 137.20 hectares, will significantly impact Hockley Heath parish by causing loss of light, increased noise, and destruction of arable land and woodland, further straining already inadequate infrastructure. Local roads are overcrowded, and flooding issues persist. I am saddened by the lack of technical evidence concerning the site's location. It threatens wildlife habitats and the well-being of residents. The plans do not address biodiversity loss or climate change and will exacerbate existing problems. Additionally, the infrastructure cannot support increased housing, leading to a detrimental car-based economy and loss of agricultural land.