No

ID sylw: 106430

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Barbara Dowsett

I am writing to formally object to the inclusion of SG24 within the SWLP.
I am a local Hockley Heath resident, having lived in the village for over 20 years. I am worried at the scale of the proposed development and the flawed justification for SG24 as a strategic growth location.
The proposal directly impacts me, my family, the local environment and village character. Indeed, if it goes ahead, the village will cease to exist, and it will become another commuter settlement poorly served by stretched or non-existent public services.
Having reviewed the various consultation documents and technical details, it is clear that there are other sites and settlements that perform MUCH better than those selected at SG24 and they have not been reviewed in the correct manner nor in fullness.
Some of my concerns are listed below:
1. Unjustifiable overdevelopment
The scale of the proposed allocation is excessive and disproportionate, completely out of step with the current community. It would erode our village identity, undermine local cohesion and destroy the very attributes that make Hockley Heath a desirable place to live.
SG24 is being advanced without due consideration of the Solihull Local Plan, which is currently under review. The failure to adopt a coordinated and integrated approach with Solihull Council highlights the enduring issues that will arise should SG24 be taken forward in its current state. The Solihull Plan was very clear that Hockley Heath is only suitable for small scale development - SG24 is quite the opposite.
SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed in its current large-scale quantum, cannot be considered in isolation away from the Solihull Plan and must have a Solihull Council engagement and agreement.
2. Irreversible destruction of green belt and limited review of sustainable alternatives
Each individual site that makes up SG24 requires inappropriate development on green belt land, designed to prevent urban sprawl and preserve open countryside. This proposal fails to demonstrate the 'exceptional circumstances' required for Green Belt release under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) with a number of the tests being applied in a flawed manner. The claim that the canal can substitute as a defensible boundary instead of the Green Belt is demonstrably flawed; several proposed sites are located beyond the canal, rendering this justification invalid.
The lack of a proper sustainability appraisal for alternative brownfield options demonstrates a missed opportunity and failure in due process. The SWLP has ignored viable alternatives, including the redevelopment of underutilized commercial spaces into residential in locations that already have a good level of infrastructure readily available.
SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed without reviewing alternative sites / options in deeper detail and taking a more comprehensive review of the plan to release green belt and its wide-ranging impact linked to character, environment and biodiversity.
3. Detrimental Environmental and Biodiversity impact
SG24 would inflict harm on local biodiversity, directly contravening national sustainability policies. The targeted sites are rich in ecological diversity, supporting an array of wildlife and plant life, particularly along the canal’s vital green corridors. The SWLP fails to meet the legal obligation in the NPPF requiring ‘conservation and enhancement of the natural… environment’ and para 175 requiring councils to take ‘a strategic approach… plan for the enhancement of natural capital’
Key failures include the destruction of key habitats with no credible mitigation plan, failure to use up to date environmental assessments (the 2013 Green Infrastructure is out of date and not fit for purpose), significant increases in air and noise pollution from additional traffic which will harm local air quality and quality of life.
4. Absence of detailed Infrastructure capacity planning and funding
SG24 is being proposed with no credible infrastructure provision to support it. Hockley Heath is already stretched in terms of roads, schools, and healthcare facilities. The SWLP fails to provide any realistic solutions to mitigate the additional strain SG24 would impose.
Roads & Transport: Many affected roads, especially to the west of SG24, are single lane with no pedestrian walking access. They rely on single lane canal bridges that are entirely unsuitable for increased traffic. Widening roads would require the expropriation of small pieces of land from a large number of private properties, which is unrealistic.
Education: Hockley Heath has a single, landlocked primary school already struggling with capacity and traffic congestion. The plan doesn’t explain how school provision will be improved and there is no mention of how school catchment areas will work. Local children leaving the primary school are already finding it difficult to get appropriate secondary school places due to the massive developments on Blythe Valley. This has resulted in children being bussed to The Heart of England School which is miles away from Hockley Heath.
Healthcare: The increase in demand for doctors, dentists, hospitals could not be covered by Hockley Heath in its current form. The area is already beyond national guidance for travel times to hospitals and A&E services. Increased demand will further exacerbate waiting times and degrade local healthcare services. There is no GP or pharmacy access in the village itself, and increasing the size of the population in the way that has been suggested would render current services entirely unsustainable.
Infrastructure Costs: The funding for essential infrastructure expansion is lacking detail, meaning these burdens will fall entirely on Solihull Council, which has already stated that Hockley Heath can only accommodate small-scale development.
5. Significant flooding and drainage risks ignored
Hockley Heath already experiences severe surface water flooding, even at times without heavy rainfall and particularly along the artery routes which will be required to serve SG24; School Road, Spring Lane, Cut Throat Lane and A3400 Stratford Road. The existing drainage infrastructure is insufficient to support additional development.
The SWLP has not updated flood risk assessments to reflect the current challenges, has not provided a clear drainage mitigation strategy (particularly for the SG24 developments, some of which are on waterlogged land), and has not considered the cumulative impact of adding impermeable surfaces to already high-risk flood zones.
6. Breach of sustainability principles
SG24 fails to meet the Sustainable Development Requirements outlined by South Warwickshire. The transport network is already under strain, local services are stretched, and the environmental consequences are severe. Proceeding with this allocation would be in direct opposition of the fundamental principles of sustainable development, making the entire plan legally and ethically indefensible.
Conclusion:
SG24 cannot proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format.
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre cannot proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly.
The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP.
SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106434

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Anthony Gilleran

I wish to formally oppose, in the strongest terms, the inclusion of SG24 within the South Warwickshire Local Plan.

I am a Hockley Heath resident, having lived in the village for more than 3 years. I also have family members who also live in the village.

My partner and I are members of a number of local clubs.
I am distressed at the reckless scale of proposed development and the flawed justifications for SG24 as a strategic growth location.

The proposal directly impacts me and my wider family, and the plans directly affect the lives we are building in this beautiful village. Hockley Heath has an amazing semi-rural character, which was one of the main appealing factors when we recently moved to the village.

Having reviewed the consultation documents, attended local meetings to clarify facts about the plan, and review some of the technical details, it is clear that Hockley Heath is not a suitable location for large or medium sized developments in the future. Furthermore, it is clear that there are alternative sites and settlements which perform far better than those selected at SG24 and they have not been reviewed in the correct manner nor in full.

Some of my concerns are listed below;

1. Unjustifiable Overdevelopment
The scale of the proposed allocation is disproportionate and excessive, being completely out of sync with the current community. Development of this nature would erode our village identity, undermine local cohesion and destroy the very attributes that make Hockley Heath a desirable place to live.

The amenities currently available within the village, such as the Primary School, healthcare provisions, church, local shops, restaurants and small businesses, can cope well with the number of residents and passing trade currently using them, but these amenities, and the supplementary amenities that go along with them, such as parking and local transport options, simply could not sustain a large increase in local residential properties.

SG24 is being advanced without due consideration of the Solihull Local Plan, which is currently under review. The failure to adopt a coordinated and integrated approach with Solihull Council highlights the enduring issues that will arise should SG24 be taken forward in its current state.

The Solihull Plan was very clear that Hockley Heath is only suitable for small scale development - SG24 is quite the opposite.
SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed in its current large-scale quantum, and it cannot be considered in isolation, away from the Solihull Plan and must have a Solihull Council engagement and agreement.

2. Irreversible destruction of green belt and limited review of sustainable alternatives
Each individual site that makes up SG24 requires inappropriate development on green belt land, designed to prevent urban sprawl and preserve open countryside. This proposal fails to demonstrate the 'exceptional circumstances' required for Green Belt release under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) with a number of the tests being applied in a flawed manner.

The claim that the canal can substitute as a defensible boundary instead of the Green Belt is demonstrably flawed; several proposed sites are located beyond the canal, rendering this justification invalid.

The lack of a proper sustainability appraisal for alternative brownfield or grey-field options demonstrates a missed opportunity and failure in due process.
The SWLP has ignored viable alternatives, including the redevelopment of underutilised commercial spaces into residential in locations that already have a good level of infrastructure readily available.

SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed without reviewing alternative sites / options in more detail and taking a more comprehensive view of the plan to release green belt and its wide ranging impact linked to character, environment and biodiversity.

3. Detrimental Environmental and Biodiversity impact
SG24 would inflict harm on local biodiversity, directly contravening national sustainability policies. The targeted sites are rich in ecological diversity, supporting an array of wildlife and plant life, particularly along the canal’s vital green corridors.

The SWLP fails to meet the legal obligation in the NPPF requiring ‘conservation and enhancement of the natural… environment’ and para 175 requiring councils to take ‘a strategic approach… plan for the enhancement of natural capital’

Key failures include; the destruction of key habitats with no credible mitigation plan, failure to use up to date environmental assessments (the 2013 Green Infrastructure is out of date and not fit for purpose), significant increases in air and noise pollution from additional traffic which will harm local air quality and quality of life.

4. Lack of detailed Infrastructure, capacity planning and funding
SG24 is being proposed with no credible infrastructure provision to support it. Hockley Heath is already stretched in terms of roads, schools, and healthcare facilities. The SWLP fails to provide any realistic solutions to mitigate the additional strain SG24 would impose.

Roads & Transport: Many affected roads, especially to the west of SG24, are single-lane with no pedestrian walking access. They are already far too narrow and rely on single lane canal bridges that are entirely unsuitable for increased traffic.
Widening roads would require the expropriation of small pieces of land from a large number of private properties, which is unrealistic. The current drainage situation in many areas within and surrounding the SG24 plots have terrible issues NOW. This would obviously be exacerbated by further development, which is unwanted, and not conducive to good environmental practise. This does not include regular flooding hotspots in the village, which are mentioned separately below. Please see photo evidence of dry weather flooding, and existing narrow roads in the area, attached.

Healthcare: The increase in demand for doctors, dentists, hospitals could not be covered by Hockley Heath in its current form. The area is already beyond national guidance for travel times to hospitals and A&E services. Increased demand will further exacerbate waiting times and degrade local healthcare services.

Education: Hockley Heath has a single, landlocked primary school already struggling with capacity and traffic congestion. The plan doesn’t explain how school provision will be improved and there is no mention of how school catchment areas will work.

Infrastructure Costs: The funding for essential infrastructure expansion is lacking detail. Current assumptions are that the burden for Local Public Transport, Highways Maintenance, Street Lighting, Refuse Collection, Education and Healthcare Provision etc, etc, will fall entirely on Solihull Council, which opposes the SWLP and they have made representations stating that Hockley Heath is only suitable to accommodate small-scale development.

5. Significant flooding and drainage risks ignored
Hockley Heath already experiences severe surface water flooding, even at times without heavy rainfall and particularly along the artery routes which will be required to serve SG24; School Road, Spring Lane, Cut Throat Lane and A3400 Stratford Road. The existing drainage infrastructure is insufficient to support additional development.

The SWLP has not updated flood risk assessments to reflect the current challenges, has not provided a clear drainage mitigation strategy (particularly for the SG24 developments, some of which are on waterlogged land), and has not considered the cumulative impact of adding impermeable surfaces to already high-risk flood zones.

6. Breach of sustainability principles
SG24 fails to meet the Sustainable Development Requirements outlined by South Warwickshire. The transport network is already under strain, local services are stretched, and the environmental consequences are severe. Proceeding with this allocation would be in direct opposition of the fundamental principles of sustainable development, making the entire plan legally and ethically indefensible.
Conclusion: SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly.
As a community, and as a local resident myself, we are in total opposition to the proposed plans for Hockley Heath and SG24 specifically.

The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing or re-submitting the SWLP.

If there is a legal obligation or instruction from Central Government to deliver more housing and to release sites in the most sustainable way, this cannot be achieved via the current SWLP, and certainly not with SG24, as there are clearly alternative settlements which perform much better under scrutiny than Hockley Heath / SG24.

I would strongly urge Warwick District Council to consider abandoning plans to develop SG24.

No

ID sylw: 106453

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Graham & Elaine Sandall

I am writing to you to oppose the proposed development of housing on land around Hockley Heath (SG24). Despite attempts to register my opposition, via the elusive 'portal' that pertains to allow comments on this proposal, I am emailing instead in the hope that this method will actually work.

The village of Hockley Heath as you are aware is set in Green Belt land, which should only be built on in exceptional circumstances. The loss of biodiversity and green space would be detrimental to the existing residents in Hockley Heath. The village struggles with surface water drainage problems and adding more housing would only exacerbate this.

The roads in and out of Hockley Heath are all single lane carriageways which already struggle with traffic congestion and flow at peak times and these all lead to the A3400 which cannot cope and is already an accident risk. To attract more traffic by building hundreds of new dwellings would be catastrophic. Coupled with this, there is little infrastructure in terms of schooling and health care provision in Hockley Heath as it is and to overburden this area further would be crippling and destructive.

The proposals for SG24 should be cancelled altogether and an alternative brown field site found for development, out of the plentiful options available in the rest of South Warwickshire.

No

ID sylw: 106480

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Pamela Curtiss

I strongly oppose this proposal. It appears to many residents of Hockley Heath to not be a very green or democratic state of affairs and it was cowardly of you to not send a representative of Stratford-upon-Avon and Warwick District Councils.

It will destroy the village nature of Hockley Heath. There is no space left for car parking and no extension of the school. The village floods at the slightest bit of rain. Form 16.30 to 18.30 there is a line of traffic waiting to turn onto the Stratford Road which cannot cope anymore. This is purely for profit. We ask your Councils to stop this.

No

ID sylw: 106485

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Carolyn Seymour

SG24 cannot proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format.
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre cannot proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly.
The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP.
SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106493

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Penelope Esslemont

Objection to Hockley Heath SG24

I have been a resident in the Village of Hockley Heath for 45 years and I am writing to oppose the development SG24. The Solihull Plan states that Hockley Heath is only suitable for small scale development whereas the current development proposal for SG24 is not a small-scale development and in its current format will only have a negative impact on the Village.

The proposed level of development would not only destroy existing green belt, which is supposed to preserve open countryside, the current SG24 plan would also destroy existing wildlife and affect biodiversity, which contravene national sustainability policies. There will also be an increase in traffic, causing not only congestion but also harmful pollutants in the environment, such as noise pollution and air pollution, which will affect the quality of life of the existing residents of the Village. Many of the roads, which will be affected in the plan are single lane with no pedestrian access, which could cause a danger to pedestrians from new developments, these roads are also heavily used by farm traffic, which with an increase in the amount of cars on the road would cause more congestion.

I also have a huge concern about flooding, as Hockley Heath currently floods during heavy rainfall and with existing development to the scale that SG24 outlines, there would be a huge risk to an increase in flooding in the area. Some of the developments on the SG24 plan are also on waterlogged land, which are unsuitable for residential development.

Public services for this scale of development are also currently not in existence in Hockley Heath. The local primary School is oversubscribed with children, and at various times of the day, outside the School, there is a lot of congestion. There is no mention in the plan how there will be an improved School provision for the Village. With the scale of the proposed development there is also going to be a huge increase for the need for doctors, dentists and hospitals, which at the moment Hockley Heath is already struggling with, and this will fall to Solihull Council, who have already stated that they can only accommodate a small-scale development.

I do not agree with the SG24 plan in its current format and even though Hockley Heath has some facilities where it can accommodate a small increase in its population, the current SG24 plan would be detrimental to Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure and the quality of life of its existing residents. There also needs to be exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release and the SWLP SG24 has not quantified viable alternatives and lacks infrastructure planning for sustainable development.

No

ID sylw: 106521

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Craig Jones

Reference: Objection to Hockley Heath SG24

I am writing to formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 within the SWLP. I am a local Hockley Heath resident.
The proposal directly impacts me, my family, the local character and the lives we have built in this beautiful village - the whole reason we decided to settle here in the first place. Having reviewed the various consultation documents and technical details, it is clear that there are other sites and settlements that perform MUCH better than those selected at SG24 and they have not been reviewed in the correct manner nor in fullness. Some of my concerns are listed below (not exhaustive);

1. Unjustifiable overdevelopment
The scale of the proposed allocation is excessive and disproportionate, completely out of step with the current community. It would erode our village identity, undermine local cohesion and destroy the very attributes that make Hockley Heath a desirable place to live.
SG24 is being advanced without due consideration of the Solihull Local Plan, which is currently under review. The failure to adopt a coordinated and integrated approach with Solihull Council highlights the enduring issues that will arise should SG24 be taken forward in its current state. The Solihull Plan was very clear that Hockley Heath is only suitable for small scale development - SG24 is quite the opposite.
SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed in its current large-scale quantum, can not be considered in isolation away from the Solihull Plan and must have a Solihull Council engagement and agreement.


2. Irreversible destruction of green belt and limited review of sustainable alternatives
Each individual site that makes up SG24 requires inappropriate development on green belt land, designed to prevent urban sprawl and preserve open countryside. This proposal fails to demonstrate the 'exceptional circumstances' required for Green Belt release under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) with a number of the tests being applied in a flawed manner. The claim that the canal can substitute as a defensible boundary instead of the Green Belt is demonstrably flawed; several proposed sites are located beyond the canal, rendering this justification invalid.
The lack of a proper sustainability appraisal for alternative brownfield options demonstrates a missed opportunity and failure in due process. The SWLP has ignored viable alternatives, including the redevelopment of underutilized commercial spaces into residential in locations that already have a good level of infrastructure readily available.
SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed without reviewing alternative sites / options in deeper detail and taking a more comprehensive review of the plan to release green belt and its wide ranging impact linked to character, environment and biodiversity.
3. Detrimental Environmental and Biodiversity impact
SG24 would inflict harm on local biodiversity, directly contravening national sustainability policies. The targeted sites are rich in ecological diversity, supporting an array of wildlife and plant life, particularly along the canal’s vital green corridors. The SWLP fails to meet the legal obligation in the NPPF requiring ‘conservation and enhancement of the natural… environment’ and para 175 requiring councils to take ‘a strategic approach… plan for the enhancement of natural capital’
Key failures include; the destruction of key habitats with no credible mitigation plan, failure to use up to date environmental assessments (the 2013 Green Infrastructure is out of date and not fit for purpose), significant increases in air and noise pollution from additional traffic which will harm local air quality and quality of life.
4. Absence of detailed Infrastructure capacity planning and funding
SG24 is being proposed with no credible infrastructure provision to support it. Hockley Heath is already stretched in terms of roads, schools, and healthcare facilities. The SWLP fails to provide any realistic solutions to mitigate the additional strain SG24 would impose.
Roads & Transport: Many affected roads, especially to the west of SG24, are single-lane with no pedestrian walking access. They rely on single lane canal bridges that are entirely unsuitable for increased traffic. Widening roads would require the expropriation of small pieces of land from a large number of private properties, which is unrealistic. In addition, there is no railway station to facilitate a choice of not using a car as transport in and out of Hockley Heath. That means that there is a guarantee of a massive increase in cars being used to and from the new proposed house locations. A simple calculation is to base each and every house having between one and two cars, could see a rise in vehicles passing throughout the roads of Hockley Heath by more than ten thousand each and every day.
Education: Hockley Heath has a single, landlocked primary school already struggling with capacity and traffic congestion. The plan doesn’t explain how school provision will be improved and there is no mention of how school catchment areas will work.
Healthcare: The increase in demand for doctors, dentists, hospitals could not be covered by Hockley Heath in its current form. The area is already beyond national guidance for travel times to hospitals and A&E services. Increased demand will further exacerbate waiting times and degrade local healthcare services. In addition, there is no GP surgery based in Hockley Heath. A massive strain would therefore be put on surrounding GP surgeries.
Infrastructure Costs: The funding for essential infrastructure expansion is lacking detail, meaning these burdens will fall entirely on Solihull Council, which has already stated that Hockley Heath can only accommodate small-scale development.
5. Significant flooding and drainage risks ignored
Hockley Heath already experiences severe surface water flooding, even at times without heavy rainfall and particularly along the artery routes which will be required to serve SG24; School Road, Spring Lane, Cut Throat Lane and A3400 Stratford Road. The existing drainage infrastructure is insufficient to support additional development. In addition, hundreds of square metres of natural “soak away” will be removed, thus putting absolute reliance on a rain water drainage system which currently cannot cope.
The SWLP has not updated flood risk assessments to reflect the current challenges, has not provided a clear drainage mitigation strategy (particularly for the SG24 developments, some of which are on waterlogged land), and has not considered the cumulative impact of adding impermeable surfaces to already high-risk flood zones.
6. Breach of sustainability principles
SG24 fails to meet the Sustainable Development Requirements outlined by South Warwickshire. The transport network is already under strain, local services are stretched, and the environmental consequences are severe. Proceeding with this allocation would be in direct opposition of the fundamental principles of sustainable development, making the entire plan legally and ethically indefensible.
Conclusion: SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have NOT been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development. The fact that the current “Green belt” is now somehow referred to as “Grey belt” is an insult to the public’s intelligence. Once historic valuable English Green belt land is build upon, it cannot be reversed. It is simply gone forever.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

Yes

ID sylw: 106536

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Edward Muntz

Asiant : Sworders

We strongly agree with strategic growth location 24 which is ideally located between the main urban areas
of Solihull, Warwick, Kenilworth and close proximity to Junction 3A and 4 of the M42, with easy access to
the West Midlands conurbation. The site lies within Priority Area 3 and would support Strategic Objective
1.
The location is also ideally located between the West Midlands and the Chiltern Railway Lines, as such
supporting the 12 Strategic Objectives and the SWLP five over arching principles.
SG24 is supported by high levels of existing infrastructure as opposed to other proposed strategic growth
locations which rely on new infrastructure investment.

No

ID sylw: 106538

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Lucinda Fuhr

I am writing to object to Hockley Heath SG24.
The reasons why I am objecting to Hockley Heath SG24 are:
• Flooding - the village already has a flooding and drainage issue where the Stratford Road can become unpassable. One year a villager swam down the Stratford Road.
• The road infrastructure gets completing clogged up when there are issues on the M42 and/or M40. I am concerned about the extra traffic and making the roads even more dangerous as they are not currently maintained effectively.
• The land that the proposed houses to be built on is Green Belt, and all these extra houses will turn the village into a small town and lose it's identity.
• The village school is over subscribed at present, so where would any additional children to the area go?
• There is no doctors surgery or pharmacy in the village and the surrounding doctors cannot cope with their current number of patients.
• There will be a harm to local wildlife and biodiversity (the circle of life)!
• The new development would fall under South Warwickshire, however, it will the Solihull council that would end up picking up all the problems and costs and put out taxes even more.

No

ID sylw: 106539

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Wayne Fulford

We are writing to express our strong opposition to the proposed plans for SG24. These plans, if approved, would have significant and far-reaching consequences for the local community, infrastructure, and environment. We believe the development is not in the best interests of the area and would place undue strain on vital resources and services. In the following response, we will outline the key concerns related to the proposed development, including its impact on traffic, local services, the environment, and the overall quality of life for existing residents.

Response Against Proposed Housing Development Due to Flooding and Drainage Issues
We strongly oppose the proposed housing development in our village due to the ongoing issues of poor drainage and flooding. The village is already experiencing significant problems with its drainage system, which regularly fails to cope with even moderate rainfall. The risk of flooding is a constant concern, and further development would only exacerbate these issues, leading to potentially devastating consequences for the village and its residents.
The current drainage infrastructure is outdated and inadequate, and we are concerned that additional housing will put even more strain on an already fragile system. Increased surface runoff from new homes and roads would further overwhelm the drainage system, increasing the risk of flooding not only on the proposed development site but also in surrounding areas.
We must also consider the environmental impact that further development would have on the village’s ecosystem. Wetlands, green spaces, and natural water absorption areas would be replaced by impermeable surfaces, reducing the land's ability to naturally absorb rainwater. This would lead to an increased risk of surface water flooding, soil erosion, and damage to local wildlife habitats.
Furthermore, there is a lack of clear and comprehensive flood mitigation plans outlined in the proposal. Without a concrete plan to upgrade the drainage infrastructure, the new housing development would significantly heighten the risk of flooding, particularly during heavy storms or adverse weather events. This poses not only an environmental threat but a serious safety concern for current and future residents.
In light of these issues, we believe that the proposed development should be postponed or cancelled until a detailed flood risk assessment and drainage improvement plan are put in place. It is crucial that any new housing developments in the area be accompanied by effective measures to improve the drainage system and protect the village from the serious risk of flooding.
Response Against Proposed Housing Development on Green Belt Land
The primary purpose of Green Belt land is to prevent urban sprawl, protect the natural environment, and maintain the integrity of rural communities. This proposal goes directly against these principles and could have long-lasting negative consequences for the local landscape, wildlife, and the community.
Green Belt land plays a crucial role in maintaining the balance between urban and rural areas. It provides valuable open spaces for recreation, agriculture, and biodiversity, and helps preserve the character and identity of villages and towns. Developing on this land would not only result in the loss of these benefits but could also set a dangerous precedent for future encroachment on protected areas.
The importance of Green Belt areas is well-documented, with local and national planning policies specifically designed to protect such lands from unnecessary development. Building on Green Belt land for housing would undermine these policies and lead to further urban sprawl, which could compromise the very qualities that make our rural areas desirable places to live.
In addition, the environmental impact of building on Green Belt land would be significant. This land often provides important habitats for local wildlife and plays a key role in managing natural resources like water absorption and carbon sequestration. By developing it, we risk damaging ecosystems and contributing to climate change, while reducing the area’s ability to support biodiversity and mitigate environmental pressures.
While we recognize the need for more housing, this development is not the solution. There are many brownfield sites and areas of underused land within urban boundaries that should be prioritized for development instead of encroaching on valuable Green Belt land. We urge local authorities to focus on sustainable development strategies that preserve the Green Belt, while also meeting housing needs through responsible and environmentally conscious approaches.
Response Against Proposed Housing Development in Hockley Heath
Housing development in Hockley Heath as it is in direct conflict with Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council’s Local Plan, which specifically states that only small-scale development is appropriate for the village. This proposal does not align with the vision or policies set out in the Local Plan and would significantly undermine the carefully considered strategy for sustainable growth in Hockley Heath.
The Local Plan recognizes Hockley Heath as a village where growth must be managed carefully to preserve its character, protect the surrounding environment, and avoid overdevelopment. It clearly states that only small-scale development is suitable, ensuring that the community remains a sustainable, rural area with the infrastructure and services that can support it. The proposed housing development is not in line with these guidelines, as it represents a large-scale development that could strain local resources, infrastructure, and services.
Hockley Heath’s infrastructure, including roads, schools, and healthcare services, is already under pressure and cannot accommodate the additional burden that a large housing development would impose. The area lacks the capacity for extensive development without significant negative impacts on the quality of life for current residents. The additional traffic, demands on public services, and potential strain on local amenities would be unsustainable for the village.
Furthermore, the scale of the proposed development would significantly alter the character of the village, undermining its distinct rural identity and the very reasons people choose to live there. It would also disrupt the local environment, potentially leading to the loss of green spaces, increased traffic congestion, and environmental degradation. These impacts would not only affect Hockley Heath but could also have wider consequences for the surrounding areas.
The purpose of the Local Plan is to ensure that development is carefully managed to benefit both current and future generations. The proposal for a large housing development goes against this fundamental principle and threatens the balance between growth and preservation that the plan seeks to achieve.

Response Against Proposed Housing Development Due to Traffic Concerns
Any future housing development would add to the significant increase in traffic which would exacerbate the already severe congestion on the A34, M40, and M42. These key roadways are already prone to heavy traffic, particularly during peak hours, and any additional vehicles from a large-scale housing development would only worsen the current situation, leading to even more delays, pollution, and safety risks.
The A34, M40, and M42 are vital routes for commuters, businesses, and local residents, and they already experience frequent congestion, especially during rush hour. The addition of hundreds or potentially thousands of new residents would inevitably result in a large number of new cars on these roads, creating further bottlenecks and significantly increasing journey times. This would not only frustrate existing residents but could also lead to serious disruption for those who rely on these routes for work, education, and daily activities.
Increased traffic congestion on these roads would also lead to a rise in air pollution, which is already a concern in many areas. The environmental impact of this development, particularly in terms of emissions from idling vehicles, would negatively affect the health and quality of life of local residents. Furthermore, the additional traffic would put further strain on an already overstretched road network, increasing the likelihood of accidents and road safety issues.
Local authorities and planners have a responsibility to ensure that developments do not place undue strain on infrastructure. While housing is needed, it must be located in areas where the existing road network can accommodate the increased traffic without detrimental effects. This development fails to meet that criterion and would have a profoundly negative impact on both local traffic flow and the broader road network.
We urge the local council and planning authorities to reconsider this development unless there is a comprehensive traffic management plan in place, including significant upgrades to the A34, M40, and M42 to handle the increased volume of traffic. Without such measures, the development would be unsustainable and harmful to the local community and infrastructure.
Response Against Proposed Housing Development Due to Impact on Wildlife and Biodiversity
We strongly oppose the proposed housing development due to the significant and detrimental impact it would have on local wildlife and biodiversity. The land designated for this development is home to a variety of species, many of which rely on these habitats for survival. The destruction of these natural spaces would result in the loss of important ecosystems and pose a serious threat to the diverse range of flora and fauna currently present.
Our environment is facing increasing pressures, and the protection of wildlife habitats is more crucial than ever. Green spaces, wetlands, woodlands, and meadows are vital for supporting biodiversity, providing food, shelter, and breeding grounds for many species. The development would destroy or fragment these habitats, causing displacement of wildlife, disrupting migratory paths, and leading to a loss of biodiversity in the area.
In particular, the destruction of these habitats could severely affect species already under threat, including insects, birds, mammals, and other wildlife that rely on this land. The introduction of urban development will likely result in increased pollution, light disturbance, noise pollution, and other factors that could further harm these delicate ecosystems. The fragmentation of natural habitats can also isolate wildlife populations, making it more difficult for species to thrive and reproduce.
Furthermore, biodiversity plays a critical role in the health of our environment. Healthy ecosystems provide services such as pollination, water purification, and carbon sequestration, all of which are essential to combating climate change and maintaining a balanced environment. By allowing this development to proceed, we risk losing these vital natural processes and jeopardizing the overall health of the local environment.
The environmental impact of this development cannot be underestimated. It is essential that we prioritize the protection of biodiversity and wildlife habitats in our planning decisions. We urge local authorities to reject this proposal unless it is accompanied by a detailed environmental impact assessment and a clear commitment to protecting and enhancing local wildlife and ecosystems.
Strong Opposition to Proposed Housing Development in South Warwickshire
We vehemently oppose the proposed housing development, which falls within South Warwickshire but would place an unfair and unsustainable burden on Solihull. The influx of new residents would significantly strain Solihull’s already overburdened infrastructure, including schools, public transport, healthcare, and refuse collection services. These essential services, which are already stretched, cannot bear the additional pressure from a development located outside Solihull’s boundaries.
Solihull Borough has already expressed its clear opposition to this development, recognizing the detrimental impact it would have on its resources and the quality of life for its residents. This development would result in an inequitable distribution of public services, with Solihull left to shoulder the burden of the new population’s needs.
We strongly urge the authorities to reconsider this proposal. Any development of this scale should not come at the expense of Solihull’s residents or services, and we stand firmly with Solihull in opposing this development.

No

ID sylw: 106544

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dee Greaves

Dear Sir/Madam,

I am writing to formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 within the SWLP. I am a local resident, having moved here 24 years ago to the Dorridge - Hockley Heath border. Plus I have friends living in Hockley Heath and the surrounding areas.

I am worried at the reckless scale of development, and flawed justification for SG24 as a strategic growth location.The proposal directly impacts me, my family, the local character and not only the poor Hockley Heath residents, but us in Dorridge, Knowle, Bentley Heath & the surrounding areas, who will have to cope with this massive influx of housing and people.

My main concern is in particular is the #178 and #596 site, which is land shared by both Hockley Heath and Dorridge residents. It is beautiful, and necessary green belt land which cannot, and should not be destroyed by these plans. #178 is 96% green belt land, yet you propose destroying the countryside by building 646 dwellings. This directly impacts the surrounding villages, and will merge Dorridge, Hockley Heath, Bentley Heath and Knowle into a town. This is not right and not fair to us who moved to this area due to the green belt area.

Having reviewed the various consultation documents and technical details, it is clear that there are other sites and settlements that perform considerably more attractive, than those selected at SG24. As such they have not been reviewed in the correct manner nor in fullness. Some of my concerns are listed below (not exhaustive);

1. Unjustifiable overdevelopment
The scale of the proposed allocation is excessive and disproportionate, completely out of step with the current community. It would erode our village identity, undermine local cohesion, and destroy the very attributes that make Hockley Heath a desirable place to live.

2. Irreversible destruction of green belt and limited review of sustainable alternatives
Each individual site that makes up SG24 requires inappropriate development on green belt land, designed to prevent urban sprawl and preserve open countryside. This proposal fails to demonstrate the 'exceptional circumstances' required for Green Belt release under the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), with a number of the tests being applied in a flawed manner. The claim that the canal can substitute as a defensible boundary, instead of the Green Belt is demonstrably flawed; several proposed sites are located beyond the canal, rendering this justification invalid.
The lack of a proper sustainability appraisal for alternative brownfield options demonstrates a missed opportunity and failure in due process. The SWLP has ignored viable alternatives, including the redevelopment of underutilized commercial spaces into residential in locations that already have a good level of infrastructure readily available.
SG24 within the SWLP should not be permitted to proceed without reviewing alternative sites / options in deeper detail, and taking a more comprehensive review of the plan to release green belt and its wide ranging impact linked to character, environment and biodiversity.

3. Detrimental Environmental and Biodiversity impact
SG24 would inflict harm on local biodiversity, directly contravening national sustainability policies. The targeted sites are rich in ecological diversity, supporting an array of wildlife and plant life, particularly along the canal’s vital green corridors. The SWLP fails to meet the legal obligation in the NPPF requiring ‘conservation and enhancement of the natural… environment’ and para 175 requiring councils to take ‘a strategic approach… plan for the enhancement of natural capital’
Key failures include; the destruction of key habitats with no credible mitigation plan, failure to use up to date environmental assessments (the 2013 Green Infrastructure is out of date and not fit for purpose), significant increases in air and noise pollution from additional traffic, which will harm local air quality and quality of life.

4. Absence of detailed Infrastructure capacity planning and funding
SG24 is being proposed with no credible infrastructure provision to support it. Hockley Heath is already stretched in terms of roads, schools, and healthcare facilities. The SWLP fails to provide any realistic solutions to mitigate the additional strain SG24 would impose.
Roads & Transport: Many affected roads, especially to the west of SG24, are single-lane with no pedestrian walking access. They rely on single lane canal bridges that are entirely unsuitable for increased traffic. Widening roads would require the expropriation of small pieces of land from a large number of private properties, which is unrealistic.
Education: Hockley Heath has a single, landlocked primary school already struggling with capacity and traffic congestion. The plan does not explain how school provision will be improved and there is no mention of how school catchment areas will work.
Healthcare: The increase in demand for doctors, dentists, hospitals could not be covered by Hockley Heath in its current form. The area is already beyond national guidance for travel times to hospitals and A&E services. Increased demand will further exacerbate waiting times and degrade local healthcare services.
Infrastructure Costs: The funding for essential infrastructure expansion is lacking detail, meaning these burdens will fall entirely on Solihull Council, which has already stated that Hockley Heath can only accommodate small-scale development.

5. Significant flooding and drainage risks ignored
Hockley Heath already experiences severe surface water flooding, even at times without heavy rainfall and particularly along the artery routes which will be required to serve SG24; School Road, Spring Lane, Cut Throat Lane and A3400 Stratford Road. The existing drainage infrastructure is insufficient to support additional development.
The SWLP has not updated flood risk assessments to reflect the current challenges, has not provided a clear drainage mitigation strategy (particularly for the SG24 developments, some of which are on waterlogged land), and has not considered the cumulative impact of adding impermeable surfaces to already high-risk flood zones.

6. Breach of sustainability principles
SG24 fails to meet the Sustainable Development Requirements outlined by South Warwickshire. The transport network is already under strain, local services are stretched, and the environmental consequences are severe. Proceeding with this allocation would be in direct opposition of the fundamental principles of sustainable development, making the entire plan legally and ethically indefensible.
Conclusion: SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

Yes

ID sylw: 106575

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: The Umberslade Estate

Asiant : Sworders

Proposed Strategic Growth Location SG24 Hockley Heath Group
We strongly agree with strategic growth location 24 which is ideally located between the main urban areas of Solihull, Warwick, Kenilworth and close proximity to Junctions 3A and 4 of the M42, with easy access to the West Midlands conurbation. The site lies within Priority Area 3 and would support Strategic Objective 1.
The location is also ideally located between the West Midlands and the Chiltern Railway Lines, as such supporting the 12 Strategic Objectives and the SWLP five overarching principles.
SG24 is supported by high levels of existing infrastructure as opposed to other proposed strategic growth locations which rely on new infrastructure investment.

No

ID sylw: 106581

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr ROBERT YARWOOD

I CAN NOT UNDERSTAND WHY SG23 AND SG24 HAVE BEEN SELECTED FOR DEVELOPMENT ITS LOCATION CAN NOT BE AN ISSUE WITH A OVER HEAD HV LINE AT ONE SIDE AND MAIN RAILWAY LINE IN THE MIDDLE. ALSO THE DISRUPTION CAUSED BY SITE TRAFFIC COMING TO THE SITE WOULD CAUSE EVEN FURTHER PROBLEMS ON THE A3400 WHICH COMES TO A STANDSTILL NOW IF THE M40 IS BLOCKED. THE EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT WOULD BE CATSASTROPHIC IT WOULD DISTROY BADGERS SETS BATS ROOSTING PERCHES AND ALL WILD LIFE I9N THE AREA. SO ONE MUST WHY US .

No

ID sylw: 106599

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Joanna Sturmey

I have lived in Hockley Heath all my life and it used to be a quiet rural place before all the building of new roads and housing estates since the 1980s. Noise pollution and traffic have become a concern. Wildlife habitat keeps being squeezed. There used to be orchards, streams and fields to the left of the school and so much wildlife, which is all gone thanks to the housing estate that was built.

Green Belt should be left alone. If councils and government continue to have no regard for the natural road there will be no fields left. If other issues were addressed there would be no need to build more houses. Once land is built upon, there is no going back. Rural space should stay rural for all to enjoy, including the wildlife who need this to survive. Extinction of all wildlife looks to be the case going forward unless England is left alone. Building needs to be stopped.

No

ID sylw: 106762

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Roger Squire

I accept that increased population leads to a housing need and that most people near proposed sites would object. However, sites selection seems to be based on high-level maps of access and public services, not any detailed knowledge of the sites.

Road safety (NPPF Paragraph 110)

The A3400 and Hockley Heath are part of a major access route carrying traffic from towns and villages around Redditch, Droitwich, Worcester, Evesham, Alcester and Studley to the main catchment area and access routes serving Birmingham and Solihull. The main route enters Hockley Heath via Spring Lane on the southern side of the Stratford canal. This is an old hump-shaped bridge which conceals views of traffic and the 30mph speed limit is often ignored. Vehicles travelling south along the A3400 travelling to the southwest have to turn right and give way to the vehicles travelling north, and traffic often backs up towards the top of the bridge. This prevents large commercial vehicles from travelling south and traffic grinds to a halt. There is a school accessed from the A3400 and during rush hour congestion stops the flow of traffic.

The B4101 also has issues approaching Hockley Heath. After crossing the bridge over the M40 it becomes narrow. This is challenging for large commercial and farm vehicles meeting oncoming traffic and dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists, particularly when the trees and bushes are overgrown. There are tight bends at near right angles with little view of oncoming traffic. The B4101 accesses the A3400 opposite the Memorial Hall and vehicles entering and exiting their car park cause issues. As SG24 is on both sides of the canal children cycling to school will be navigating the canal bridge and the B4101. This school is at capacity. Entry/exit from the Wharf car park adjoining the bridge also causes issues in busy times. Traffic at the junction between the A3400 and the Old Warwick Road is a problem as vehicles enter/exit the car park and access local shops. Traffic at the junction between the A3400 and Aylesbury Road backs up and there have been accidents. This is part of a cut-through to Earlswood and Redditch. When there are accidents on the M42 and M40 traffic is diverted along the A3400 and fed along Spring Lane.

Surface water drainage (NPPF Paragraph 170)

B4101 Spring Lane has surface water run off on all sides and particularly the wood's edge. The main A3400 is prone to flooding past the junction of Orchard Road and on to houses towards the M42 and Shirley. When it floods large commercial vehicles and SUV drivers send waves into neighbouring front gardens.

Other issues

There are no adequate provisions for schooling (NPPF Paragraph 20), it would change the village's character (Paragraph 5), it would be contrary to Solihull's local plan, the scale would be disproportionate (Paragraph 20), there are limited local amenities (Paragraph 98), and no sustainable employment opportunities (Paragraph 86).

If this proceeds I can envisage local residents banding together and seeking judicial review.

No

ID sylw: 106763

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Jones

I strongly object to your proposed plans to build a huge number of houses on what is valuable arable farmland surrounding the village of Hockley Heath. This land is designated Green Belt, and should remain so. Our village is a gem, and to increase the size of it to the monstrous proportions that you are proposing is disgraceful.

No

ID sylw: 106771

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Collette Higgins

I'm writing to respond to the consultation on the South Warwickshire Local Plan. I write with specific reference to the building proposals for SG24, near Hockley Heath, the village I have lived in for many years and know the aera well. I attended a residents' meeting to hear of the proposals. The meeting was attended by local Solihull Councilors who informed residents of their own plan to site fewer than 100 in Hockley Heath, because the village lacked sufficient amenities and infrastructure which are already overstretched. It was a real shame that South Warwickshire was not represented to answer questions, of which there were many. (NPPF Para 15)

This particular site, SG24, is not a viable option for the following reasons:

Adding a further 5000 homes would totally change the nature of the village. This would more than triple the size of the village. It could no longer be described as a rural village and eat up any buffer between Hockley Heath and Dorridge. The local primary and secondary schools are already full, with children having to attend schools further afield. There is no local Health Centre or Pharmacy. There is no Accident and Emergency Department at Solihull Hospital. Residents go to Heartlands which is already at capacity. Any additional housing of this scale would put an unsustainable burden on already stretched resources in this area. (NPPF Para 20.98)

Rush hour regularly brings traffic to a standstill on the main Stratford road through the village, and when the M42 is closed. It can take 15 minutes to exit Aylesbury Road, School Road and Old Warwick Road onto the Stratford Road at these times. There is one bus an hour to Birmingham, Solihull and Stratford, if it comes at all. Residents have little option but to have a car. What will 5000 extra cars add in terms of noise, safety, pollution and congestion? A shuddering thought. (NPPF Para 109,110)

The roads and fields around the village are prone to flooding regularly. Severn Trent Water's Plan to address the flooding issues is not due to be executed until 2031 at the earliest. An additional 5000 would put an enormous strain on already outdated and overstretched drains and wastes disposal. The scale of the proposal would greatly alter an already fragile water table. (NPPF Para 170)

5000 houses at SG24 would have a huge environmental impact, not only on the nature of the village and its community feel but on local wildlife too. There are deer, foxes and badgers living in the area together with a variety of birdlife including kites, buzzards and owls who rely on these fields and hedges for survival. (NPPF Para 8,15, 187)

Properties in villages carry a hefty premium on house prices because people choose to live in a rural location to enjoy open aspects, fresh air and wildlife. The proposed development will turn Hockley Heath from a quiet village into a sprawling town with no infrastructure or amenities to cope with the growth. The plan offers no community infrastructure, as far as i can see, with likely planning and Council Tax gains going to Warwickshire and all the burden will be borne locally by Solihull Council. This strikes me as most unfair. (NPPF Para 16, 20, 135,143)
16,
Pushing all sites forward in the SW plan seems a rather clumsy approach. A more refined and considered approach should be considered with due regard to the potential impact on local communities and neighbouring authorities.

I very much hope you will take these points on board when making huge decisions that have a lifelong impact on people's lives and their community.

No

ID sylw: 106814

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Helen Dowsett

The proposed allocation of SG24 is fundamentally unsound and contrary to national planning policy and legal requirements. It will result in significant harm to the environment, infrastructure, and the quality of life of residents in Hockley Heath.
I request that the Planning Authority undertake a thorough review of alternative sites and options, engaging in meaningful dialogue with Solihull Council and the local community.

Other

ID sylw: 106815

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Solihull MBC

Reasons to Oppose Hockley Heath Group (SG24) as a Strategic Growth Location in the South Warwickshire Local Plan.

1. Surface Water Drainage Issues
Current drainage problems in Hockley Heath highlight the unsuitability of large-scale development without substantial infrastructure improvements.

2. Lack of Secondary School Provision
Hockley Heath lacks a secondary school, and neighbouring schools are already at capacity, making it unsustainable to meet the educational needs of an additional 2,000 households.

3. Poor Public Transport Links
Hockley Heath is not close to a train station and has limited public transport, increasing reliance on cars and contravening the aim to promote sustainable travel.

4. Character of the Village
A large-scale development would fundamentally alter the character of Hockley Heath, a small village, undermining its distinctiveness and rural identity.

5. Maintaining a Green Buffer
Keeping a green buffer between Dorridge and Hockley Heath prevents urban sprawl and protects the individual identities of these settlements.

6. Contradiction with SMBC's Local Plan
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC) determined that only small-scale development is appropriate for Hockley Heath. Overriding this decision undermines local planning authority evidence and contradicts NPPF Paragraph 15, which encourages plans to be shaped by local needs.

7. Traffic Congestion and Road Safety
A development of this size will significantly increase traffic on the A3400 and surrounding roads, worsening congestion and raising safety concerns in a village already experiencing issues with speeding and heavy vehicles.

8. Biodiversity and Environmental Impact
The proposed site risks harming wildlife habitats in and around the village, failing to meet this requirement.

No

ID sylw: 106829

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Salman Farhanieh

SG24 should not proceed as currently proposed within the SWLP. A transparent, comprehensive reassessment must be undertaken involving genuine community consultation and collaboration with Solihull Council. Any future development in Hockley Heath must respect the village's limited infrastructure, protect its valued natural environment, and safeguard residents' quality of life and
safety.

No

ID sylw: 106837

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart Gibbons

We strongly oppose the adoption of SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. It is clear that this site would be unsound due to the unsustainable pressures it would place on the local community, local road network and local health and educational infrastructure. We are also concerned that SG24 would do immeasurable harm to the local environment and wildlife.
Consequently, SG24 should be removed from consideration from any further iterations of the local plan.
We hope that the planning authority will take these concerns into account and reassure us and other residents of Hockley Heath by removing SG24 from further consideration.

No

ID sylw: 106842

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Gillian Hall

Reasons why I as a long lived resident do not want this massive development to take place.

1. It completely changes the village into a town without the facilities that a normal town would expect.
e.g. a bigger school, doctors surgery, bus service.

2. The A34 would become extremely busy - congestion - what happens when the motorways - M42, M40, close as they are prone to do - where would the excess traffic go? This road - A34 - negatively floods and occasionally has to close.

3. Residents bought their homes in a small village - we do not want to wake up in a town!

Other

ID sylw: 106876

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Birmingham International Airport Ltd

It has been noted the SWLP’s potential strategic locations SG24 – Hockley Heath Group may be within this 15km radius of the airport. Therefore, when considering these, the Councils need to review the Airport’s Tall Building Policy and to determine how this may impact any proposed development within these areas. It is also requested that reference is made to aerodrome safeguarding and statutory consultation with the Airport within corresponding policy requirements and pre-application advice guidance, should this strategic location be carried forward within the Regulation 19 version of the SWLP.

No

ID sylw: 106908

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jacqueline Dingley

Surface Water Drainage Issues

Spring Lane.
This road has always had tendency to flood in heavy rain as the water does not easily drain into the fields.
General
There have been flooding issues on the Stratford Road (A3400) specifically on the section between The Barn and The Miller & Carter Steakhouse for many years.

Poor Public Transport Links
General
Hockley Heath does not have any rail links and only limited bus routes which means that many of the new residents will be car users.
Spring Lane
This road is already busy, as it is a cut through to Redditch, and so any additional residential development in this specific area will only cause more congestion.

Traffic Congestion and Road Safety

Spring Lane
This road is very busy at peak times, and it can occasionally take me several minutes to gain access to the road safely when it is busy. As many cars ignore the 30-mph speed limit there have been several near miss events I have witnessed in recent years. Over the years there have been a few serious accidents on this road which have required the air ambulance to land in the field opposite our house (this field is identified for potential housing in your proposal) to provide emergency care to the motorists involved.

Limited Local Amenities

Hockley Heath has very few local amenities such as shops and healthcare facilities.
Apart from a small Coop and tiny Tesco Express, which is useful for the odd item, there are no significant supermarkets or similar shops in the village.

We have NO NHS healthcare facilities in Hockley Heath. All residents must make use of Knowle and Dorridge to source doctors and pharmacy services. These services are already oversubscribed, and the large-scale development would make overwhelm the
current provision.

Other

ID sylw: 106930

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Historic England

Umberslade Baptist Church (GII*) and schoolrooms (GII*) sit in a very isolated position and the proposed parcel of land abutting it (located to the south of B40100 would be harmful if developed. The buildings are on the HAR Register & if development goes ahead in this area, then HE suggests that S106 financial contributions should be secured to assist with the conservation of these heritage assets.

No

ID sylw: 106943

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Gareth Dowsett

SG24, as currently proposed, is fundamentally unsustainable and unacceptable. It would inflict irreparable damage on Hockley Heath's character, environment, infrastructure, and the safety of its residents. The SWLP must conduct a thorough review of alternative sites and options and engage in meaningful dialogue with Solihull Council.

The SWLP has a legal and ethical obligation to pursue housing development in the most sustainable manner possible, and SG24, in its current form, demonstrably fails to meet this obligation.

No

ID sylw: 106957

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Deborah Lane

We strongly oppose the adoption of SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. It is clear that this site would be unsound due to the unsustainable pressures it would place on the local community, local road network and local health and educational infrastructure. We are also concerned that SG24 would do immeasurable harm to the local environment and wildlife.

Consequently, SG24 should be removed from consideration from any further iterations of the local plan.

We hope that the planning authority will take these concerns into account and reassure us and other residents of Hockley Heath by removing SG24 from further consideration.

No

ID sylw: 106958

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Lydia Rosado

We strongly oppose the adoption of SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. It is clear that this site would be unsound due to the unsustainable pressures it would place on the local community, local road network and local health and educational infrastructure. We are also concerned that SG24 would do immeasurable harm to the local environment and wildlife.
Consequently, SG24 should be removed from consideration from any further iterations of the local plan.
We hope that the planning authority will take these concerns into account and reassure us and other residents of Hockley Heath by removing SG24 from further consideration.

No

ID sylw: 106959

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Oskar Zaremba

We strongly oppose the adoption of SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. It is clear that this site would be unsound due to the unsustainable pressures it would place on the local community, local road network and local health and educational infrastructure. We are also concerned that SG24 would do immeasurable harm to the local environment and wildlife.
Consequently, SG24 should be removed from consideration from any further iterations of the local plan.
We hope that the planning authority will take these concerns into account and reassure us and other residents of Hockley Heath by removing SG24 from further consideration.

No

ID sylw: 107029

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Joseph Vale

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, socio-economic, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.