Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69712

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs. B. Singh

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69713

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Harnek Singh

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69714

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Gurdev Singh

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69715

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: S. James

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69716

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr Ross James

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69719

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Verena Kirchner

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- no evidence to support proposed park and ride with flood lighting and increased traffic
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69721

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Deborah Brennan

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69723

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Tom Galea

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69724

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Jake Orga

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69725

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: John Lillie

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69726

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: L.E. Bradbury

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69728

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Jesse and Rebecca Ervin

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69733

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Sport England

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Clarification should be made in regards to the intended future of the sports club site (Alvis) at Kings Hill.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69740

Derbyniwyd: 12/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr. Gurmit Swatt

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69742

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: L. Johnson

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69743

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Dr. Helen Metcalfe

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69746

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. David Llewelyn

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69747

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Jackie McLellan

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69748

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Antonia Stewart

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69749

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Nigel Johnson

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69750

Derbyniwyd: 15/04/2016

Ymatebydd: D Johnson

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Heb nodi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Local residents will lose a vital green space, which is used for walking, running, etc.
- Increase in traffic and flood.
- Better to build near Coventry's site.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69812

Derbyniwyd: 14/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs. Sandra Lewis Hunt

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

- Green belt is preserved for environmental reasons - trees and plants, wildlife as well as pleasure and enjoyment.
- If natural environment is destroyed, children will not have wild places to learn about nature and wild life.
- Children will imitate the same and continue destroying the heritage.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69832

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

1. Revise DS15 in the light of our representations in Mod 10 by the omission of "including the former sewage works " in item a).
2. Reduce the area of land at Gallows Hill to that granted on appeal in item g) in the light of our representations in Mod 10
3. Why is the LPA not providing the overall masterplan across this part of the district for developers to take their part of the overall development to which they have to demonstrate that their proposal complies?

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69851

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mrs J Mackenzie

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Allocations contrary to NPPF requirement to maintain separation, prevent coalescence
Numbers based on Coventry requirements not approved in local plan, revised before 2017?
No critical examination of claims that land unavailable -areas of Coventry green belt could be developed with less impact
Provision of land to meet Coventry's overspill contrary to NPPF - require sub-regional SA to be valid
How do proposals fit with neighbouring development
No consultation undertaken with parish councils before decisions made
MoU providing additional housing for Combined Authority circumvents democratic process, NPPF
Impact of proposals at Thickthorn and Kings Hill next to over-capacity A46 not considered

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69884

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: David Hoare

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

-The area around Old Milverton is used by walkers, runners and cyclists.
-It will diminish the rural atmosphere which is of beneficial to the residents of Leamington and Warwick.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69888

Derbyniwyd: 18/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Suzanne Robbins

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Object to proposals: -
- No exceptional circumstances exist justifying removal of land from green belt.
- contrary to national and government policy
- alternative non-green belt sites available
- Kings Hill a better site
- will generate additional traffic, congestion
- adverse impacts on environment, character and appearance of area
- adverse impact on local facilities and services
- loss of recreational amenity
- sufficient five-year supply of housing land
- proposal for Park & Ride should be reviewed - no scheduled bus services.
- P&R will end up as car park
- in breach of human rights legislation

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69903

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Lewis Stephenson

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

The proposed development is to support the needs of Coventry City Council, not Leamington. There are sustainable sites closer to Coventry which would not involve extra commuting, congestion and road building. A railway station would be difficult to build. Most people who are in need of Coventry housing would not buy such houses. It would destroy the picturesque entrance to Leamington, together with its present wildlife and recreational use.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69915

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Mr. Christopher Trye

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

-The urban separation between Kenilworth and Leamington would be reduced to less than 1 1/2 miles. Much of the highly productive farmland would be lost together.
-There is no infrastructure to support development. Old Milverton Road, which has a difficult T-junction with Rugby road at one end would add to the congestion on the A452 at the blackdown roundabout at the other end.
-It has been suggested that the proposal would 'share the pain' to a degree with the developments on Non-Greenbelt land to the south of Leamington. This is not acceptable as a basis for planning policy.

Gwrthwynebu

ID sylw: 69916

Derbyniwyd: 20/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Ms. I Walker

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Housing, road and transport development in the area of Old Milverton is not sound as it damages the character of the area which is attractive to local people for many reasons. The country walks, nature, freedom, cycling, exercise are all enjoyed at present and would be jeopardised by the proposed development.

Cefnogi

ID sylw: 69955

Derbyniwyd: 21/04/2016

Ymatebydd: University of Warwick

Asiant : Turley

The University notes the requirements placed on the development of the land south of Westwood Heath Road, adjoining the University campus, and the Kings Hill site east of the Gibbet Hill campus. The University strongly supports the provision of a new rail station.
The supporting text refers to the landowners/developers working together with the local authority as a full partner to ensure comprehensive development. The University strongly supports this, with cross reference to Policy DS NEW1 which specifically requires comprehensive longer-term planning of this area, taking account of the potential future growth of the University.