Sylw

ID sylw: 4076

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diana Sellwood

I do not feel there is enough detail to be able to comment on this.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4089

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Yes - a fair and workable system.

Sylw

ID sylw: 4153

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Woodland Trust

As regards funding, At the national ParkCity Conference in London last March (sponsored by Natural England and CABE) the then Minister for Housing & Planning Margaret Beckett stated that 'Section 106 has traditionally been the means of funding these projects. The new planning act also makes provision for a community infrastructure levy. Authorities can choose to make this charge to raise funds for investment in infrastructure. Given what we know about the benefits of public spaces, I'd expect to see that being invested in green infrastructure just as much as in traditional forms of infrastructure (http://www.communities.gov.uk/speeches/corporate/bitsbetweenbuildings) .

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4202

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Onkar Mann

I believe the district should not wait before proposing any required infrastructure

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4270

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Kulwinder Fathers

The council should produce infrastructure proposals in conjunction with any development proposed,rather than wait for details of the levy.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4444

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

Support

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4551

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

support

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4617

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

object

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4715

Derbyniwyd: 23/10/2009

Ymatebydd: V Gill Peppitt

As long as money spent wisely in areas requiring new infrastructure.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 4883

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke

This has the effect of putting up house prices. Government funding should be sought for regeneration projects.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 4973

Derbyniwyd: 08/10/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Graham Harrison

Yes

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5060

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Morris

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5156

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts

This is a short term cash inflow, long term where will the on-going funding come from???

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5255

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Lindsay Wood

object

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5293

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: J. N. Price

The CIL approach largely eliminates the need for the current ad hoc approach to securing developer contributions which is not seen to be transparent and has lead in the past to allegations of 'horsetrading' over development permissions.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5353

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: SEAN DEELY

There is no detail as to how this will work in practice

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5405

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Baxter

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5445

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mike Cheeseman

Sounds like another layer of complexity. Make the developer submit plans in line with guidelines and provide the infrastructure. He could team up with providers and defray some of the costs as appropriate.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5483

Derbyniwyd: 27/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Joanna Illingworth

Blanket use of CIL could discourage development in the areas where it is most needed.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5537

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr and Mrs G Morgan

Nifer y bobl: 2

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5582

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: George Martin

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 5610

Derbyniwyd: 27/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Dave Crisford

I am not in favour of the total adoption of the CIL. For some developments, it would be better if the developer provided or was responsible for the associated infrastructure when this is required to integrate the development into the existing community.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5668

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Jane Boynton

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5714

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Roger Warren

Strongly Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5777

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Philip Wilson

We are all in this together - so a modest infrastructure levy might lead to more within our local communities taking a keener interest and pride in our locality than currently exists!

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5820

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Cox

But don't know enough about the implications from the explanation.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 5934

Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Alan Roberts

But only if it is in a separate account and target at that development and not in a general fund.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6009

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Harris

Support.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 6036

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Paul Skidmore

Support.

Sylw

ID sylw: 6138

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Richard and Judy Swallow

Nifer y bobl: 2

I assume Community Infrastructure Levy approach means charging the developer through a S106 Agreement the cost of the infrastructure but that means that the infrastructure is not sufficient and too late.