Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1885

Derbyniwyd: 31/07/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Helen Cheatham

No

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 1951

Derbyniwyd: 03/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Ferguson

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 1983

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Ken Hope

(11.c) Depends on what it turns out to be when it arrives!!

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2060

Derbyniwyd: 04/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mr john jacques

developers will not tender unless they can make a satisfactoy profit

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2078

Derbyniwyd: 05/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Kerr

The concept of a 'Levy' is supported providing monitoring is in place to ensure that the 'Levy' is used for its declared purpose and not to supplement WDC expenditure in general.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2332

Derbyniwyd: 21/07/2009

Ymatebydd: S B Hoyles

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2448

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Object.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2498

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: British Waterways

Both 106 and CIL are supported by BW.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2565

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

Contributions in the form of a levy should be paid by developers.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2643

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 2758

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Yes the levy proposed by the CIL is the fair way of getting something back from the developers who will be profiting from the housing and employment units being built.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2802

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sheila F. Hadfield

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2945

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

The levy should be on a site-by-site basis according to:
* The infrastructure needs of that site
* AND the impact of that site on the wider geographic area

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 2996

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs and Mr J Parr and Cotterill

Existing Council tax payers deserve a rateable value evaluation should these proposals go through.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3100

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2000

Ymatebydd: Mr Anthony Morris

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3180

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Murphy

The levy should be on a site-by-site basis according to:
* The infrastructure needs of that site
* AND the impact of that site on the wider geographic area

Sylw

ID sylw: 3182

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.C Hadfield

What does this jargon mean?

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3231

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore

yes

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3284

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3285

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

I support it.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3333

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3375

Derbyniwyd: 17/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Christopher Gibb

Support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 3486

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby

I do not think that developers should influence the Council.

Sylw

ID sylw: 3608

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Sport England

It will not also be appropriate to rely on a CIL, even if it does come in. There will be times negotiations with the developer over large retail or employment schemes are justified over a CIL approach.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3715

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

Sounds reasonable, and might encourage brownfield development first.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3752

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3911

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

Your current strategy of securing money directly from the developers hasn't benefited Warwick Gates, so yes lets try something new that might just provide benefit at the place it was supposed to.

Sylw

ID sylw: 3966

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr John Archer

Not sure at this stage. Depends how it evolves. There is a danger in it becoming too complex and presenting significant front funding difficulties. Approach with caution!

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 3992

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr M Abba

Yes, the developers should pay for all infrastructure improvements, and these should be in place before any development starts. there is no point building 2000 new homes without first build a primary school - look at the issues this has caused in Warwick Gates.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4069

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Keith Turfrey

Developers are in for profit. Succes will depend on a proper thought through proposal supported by the electorate and strictly controlled by a planning dept not beholden to the developer.