BASE HEADER
Do you support or object to the preferred criteria for selecting the location of gypsy and traveller sites?
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2455
Derbyniwyd: 08/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Connolly
When Gypsy and Travellers visit Thickthorn the town comes to a standstill with total chaos - (Photos can be provided if required). A police report on road closures, guns and helicopters should be reviewed.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2472
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr G.C. Allman
Personally I object to my taxes funding the development of sites for a group of people who choose not to pay taxes and generally only have a negative impact on whatever community they pitch up on.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2542
Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Friends, Families & Travellers and Traveller Law Reform Project
Should indicate how pitches will be delivered - Circular 1/2006 states that allocations should be made through allocations DPDs.
No objections to criteria 1, 2, 3, 5 however we believe that the others are too tightly drawn.
C4 enables objections where there are existing residential propereties. Para 63 of 1/2006 states lpas should consider first locations in or near existing settlements. C4 does not define 'other disturbances' if retained it should be defined.
C6 may enable local landscape and nature conservation designations being used to refuse permission for sites contrary to para53 of Circ.1/2006. This criterion thus requires revision or preferably deletion.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2572
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr R.A and Mrs B.E Donaldson
Nifer y bobl: 2
KENILWORTH does have many problems when permission is given to travellers to hold horse fairs and other events in the town. Permanent involvement would be detrimental to the residents and tourists.
Sylw
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2650
Derbyniwyd: 14/09/2009
Ymatebydd: John Arnold
All required services GP, schools etc should be on the site since these perople fo not wish to integrate in the accepted manner.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2698
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Devitt
The selection of gypsys venues should be for small sites limited to 10-12 vehicles to ensure the impact is minimal. The provision of supervision of such sites at our expense should require a reciprocal agreement from the users - they should pay rent, be responsible for all service costs and elect a small committee to be responsible for waste and recycling.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2765
Derbyniwyd: 09/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale
New sites hould not be built on greenfield areas. Utilities should be provided but no new sites should be allowed near low lying flood risk areas or areas of natural beauty. If services and infrastructure are provided, those who benefit should pay rates and utility charges.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2852
Derbyniwyd: 11/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Butcher
Object.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 2915
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: ALISON ELFWOOD
DON'T AGREE WITH PANDERING TO THE WHIMS OF THESE PEOPLE . RULES ARE FOR EVERYONE OR NO ONE. YOU DECIDE
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3239
Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009
Ymatebydd: mrs stella moore
gypsies have caused such problems in the local area that I do not think their needs merit all this and that they should pay taxes like the rest of us
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3292
Derbyniwyd: 20/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr David John Bowers
Gypsies and Travellers chose this way of life,
I do not see why others have to pay for this.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3344
Derbyniwyd: 10/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Terence Kemp
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3413
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs M Kane
Support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3489
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs E. Appleby
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3583
Derbyniwyd: 16/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Owen
object
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3720
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Brookes
By qualifying the access to GP surgery, school etc as 'Convenient' I am concerned that this policy directly leads to sites that abut the larger rural communities or the suburbs. The 4th criteria does not seem particularly strong either - why not refer to the amenity and privacy of existing dwellings to help reinforce it?
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3759
Derbyniwyd: 15/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Dennis Michael Crips
Support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3887
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Patricia Diane Freeman
Gypsies are a law to themselves. Why are they not subject to the law we all adopt.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 3916
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Debbie Wiggins
It is usually the minority that give groups a bad name and gypsies suffer from this. If there are fair rules and they obey them there would be no problem.
I do support this but wouldn't it be really nice if you used this criteria for those of us who are not gypsies or travellers. eg, you want to build homes on a flood site to the South of Harbury Lane, but presumably this would not be suitable for a gypsy or traveller site!
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4088
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Keith Turfrey
The objective is sound. If we are to avoid the problems that regularly occur in Kenilworth ( not always true Gypsies) then a controlled site is essential. Not Abbey Fields again though. NIMBY attitudes will surface but the objective is correct.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4100
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Ms Angela Clarke
Yes
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4451
Derbyniwyd: 24/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Andrea Telford
support
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4558
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Southern Windy Arbour Area Residents' Association
support
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4627
Derbyniwyd: 23/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr S Morris
These communities do not contribute to local community or pay their way. They should not be accommodated.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4794
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: richard keylock
Why are these individuals singled out from any other minority group? They should be made to apply for their requirements like all other applicants and go through the same processes. They as a group should not be afforded any special treatment or favouritism.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4843
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr. Andrew Clarke
This is a group that respects no other section of the community ,makes no contribution to society and is responsible for bringing crime and rubbish to any community they are near.I can substantiate this from all the issues at the so called Kenilworth Horse fairs
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 4892
Derbyniwyd: 25/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Vera Leeke
The number of sites indicated is too many
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5067
Derbyniwyd: 18/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Michael Morris
Support.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5076
Derbyniwyd: 21/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mrs Dawn Keylock
Why are these individuals singled out from any other minority group? They should be made to apply for their requirements like all other applicants and go through the same processes. They as a group should not be afforded any special treatment or favouritism. Why not favour hardworking familes with both mums and dads who always appear to be the "odd ones out" and rarely afforded any special treatment!
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
ID sylw: 5166
Derbyniwyd: 22/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Betts
Gypsies and travelers should not be allowed to stay anywhere unless they leave a cash bond/retainer with the owner of the area that they wish to stay in to cover damage/cleaning etc. It should be the goal of local Government to actively encourage (all) people to pay their own way and not take other peoples resources for free.