H28 Hatton Park - North of Birmingham Road

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 30 o 35

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 64911

Derbyniwyd: 16/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Dr Paul and Alison Sutcliffe

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We strongly object to the development of additional housing on land connected to Hatton Park. Main reasons include: Birmingham Road would not cope with the considerable congestion and disruption that this would cause; transport links are already stretched; significant impact on our wildlife that is established on this green belt land - no "exceptional circumstances" not "sustainable"; our local primary schools would not have capacity; impact on drainage; impact of current residents quality of life; impact on child development through added pressure on transportation to schools; impact on Ebrington Drive; and weaknesses in "evidence-based" and synthesis. Please consult residents!

Testun llawn:

We strongly object to the development of additional housing on land connected to Hatton Park. Main reasons include: a) Birmingham Road would not cope with the considerable congestion and disruption that this would cause; b) transport links are already stretched; c) it would have a significant impact on our wildlife that is established on this land; d) our local primary schools would not have capacity; e) impact on drainage; f) impact of current residents quality of life; g) impact on child development through added pressure on transportation to schools; and h) not "evidence-based".

We are extremely concerned that any decisions made to date are not "evidence-based". Specifically, it is our concern that there are limitations in the rigour, transparency and methodology used to develop these proposed plans on Hatton Park. Despite repeated disapproval and objection from the local community we are extremely concerned that the voice and opinions of the community have not been clearly integrated into these plans through the appropriate synthesis and appraisal.

From a personal point of view we need to express our upmost disapproval and objection over expanding housing adjacent to Hatton Park on green belt land. I do not see what the "exceptional circumastances" are for developing on this green belt. I do not see this plan as "sustainable". I cannot comprehend how the estimated number of houses planned on this site has been established. The current plans would not be in-keeping with the large houses surrounding this land.

There is considerable worry and upset among residents who live on Hatton Park and surrounding areas. This is significantly impacting on their quality of life. This small community is already overburden by through traffic (e.g. Birmingham Road) and schools are at capacity. Please work closely with parishes and residents before considering any further expansion.

Schools and early year care:
There needs to be greater focus on how schools will be expanded. For example, as you are aware, Budbrooke Primary is at capacity and it takes children from Chase Meadow & Hatton Park. The Ferncumbe Primary School at Hatton is over capacity. Further growth on this land would result in more children having to travel to schools outside the catchment area, resulting in greater pressure on families and impact on their quality of life. If you go ahead with development on this planned site you would force people to leave the area and take their businesses elsewhere due to the likely impact on commuting, links to the A40 and transport to schools. Children are already having to set off earlier and earlier to get to school on time - again this is likely to have an impact on their maturational development and quality of life. I cannot take this risk for my family.

Early-year care needs careful consideration at an affordable price. Already many nurseries are at capacity or in considerable demand. The costs are also unmanageable for many parents wanting to return to work after maternity leave. Added housing would place increased demand on these services.

Green spaces and green belts:
The wildlife on the land occupying the proposed land adjacent to Birmingham Road needs to be respected and the natural habitats for our wildlife maintained. Housing on this planned site has resulted in considerable frustration and objection at meetings we have attended. People do not feel listened too. Please note that Muntjac deers, bats, birds of prey, pheasants, and many small mammals reside on the proposed land adjaccent to Birmingham Road. I feel strongly about protecting not destroying their habitat. Protecting our natural flora and fauna is important. Adding just a small number of houses will have a high price on our wildlife which will not be repairable.

Transport:
Expanding our road networks is going to be important to deal with the increasing cars on our roads. Birmingham road is already heavily congested. People on the Hatton Park estate are being required to set off earlier and earlier to avoid the congestion which results every morning. We also need to consider the impact this will have on noise and air pollution for residents already residing in places of growth.

I also note that there is likely to be a through road connecting the current housing on Hatton Park via Ebrington Drive. Please note that this is often a single lane road as current residents park here. This road is played on by young children including the green area at the end of Ebrington Drive. Removing the green area and making this a busy road would significantly impact on current residents living on and around Ebinggton Drive.

Healthcare:
Ensuring that GP surgeries and hospitals can cope with the housing expansion will be of upmost importance. GP surgeries are already struggling to cope.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65078

Derbyniwyd: 22/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Katharine Mary Silvester

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The development of this site for 80 new houses does not fit with the LDP's other proposal to allocate Oaklands Farm as a site Gipsies and travellers. These two initiatives are inconsistent with many of the LDP's strategies to enhance the local environment, communities and local amenities.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65216

Derbyniwyd: 24/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Dominic Harrison

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Regarding the Hatton Park development H28, the existing facilities is extremely inadequate for teenagers. If the new extension proceeds consideration has to be given for the provision of leisure facilities for children 12 - 17 - an age group that is overlooked. Even a small area for skateboarding , roller blading etc should be a priority.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65294

Derbyniwyd: 25/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Miss Dawn Elliott

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Damaging to the character of the existing Hatton Park development and negative impact upon the congestion on B'ham road.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65346

Derbyniwyd: 25/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Hinett

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hatton Park in my view is not suitable for development of 70-90 homes.
My concerns fall into two categories: highways and ecology.
Highways: As a key consultation theme, the council should be aware that current congestion on Birmingham Road is a very real problem. During 8-9am an extremely long, slow moving queue backs up, some days up as far as the Hatton Arms and beyond. Adding 90 or more extra vehicles will only exacerbate this problem.
Ecology: Development of the preferred site will directly impact Local Wildlife in Smith's Covert, by taking away extended habitat and feeding grounds.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65348

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Laura Teodorczyk

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hatton Park is NOT suitable for further development.

-It is located within the Green Belt;
-There is already significant traffic congestion on the A4177- which will only get worse;
-The proposed exit onto the A4177 is an accident blackspot with no safe pedestrian crossing;
-Development of this site will ecologically destroy Smith's Covert (ancient woodland, home to many protected animals);
-Facilities/amenities within Hatton Park are insufficient for 850 homes;
-Public transport within Hatton Park is insufficient;
-Flooding on and around this site will be exacerbated by further development;
-The local school has already been extended and is close to fullcapacity.

Testun llawn:

A Housing Needs Survey for the Parish of Hatton carried out in May 2014 demonstrated a need for 12 dwellings, for which there is already sufficient windfall and brownfield sites within the Parish. In a survey for the recently prepared Parish Plan 64% opposed any further development in the Parish, and 80% opposed any change to the Green Belt.

The assessment of Hatton Park as a Growth Village is subjective and only JUST places it into this category. If the population of Hatton Park wasn't described as "about 2020" and instead was accurately assessed as say 1990, it would not be a Growth Village.

It's surrounded by Green Belt and not suitable for development. No 'exceptional circumstances' as required by the NPPF to justify such development are identified, nor indeed exist.

The existing local infrastructure is already struggling and any further development will result in additional stress. There is insufficient planning (including financial) for the additional infrastructure necessary to support the proposed level of growth (within Hatton Parish and Warwick District).

The A4177 is the main road providing access to the A46 leading to the M42/M40 and A45/M6 - there is already significant traffic congestion, particularly during rush hours, which will be exacerbated by this development (which will be made worse by the proposed works to the Stanks junction giving traffic on the A46 priority). The proposed exit onto the A4177 is already an accident blackspot and will encourage the use of the Shell garage as a local shop increasing the accident risk with no safe pedestrian crossing.

Development of this site will result in Smith's Covert - an ancient woodland - being predominately locked by development. This piece of woodland is home to many protected animal species; bats as well as deer, badgers, foxes, rabbits, and birdlife including green and spotted woodpeckers and buzzards to name a few. These species will suffer if this corridor link from Smith's Covert to the greater countryside is blocked by housing.

The local school has already been extended and is/close to full capacity.

Facilities/amenities within Hatton Park are insufficient and not in-line with a secondary village. There is a community centre and small village shop - but that is all. Hatton Park village shop would benefit from additional residents - however the location of the preferred site would provide the Shell garage with additional business - not the village shop.

Public transport within Hatton Park is insufficient. The bus service is sporadic and unreliable and therefore underutilised. Residents have to rely on cars to access supermarkets, doctors surgeries, post offices, dentists, train stations, restaurants etc.

Local flooding on the Birmingham Road at the junction with Ugly Bridge Road is a regular occurrence and is likely to get worse with additional development.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65351

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Martin Teodorczyk

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hatton Park is washed over by the Green Belt and no 'exceptional circumstances' to develop as required by the NPPF exist.

The subjective analysis in the Villages Settlement Hierarchy ONLY JUST makes Hatton Park a 'Growth Village' category with a population of "about 2020".

A Housing Needs Survey for the Parish of Hatton in May 2014 demonstrated a need for 12 dwellings, for which there is already sufficient land.

64% in Hatton opposed any further development in the Parish, and 80% opposed any change to the Green Belt. No meaningful consultation has taken place with the local community by WDC.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65407

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Miss Rachel Lane

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is Green belt land which is currently enjoyed by countless wildlife. No exceptional circumstances to
Justify the building on this land. The land is also prone to flooding.

Congestion: Birmingham Road suffers from extreme congestion in the mornings. Getting off the estate in the morning can take up to 15 minutes. There have also been a number of accidents on this road.

Infrastructure: The current schools are over stretched at the moment. Can they cope with extra capacity? Doctors surgery/ hospital are stretched. Is there the budget to support increased housing to fund extra health care/schooling?

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65416

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Pauline Neale

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There has been no change in the plan or response to the first consultation process that ended 20.1.14. The process has been flawed & the change to the site adjacent to Hatton Park has been made without consulting with the local community. The housing numbers needed between 2011 & 2029 have been wrongly estimated as the population is now expected to increase by 15,300 and not 21,500 in the period. The infrastructure needed to support the extra 90 houses proposed will be impossible to provide and the ecological impact of so many new homes will be unsustainable.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65458

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Jennifer and Gary Ingram

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Objection to 80 houses on Hatton Park due to flooding on lower ground, plus the strain on Hatton Park estate.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65465

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Philip Barton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The local infrastructure around Hatton Park cannot support another 80 homes, and is supposedly Green Belt Land, the additional homes are not 'exceptional conditions' as required by the National Planning Policy Framework. Local schools are full and cannot accept any increase in the school age population. The traffic on the A4177 during peak periods is already high, making access to the road difficult at times and the road is typically congested down to Shanks Island and the A46. The additional traffic will increase this problem unless additional traffic management is added. The A4177 is prone to flooding and has been the scene of two fatalities recently.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 65929

Derbyniwyd: 23/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elaine Kemp

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This site lies in the green belt. No exceptional circumstances have been justfied. A local housing needs survey demosntarted the need for 12 dwellings which can be provided on windfall/brownfield sites in the parish. Local people oppose further development and any changes to the green belt.

Atodiadau:

4935_R.pdf (155.90 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66362

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Epton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Final revision of site, reducing site area without commensurate reduction in housing numbers took place without proper consultation although authority was in contact with developer.
No exceptional circumstances as required by NPPF for development in Green Belt. Housing Needs Survey (May 2014) demonstrated need for 12 dwellings for which there is already windfall and brownfield sites. In recent survey for Parish Plan, 64% opposed further development in Parish and 80% opposed to any change to Green Belt.

Atodiadau:

8244_R.pdf (158.34 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66380

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Hatton Estate

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hatton Estates are the co-promoters with Bloor Homes of the land at Hatton Hill (south of Birmingham Road). Objection is made to the allocation of land north of Birmingham Road (H28) which should be deleted and replaced by the land at Hatton Hill for the following reasons¬:-
*Hatton Park residents access/ use the school, church and pub in the locality. The Hatton Hill site is better located to these facilities. It is illogical to prefer a site that is further away.
*The Hatton Hill Site promoted by this representation could encompass an extension to the Hatton Locks car park (currently with insufficient capacity and being used intensively by visitors to the locks/canal). This would resolve a current local issue with better/ safer access thus bringing real benefits to the local community
*A new roundabout access to the Hatton Hill Site would provide a safe point of access as well as reducing traffic speed on the busy A4177 Birmingham Road. The site currently in the Local Plan would be accessed opposite the dangerous Ugly Bridge road in the most dangerous and congested section of the Birmingham Road.
*There have been 85 objections to the site currently in the Local Plan, this is a measure of the local concern and an indicator of the significant adverse impact it will have on a large number of properties/ families adjacent to it.
*The intended alternative at Hatton Hill would be well screened by an intended tree/ landscape buffer and would not impact on surrounding properties and the wider landscape.
*The Hatton Hill site is currently arable land and is sheltered by trees and hedges and has minimal ecological or landscape merit. The careful integration of SUDS and the protection of existing edges of the field will enhance ecology and landscape.
*The site is hidden/ protected from the nearby canal by trees, a further belt of trees and landscaping is intended
*The Hatton Hill site is 'self-contained' and could not be extended if further houses were required in the future. The current allocation is causing alarm with the local community as it is perceived as being ripe for extension into the open countryside for future requirements.
*To conclude the current allocation in the plan is considered unsound and not justified based on the evidence available and given that there is a more suitable alternative at Hatton Hill.

Atodiadau:

Hatton Estates - Response form DS10 DS11.pdf (711.50 KB)
DE103 SK01 110614 Rev A no concept.pdf (11.32 MB)
Hatton Park Inset Plan Amendment.pdf (918.42 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66384

Derbyniwyd: 25/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Price

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Site H28 lies in the green belt and no exceptional circumstances as required by the NPPF are identified to justify such a development. A housing needs survey for the parish of Hatton carried out in May 2014 demonstrated a need for 12 dwellings for which there is already sufficient windfall and brownfield sites. In a survey for the recently prepared Parish Plan 64% opposed any further development in the Parish and 80% opposed any change to the green belt.

Atodiadau:

11538_R.pdf (144.95 KB)

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66596

Derbyniwyd: 25/06/2014

Ymatebydd: A C Lloyd Homes Ltd

Asiant : Delta Planning

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

When site forward it will be critical to ensure new community can integrate with existing community at Hatton Park, which can be secured by bringing access from Ebrington Drive. This will ensure connectivity to the village, existing bus stops and local facilities, whilst also avoiding an unnecessary new access onto the Warwick Road. As owner of the land at the end of Ebrington Drive, A C Lloyd Homes is willing to work with the site owners to ensure this more preferable access solution is delivered.

Atodiadau:

5958 - 1 - c Landscape and Visual Assessment - Appendix 1 Part 1.pdf (5.06 MB)
5958 - 1 - d Extract from WCC Landscape Assessment Update April 2014.pdf (514.07 KB)
5958 -1-a AC Lloyd Homes Reps to Warwick Local Plan June 2014 - FINAL.pdf (265.31 KB)
5958 - 2 - c Site Location Plan.pdf (118.96 KB)
5958 - 2 - b Planning Statement - Rev 1.pdf (445.22 KB)
5958 - 3 - Landscape and Visual Assessment - Appendix 1 Part 3.pdf (4.76 MB)
5958 - 4 - a - Ecology Report.pdf (3.58 MB)
5958 - 4 - b Radford FRA.pdf (2.67 MB)
5958 - 5 - a Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment.pdf (3.71 MB)
5958 - 7 Drainange and Utilities Statement.pdf (4.47 MB)
5958 - 5 - b Planning Statement -Final.pdf (390.34 KB)
5958 - 6 - a - Bishop Tachbrook Location Plan.pdf (0 B)
5958 - 8 - b Illustrative Site Layout.pdf (857.26 KB)
5958 -10 - a Illustrative site layout plan.pdf (3.21 MB)
5958 - 9 _ R MultiPDF6927463869910146693.pdf (3.02 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66711

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Miss L R Vickers

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As this site provides for the housing on a reduced site, the potential exists for further housing in Hatton Park which will add to traffic volumes on Birmingham Road, along with employment related development at Opus 40. there is already significant congestion in and out of Hampton Magna which will be further exacerbated by this development

Atodiadau:

504_R.pdf (383.18 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66734

Derbyniwyd: 01/07/2014

Ymatebydd: Hatton Parish Council

Nifer y bobl: 53

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No exceptional circumstances as required by the NPPF are identified or indeed exist. A housing needs survey for the parish of Hatton carried out in May 2014 demonstrated a need for 12 dwellings of which there is already sufficient windfall and brownfield sites. In a survey for the recently prepared Parish Plan 64% opposed any further development in the Parish, and 80% opposed any change to the Green Belt

Atodiadau:

1045_R-Local Plan Rep.pdf (1.89 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66855

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carol Cross

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66858

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Dene Jackson-Clarke

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66861

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Bob Davis

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66864

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jennifer Bickerstaff

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66867

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Pilkington

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66870

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Sutton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66873

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Miss Louise Wilson

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Atodiadau:

8105_R-LouiseWilson_LocalPlanRep.pdf (3.26 MB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66876

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Frank Roper

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66879

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Hampton Magna Residents' Association

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Atodiadau:

12305_R-IMG_20140623_0002_NEW.pdf (9.21 MB)
12305 -LOCAL PLAN PUBLICATION DRAFT REPRESENTATION to WDC 2014.pdf (177.56 KB)

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66882

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: mr clive fennell

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66885

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Mrs Pamela J Sutton

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

ID sylw: 66888

Derbyniwyd: 27/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Linda I Pearce

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth: