No

ID sylw: 88225

Derbyniwyd: 09/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Kenneth Miller

Please see rep below (submitted as attachment).

No

ID sylw: 88260

Derbyniwyd: 14/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Makes no sense.

No

ID sylw: 88472

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Frances Greenwood

The road infrastructure of the A435 cannot support this scale of development.
Traffic is already dreadful at times in this area, and the traffic through the village is horrendous.
It become almost impossible to get from Alcester to Redditch through Studley with an increase in traffic.

No

ID sylw: 88476

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr mark greenwood

Terrible idea not thought through no amenities to support the growth

No

ID sylw: 88599

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Green belt, poor strategic location and transport links. Protect Historic Towns. Henley poorly developed with in-town infilling and has poor parking and limited access in and out. Not against developing Henley, but should seek to build infill in the areas around Henley and preserve the town heritage, e.g. infill In Buckley Green, on the former Garden Centre (north of Henley and it is a brownfield site!), expand in Claverdon, Ullenhall and Wootton Wawen. Business Hubs should be located near to accessible motorway and good road infrastructure (Blythe Valley an excellent example). Could easily build 600 homes around Henley by infill.

Yes

ID sylw: 88643

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

No

ID sylw: 88651

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ida Marjorie Brown

Opposite side of town would be better relocation but question the transport links

No

ID sylw: 88767

Derbyniwyd: 12/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Charles Farran

I have lived in Middletown since 1986, and I strongly oppose the SG22 development, which would merge Middletown with Studley, erasing its identity and turning it into an urban area. The 2014 Sambourne Parish Plan opposed further housing, and the Green Belt, established in 1975, aims to prevent urban sprawl. SG22 is valuable agricultural land and its loss would threaten food security. The proposed development would significantly increase Studley's population, overwhelming local services, including healthcare. The 2018 Studley Neighbourhood Plan showed 97% of residents did not wish the existing boundary to be changed.

No

ID sylw: 89003

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association

Our neighbouring local authority has already built up to the county line. It is relying on Warwickshire to avoid urban sprawl through us maintaining our Green Belt protection. None of the Northern cluster of proposed sites SG22, 23 or 24 should be developed until other options outside Green Belt have been exhausted elsewhere in South Warwickshire.

No

ID sylw: 89364

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Russell

This is a ridiculous amount of housing for this site and would cause huge disruption and change the local environment beyond recognition. A much smaller development could be conceived.

No

ID sylw: 89531

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

Stop please, this is green belt land!

Yes

ID sylw: 89736

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Compton Verney

n/a

No

ID sylw: 89992

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cindy Foster

I object vehemently to the proposed development SO22 as the land is Greenbelt and provides a much needed area for wildlife and clean air Close to an already overpopulated town.

No

ID sylw: 90044

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ruth Smith

No. The land is farmed green belt and we need to keep food production. The noise and air pollution is already bad and the increase in traffic would be horrendous on the country roads. The junctions each end the A448 are already over capacity at peak times, with long queues of traffic. It would increase Studley's population by about 40%; the doctors and local schools are already over-subscribed with waiting lists and there is no NHS Dentist. It would detrimentally affect wildlife. Studley, Middletown and Sambourne would lose their village identities. There is no public transport within walking distance.

No

ID sylw: 90135

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Warren

I do not agree with sg22 as it is green belt land and studley does not have the infrastructure to support lots of new houses, we have no bank, no post office, only 1 doctors, only a private dentist, the schools are full. Please keep our village as it is!

Other

ID sylw: 90395

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Jones

I don't know this areas well enough to comment

No

ID sylw: 90400

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Martin Russell

Re SG22. I strongly oppose this proposal for many reasons.1 The surrounding road infrastructure is inadequate.2 The land in not grey belt as prime agricultural with elevated site ie landscape value & loss of valuable greenbelt which seperates different villages.3 population/dwelling numbers will swamp existing hamlet and even Studley. 4 Facilities like schools & doctors may be in the area but there is no capacity. In conclusion I think West of Studley SG22 is an unsuitable site.

Yes

ID sylw: 90403

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Louise Stewart

Adds to existing well established infrastructure and as a medium town, it already provides employment with significant further opportunity for expansion. Makes sense to formally join it up with the next town along. Business owners do not want to come to a brand new site with no facilities, it is too risky for them in an already challenging economy.

No

ID sylw: 90409

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Mandy Russell

Re West Studley Parcel SG22. I'm opposed to this because it would mean loosing the identity of the rural hamlet of Middletown/ Sambourne and join us with studley also the large number of proposed houses would mean the already busy A448 being heavily congested .The site is quality farm land and should not be developed due to government net zero guidelines.

No

ID sylw: 90655

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorna Bullett

Access to Schools - there are no spaces in Studley today, and no space at either primary or secondary schools to develop
Access to GP / Hospital services - GP provision is poor currently and it takes a long time to get appointments. the hospital is reducing in levels of services and Worcester/ Warwickshire are a significant distance with limited public transport.
The junction with Middletown lane and Bromsgrove road is unsafe in its current state, there are many near accidents in this location.

No

ID sylw: 91029

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

No. given its location to Redditch i am not convinced this side of Studley requires expansion. There is very little distance between Studley and Redditch i believe it to be better to infill the boundary to Redditch rather than leave such little distance.

No

ID sylw: 91136

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Studley Parish Council

Asiant : Mrs Katharine Walters

The local infrastructure is inadequate to support SG22, local schools at maximum capacity, health services stretched, no banking facilities, no post office. Road network would need sufficient upgrade of 1 and 2 new roundabouts. Worcestershire Highways would need consultation. Traffic on A435 is currently at 22,000 vehicles per day. Any CIL or S106 will not be given to Studley as SG22 in Sambourne parish. SG22 will have a serious detrimental effect to the living standards of Studley residents.
Studley Parish Council opinion is in agreement with Sambourne PC following joint meetings.

No

ID sylw: 91150

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Katharine Walters

The local infrastructure is inadequate to support SG22, local schools at maximum capacity, health services stretched, no banking facilities, no post office. Road network would need sufficient upgrade of 1 and 2 new roundabouts. Worcestershire Highways would need consultation. Traffic on A435 is currently at 22,000 vehicles per day. Any CIL or S106 will not be given to Studley as SG22 in Sambourne parish. SG22 will have a serious detrimental effect to the living standards of Studley residents. Studley Parish Council opinion is in agreement with Sambourne PC following joint meetings.

No

ID sylw: 91275

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Gunningham

I object.

Insufficient local infrastructure and capacity - schools, hospitals, GPs, dentists, care for elderly, shops, bus services, transport, roads, and safety thereof (speed, traffic management).

Loss of greenbelt.

Impact of building program - over a very extended period. Noise, dirt, visual impact, large vehicles, road damage, danger to pedestrians, interruptions to services.

Visual impact of new properties. Increased noise and lighting.

Loss of enjoyment of open space.

Loss of enjoyment of personal home.

Financial impact to property values.

No

ID sylw: 91344

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Mack

The area chosen is lacking the adequate road infrastructure and other local services to accommodate the development.

No

ID sylw: 91681

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Sam Green

The sites are too big!
The Studley site should be split into 3 or 4 sites. The other locations should be west of the A435 (just before the petrol station), then on the land off Abbeyfields Drive (again west of A435). Pictures of these locations attached.
It's lazy to bang them all in one site.
The Wilmcote site is a travesty too. Massively out of proportion to the area.

No

ID sylw: 91813

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd:

Local infrastructure is already under too much pressure, health services limited, no post office or bank road network overused tailbacks pollution. Green Lane Jill Lane and spernal junction will all need roundabouts. Crabs cross roundabout is a danger to support more traffic can not easily be enlarged, it is also worcestershire/redditch boundary in many places What happens to CIL or S106 money will Studley see any of it. The Lepus reports are extensive but flawed/biased with basic scores, its all very well being close to a school but if it is full and can not be expanded it doesnt help

No

ID sylw: 91960

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: NEIL ADCOCK

The development of this area will cause loss of green belt and farmland and a massive increase in traffic and polution.

No

ID sylw: 92012

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lydia Lyth

No, Green Belts shouldn’t include housing allocations. This is unacceptable to approve, the local community are at Max capacity already of doctors, dentists and schools.
The impact of the proposed would have a negative impact on wildlife including protected and declining species at these locations, which act as transitional buffers for nature and would reduce access to nature for people living in urban areas.
Not satisfied that the Councils have carried out a detailed Green Belt Review to include this land, particularly the Stage 2 work as well landscape impact assessments. They have not done individual Flood Assessment work.

No

ID sylw: 92025

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kathryn mountney

Building so many houses would be detrimental to Studley. Facilities such as schools and doctors are already overstretched and oversubscribed without increasing population

It would no long be a rural village, losing green space.

The road network wouldn't cope with an influx of cars as public transport is already limited in this area