Yes

ID sylw: 89376

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr David Armstrong

SG02 is largely represented by existing employment land, which is very sparse due to the agricultural nature of the industry represented, and is in my opinion not efficiently used. Subject to the nature of employment land sought I would support making more efficient use of this land, through increased density, or a wider mix of employment types.

No

ID sylw: 89513

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

More green belt land. Avoid wherever possible! Nature is not so easy to get back.

No

ID sylw: 89676

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Malcolm Strens

The historic Stoneleigh Park Estate is a very sensitive habitat with ancient Woodland and important wildlife corridors. Any development to the east of Stoneleigh road in particular would eat into an important green belt corridor. Land blighted by HS2 works in the vicinity also needs to recover.

Yes

ID sylw: 89711

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Dodd

I believe this is an ideal location for employment growth as it is a big enough site already for employers to expand on without creating further damage to the environment. However, there are no bus routes to Stoneleigh Park and I believe this would need to be improved in order to make the best use of the growth opportunity offered by the land at Stoneleigh Park and the other side of Stoneleigh village.

Yes

ID sylw: 89725

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

No

ID sylw: 89983

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kulbir Birak

Single road of access that would become quickly overloaded. Would impact on the environment surrounding

No

ID sylw: 90079

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Catherine Hewson

Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes

Yes

ID sylw: 90396

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

Builds on existing development, brownfield sites and has access to roads. There is also further opportunity for industrial and commercial development.

No

ID sylw: 90686

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Averil Stewart

disagree that pristine farmland should be used for housing or business when better options exist than this. Britain also needs food security

Yes

ID sylw: 90999

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Agree. Stoneleigh Park needs to be developed and enhanced for housing recreational and employment opportunites. Ideal site for development

No

ID sylw: 91309

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Corinne Pilgrim

The area includes many old trees and has already been significantly disrupted by HS2 development. It is used as a pleasant area to walk a dog off lead by many people and the area is very pretty countryside

No

ID sylw: 91418

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Lucia Restall Orr

The proposal will impact upon the following important Local Wildlife Sites: Broadwells Wood and Black Waste Wood Local Wildlife Site (LWS) and Wainbody and Kenilworth Road Woods LWS, Kenilworth Common LWS and River Sowe & Finham Brook & lakes

Yes

ID sylw: 91489

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Beth Palmer

Appears on the surface to be less impactful

Yes

ID sylw: 91924

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James OShea

This is a suitable and sustainable location which has the relevant infrastructure to work with.

Yes

ID sylw: 91999

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Kevin Brown

This is already an established venue and accessibility is good.

Yes

ID sylw: 92289

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Harbury Parish Council

Yes, but we note the road network is currently not sufficient and wider infrastructure would need considerable improvement

Yes

ID sylw: 92890

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ed Molloy

Stoneleigh Park is already a site that has been built upon and is not in my opinion "Green Belt". It has good links to Kenilworth and Coventry.

If this site is chosen it will impact sprawl and that should be considered when deciding other and future sites.

Other

ID sylw: 93059

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cathy Kennedy

I can’t tell from the consultation or the map what you actually propose to do here. I cannot therefore make a determination either way.

Yes

ID sylw: 93132

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jean Nixon

This land includes the NAC site which is largely developed with industrial units and offices. It will include brown or grey land which is preferable to using green belt and will provide much needed jobs to support the housing planned in the area.

No

ID sylw: 93413

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bernard Davis

Although this area is currently used for light industrial and agricultural purposes, it is entirely green belt and is also surrounded by attractive parkland which is used to leisure activities. There is a case that HS2 has already undermined the case for not redeveloping this area.

Yes

ID sylw: 93511

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jon Redhead

The location of Stoneleigh park would be a favourable proposition considering that much of the building infrastructure could be easier to accommodate, as well as local links for employment and transport. The site has been host to many very large events in the past including the Royal show, and Town and Country Festival which are no longer held there. The large site would accommodate many homes close to employment areas.

Yes

ID sylw: 93592

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bennett

This area is well supported by the existing infrastructure provided by the A46 and the B4113/B4115. The local environment is already being degraded by the construction of the HS2 railway line making the additional impact of new housing less of a disadvantage compared to other sites. The National Agricultural Centre (NAC) at Stoneleigh has seen lower demand in recent years and could be repurposed for housing with many of the essential power and services already in place.

No

ID sylw: 94153

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Anne Green

Inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Insufficient infrastructure.

Other

ID sylw: 94205

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Close

Mixed use should be considered, not solely employment - the councils should set out options

Other

ID sylw: 94216

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: mr william tansey

It is important to reduce the squeeze on this site by not industrialising the additional 5 blocks as they stand in greenbelt which makes a significant contribution to the identities of the Bordering Towns and City.

This area contributes significantly to all 5 stated purposed of the West Midlands Greenbelt particularly in restricting urban sprawl and in preventing the neighbouring Historic towns merging. Further inclusion risks this groups of Historic towns being subsumed into the West Midlands Conurbation and it is the sole purpose of this Greenbelt to prevent exactly that.

Yes

ID sylw: 94419

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Heidi Ambrose-Brown

Proximity to NAC - already an established business park. New housing development is already being built nearby - realistic to implement 20 minute neighbourhood.

No

ID sylw: 94445

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Belinda Brown

This location is made up entirely of greenbelt land and should therefore be protected from development. No homes should be being built on green belt land as a part of this SWLP, when there are other sites available!

Yes

ID sylw: 94650

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Hammond

.

Other

ID sylw: 94710

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Gosling

we have insufficient knowledge of this location from which to make an informed comment

Yes

ID sylw: 94760

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

This has been an underused area for many years and is already partially developed