Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2303

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: M Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2305

Derbyniwyd: 01/09/2009

Ymatebydd: M Wiles

We do not understand the reason further homes are required in this area, when over recent years there have already been 2 major developments of housing in the area of South Farm and Warwick Gates.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2324

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2378

Derbyniwyd: 21/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Anonymous 13

Object to the proposed building houses around our Park Home in Harbury Lane. We would be dead centre of housing estates.

Traffic congestion would be massive

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2400

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

No.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2439

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2469

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Phizackerley

As a resident of a Heathcote Park this would utterly destroy the attractive rural landscape which we enjoy.

Such a massive intrusion would clearly overload the existing support services and lead to increased pollution and put a severe strain on existing water supplies.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2478

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr D J Bradshaw

Leamington and Warwick are in danger of becoming like a city and any new road network put in to serve the new development will be of no help to the congestion in Leamington and Warwick.
The area of Warwick Gates/Whitnash has had enough development.

Sylw

ID sylw: 2533

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Margrave

As other adjacent area.
1. Would cause over-development of Whitnash, extending urban sprawl beyong reasonable means.
2. Water and road infrastructure cannot take the expansion. No investigation has been conducted.
3. Would cause further erosion of borders between Whitnash and Bishop's tachbrook creating an ugly contiguous urban sprawl from B.T. to North Leamington.
4. Insufficient availability of school places.
5. Loss of valuable agricultural land.
6. Development here would cause further traffic problems with people having to drive into Leamington/Kenilworth/Coventry to work.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2626

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2686

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2718

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Opposed to creeping urbanisation

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2748

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Good land for extending current housing.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2838

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2877

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Susan Butcher

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2935

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

This should be most strenuously resisted.
* Loss of valuable agricultural land
* Excessive creeping towards Bishops Tachbrook , eroding the buffer zone/area of restraint
* Too demanding of new infrastructure implementation
* All existing infrastructure is north of river with limited crossing possibilities
* Significant impact on communications into/through Warwick/Leamington

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2986

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3045

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Whigham

Provided infrastructure can support this

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3067

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard James

To concentrate some much development in one area of south Leamington in addition to the development carried out over the last 10 years is not sustainable. I do not believe the huge investment which will be necessary will be forthcoming to dramically improve the current infrastucture.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3089

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Too great a number of houses for the need's of Bishops Tahbrook's parish.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3123

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mel Gillman

Strongly object due to:
- Inability of current roads and schools to cope with current levels of housing. 4000 extra homes are not viable on the earmarked site.
- Loss of green belt.
- Available sites close by that are currently scheduled for employment land and have not been used for over 10 years.
- Loss of rural village as this will merge with the larger urban area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3166

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

This should be most strenuously resisted.
* Loss of valuable agricultural land
* Excessive creeping towards Bishops Tachbrook , eroding the buffer zone/area of restraint
* Too demanding of new infrastructure implementation
* All existing infrastructure is north of river with limited crossing possibilities
* Significant impact on communications into/through Warwick/Leamington

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3274

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

This is an area of green belt land and farming
land which should be left as it is. In this district we have Warwick Gates which is a mini town in it self.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3366

Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David Neale

Green fields south of Leamington should not be built on as area of restraint which seems to move when council want to develop land. Not option preferred by the public.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3367

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb

Development here will encourage more car journeys via the M40, aminly because Leamington station car park is full at 0800, and all the commuter trains to Birmingham are full too. Schools and roads are all full.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3372

Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David Neale

Green fields south of Leamington should not be built on as area of restraint which seems to move when council want to develop land. Not option preferred by the public.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3376

Derbyniwyd: 14/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hazel Neale

Developing south of Leamington will make a sprawling suburb. Heathcote and Bishops Tachbrook will be like living in city without city ammenities. Lack of community. People will still use cars and this will make Leamington and Warwick unpopular. People will go elsewhere. Warwick Castle will lose visitors.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3399

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Too many!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3420

Derbyniwyd: 29/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss Stephanie Hawkins

Would destroy Bishops Tachbrook and make it suburb of Leamington. BT has need for only 15 houses. Infrastructure of area already under strain and this would increase traffic through village and on bridges into towns. Against vision.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3426

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs J Morby

Object to development south of Warwick due to traffic congestion and potential increase through village of commuters heading for M40 and A46 junctions.