Yes

ID sylw: 86105

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

N/A

No

ID sylw: 86306

Derbyniwyd: 20/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Nash

Water - both flooding and shortage is already a problem in C1 area

Yes

ID sylw: 86688

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Bridgewater

Improving waterways have a multilevel benefit to the climate and to residents.

No

ID sylw: 86935

Derbyniwyd: 31/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Arthur Hogan-Fleming

We're not living in the eighteenth century.

Other

ID sylw: 87084

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Developers need to be expected to work with water stakeholders like canals and rivers trust or the clean water alliance.

Yes

ID sylw: 87177

Derbyniwyd: 05/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Bryan Hay

I agree with the proposed approach.

Yes

ID sylw: 87416

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

None

Yes

ID sylw: 87595

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

I agree

Other

ID sylw: 88837

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Agree in principle but believe this policy requires revising. Your introduction states the importance of the valuable assets such as Canals and Rivers but the policy in the main targets canals and rightly so. My understanding is the UK waterways are managed by UK Navigation authorities but this policy does nothing about addressing the numerous rivers and canals for improving the conditions and not just adding marinas. The policy should link to a national policy for improving access and conditions of the rivers and canals that have fallen below standard. Policy should work in conjunction not individually

Yes

ID sylw: 89077

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

i agree

Yes

ID sylw: 89347

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barrie Hayles

n/a

Other

ID sylw: 89353

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Durk

It would be good to see the canals more widely appreciated. Who is going to pay for any necessary canal works, upgrading towpaths and bridges or lock areas? The Canal and Rivers trust is now a charity and doesn't get money from the Government. Will developers be expected to contribute?

Yes

ID sylw: 89495

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sidney Syson

Should mention here be made of canal conservation areas? Is there any potential for increasing these?

Other

ID sylw: 90508

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

The Stratford Canal is a significant asset to Stratford town and local villages. Running adjacent to Wilmcote it is a pleasant place to spend time for leisure pursuits. However it is already adversely impacted by littering, pollution and graffiti and additional footfall would further ruin the environment and increase risks to local flora and fauna. It is a shared use route already, meaning that increased traffic would be detrimental to wildlife as well as increasing risk to health and safety of all users due to increased risk of collision, theft and menacing activity.

Yes

ID sylw: 90916

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Malcolm Fisk

I agree

Other

ID sylw: 91024

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Canal & River Trust

It is important to ensure that any waterways policy clearly acknowledges the multi-functional nature of the canal network and the need to consider how development can impact its historic significance, its role as a wildlife habitat/blue green infrastructure corridor as well as offering active travel options along towpaths and presenting significant place-making opportunities through promoting high quality design, including provision of active frontages onto the canal, improving the public realm; sensitively integrating with the canal and any associated canal-side or canal-related features, structures or buildings.

Yes

ID sylw: 91192

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Radford Semele Parish Council

Radford Semele Parish Council supports the suggestions.

Yes

ID sylw: 91692

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Geoff Norman

SEnsible

No

ID sylw: 91780

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanne Taylor

There is no comment on the health of the waterways, restoring then to a good state of health and then maintaining that good state.

Yes

ID sylw: 92480

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree

Yes

ID sylw: 92674

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Fairburn

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 93013

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alison Blake

Lofty ideals but where does the money come from?

Yes

ID sylw: 93354

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ian Michael Hayes

I agree in general, but feel that the options that waterways offer for active travel other than for recreational purposes are very limited.

No

ID sylw: 93512

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Sims

There isn't any detail included in the plan about the protection of our waterways! Just a lot of words that say nothing. The canal in Stratford is covered in litter and has been closed now for about two years. The state of the canal path has deteriorated significantly since the new estate was built in Bishopton. More development will destroy more of our environment as people move in that neither care nor respect it.

Yes

ID sylw: 93915

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Beverley Comley

Development of rivers should be not at the detriment of wildlife

Other

ID sylw: 94145

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart Mace

Where access to canals is improved, it is imperative that the long term maintenance of those routes is ensured. The Canal and Rivers Trust is a charity with limited resources, and towpaths in rural areas are not maintained to the same standard as in urban areas or places attracting tourism.

Yes

ID sylw: 95221

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

no further comment

Yes

ID sylw: 95755

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bloor Homes Western

Asiant : Marrons

Draft Policy Direction 28’s aim to promote the use and accessibility of waterways in South Warwickshire is supported. The policy appropriately recognises the ecological benefits of waterways and seeks to protect them from harmful development while encouraging regeneration.

Further clarity is needed on what constitutes an “adverse impact” on the integrity of the waterways structure, water quality, landscape, heritage and ecological quality and character. Clear definitions or criteria would ensure greater consistency in decision-making and provide developers with a better understanding of policy requirements.

Yes

ID sylw: 95772

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Amanda Dyhouse

N/A

Yes

ID sylw: 95950

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Tesh

Yes