BASE HEADER

Strategic Growth Location SG02 Question

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 1 i 30 o 124

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 85946

Derbyniwyd: 10/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Averil Stewart

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Using farmland at Stoneleigh should not be the first port of call. the surrounding roads are not fit for high traffic, do not have the same services and the use of this land effectively joins both Stoneleigh and Kenilworth to make a coventry conubation with is detrimetal to the wildlife of the area also

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86016

Derbyniwyd: 11/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Pashley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed location covers green belt land, so I consider this location inappropriate for development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86044

Derbyniwyd: 12/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandy McCaskie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

N/A

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86269

Derbyniwyd: 18/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Ruth Buckley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There are plenty of half used properties already in the Stoneleigh Park complex. These should be used rather than new employment. Far too much land in that area has already been decimated by the HS2 work.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86595

Derbyniwyd: 28/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Darrell Muffitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Appears to be a reasonable extension of established use

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86725

Derbyniwyd: 29/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Claire Whitehouse

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Stoneleigh Park should be retained as an agricultural park, supporting the businesses that are located there. Investment should be encouraged to generate more employment and opportunities. Many exhibitions take place there so would lose huge revenue and job loss if it was forced to close.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86809

Derbyniwyd: 30/01/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GERALD KELLY

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Consider travel and the effect on rural environment

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86967

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Carys Bains

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Having moved to the area recently, one of the biggest benefits is the fact that it is quiet, calm and we’re surrounded by nature. The current doctors schools and amenities do not have the capacity to take on the amount of houses which have been provided, and there are no plans to extend these. Additionally more houses (including inevitable social housing) will bring the value down of the existing houses in the local area and will likely push others out.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 86992

Derbyniwyd: 02/02/2025

Ymatebydd: S Gardner

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

What this space is used for is not described fully enough. How does this development relate to SG01 which is a huge development.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87032

Derbyniwyd: 03/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Judith Corless

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

yes, good for smaller businesses, offices, manufacturing and some housing. Road links there have improved over the last few years

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87217

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Arina Cirstea

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Some areas (Stoneleigh Park) already used and in need in of further development.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87222

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Rusbridge

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This area does not make sense, wrapped around HS2 and adjacent to the very noisy A46. Areas further away from these noise polluting corridors would make more sense.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87333

Derbyniwyd: 08/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Andrew Day

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Already a developed area, brownfield opportunity

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87490

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87491

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: mrs susan morris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I agree

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87515

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Michaelina Jakala

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87517

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Michaelina Jakala

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I do not support - too much development with too little infrastructure.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87683

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr justin kerridge

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

yes

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87822

Derbyniwyd: 11/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Hotten

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There are no exceptional circumstances to warrant development in the green belt as there are sufficient strategic growth locations outside of the green belt.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87975

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sharon Quantrill

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is within the greenbelt.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 87976

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Quantrill

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This is greenbelt land I believe.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88064

Derbyniwyd: 13/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jeanette Ray

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This looks like green belt land , which we are loosing dramatically.
Kenilworth doesn’t have the infrastructure to cope with more houses and people.
Roads are not adequate to cope with more traffic this will produce.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88162

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rozanne Harris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There isnt the road infrastructure in place. Ok HS2 is operating there but they use their own haul road for material transport.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88227

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Absolutely 100%. Regeneration of land (brownfield) in an area in need of. To market and bring new businesses and housing. Having lived in Warwickshire all my life it has disappointed me how the City of Coventry has declined over the years when it was once a vibrant hub. It is time to regenerate Coventry over the next 25 years and make it a place to go - socially, to live and to work.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88229

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Given it being an effective brownfield site and not utilised to its full this is a natural location for redevelopment of business commerce and housing.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88615

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

N/A

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88657

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Middleton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Stoneleigh Park (NAC) seems a sound location for employment growth as it already has various employment on site and it is close to major residential areas.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88679

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Crispin Passmore

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

More local employment opportunities and perhaps housing too

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88782

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Roopa Lentini

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Ruin rural landscape and cause bottlenecks to infrastructure

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88785

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Dean Lentini

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Building new houses in north Leamington is not only going to cause more traffic than we already have and the infrastructure won’t handle it. But more disappointingly it will ruin the countryside we have and that up market feel. Look at Warwick gates development it’s ruined and the traffic is colossal and the place looks like a tip. Leamington has been ruined enough without you building more trash in the best part of leamington.