BASE HEADER

Do you support or object to the preferred criteria for selecting the location of gypsy and traveller sites?

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 31 i 60 o 97

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2455

Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

When Gypsy and Travellers visit Thickthorn the town comes to a standstill with total chaos - (Photos can be provided if required). A police report on road closures, guns and helicopters should be reviewed.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2472

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr G.C. Allman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Personally I object to my taxes funding the development of sites for a group of people who choose not to pay taxes and generally only have a negative impact on whatever community they pitch up on.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2542

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Friends, Families & Travellers and Traveller Law Reform Project

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Should indicate how pitches will be delivered - Circular 1/2006 states that allocations should be made through allocations DPDs.
No objections to criteria 1, 2, 3, 5 however we believe that the others are too tightly drawn.
C4 enables objections where there are existing residential propereties. Para 63 of 1/2006 states lpas should consider first locations in or near existing settlements. C4 does not define 'other disturbances' if retained it should be defined.
C6 may enable local landscape and nature conservation designations being used to refuse permission for sites contrary to para53 of Circ.1/2006. This criterion thus requires revision or preferably deletion.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2572

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson

Nifer y bobl: 2

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

KENILWORTH does have many problems when permission is given to travellers to hold horse fairs and other events in the town. Permanent involvement would be detrimental to the residents and tourists.

Sylw

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2650

Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009

Ymatebydd: John Arnold

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

All required services GP, schools etc should be on the site since these perople fo not wish to integrate in the accepted manner.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2698

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The selection of gypsys venues should be for small sites limited to 10-12 vehicles to ensure the impact is minimal. The provision of supervision of such sites at our expense should require a reciprocal agreement from the users - they should pay rent, be responsible for all service costs and elect a small committee to be responsible for waste and recycling.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2765

Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

New sites hould not be built on greenfield areas. Utilities should be provided but no new sites should be allowed near low lying flood risk areas or areas of natural beauty. If services and infrastructure are provided, those who benefit should pay rates and utility charges.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2852

Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Object.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 2915

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

DON'T AGREE WITH PANDERING TO THE WHIMS OF THESE PEOPLE . RULES ARE FOR EVERYONE OR NO ONE. YOU DECIDE

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3239

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

gypsies have caused such problems in the local area that I do not think their needs merit all this and that they should pay taxes like the rest of us

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3292

Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gypsies and Travellers chose this way of life,
I do not see why others have to pay for this.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3344

Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3413

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3489

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3583

Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Owen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

object

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3720

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

By qualifying the access to GP surgery, school etc as 'Convenient' I am concerned that this policy directly leads to sites that abut the larger rural communities or the suburbs. The 4th criteria does not seem particularly strong either - why not refer to the amenity and privacy of existing dwellings to help reinforce it?

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3759

Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3887

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gypsies are a law to themselves. Why are they not subject to the law we all adopt.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 3916

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is usually the minority that give groups a bad name and gypsies suffer from this. If there are fair rules and they obey them there would be no problem.
I do support this but wouldn't it be really nice if you used this criteria for those of us who are not gypsies or travellers. eg, you want to build homes on a flood site to the South of Harbury Lane, but presumably this would not be suitable for a gypsy or traveller site!

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4088

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Keith Turfrey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The objective is sound. If we are to avoid the problems that regularly occur in Kenilworth ( not always true Gypsies) then a controlled site is essential. Not Abbey Fields again though. NIMBY attitudes will surface but the objective is correct.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4100

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4451

Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4558

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

support

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4627

Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

These communities do not contribute to local community or pay their way. They should not be accommodated.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4794

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: richard keylock

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Why are these individuals singled out from any other minority group? They should be made to apply for their requirements like all other applicants and go through the same processes. They as a group should not be afforded any special treatment or favouritism.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4843

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is a group that respects no other section of the community ,makes no contribution to society and is responsible for bringing crime and rubbish to any community they are near.I can substantiate this from all the issues at the so called Kenilworth Horse fairs

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 4892

Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The number of sites indicated is too many

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 5067

Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Michael Morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Support.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 5076

Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mrs Dawn Keylock

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Why are these individuals singled out from any other minority group? They should be made to apply for their requirements like all other applicants and go through the same processes. They as a group should not be afforded any special treatment or favouritism. Why not favour hardworking familes with both mums and dads who always appear to be the "odd ones out" and rarely afforded any special treatment!

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 5166

Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gypsies and travelers should not be allowed to stay anywhere unless they leave a cash bond/retainer with the owner of the area that they wish to stay in to cover damage/cleaning etc. It should be the goal of local Government to actively encourage (all) people to pay their own way and not take other peoples resources for free.