No

ID sylw: 101075

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Culley

You just want to put swathes of housing everywhere and look at the disaster all around south leamington down gallows hill

No

ID sylw: 101107

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Bart Slob

I understand the need for a strategic local plan but have concerns about its approach. The lack of commitment to prioritising brownfield sites over Green Belt loss is problematic, particularly for SG04. Infrastructure planning must ensure schools, healthcare, and transport are in place before major development. Heritage sites, such as Kenilworth Castle, need stronger protections against harmful impacts. Additionally, public consultation should be more transparent and accessible to ensure meaningful input. Greater clarity on how feedback will shape the final plan is essential. Without these improvements, I cannot fully support the proposals in the Introduction.

No

ID sylw: 101188

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Wareing and Company

I do not agree that SG06 should be allocated for residential development.

The local housing need can be met without developing green belt land,SG06 is not a sustainable location,this land is high quality agricultural land, the same proposals have been rejected by the planning inspector in 2017,we need to retain the biodiversity and access to nature so close to the urban environment.

Allocating this site will set a precedent to undermine retaining a separation between North Leamington and Kenilworth

Other

ID sylw: 101360

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Webb Family

Asiant : Delta Planning

The Webb family broadly supports Chapter 1, with the exception that the Local Plan should progress in one part rather than two. Please refer to our complete response for full details.

Other

ID sylw: 101372

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: AC Lloyd - Site 165

Asiant : Delta Planning

AC Lloyd raise one issue that the SWLP is to be progressed in two parts. A single SWLP would be much clearer, without the need to save selected existing policies. It would better meet the Government’s expectations to ensure sites are quickly allocated, permitted and developed to drive economic growth. A number of policy areas typically associated with Part2 plans are coming forward in Part 1. If the Councils don't wish to allocate small residential sites at the non-strategic village level, then that aspect could be addressed through an overall requirement figure, criteria-based policies, and neighbourhood plans. See full response.

No

ID sylw: 101446

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land

Asiant : Marrons

The Councils may want to reflect on what it needs to supplement its Strategic Policies in the Part 1 Plan to aid delivery, whether a Part 2 Plan is the correct approach if delivery of the strategic allocations is anticipated within the early part of the Plan period.

If not, and the strategic allocations are all anticipated to be delivered later in the Plan period, then small sites will be required to bolster supply in the early years of the Plan.

The Plan needs to allocate deliverable sites of a scale and location that can be delivered within 5 years.

No

ID sylw: 101457

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason

This development is not good for the area.

Yes

ID sylw: 101602

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Lovell Strategic Land

Asiant : Carter Jonas

Lovell supports the decision to bring forward a new Local Plan. Significant planning legislative changes have occurred since the two authorities adopted their current Local Plans, which predate the aspiration for a joint Local Plan. Given the context of the Government’s ambitions of 1.5m new homes and pro-growth business and employment policies it is critical that the Plan provides sufficient housing and economic growth. We support the idea of a longer plan-period, however it should be extended to a minimum of 30 years given the proposal for new settlements. If the Plan were adopted by late 2027, which is ambitious, it would cover only 23 full years. The Plan will likely require Modifications arising from Examination given the revisions to the NPPF. The timeframes should be shifted back to be more realistic.

Other

ID sylw: 101617

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

We continue to promote the site at Bedlam’s End, Baddesley Clinton (site ref: 490). The site can reasonably be viewed as Grey Belt and the allocation of Site 490 for residential development is supported.

There are too many options set out in the consultation. A number of the 12 proposed new settlements contain no opportunities identified through the Call for Sites. It is incumbent on the Councils to allocate sites that are already being promoted and available, such as our client's site at Baddesley Clinton to help accommodate the Districts’ housing needs.

No

ID sylw: 101755

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Marrons

Catesby Estates express some concerns regarding the Plan's capacity to deliver the development needed to meet its targets.

Yes

ID sylw: 102004

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

BDW generally supports the proposals in the introduction. It is anticipated that additional technical evidence will be provided and consulted upon with relevant stakeholders and interested parties as referenced throughout these responses to the respective policy directions.

Other

ID sylw: 102108

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited

Asiant : Turley

Whether the Council prepares a Part 1 plan only, or a single comprehensive plan, the focus should be on adopting a plan as soon as possible to support housing delivery and meeting both districts’ local housing needs and those of the wider Housing Market Area. The IDP should be developed further as soon as possible. IM land is actively promoting the land off Rumbush Lane (’the site’) for residential development. It is not clear why the site has not been considered as a reasonable alternative by the SA, despite its sustainability credentials and prominent location adjacent to Earlswood station.

Other

ID sylw: 102135

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Asiant : Turley

Comments requesting additional clarification on the Part 1 Plan and the threshold/definition of strategic allocation.

Other

ID sylw: 102179

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

We continue to promote the site at land at Springfield Farm, Harbury, (site ref: 491). The allocation of Site ref: 491 for residential development is supported.

There are too many options set out in the consultation. A number of the 12 proposed new settlements contain no opportunities identified through the Call for Sites. It is incumbent on the Councils to allocate sites that are already being promoted and available, such as our client's site at Springfield Farm, Harbury (ref: 491) to help accommodate the Districts’ housing needs.

No

ID sylw: 102300

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough

Asiant : Marrons

Concerns about the Two-Part Plan approach. The Plan must identify deliverable sites for the first five years post-adoption (2028-2033). While existing commitments help, new allocations are needed. For strategic allocations in Part-1 to contribute to 5YHLS, clear evidence of housing completions within five years is required. Delivery may be delayed if detailed policies, masterplans, and design codes follow in the Part-2. To speed up housing delivery, the Councils should abandon the two-part Plan approach and move to a single Local Plan which identifies its full requirement and allocate sites, one being Land East of Rouncil Lane.

No

ID sylw: 102334

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Orbit Homes and Grevayne Properties

Asiant : Marrons

The Plan needs to demonstrate specific, deliverable sites for five years following the intended date of adoption (anticipated to be 2028-2033). The Plan can rely on existing commitments, but inevitably there is a requirement for new allocations.
Orbit and Grevayne Properties consider land South of Alcester Road, Stratford-upon-Avon as a suitable site for allocation in this context. It is of a scale (circa 70 homes) that can be delivered in full within the first 5 years of the Plan period. It is in a sustainable location adjacent to the built-up area boundary, and has no constraints that would preclude delivery.

No

ID sylw: 102389

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough

Asiant : Marrons

Concerns about the Two-Part Plan approach. The Plan must identify deliverable sites for the first five years post-adoption (2028-2033). While existing commitments help, new allocations are needed. For strategic allocations in Part-1 to contribute to 5YHLS, clear evidence of housing completions within five years is required. Delivery may be delayed if detailed policies, masterplans, and design codes follow in the Part-2. To speed up housing delivery, the Councils should abandon the two-part Plan approach and move to a single Local Plan which identifies its full requirement and allocate sites, one being Land South of Chichester Lane at Hampton Magna.

Yes

ID sylw: 102455

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hill Residential

Asiant : Turley

Support introduction subject to comments on comprehensive part 1 plan and dev management policies, review of sites allocated in adopted plans, and comprehensive IDP.

Other

ID sylw: 102458

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Deeley Homes Dean Weldon

Deeley Homes has concerns over the ongoing suggestion that the SWLP will be progressed in two parts.

Yes

ID sylw: 102497

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Landowner Consortium

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

The Landowner Consortium generally supports the proposals in the introduction. It is anticipated that additional technical evidence will be provided and consulted upon with relevant stakeholders and interested parties as referenced throughout these responses to the respective policy directions.

Yes

ID sylw: 102519

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Ellis

I broadly support the need for new housing, providing the location of such housing is appropriate in scale and type taking into account the proposed location of the new housing, specifically, the impact on the existing landscape and population, suitability of local infrastructure (road and rail), connectivity and proximity to amenities (shopping, train stations, theatres, cinemas, libraries etc), and the impact on the natural environment (including wildlife, use of such environment by the existing and visiting population, and flooding). I do not support new housing where the impact is negative and cannot be sufficiently mitigated. Thank you.

Other

ID sylw: 102556

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Turley

Whether the Council prepares a Part 1 plan only, or a single comprehensive plan, the focus should be on adopting a plan as soon as possible to support housing delivery and meeting both districts’ local housing needs and those of the wider Housing Market Area. The IDP should be developed further as soon as possible. It is not clear why the Land off Rumbush Lane has not been considered as a reasonable alternative by the SA.

Other

ID sylw: 102576

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited

Asiant : Turley

IM Land 1 Limited (‘IM Land’) supports the proposals in the introduction in respect of the Land South of Westwood Heath. Whether the Council prepares a Part 1 plan only, or a single comprehensive plan, the focus should be on adopting a plan as soon as possible to support housing delivery and meeting both districts’ local housing needs and those of the wider Housing Market Area (‘HMA’). Additional clarity on development requirements will only support this, though this should not repeat national policy with the National Planning Policy Framework (‘NPPF’) and the National Planning Practice Guidance (‘PPG’).

Other

ID sylw: 102635

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

Site 515 is a HELAA B site and lies between proposed New Settlement Sites A1 and A2. It would also be classed as Grey Belt. The allocation of Site 515 for residential or other development is supported. The current consultation does not carry sufficient certainty for the plan to move forward to Regulation 19 stage without a further chance to comment. There are too many options set out in the consultation. It seems unlikely that plenty more sites will come forward in a further Call for Sites and sites that are already being promoted and available should be allocated.

Yes

ID sylw: 102656

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Chapman

My comments are in regard to SG17
The proposals are a threat to the already stretched local amenities and public services. The near doubling of the population cannot be accommodated without a significant investment in the GP surgery in particular.
The loss of the recycling center would be entirely counter productive - as it is probable that as more waste would be generated, then fly tipping would result.
The proposed housing would be a long walk from the town centre. The current bridge is currently inadequate - and the increase in pedestrian and vehicular traffic would be detrimental.

Other

ID sylw: 102681

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elizabeth Browne

I do not agree that the proposal should be looking as far ahead as 2050. There are too many unknowns/changes likely to happen that planning this far ahead is unrealistic and inaccurate. For example, the actual housing target that needs to be achieved is constantly changing. What is the point/validity of planning for so many years for a target that is clearly going to change.

No

ID sylw: 102697

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nick Alexander

Green belt land should be protected for the benefit of wildlife and recreational purposes of local residents. Other sites should be used.

Yes

ID sylw: 102771

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Bailey

I support the proposals.

Other

ID sylw: 102805

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon

Asiant : Turley

The Threshold for a “strategic allocation” needs to be confirmed in order to fully comment on, or support, the approach to the SWLP Part 1 Plan. Without this clarification it is difficult to provide a detailed comment on this aspect of the Plan.

Should the SWLP be split into two plans, the Part 1 Plan should set out how the overall housing requirements for the SWLP area are to be met through a clear settlement hierarchy. This approach will ensure any Part 2 Plan and future Neighbourhood Development Plans can progress as quickly as possible due to aligning with the Part 1 Plan. Further, in the interim period between the various plans being adopted / made, this approach would allow sustainable development that is in accordance with the Part 1 Plan and the NPPF to come forward and provide a much needed immediate supply of housing for the SWLP area.

Notwithstanding this, Richborough consider that the SWLP should progress as a single Local Plan with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.

Other

ID sylw: 102814

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

The Threshold for a “strategic allocation” needs to be confirmed in order to fully comment on, or support, the approach to the SWLP Part 1 Plan. Without this clarification it is difficult to provide a detailed comment on this aspect of the Plan.

Should the SWLP be split into two plans, the Part 1 Plan should set out how the overall housing requirements for the SWLP area are to be met through a clear settlement hierarchy. This approach will ensure any Part 2 Plan and future Neighbourhood Development Plans can progress as quickly as possible due to aligning with the Part 1 Plan. Further, in the interim period between the various plans being adopted / made, this approach would allow sustainable development that is in accordance with the Part 1 Plan and the NPPF to come forward and provide a much needed immediate supply of housing for the SWLP area.

Notwithstanding this, Richborough consider that the SWLP should progress as a single Local Plan with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.