Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2080

Derbyniwyd: 05/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs pat watson

Asiant : mrs pat watson

Lack of infrastructure is the main problem, and any more traffic would cause hugh problems. Lack of schools and health provision.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2101

Derbyniwyd: 06/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Nick Booker

I do not support this option. It's the thin end of the wedge for the creep of Coventry towards Kenilworth

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2188

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs Barrie and Margaret Hayles

Subject to local residents' standing on this. This should then be part of WDC's calculation not Coventry C.C.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2212

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr TERRY ARNETT

Loss of Green belt land
Loss of Farm land loss of habitat for wildlife
increase of tra,ffic
number of vehicles to at least 7,000 more cars to immediate area ,average home now having two cars, safety of children locally who are encouraged to walk to school protect their environment and be green.
Schools
current numbers allocated to both the primary school and Finham Comp will be effected as it What will people do for schooling who accommodate the estate in its earlier years ?

Roads are already in a poor state of repair

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2282

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

By far the best site for consideration is the land within the WDC area South of Coventry at Finham. Being close to that city where the existing infrastructure is well able to accommodate the influx. i.e. with respect to shops, transport, schools etc should be the preferred option.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2376

Derbyniwyd: 07/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lauren Burgoine

The beautiful countryside and wildlife provides an escape for people near Coventry.
The deep hedgerows and fields provide a home to nature you are lucky to find in Coventry, and the green belt land is very precious to this wildlife.

I would be horrified to think that this beautiful landscape could be replaced by rows of identical soulless houses with no back gardens, and the area bulldozed to make way for roads and concrete.

The currently good local schools, nursery and other infrastructure would not be able to cope with the amount of new residents and homes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2377

Derbyniwyd: 30/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Anonymous 12

High density house building will only bring unrest with people being cramped together.

Finham residents would be more sympathetic and look more kindly at King's hill if the right type of development is built i.e. bungalows.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2403

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roy Standley

Yes.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2601

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard Storey

Stongly oppose all extensions of Kenilworth, but especially any more which shifts the distinction between Kenilworth and Coventry.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2628

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2751

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Good as extending the urban areas south of Coventry.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2795

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

This too should be preserved. Ancient trees and hedgerows support a variety of wild life. It should not be sacrificed for housing and factories which Coventry can accommodate elsewhere. The green belt should be sacrosanct.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2821

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Tony Hyndman

Finham cannot support this plan due to lack of amenties.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2892

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

CURRENTLY WE HAVE A CLOSE KNIT COMMUNITY IN GREEN LANE. THE CURRENT SERVICES, ROADS, SCHOOLS, DOCTORS ETC ARE JUST ENOUGH FOR US, ANY ADDITIONS WOULD WREAK HAVOC WITH OUR INFRASTRUCTURE. GREEN BELT LAND SHOULD NOT BE BUILT ON, THERE ARE PLENTY OF OTHER OPTIONS. REGENERATE THE CITY CENTRE, REFURBISH HOUSES THAT HAVE BEEN ABANDONED, USE BROWNFILL SITES. ONCE THE GREEN BELT HAS GONE THEN YOU'LL START ENCROACHING ON COUNTRYSIDE. WHEN WILL YOU STOP? I KNOW THE GOV HAS GIVEN YOU TARGETS, THEY GIVE YOU MONEY BUT YOU WORK FOR US, WE PAY YOUR WAGES, YOU LIVE IN OUR COMMUNITIES.

Sylw

ID sylw: 2938

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Support for accomodating WDC allocation, Object if proposed to support Coventry allocation/overspill.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2989

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Strongly object to this land being used other than the high yield arable land that it is - also the Alvis Sports Ground is beneficial to the junior, youth and senior houses - also Leasowes Garden Nursery employs only handicapped and disabled young people.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3017

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Bill McCutchon

This is far too high a number of dwellings to place in this particular locality because of the huge increase it will generate of vehicular traffic and the affect this will have on the main thoroughfares in the locality and to and from Coventry and adjoining towns.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3048

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Whigham

Similar to my comment on Kenilworth - need to consider provision of housing at all locations

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3053

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Gregory

1. Environmental effect on green belt/ open farm land
2. Capacity of local schools to accommodate pupils
3. Increased congestion on local roads, access and transport issues.
4. Greatly increased risk of flooding in area with implications for existing properties and roads.
5. Ability of all existing infrastructures to accommodate proposals

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3064

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Alison Oliver

good location for motorway connections

Sylw

ID sylw: 3066

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard James

I do NOT support allocating this land to Coventry for development but would give support for it to be part of the Warwick District allocation and thereby minimise the size of any development in the already over-developed area of south Leamington in particular around the Harbury Lane.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3093

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3162

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

This is a further infringement of the Green Belt. It is important to preserve the separate identities of both Kenilworth and Coventry.

Sylw

ID sylw: 3170

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

Support for accomodating WDC allocation, STRONGLY Object if proposed to support Coventry allocation/overspill.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3213

Derbyniwyd: 19/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Ingledew

It is unnecessary to meet the real demand for housing in Coventry. There are already a large number of opportunities for improving the housing stock within Coventry's existing boundaries and most of those already underway are stalled because of a lack of demand (for example Whitley urban village). The location has very few local job opportunities for the increased population should it materialise. It is highly likely that most of these new residents will have to commute to find work, which is an increasingly unsustainable model.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3277

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3326

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Object to creeping urbanisation of land currently defining separate identities of Coventry and Kenilworth

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3390

Derbyniwyd: 02/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Finham site well located for roads and hospital - should be developed for Warwick District not Coventry

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3402

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3422

Derbyniwyd: 29/08/2009

Ymatebydd: Miss Stephanie Hawkins

Site at Finham is better located for services of Coventry and near to A45 for access. Was preferred location of local people in previous consultation