Yes

ID sylw: 101729

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs MIchele Gill

These area have already had large scale development with minimal increase in infrastructure to support it. It needs no more. These proposals, if implemented, will destroy the nature of the areas affected. F2, F3,G1

Yes

ID sylw: 101742

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Louise Bennett

RefID 757 Land adjacent to B4089
Road safety primary concern with this site. Access to site potentially in 50mph country lane. Speeding and visibility issues on this stretch of road which is very close to the village primary school. Volume of traffic - c2892 mixed vehicle usage each day. No pavement for easy access to school and other village facilities (pub and village hall). Severn Trent Water pumping station on site. Just after double bend leading into/out of village.

No

ID sylw: 101751

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

I object to the proposed housing developments on the Land Part Grange Farm, Budbrooke (ID 119). I have significant concerns regarding the impact this development would have, particularly with respect to its location within the Green Belt and the capacity of the local road network and infrastructure, which are already under considerable strain.

Increased Traffic and Safety Risks:
Many local roads are already used as a shortcut by drivers attempting to avoid congestion on the A46/ Birmingham Road or access Warwick Parkway. The addition of new homes will significantly increase through-traffic, exacerbating congestion and creating further safety risks for both residents and road users.

Inadequate Road Capacity:
Many local roads are already used as a shortcut/ rat run by drivers attempting to avoid congestion on the A46 (Particularly area around Stank’s Island/ Longbridge Island and Birmingham Road, which can then lead to traffic backing up on the A46 and the Birmingham Road, making the situation even worse) or access Warwick Parkway or the Birmingham Road at the Shell garage. The addition of new homes in this area will significantly increase on the Birmingham Road, exacerbating congestion and creating further safety risks for both residents and road users

Yes

ID sylw: 101768

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Hall

Land to North of Wasperton Lane, Barford
I do not support this proposal:
- there has been no initial consultation on this proposed site
- there are several overlapping proposals for this area -- a 'settlement' up Wasperton Lane, a massive quarry site also up Wasperton Lane (but not even known about or recognised on this plan). They have to be reviewed together.
- traffic impact on Wasperton Lane and Barford village of new developments. Wasperton Lane is already overrun by 'ratrun' traffic from the Gaydon area and is too narrow to cope with any of this.

Yes

ID sylw: 101770

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Louise Bennett

RefID 880 Land North of B4089, Great Alne.
Primary concern is road safety, based on access and visibility of site access which is currently located in 50mph zone. Speeding is a major issue in this location in the village where 45% have been found to be speeding as part of the Community Speedwatch programme. Volume and mix of traffic of concern - farm, buses, lorries. Also any development anywhere in the village will cause major issues with construction traffic and associated activities, due to the nature of the village and its lack of infrastructure to sustain any development.

Yes

ID sylw: 101771

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Catesby Estates

Asiant : Marrons

We raise into question the utility and methodology of a number of the HELAA results, as outlined.

Other

ID sylw: 101777

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Janet Neale

Site 65 is at the base of a hump back weight restricted bridge on a road with no pavements. This is a ludicrous site. It is blatantly unsafe.
Site 664 has already lost at appeal. Nothing has change since then in respect of damage to landscape and heritage assets. This site needs to be removed.
Site 182 should not be used for housing but could be used to provide a back access to the school by pulling a road through from Kingshurst which then joined up with the end of School Lane. Car parking could be provided parents

Other

ID sylw: 101787

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Grevayne Properties Limited

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

We continue to promote the site at Bedlam’s End, Baddesley Clinton (site ref: 490).

The HELAA assessment of Sites Ref: 490 demonstrates that there are no significant constraints to the development of the land. Site Ref 490 has been attributed a favourable, mid-range, HELAA Part B score. The site is a logical and sustainable location for residential development and provides opportunities for self-build and/or market housing. The site amounts to Grey Belt.

In accordance with the NPPF, it is suggested that the land at Bedlam’s End (site ref: 490) is entirely appropriate for allocation for residential development within the SWLP.

Yes

ID sylw: 101795

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Vincent Hall

Land East of Wellesbourne Road, Barford, Warwickshire
I do not support this proposal:
-there has been no prior consultation on this proposal.
-there are several overlapping proposals from different authorities in this area, including a 'settlement', a quarry and these smaller sites
-the impact of access traffic on Wasperton Lane and Barford village is unimaginable. The lane is already unable to sustain the heavy 'ratrun' traffic from the Gaydon area and has been ruined.

Yes

ID sylw: 101807

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Geaney

In summary, my objections to the Site 712 Proposal are :

1) Huge traffic problems will be created on Church Lane and its T juction with Church Street
2) The road/pedestrian safety issues with increased traffic and have no pavement. and the back up of traffic on Church Lane
3) Other road users such as utility providers - BT, STWAs, Royal mail, WDC refuse collection will further increase on Church Lane will result in more traffic chaos.

Please do not put any further pressure on Church Lane and its Listed dwellings.

Barry Geaney

Yes

ID sylw: 101814

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr H Farmer

I strongly object to the allocation of Site 492 and Site 827 in the SWLP due to a flawed and inconsistent assessment process. Initially deemed unsuitable in the Stratford SAP, The Site was later reclassified without public consultation or clear justification. Despite no change in site constraints, it has now been given one of the most favourable HELAA scores, raising serious concerns about the credibility of the evidence base. The SWLP must be based on consistent, transparent, and evidence-led decision-making. The Site’s allocation fails this test and should be removed from the Preferred Options.

No

ID sylw: 101815

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

I object to proposed site RefID 573. Following two recent developments there are regular water outages from burst pipes and faults. Further developments will exacerbate issues with grey water, drains, and flooding. Despite numerous repairs, systems fail due to being pushed beyond limits. They need upgrading before further developments. This covers Hampton Road, Henley Road, Old Budbrooke Road and Woodway.

The site is within Green Belt. The NPPF permits developments only in exceptional circumstances, which doesn't apply here. Several road sections in Hampton-on-the-Hill are single-lane. This causes frequent congestion, delays, and accident risk. The existing rural road network, strained by narrow lanes and heavy parking, was designed for much smaller populations and is ill-suited to accommodate traffic from new development. Local roads are used as rat-runs by drivers attempting to avoid A46 congestion, particularly around Stank’s Island/Longbridge Island and Birmingham Road. This can lead to A46 traffic backing up, worsening the situation. Other drivers shortcut to access Warwick Parkway or Birmingham Road at the Shell garage. New housing would continue to worsen the issues, leading to increased congestion, road rage, and overall reductions in road safety. Road-widening or expansion is unfeasible given the rural location and likely environmental impacts.

No

ID sylw: 101875

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

I object to site RefID 51. Following two recent developments there are regular water outages from burst pipes and faults. Further developments will exacerbate issues with grey water, drains, and flooding. Despite numerous repairs, systems fail due to being pushed beyond limits. They need upgrading before further developments. This covers Hampton Road, Henley Road, Old Budbrooke Road and Woodway.

The site is within Green Belt. The NPPF permits developments only in exceptional circumstances, which doesn't apply here. Several road sections in Hampton-on-the-Hill are single-lane. This causes frequent congestion, delays, and accident risk. The existing rural road network, strained by narrow lanes and heavy parking, was designed for much smaller populations and is ill-suited to accommodate traffic from new development. Local roads are used as rat-runs by drivers attempting to avoid A46 congestion, particularly around Stank’s Island/Longbridge Island and Birmingham Road. This can lead to A46 traffic backing up, worsening the situation. Other drivers shortcut to access Warwick Parkway or Birmingham Road at the Shell garage. New housing would continue to worsen the issues, leading to increased congestion, road rage, and overall reductions in road safety. Road-widening or expansion is unfeasible given the rural location and likely environmental impacts.

No

ID sylw: 101927

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

I object to housing development on site ID 55. Development in Green Belt is only permitted in exceptional circumstances. Several sections of roads in Hampton-on-the Hill are single lane or have vehicles parked along one side. This causes congestion, delays and increased accident risk. Local roads are used by drivers to avoid the A46 or access Warwick Parkway. The area around Stank's Island is particularly badly-affected and leads to traffic backing up on the A46 down to Longbridge Island. These problems would be worsened by additional traffic from new housing. The local road network of winding and narrow country lanes is already beyond capacity and was designed for a much smaller population. Expansion of roads is not feasible due to the rural nature of the area and likely environmental impacts. Since the latest completed two developments we regularly suffer with water outages, burst pipes, grey water issues, and drains blocking/failing allowing local roads to flood. The present original systems are pushed to their limit and urgently require upgrading PRIOR to any further local developments.

Yes

ID sylw: 101965

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Propernomics Ltd

HELAA site ref. 203 - "Land adjacent Sports and Social Club, Byfield Road, Priors Marston" is exceptionally well located in terms of accessibility to facilities for "open space, leisure, recreation, wellbeing" and "places to meet". Furthermore, the proposed development could facilitate better access to the Sports and Social Club for members of the wider community as a consequence of development. This should be reflected in a more favourable score for the site compared to others.

Yes

ID sylw: 101994

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Drew Contracts Ltd

Asiant : RCA Regeneration

Our client owns site 361 - 2 Bidford Road, Broom, Alcester, part of proposed allocation SG20. It is a Brownfield site proposed for residential use. The small industrial unit on the site is currently occupied but the company want to move from the existing premises because there is insufficient room for expansion. Attempts to sell the site as an industrial site have been unsuccessful due to its small size and location. Residential redevelopment of the site would not therefore cause unacceptable loss of employment land.

Rural listed buildings and scheduled monuments scoring should not be applied at strategic level.

No

ID sylw: 102008

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

I object to the proposed housing developments on site ID 715. Since the latest two developments completed there are regularly issues with water outages, grey water, and drains blocking/failing leading to flooding on local roads. The systems require upgrading prior to any further local developments as repairs frequently fail. This site is Green Belt which should only be developed in exceptional circumstances. There are several sections of roads which are single-lane with issues due to vehicles parking on one side. This already causes congestion, delays and increased accident risk. This would only worsen with additional traffic from new development. Drivers use local roads as a shortcut to avoid congestion on the A46 or access Warwick Parkway or Birmingham Road at the Shell Garage. The local road network is predominantly winding and narrow and was designed for a much smaller population. Widening or expanding to meet additional traffic volumes is not feasible due to the rural location and the likely environmental impact.

No

ID sylw: 102012

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Dave Steele

with regard to Land South of Southam Road [ref id 209]. This is a high quality agricultural land which supports a high number of wildlife species. Planning policy EC2 states that best and most versatile land should be protected. 22 species of birds have been recorded as displaying breeding behaviour here. The breeding behaviour of five BoCC Red list species (skylark, yellow wagtail, yellowhammer, grey partridge and house sparrow) and seven BoCC Amber list species (song thrush, wren, whitethroat, moorhen, woodpigeon, dunnock and chaffinch) was identified in the survey. Six of these are priority species under Section 41 of the NERC Act 2006.

No

ID sylw: 102037

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

OBJECTION:
Subject: Objection to Proposed Housing Development at Land and buildings at the Coach House (ID 68)

I am writing to formally object to the proposed housing developments on the Land and buildings at the Coach House (ID 68). While I understand the need for housing, I have significant concerns regarding the impact this development would have, particularly with respect to its location within the Green Belt and the capacity of the local road network and infrastructure, which are already under considerable strain.
Single-Track Roads and Safety Concerns:
Several sections of the roads in Hampton-on-the-Hill are single-lane, particularly in areas where vehicles are parked along one side. This limitation causes frequent congestion, delays, and an increased risk of accidents. With the additional traffic generated by the new housing, these issues will only worsen, leading to further congestion, heightened road rage incidents (which already occur), and an overall decline in road safety.

Increased Traffic and Safety Risks:
Many local roads are already used as a shortcut by drivers attempting to avoid congestion on the A46 or access Warwick Parkway. The addition of new homes will significantly increase through-traffic, exacerbating congestion and creating further safety risks for both residents and road users.

Inadequate Road Capacity:
The local road network, consisting predominantly of narrow, winding county lanes, was originally designed to serve a much smaller population. These roads are already operating beyond their capacity and are not suited to handle the additional volume of traffic that would result from the proposed development. Widening or expanding these roads is not a feasible option due to their rural nature and the likely environmental impact of such modifications.
Many local roads are already used as a shortcut/ rat run by drivers attempting to avoid congestion on the A46 (Particularly area around Stank’s Island, which can then lead to traffic backing up on the A46 down to Longbridge Island, making the situation even worse) or access Warwick Parkway or the Birmingham Road at the Shell garage. The addition of new homes will significantly increase through-traffic, exacerbating congestion and creating further safety risks for both residents and road users
Conclusion: The local road infrastructure in Hampton-on-the-Hill and Hampton Magna is not equipped to handle the scale of development proposed. This, combined with the Green Belt location of the site, makes the development unsuitable for this area. I strongly urge the planning department to consider these issues in detail before proceeding with the application.

Yes

ID sylw: 102044

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rough Hill Rare Breeds Ltd

Asiant : RCA Regeneration

REFID-580
We object to the site being sifted out on the basis of its Green Belt location. The site meets the definition of Grey Belt land and is suitable to be released for development. The scoring of the site should be changed from amber to green.
The methodology should be updated to include a positive weighting for sites that meet the definition of Grey Belt.
Detailed site assessments for all sites should be carried out now to support allocations under Draft Policy Direction 3. The site is suitable for rural retail and/or housing.

Yes

ID sylw: 102074

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Site name: Land west of A46, Stratford upon Avon
Site ID: 385

The HELAA assessment was undertaken prior to the NPPF was adopted in December 2024, also with implications in relation to green belt. The NPPF included ‘grey belt’ as defined in Annex 2 of the NPPF.

The GBR Stage 1 (October 2024) confirms that the site does not contribute to three of the purposes of the green belt (a, b and d) and therefore constitutes grey belt. This should be reflected in a subsequent HELAA update.

No

ID sylw: 102102

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: IM Land 1 Limited

Asiant : Turley

IM Land has comments in respect of site ref ID: 179. IM Land would welcome discussion with SWLP authorities and key stakeholders to discuss the site further and seek their inputs to continue to evolve the masterplan, which will be submitted to future stages of the SWLP. To ensure that everyone can understand the results of the assessment, and to justify allocations, the methodology needs to be clear, consistent and easy to understand.

No

ID sylw: 102106

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Brian Slack

OBJECTION:
Land Northwest of M40 Junction 15 Commercial / Industrial Site (ID 44)

Warwick, a historic town in England, is subject to various planning policies aimed at preserving its character and preventing urban sprawl. This plan to develop a large Industrial / Commercial site in the Green Belt on the edge of Warwick and within view of the town, a busy dual carriageway and surrounding villages would appear to conflict with this and would not protect Warwick's historic character and maintain its openness by controlling development and preventing sprawl.
Warwick, a town of significant historical value, is governed by a range of planning policies designed to protect its character. These policies are essential for maintaining the town’s distinctiveness and ensuring that its unique heritage remains safeguarded for future generations.
However, the proposed development on the edge of Warwick is in direct conflict with these protective measures. Such a development would inevitably lead to the erosion of Warwick's historic landscape, blurring the boundaries between the town and surrounding areas. It would compromise the openness of the town, a quality that has long defined its charm and visual integrity.
In addition, the development would disrupt the carefully planned control over sprawl that has been established to protect the town’s setting. By permitting this large-scale g project, we risk undermining the principles that keep Warwick distinct, potentially triggering further urban encroachment. This would not only damage the town’s unique heritage but also diminish its appeal as a historic gem.

Yes

ID sylw: 102111

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Nigel Williams

Grove Lane : REF ID 193 : Ashow – housing – minimum 10 properties.
This represents inappropriate development of green belt.
It would have a hugely detrimental impact on the village/hamlet.
There is minimal infrastructure (no mains sewerage) to support or justify such a development.
The village is all single track lanes and therefore unlikley to support building-related traffic without substantial degradation to the roads and disruption for residents.
There is no amenity in the village and so subsequent vehicular traffic generated of necessary journeys and its associated negative impact will adversely affect the environment and increase CO2 emissions.

Yes

ID sylw: 102113

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Holly Chenu

REFID 53 – Land adjoining Mill House
The map showing site 53 incorrectly includes part of our garden, which is a pedestrian right of way for our next door neighbours only, which is not currently in use. It also incorrectly includes our neighbours’ house and garden as part of the site available for development.

REFID C1 – Land south of Kingswood
I object to the proposed new settlement C1 because it is unviable because of the lack of suitable road infrastructure, public transport, schooling and local amenities - all future residents would need cars, leading to congestion and dangerous conditions

Other

ID sylw: 102117

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Watkins

HELAA assessment: Part of Elliotts Farm Barford

This is an entirely unsuitable site for development for any purpose as it is accessed from the Barford by-pass which is already overloaded at peak times. Traffic will increase substantially given other development proposals in the SWLP.

The site is fertile and productive agricultural land.on the west side of the A429 remote from the village of Barford which is a conservation area.

Development of this site would not be in accordance with 3.1 Vision "well designed" and "well connected" and would conflict with 3.2 Strategic Ojectives 3, 5, 7, 8 and 11.

Yes

ID sylw: 102118

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jennie Lunt

Site 278 was erroneously submitted for development as it is not fully owned by the applicant, with local residents, including myself, owning part of the land and opposing its inclusion. This misrepresentation affects the HELAA-B assessment, which incorrectly scores the site as ‘green’ under ownership and willingness to develop. Additionally, the site may qualify as Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land, which should be preserved under NPPF guidelines. The site supports legally protected species, forming a vital wildlife corridor within the Green Belt. It also suffers from flooding and would worsen road safety issues on the A3400.

Yes

ID sylw: 102120

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Lunt

Site 278 was erroneously submitted for development as it is not fully owned by the applicant, with local residents, including myself, owning part of the land and opposing its inclusion. This misrepresentation affects the HELAA-B assessment, which incorrectly scores the site as ‘green’ under ownership and willingness to develop. Additionally, the site may qualify as Best and Most Versatile (BMV) agricultural land, which should be preserved under NPPF guidelines. The site supports legally protected species, forming a vital wildlife corridor within the Green Belt. It also suffers from flooding and would worsen road safety issues on the A3400.

Yes

ID sylw: 102148

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Thompson

Site Ref 712 - Land on East Side of Church Lane, Barford
The majority of Church Lane is only single carriageway and includes a blind 90 degree bend. More traffic using the lane is unthinkable. 70 houses could generate 140 more cars!
Church Lane has no pavements and yet provides a means of access to St Peters Primary School!
Primary school has no spare capacity.
Approximately 35% of the proposed development is in a conservation area.
Parts of Church Lane are often obstructed by parked cars of visitors to St Peters Church, the separate churchyard and St Georges Playing Field.

Yes

ID sylw: 102196

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Taylor Wimpey Strategic Land

Asiant : Turley

Comments in relation to site REFID 531.