BASE HEADER
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101005
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mac Mic Group
Asiant : Marrons
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101049
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr guy evans
n/a
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101135
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hallam Land Management Limited
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs. The needs of Southam must be considered, the SWCs should not enforce densities which would not deliver the homes to meet the identified need, as this may impact developer viability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101270
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Bart Slob
I partially agree with Draft Policy Direction 8 but have concerns about its implementation. The policy promotes higher density development but lacks clear guidance on where it is appropriate. Density should respect local character and avoid overdevelopment, particularly in areas with limited infrastructure. Increased density must be matched by improvements in schools, healthcare, and transport to prevent further strain on services. The policy should guarantee infrastructure expansion before high-density development is approved. A balanced approach is needed, ensuring densification is sustainable, context-sensitive, and supported by essential infrastructure to maintain quality of life for residents.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101309
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hallam Land
Asiant : Marrons
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101429
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bellway Strategic Land / Ashberry Strategic Land
Asiant : Marrons
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Furthermore, the needs of the Main Service Centres and Local Service Villages must be considered, the SWC’s should not enforce densities which would not deliver the homes to meet the identified need, as this may impact developer viability.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101458
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Ms Zoe Leventhal
Higher density housing is appropriate in built up areas to avoid the need to release important green belt land and encroach further on nature and biodiversity. This also creates closer communities and better sustainable development
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101525
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Rollason
This development is not good for the area
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101571
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Alderley Holdings Trust
Asiant : Mr Jack Barnes
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101824
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Clive Henderson
The proposal looks reasonable to me
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101917
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Anne Page
N/A
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 101957
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bishop's Tachbrook Parish Council
The NPPF emphasises the importance of making efficient use of land (Paragraph 124), but also recognizes the need for a range of housing densities to reflect local market conditions and community needs. While higher densities help meet housing demand, lower-density developments must also be accommodated to provide choice, support well-being and meet the needs of those requiring larger gardens or more space from neighbours. A balanced approach ensures sustainable development, aligns with local character (Paragraph 125) and delivers diverse housing options for all residents.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102007
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Joseph Dimambro-Denson
We need to aim for a higher minimum level of densification to avoid sprawl and enable creation of parks and greenspaces. I'm talking about gentle density levels that will also encourage active travel, but not be offputting.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102097
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Sarah Brooke-Taylor
Increased density can put a significant strain on existing infrastructure, such as roads, public transport, and utilities. This can lead to congestion, overburdened public services, and a decline in the quality of life for residents. It can lead to increased air pollution, reduced green spaces, and changes to local microclimates. Lack of privacy and increased noise levels can negatively affect the mental and physical health of inhabitants. A Design Code is one way forward but should not be too prescriptive and be wary of generalisations.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102114
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited
Asiant : Turley
53. IM Land do not object to the approach proposed by Draft Policy Direction 8, subject to any final policy building in flexibility for density ranges. Planning policy must support efficient use of land at appropriate density in accordance with Paragraph 129 in the NPPF.
54. The wording indicates density ranges will be agreed through a Design Code. Any Design Code should be prepared in accord with national guidance and offer a degree of flexibility and variety aligning with NPPF Paragraph 133 to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market demands.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102122
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The draft policy seeks to incorporate densities in design codes which may include areas for higher density. Flexibility in these codes is essential to prevent conflicts that might impede the growth strategy, especially for new settlements and strategic growth locations. Larger settlements may encompass varied densities, with higher densities near local centres or transport hubs and lower densities on peripheries. An overarching density strategy, for example with indicative density ranges, could allow for site-specific codes to address site specific requirements which would assist the council's development management team in assessing suitability and achievability of densities in proposed developments.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102143
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace
N/A
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102180
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hallam Land
Asiant : LRM Planning
Draft Policy Direction 26 indicates that individual design codes are proposed for site specific allocations and that these will be produced by the local planning authority and adopted after the SWLP adoption. The logic of these two approaches is that only once those design codes have been prepared would the appropriate density ranges have been determined for different locations. Given the potential extent and number of site-specific design codes required under this approach we would question whether this is an efficient and effective process.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102243
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land
Asiant : Turley
Taylor Wimpey has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
In respect of any overarching Design Code to be adopted by the Council, this should give a degree of flexibility to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market and cross reference Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102321
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough
Asiant : Marrons
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102450
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
ill Residential does not object to the approach proposed by Draft Policy Direction 8, subject to any final policy building in flexibility for density ranges, which the draft policy indicates will be agreed through Design Codes.
Any overarching Design Code to be adopted by either of the councils should give a degree of flexibility to allow consideration on a site-by-site basis and to ensure it remains adaptable to a changing market.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102544
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Carl Barthorpe
Building and occupation density in Kenilworth is already too high, its not a suitable town for any further growth, there's already 1000 houses under construction (nearly 5000 approved within a couple of miles, e.g. South Coventry)
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102704
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Miss Phoebe Withnall
Draft Policy Direction 8 takes a sensible approach by recognising the benefits of higher density while ensuring it is shaped by design codes. Increasing density, if well planned, can create walkable, vibrant neighbourhoods that reduce car dependency and support local services. However, without clear minimum density requirements, there is a risk that developments will default to low-density sprawl rather than making efficient use of land. The policy should ensure that densification does not become a token gesture and that new development actually contributes to more sustainable, well-connected places rather than just adding more housing without improving urban form.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102817
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Mr David Bailey
I would encourage denser and taller housing, e.g. flats above retail.
No
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 102980
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes
Asiant : Marrons
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103194
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Chesterton and Kingston Parish Meeting
Densification should be looked at on urban brown belt and in suitable existing main cities and towns excluding Warwick and South Leamington
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103214
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Salford Road, Bidford-on-Avon
Asiant : Turley
Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103215
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Gaydon Road, Bishop's Itchington
Asiant : Turley
Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103217
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Lighthorne Road, Kineton
Asiant : Turley
Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
ID sylw: 103219
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Richborough - Sycamore Close, Stockton
Asiant : Turley
Richborough has no objection to the emerging policy direction and agrees that density should be considered in accordance with different types of locations of development.
With regard to the reference to Design Codes, it is recommended that the future policy text for Draft Policy Direction 8 should cross refer to Draft Policy Direction 26 ‘Design Codes’ and the supporting text. Richborough have provided more detailed comments in relation to Design Codes within their response to Draft Policy Direction 26.