BASE HEADER
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Open Space?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33769
Derbyniwyd: 28/08/2009
Ymatebydd: Shirley Estates
Asiant : Davis Planning Partnership
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33833
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates
Support
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33886
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd
Asiant : Redline
The current approach to open space provision is unworkable.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33920
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Royal Leamington Spa Town Council
Allotment land should be excluded from options because of enormous amenity/ecological value. Particularly allotment land to north of Leamington. Important that allotment land is provided as part of new developments and sugget there should be provision of one new allotment for every ten houses. Particular shortage of allotment land in south Leamington. St Mary Allotments have long waiting list. Extra development likely to produce greater demands.
Account should be taken of ecological value of residential gardens, especially as wild life corridors. Strongly advocate should not normally be considered for development. Options for Growth document does acknowledge ecological value of such spaces.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 33934
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
The provision of open spaces, allotments etc is essential in any planning brief and should be enforced in any development.