Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2321

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2398

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

Yes.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2437

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2531

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Margrave

1. Would further erode Whitnash's identity as a separate community from Leamington & Sydenham.
2. Would damage historical Brook Valley area.
3. Would overload infrastructure, roads and water systems cannot take any more.
4. Would lose valuable agricultural land.
5. Other brownfield sites are better suited.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2623

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2684

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

No, this is intruding into a farming area and will encourage later expansioin to Radford Semele which should remain a separate village.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2715

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2746

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

This is continuing development of exisiting housing areas.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2933

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2984

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

No objection to sympathetic housing on brown field sites

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3043

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Whigham

Provided that the infrastructure can support this

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3088

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3152

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3209

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert Burtonshaw

No building on North Leamington Allotments

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3272

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

I object it is already a very built-up area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3350

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Gill Barker

Whitnash attacked from all sides

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3382

Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hazel Neale

Developing south of Leamington will make a sprawling suburb. Heathcote and Bishops Tachbrook will be like living in city without city ammenities. Lack of community. People will still use cars and this will make Leamington and Warwick unpopular. People will go elsewhere. Warwick Castle will lose visitors.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3427

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs J Morby

Object to development south of Warwick due to traffic congestion and potential increase through village of commuters heading for M40 and A46 junctions.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3439

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Gillian F Starkey

Object to development of Whitnash and Warwick Gates area. Public services already stretched, roads regularly congested, extensive drainage problems. Looking at infrastrucure later is back to front approach. Unless provision of schools, medical services, traffic management etc addressed and necessary improvements included, will continue to actively object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3454

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro

Population growth not accepted. Many east Europeans are returning home. Birth control strategies are expected to reduce UK population

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3455

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr P Dimanbro

Population growth not accepted. Many east Europeans are returning home. Birth control strategies are expected to reduce UK population

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3477

Derbyniwyd: 04/08/2009

Ymatebydd: W R Bethall

The last of the greenfields surrounding Whitnash will have been built on over the last 40 years. During this time long standing residents have suffered from disruption due to building work and the preferred options will create further misery. Development on South Farm, the allotments, the Gas works Site and Warwick Gates has affected many due to the inadequate follow on of infrastructure and because of problems with flooding. How many dwellings will be built on the Woodside Farm site, if as rumoured it is 250 where would traffic enter and exit the site? Would a developer be required to provide access onto the Harbury Lane or would it be via Landor Road? Traffic on Landor Road, Ashford Road and access onto the Tachbrook Road is already a nightmare at peak times and needless to say this development will further add to the choked road systems.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3484

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Bolland

The objections hinge on the health hazards posed by the proximity of a busy main line railway to this site and the loss of an undeveloped gateway to open countryside for Whitnash residents.

The prevailing winds carry exhaust particulates from the trains and brake dust to the site and this coupled with the mist that often hangs over the area on cold mornings seems to me to constitute a health hazard.

There is also the question of maintaining buffer zones between Leamington, Whitnash and Radford Semele.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3500

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Horsley

Land South of Sydenham Main objection that strategy hinges primarily on unquantifiable values which would do significant harm to Whitnash and Bishops Tachbrook. Whitnash has had massive development in Warwick Gates turning it into amorphous mass.Latest proposals threaten greater loss of identity, community.
Land rejected for development by LP Inspector - what has changed? Even if Inspectors findings relevant only to 2011, they should not be disregarded. WDC has responsibility to to preserve green environment. Infrastructure already strained. Further increases in population would have further unpleasant impact. Roads are choked at certain times of day, schools are at bursting point, doctors and dentists already over-subscribed. No need for industrial units as employers are moving out not in. People will travel to work where their skills are needed

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3535

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: R.F. Garner

Land east of Whitnash

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3544

Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Chris and Pauline Vaughan

Object for the following reasons:
Increased traffic, lack of infrstructure, access to Warwick hospital, increased pollution leading to loss of quality of life, enbough new housing built over last 15 years - who will live there? Need to use brownfield land first. Free homes by building halls of residence at University; ask villages if housing needed for first time buyers allowing them to stay in their own area. Land at Finham should be used to meet Warwick's housing requirement.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3552

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Drew

Not only detrimental to residents of Bishops Tachbrook, Whitnash and Warwick Gates, but also to residents of Warwick and Leamington Spa
Infrastructure:already inadequate
Water supply: poor pressure in Bishops Tachbrook after Warwick Gates built so Severn Trent had to build new pumping station.
Sewers: inadequate for village. Sewage flows into fardens onto Oakley Wood Road when torrential rain falls occur
Surface Drainage: flooding occurs on Oakley Wood Road where is crosses Tach Brook - more houses will increase problem along Tach Brook valley
Roads:
Congestion at peak times will worsen as will pollution. Traffic will increase through Bishops Tachbrook adding to speeding problems
Education: Not enough primary school places now. If more children have to travel to school, traffic will increase. Children at school outside area decreases social development of community.
Services: Police and doctors stretched now and will come under more pressure. Emergency vehicles will have to contend with congested bridges across rivers in Leamington and Warwick
Green Belt Land: In direct contradiction to Govt. policy to make Britain self sufficient in food production
Vision: Loss of village identity would contradict vision
Employment: Will be few jobs for new residents. Why build on green belt land for people to travel elsewhere to work?
Do not appear to have taken account of public opinion on options consultation when majority chose south of Coventry.
Additional housing could be located in villages, where needed.
Look for brown field sites

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3553

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Drew

Not only detrimental to residents of Bishops Tachbrook, Whitnash and Warwick Gates, but also to residents of Warwick and Leamington Spa
Infrastructure:already inadequate
Water supply: poor pressure in Bishops Tachbrook after Warwick Gates built so Severn Trent had to build new pumping station.
Sewers: inadequate for village. Sewage flows into fardens onto Oakley Wood Road when torrential rain falls occur
Surface Drainage: flooding occurs on Oakley Wood Road where is crosses Tach Brook - more houses will increase problem along Tach Brook valley
Roads:
Congestion at peak times will worsen as will pollution. Traffic will increase through Bishops Tachbrook adding to speeding problems
Education: Not enough primary school places now. If more children have to travel to school, traffic will increase. Children at school outside area decreases social development of community.
Services: Police and doctors stretched now and will come under more pressure. Emergency vehicles will have to contend with congested bridges across rivers in Leamington and Warwick
Green Belt Land: In direct contradiction to Govt. policy to make Britain self sufficient in food production
Vision: Loss of village identity would contradict vision
Employment: Will be few jobs for new residents. Why build on green belt land for people to travel elsewhere to work?
Do not appear to have taken account of public opinion on options consultation when majority chose south of Coventry.
Additional housing could be located in villages, where needed.
Look for brown field sites

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3581

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jean Shaddick

Anti-social behaviour results from large estates of houses. Infrastructure is not in place to deal with development. Traffic problems, especially with getting to Warwick hospital and ambulances will take longer through extra traffic. Told not to increase flood risk by not concreting over gardens.
Will need land to grow our own food in future.
Area around Harbury Lane easy target but it will ruin attractive place to live. Heritage sites of Warwick and Leamington should not be allowed to become like Coventry, Rugby and suburbs of Birmingham

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3618

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs D H Cowgill

No need for further housing, schools full, doctors, dentists, police services stretched. Commercial sites remain empty so where will people find employment. Already two major developments on last few years at South farm and Warwick Gates overloading services in Whitnash. Good agricultural land needed. South of Sydnenham site and east of Whitnash is next to Whitnash Brook Valley Nature reserve with wildlife in evidence.