Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2418

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

No.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2468

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Edna Hemming

Object most strongly against any further developnent on greenbelt land, allotments and school playing fields. There comes a time to say enough is enough.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2471

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.C. Allman

I can see no way that I can support a strategy developed in order to satisfy central government, based on requirements that nobody locally thinks are accurate, and does not have any sort of reasoning or effective planning/consideration for the implications of such growth envisaged by the plan.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2480

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Rycroft

The core strategy believes that the projected growth is "particularly unrealistic" but is ploughing on regardless of this and is trying to force the additional housing anyway without any evidence that it is needed.

The numbers are solely based on a recent 5 year growth spurt and not on any long term historical trend for growth that would probably be more accurate.

The emerging West Midlands Regional Spatial Strategy is trying to reduce the amount of migration from Coventry and Birmingham which must therefore reduce the extra 25,250 people to a smaller number as migration was the biggest factor in recent growth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2484

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: British Waterways

The canals form a non-footloose corridor, which in the main passes through open countryside within Warwick District. It is a multifunctional asset which delivers on the growth agenda within rural areas by the positioning of small businesses within redundant canal buildings and location of off-line moorings/marinas and tourist/recreational opportunities. British Waterways would not wish to sterilise the potential for this growth within the open countryside.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2543

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Beausale, Hasely, Honiley & Wroxall Parish Council

The Parish Council support the Core Strategy preferred options but think that the numbers of houses planned is excessive.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2545

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

KENILWORTH. Expansion would destroy the character of the town and much green belt would be destroyed. Also a ribbon development along the A46 would be created and the approach from the east would be spoiled.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2593

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard Storey

no.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2604

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Area to east of Kenilworth will severely impact on Glasshouse Lane residents (traffic etc).

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2633

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr James Delaney

Towns in Warwickshire (Kenilworth, Warwick, Leamington) already have overstretched infrastructure. New development would best be served by a "new town" starting from scratch, along lines of Milton Keynes (road network designed for forecast population, and good transport links).
Development between Kenilworth and Coventry would lose the individuality of both areas. Gap critical to each areas community and identity.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2664

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2727

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

It would be better to distribute growth between the four towns including kenilworth to encourage smaller industrial units to set up there, encouraging similar development of surrounding villages as well as the south of Coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2781

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Open ground should be retained to allow rain to soak away in these times of climate change and predicted rainfall. New housing could be a disaster.

There will be more traffic chaos in Kenilworth at peak times as more people get to work.

We cannot allow Coventry encroach into our precious Greeen Belt! That will prove the thin end of a very large wedge.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2823

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2862

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2904

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

YOU'RE NOT TARGETING THE RIGHT AREAS.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2919

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

The facilities/infrastructure are neither available nor easily provided.
Major traffic issues into/out of Leamington and Warwick. Will need significant road improvements and at least an extra river crossing.

Section 3.14
Points 3 and 4 are fine but bullet points 1,2 and 5 should be changed to spread development more evenly over the FOUR towns, the A46 corridor and south of Coventry.

Finham should be targeted as the prime location for placement of the bulk of extra housing allocated to WDC, in particular accommodating the expected influx from the major conurbations.

It should not be allocated to accommodate Coventry's allocation.

Sylw

ID sylw: 2956

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Golf Club

Kenilworth Golf Club does not have a view on the Preferred Growth Strategy for the District, nor does it have a view on the priciple of any housing or employment allocations proposed in or around Kenilworth.However the Club wishes to draw attention to comments in Section 11(a)with regard to the potential effect on the Club of the housing and employment proposals in Kenilworth.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2966

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Strongly object to any building on green belt until all other options have taken place.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2988

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Williams

It would be far better to develop a number of housing sites in various locations rather than have concentrated housing in one location which will increase pressure on local infrastructure and introduce bottleknecks. The area around Hampton Magna and Budbrooke is an excellent location that is within walking distance of the great facilities of Warwick Parkway train station and seconds from the A46. This area should be seriously considered.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3015

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bill McCutchon

This is far too high a number of dwellings to place in this particular locality because of the huge increase it will generate of vehicular traffic and the affect this will have on the main thoroughfares in the locality and to and from Coventry and adjoining towns.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3023

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rhyan Barry

The United Kingdom has already gone beyond the optimum number of residents. The infrastructure is being pushed far and beyond what it is capable of. Traffic jams are common place, waiting times for hospital appointments, the list goes on; our public services are overstretched and under-resourced. And now we are going to start building houses on green belt. Will this 'growth' only stop when there is no blade of grass left? We have a responsibility to this land of which we are failing!

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3039

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Whigham

There is no easy answer to this, however I belive on balance this is the best compromise to meet the needs.
Of key importance is the balance of workers, infrastructure for any development , and most of all strict control development in open / green spaces.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3055

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Alison Oliver

Sounds sensible

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3069

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Except for the proposed intense housing development to the south of the Leamington Spa and Whitnash.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3119

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Tracey Latto

I strongly object to any further development to the south of Sydenham and east of Whitnash. Radford Semele has long been a small village on the edge of Leamington Spa and long should it remain so!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3121

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mel Gillman

The proposals do not teake into account the infrastructure required to support such a proposal. Roads, schools etc are already overloaede within these areas particularly in the Bishops Tachbrook / Witnash area. There will be loss of green space and village identity.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3133

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

There is no need for any growth

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3139

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Facilities/infrastructure are neither available nor easily provided for. Will lead to major traffic issues into/out of LeamingtonWarwick. Needs significant major road improvements and an extra river crossing.

Section 3.14
Bullet points 3,4 are fine. Points 1,2 and 5 should be changed to spread development more evenly over the FOUR towns and south of Coventry.

Finham should be targeted as the prime location for placement of the bulk of extra housing allocated to WDC, in particular accommodating the expected influx from the Birmingham and Coventry conurbations.

It should not be allocated to accommodate Coventry's allocation.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3192

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments