Cefnogi

ID sylw: 131

Derbyniwyd: 06/07/2009

Ymatebydd: R A Chapleo

Strongly support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 170

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Tony Lucas

The entire area surrounding Green Lane, Kings Hill Lane, Stoneleigh Road, Kenpas Highway and Warwick University already suffers terribly from traffic congestion and lack of services - to build an entirely new housing development in this area would have a serious negative impact on all current and future residents.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 195

Derbyniwyd: 11/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Holmes

I support all the suggested options as they focus housing on areas best able to accommodate new development, without encroaching on the Green Belt.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 218

Derbyniwyd: 03/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Baxter

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 231

Derbyniwyd: 09/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Duncan Hurwood

I absolutely object to the building on Green Belt land at this place. It will ruin the green-belt around Coventry, be appalling for local infrastructure, especially transport, and set a terrible precedent for building on Green Belt land. Coventry does not need this development in any way whatsoever.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 271

Derbyniwyd: 10/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Robinson

Coventry needs regeneration and some decent houisng.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 336

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs D Bolam

An area suitable for new housing.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 364

Derbyniwyd: 22/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Pounds

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 396

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Canon David Tilley

Roads likely to be overloaded - road to Gibbett Hill traffic light already massively congested with univerisyt traffic.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 400

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Warden

Kings Hill would present many problems to the local road infrastructure that is already regularly clogged by heavy traffic to Warwick University. The abuse of Green Belt land for Housing and Employment should be resisted. We are increasingly told that Coventry needs more employment and I agree that it does, but what is being done with all the unused Brownfield sites from previous 'now redundant' industry? I do not accept that Coventry 'needs' to expand in line with instructions from central government. We need to be more efficient and effective, using existing sites and not use Green Belt land.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 411

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

Appropriate location

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 412

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

This site has very good transport links

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 415

Derbyniwyd: 26/07/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs linda allen

The use of this land appears to bring Kenilworth into the Coventry area, particularly when one sees where Coventry might build, and therefore I do not believe this land should be used.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 442

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Peter Clarke

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 493

Derbyniwyd: 24/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Georgina Wilson

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 523

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Lesley Beck

Site should not be developed to prevent Kenilworth and Coventry merging and to preserve nature sites in the area, bio-diversity and ancient landscape features.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 537

Derbyniwyd: 03/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Abbie Rae

Why here? such a wonderful greenspace and your planning on building houses? - Where are these people coming from to live in them? where are they going to work? as there isn't any new industrys within the area. It is wonderful to live so close to the countryside and you want to change that. What about the road system and the flooding risks? The whole plan is just plain wrong you should look for other options redevelop what you currently have, look at alternative building project, new houses in this area will look out of place,

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 564

Derbyniwyd: 27/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr A M Webley

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 627

Derbyniwyd: 23/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.R. Summers

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 677

Derbyniwyd: 07/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Anna Sampson

This is a massive amount of housing which is not needed.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 716

Derbyniwyd: 10/08/2009

Ymatebydd: P.A. Yarwood

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 787

Derbyniwyd: 05/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Faye Davis

I think this development conflicts with your growth strategy - this is the greenbelt division between Kenilworth and Coventry. It also conflicts with your rural strategy as it will take out several rural properties. This development would have a further impact on local ecosystems, infrastructe etc.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 824

Derbyniwyd: 06/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Bill Crossland

I feel that I must add my voice to the large number of people obkecting to the proposed area of development at the above, I feel that the development is both unnecessary and ill conceived and morally wrong.

It would appear that all of the parties proposing this are intent on imposing there jack booting policieis on the local population with neither thought nor care as the long term effects this may have on the many peole living in the area.

I think we would all be greatful if you refused this application in the first instance.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 825

Derbyniwyd: 12/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs R S Petrak

Wildlife is a vital part of this area and once we start building on it, where will all the creatures go? We will have destroued centuries of safe habitat.

Our house is at the bottom of the steep slope of Green Lane, opposite the pond, and it is a worry that if the water table is altered or the drainage is upset then we will be subject to flooding at teh worst or rising damp at best.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 829

Derbyniwyd: 14/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Robert James Bannister

Coventry's population has declined from 338,000 to 308,000 in the last generation. Therefore expansion of housing should be within its own boundaries. Coventry has requested more housing as a percentage that any other authority in the West Midlands. This is quite unfair to residents of Warwick District. Also, support cannot be given to project without detailed plans.

Sylw

ID sylw: 855

Derbyniwyd: 18/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Adrian Farmer

Not necessary

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 893

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Freeman

I am defintely NOT in favour of building houses around Kings Hill. Its a beautiful area that is used by runners, walkers, cyclers etc to escape into the nearby countryside. Why would you want to destroy green belt land when there are plenty of industrial units in Coventry that are empty and could be used to build homes? Its so short sighted to destroy green belt whilst the centres are empty??? You will never get this land back.

Very disapointed to hear of this suggestion....its not right at all !!!

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 919

Derbyniwyd: 19/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Christine Betts

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 959

Derbyniwyd: 23/08/2009

Ymatebydd: ms julia shepherd

I strongly object to this propsal. The infrastructure will not support such a development; the roads in this area are severely congested on a regular basis. To add to this it will destroy the habititats of countless numbers of differing wildlife in the area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1001

Derbyniwyd: 24/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Cllr Tim Sawdon

This is Green Belt and should remain so. It is not appropriate for employment or housing without substantial infrastructure changes which would destroy the 'gap' between Coventry and Kenilworth.