Cefnogi

ID sylw: 60472

Derbyniwyd: 28/11/2013

Ymatebydd: Eric Williams

Strongly agree with council decision to discount the options listed. All of the reason described are valid and have my strong support.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 60588

Derbyniwyd: 10/12/2013

Ymatebydd: Dr Glenn Miles

The "poor access" and "out of character" criticisms of the Peeping Tom site are misleading. It is positioned on Cromwell Lane, 15 minutes walk from Tile Hill Station and 3 minutes from Westwood Heath Road, which covers the great majority of the public transport links compared to the other sites under consideration. If the Peeping Tom site would be out of character, how is the Burrow Hill Nursery site any more in character?

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 60759

Derbyniwyd: 13/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Ward

I am in general agreement with the site review.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 60786

Derbyniwyd: 13/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Danielle White

There is no mention of the land that will be affected by HS2 and the opportunities to redevelop this land once/if HS2 goes ahead.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 60982

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr John & Diana Levett

All options should be reconsidered. Reasons for rejecting Option 7 flawed. Few suggestions for implementing the development.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 60988

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Alex Hills

Asiant : Mr Alex Hills

1) not sufficient consideration of the discounted options
2) no details in the type of properties that will be built on these sites, and no details on providing housing for those who are displaced by HS2 who want to remain in the area.
3) In the site review for the discounted option number 7 which constitutes two separate sites, which have not been separated, it states that there is an issue of accessibility. This is not the case. There is a slip way at the side of 36 Hodgetts lane. No arrangements in regards to this have been undertaken.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 60991

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Marlene Hills

no detail given as to why other options are discounted or right of response given to the site owners

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 60999

Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Moon

Yes, I agree that site 1 would be the best site for the proposed building of houses in Burton Green. Building on the other sites would destroy the character of the village

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61134

Derbyniwyd: 19/01/2014

Ymatebydd: mrs bronwyn ward

I am very keen that ribbon development is avoided as this will have maximum impact on hedgerows, trees and communal views, altering the character of the village. in this much I support the site reviews.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61306

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Crest Strategic Projects

Asiant : d2planning

-The land at Lodge Farm is one of the least constrained parcels south of Coventry and potentially suitable for release from the Green Belt (Coventry Joint Green Belt Review, July 2009).
-The SHLAA identifies that the land is suitable, achievable and deliverable. The site was not recognised as having a high landscape value and 18.5 hectares could be developed with satisfactory mitigation.
-The site has been intensely farmed for many years and there is little biodiversity interest within the land itself. Development would provide the opportunity to enhance biodiversity.
-HS2 would not restrict the development of the site.
-Site access can be obtained for the requisite standards to serve a development of up to 800 dwellings.
-There are no other technical or environmental issues that would prohibit the delivery of the site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61383

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Brewer

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61409

Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Jeffrey, Valerie and Craig Sawyer

The respondents believe that building on Site 7 is a possibility and offers the following objections:
-The construction phases of both HS2 and a housing development would cause an upheaval for many years. Both proposals would financially impact our property.
-The community would not benefit from the site with regard to the relocation of the village hall as envisaged on Site 1.
-The rear gardens of the adjacent houses would be overlooked by the new properties.
-Additional access onto Cromwell Lane would make accessing our property more dangerous. Construction of HS2 will make Cromwell Lane busier, thus exacerbating the danger.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61429

Derbyniwyd: 22/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Erwin & Claire Verwichte & Foullon

Nifer y bobl: 2

-Site 7 should be the preferred option.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61433

Derbyniwyd: 22/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Dr Andrew Gibbs

-Largely agree with the reasons for dismissing Site 2, 5 and 6 and would like to add that these would act to make the village part of Coventry rather than Warwickshire. Green Belt should not be impacted here.
-Site 3 and 4 would reinforce the historical ribbon development and therefore it was right to discount them.
-The preferred option at Burrow Hill Nursery does appear to be the best site.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61457

Derbyniwyd: 24/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Christine Clifford

-Object to Site 7 as it is likely to increase traffic along Hodgetts Land and Cromwell Lane which are already congested. Access to the site would be hazardous whilst building and for residents once the houses were built. This would be the case for a site entrance in Hodgetts Lane or Cromwell lane.

-The site is back land and a number of existing properties would have their privacy affected.

-The site is very close to the HS2 proposal. This makes the site inappropriate for housing development until the line is completed and its effects on the local area established.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61470

Derbyniwyd: 24/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rosalie Vine

-Support the discounted options 2,5,6 and 7 as they are 'back garden developments'.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61502

Derbyniwyd: 24/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs Marcus & K Stewart

Site 2 would be suitable for housing, but not a village hall.
Site 7 is wholly unsuitable for housing development as it will be surrounded by HS2.
Site 5 and 6 are unsuitable as they will start to close the 'Crackley Gap'.
Sites 3 and 4 are unsuitable as they will not be in character with Red Lane.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61510

Derbyniwyd: 25/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Jeremy Marshall

-WDC should also consider the area off Hodgetts Lane so we move to be more of a separate village and less of a ribbon settlement linked to Coventry

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61551

Derbyniwyd: 17/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Luisa Protheroe

Asiant : Viner & Company

-168 Cromwell Lane could be developed to produce extra dwellings to add to the dwelling mix of Burton Green.

-There is good access to the site from both the frontage and the land at the side of the property.

-Services are available in Cromwell Lane

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61630

Derbyniwyd: 21/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Geoffrey Powell

-Housing should not be built on green field areas.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61706

Derbyniwyd: 24/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs Max & Judy Cramp

Nifer y bobl: 2

Support Site Review as we object to Site 2 because

-Drainage problems- the pond and surrounding fields becmoes very full and wet in the winter. Our proerty floods because the pipe which should take the water down field to a soak away is too small and inadequate.
-In addition there is a great variety of wildlife living in the pond which would be harmful to the many species to disturb- including great newts and other pond life, dragon flies, herons etc. Many small birds nest in the hedges which are also home to pheasants, the occasional partridge and deer.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61737

Derbyniwyd: 23/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr & Mrs R C & Linda Stone

Nifer y bobl: 2

Support Site 7 as a discounted option for the following reasons:
-It would destroy our environment as well as lowering the value of our property on Cromwell Lane.
-Our property would be overlooked because of higher elevation and there would also be noise issues. No building should occur on this site.
-It would be totally out of place in this area and would affect a large amount of people in a small enclosed proximity.
-The village is already blighted by HS2 and now it is suffering the New Local Plan for housing.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 61783

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Stone

Object developing on Site 7 based on the understanding that it is now being proposed for development as:
-The access road would cause lots of disturbance to homes on either side.
-New homes would overlook existing properties and spoil their outlook.
-Too many houses are proposed.
-The Green Belt land would lose its openness.

-There has been a lack of consultation for such a significant development. The site was previously ruled out for deliverability and access reasons.
-Neighbours of Site 7 have only found out by chance. They have not yet had an opportunity to register their objections.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 61962

Derbyniwyd: 16/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Cleeve Belcher

-All sites should be considered to spread the increased number of houses throughout the village.
-35 houses could be absorbed into the village without greatly altering its character.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 62016

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ann Corbett

-Housing development should be diffused throughout the village and not concentrated in one small area.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 62023

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jayne Tomlinson

-Recommend that Sites 2,5,6 and 7 are reconsidered for development since access issues can be overcome.
-Should bats be in danger of being eliminated, the priority and the right thing to do is to protect the bats and choose sites where they are not living.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 62027

Derbyniwyd: 15/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue Rogers

Site 2,5, 6 and 7 should be considered to spread the increased number of houses throughout the village, also maybe the land at the bottom half of Red Lane.
-This would cause the least landscape impact of all the options and have the least effect on traffic.
-Access has been mentioned as a problem but developers will purchase land/houses to provide necessary entrance.
-The village could also be connected to the remainder of Hob Lane with the presence of a few houses.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 62036

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Eleanor Brewer

-All of the housing development should not be placed on Site 1. Some should be located on one of the dicounted sites (i.e. Site 2, 5 or 6).

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 62042

Derbyniwyd: 22/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Dr Andrew Gibbs

-Site 7 offers the possibility to thicken the village around the central region and appears comparable assuming that suitable access is available.
-Housing requirement should be divided between Site 1 and 7 to maintain a relatively open aspect/lower density for the new housing in order to fit well within the current village.
-Should HS2 happen, Site 1 will be worse affected than Site 7 and therefore it is more important that the development is divided between the two sites to reduce the concept of living on the wrong side of the tracks.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 63146

Derbyniwyd: 13/01/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Thwaites

-Anecdotally the site Matrix document no longer reflects the view of the Parish Council. The Parish Council are opposed to any development in Hampton Magna, but accepting that it is inevitable, they now prefer the Maple Lodge site.