No

ID sylw: 106040

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sophie Jutkiewicz

Conclusion: SG24 is an Unsuitable Strategic Growth Location
The proposed inclusion of SG24 in the SWLP is fundamentally unsound and should not proceed in its current form. While Hockley Heath is capable of accommodating modest, well-planned growth, SG24 represents an unsustainable, disproportionate, and poorly justified allocation that:
• Contravenes the Solihull Local Plan and lacks coordinated cross-boundary planning.
• Fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release.
• Ignores infrastructure capacity constraints and lacks a deliverable funding strategy.
• Would result in significant environmental harm with no adequate mitigation measures.
• Fails to align with sustainability principles and climate commitments.
The SWLP has a legal and ethical duty to allocate development in the most sustainable locations. SG24 does not meet this requirement and must be reconsidered in favour of better-performing, more suitable sites. I urge Warwick District and Stratford-on-Avon District Councils to reject this allocation and conduct a more rigorous, evidence-based site selection process that prioritises genuine sustainability.

No

ID sylw: 106043

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew Spedding

Hockley Heath is a small village with minimal infrastructure. It has no GP practice, pharmacy or post office and one small one-form entry primary school which feeds the already over-subscribed Tudor Grange secondary school.
[Redacted] Children of Hockley Heath have to travel to school by designated school buses as their school is too far to reach on foot and there are poor public transport services within the village.
Hockley Heath is already burdened by traffic through the village caused by congestion on both the M40 and M42 motorway. Traffic, including HGVs use the village to avoid this congestion and this puts the children travelling to and from their schools at further risk. The pollution level is also of increasing concern for what should be a semi-rural area.
Your plans for SG24 will destroy an area of natural beauty, wildlife habitats such as Deer, Badgers, Foxes, Owls to mention a few will be irradicated without a thought. You will destroy one of the most popular villages in the west midlands and this will also have a detrimental effect on the house prices.
The views of the residents of this village must be listened to and all views taken into account , the proposal of the development of 7000 new houses is simply obsurd and ask that you ensure my opposition to the plan is lodged.

No

ID sylw: 106044

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julie Waters

Development of the suggested scale would be totally out of character for Hockley Heath, described in the Solihull Local Plan Review as having the characteristics of a semi-rural village, with inter and post-war ribbon development along the Stratford Road and noting the Stratford-upon-Avon canal providing a linear heritage asset with a village wharf. There are currently around 1900 residents in Hockley Heath and around 500 households. The suggested proposals are to add 2,875 houses with 6 parcels across 133.51 hectares. This is more than five times the size of the existing village.
Development of the suggested scale is therefore not sustainable and would place a significant and unacceptable demand on local services. Your Sustainability Appraisal (para 5.6.1) acknowledges the potential impact to Grade II Listed Buildings. Parcel HOH1 is adjacent to properties 2301 and 2303 Stratford Road and parcels HOH3 and HOH4 are adjacent to St Thomas’s Church, Nuthurst Lane. The proposals are likely to cause significant harm to the setting of these designated heritage assets.
The Sustainability Appraisal also places Hockley Heath within the bottom five in terms of its negative scores for access to A&E services, GP surgeries and leisure facilities. It views the primary school being within 800m of the parcels as a positive impact but this school has 215 pupils on the school roll, with children from ages 2 to 11. It is a village school and is not going to be able to meet the needs of the additional residents. In terms of mitigation in respect of the health impacts, your appraisal notes that the new infrastructure would require a significant level of investment in health services and leisure facilities which (as noted in the appraisal) is likely to be difficult to achieve. These local services are already under considerable pressure and placing further demands on them would be totally unfair and unacceptable.
The parcels are all in the Green Belt and parcels 1 and 3 are identified as having a moderate contribution. However, it could be argued that some parcels have a strong contribution, notably HOH1 which would bring Hockley Heath significantly closer to Dorridge.
Whilst the suggested allocations are not consistent with the Green Belt review, having regard for the linear form of the village, limited development to parcel HOH6 could retain that form whilst providing a more modest contribution to housing.

Any new housing should be proportionate in scale to the existing settlements for the reasons set out above.
To reiterate
Development of the suggested scale would be totally out of character for a semi-rural village like Hockley Heath.
There are currently around 1900 residents in Hockley Heath and around 500 households. The suggested proposals are to add 2,875 houses with 6 parcels across 133.51 hectares. This is more than five times the size of the existing village which is entirely disproportionate.
Development of the suggested scale is therefore not sustainable and would place a significant and unacceptable demand on local services. Your Sustainability Appraisal (para 5.6.1) acknowledges the potential impact to Grade II Listed Buildings. Parcel HOH1 is adjacent to properties 2301 and 2303 Stratford Road and parcels HOH3 and HOH4 are adjacent to St Thomas’s Church, Nuthurst Lane. The proposals are likely to cause significant harm to the setting of these designated heritage assets.
The Sustainability Appraisal also places Hockley Heath within the bottom five in terms of its negative scores for access to A&E services, GP surgeries and leisure facilities. It views the primary school being within 800m of the parcels as a positive impact but this school has 215 pupils on the school roll, with children from ages 2 to 11. It is a village school and is not going to be able to meet the needs of the additional residents. In terms of mitigation in respect of the health impacts, your appraisal notes that the new infrastructure would require a significant level of investment in health services and leisure facilities which (as noted in the appraisal) is likely to be difficult to achieve. These local services are already under considerable pressure and placing further demands on them would be totally unfair and unacceptable.
The parcels are all in the Green Belt and parcels 1 and 3 are identified as having a moderate contribution. However, it could be argued that some parcels have a strong contribution, notably HOH1 which would bring Hockley Heath significantly closer to Dorridge.
Whilst the suggested allocations are not consistent with the Green Belt review, having regard for the linear form of the village, limited development to parcel HOH6 could retain that form whilst providing a more modest contribution to housing.

Your consultation states that, for the Greater Birmingham and Black Country HMA, there is evidence of a significant shortfall between housing requirements and land supply. However, the overall scale of the shortfall has not been collectively quantified beyond 2031 since the GBBCHMA Strategic Growth Study (2018). A study refresh is required to re-evaluate the housing shortfall considering more recent evidence and policy. Council officers meet regularly with counterparts from other Councils and with various stakeholders in both the Coventry & Warwickshire and Greater Birmingham & Black Country Housing Market Area to discuss cross boundary issues. Until there is greater certainty regarding the quantum of unmet needs from neighbouring housing market areas, it is premature to allocate reserve housing sites.
Your consultation is not clear on this position. Whilst you do not specifically say that site SG24 is identified to meet the needs of housing in Birmingham under the duty to cooperate, the URL on the interactive map takes the user directly to this section of the consultation which suggests this may be a consideration. Under the new NPPF, the housing figures for Birmingham have reduced from 7,174 to 4,448. Whilst Solihull was previously showing the provision of 2,000 houses to meet the needs of Birmingham under the duty to co-operate, there is no evidence to suggest that will now be the case, especially given the reduced number for Birmingham.
It is also clear from your consultation that the overall scale of any shortfall has not been collectively quantified beyond 2031 since the GBBCHMA Strategic Growth Study (2018). You also indicate that a study refresh is required to re-evaluate the housing shortfall considering more recent evidence and policy. Until there is a greater certainty regarding the quantum of unmet needs from neighbouring housing market areas it is premature to allocate reserve housing sites.

No

ID sylw: 106051

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ann Boulton

I am writing to object to the proposed development around the village of Hockley Heath. From what I can see on the plans the developments would swamp the village without bringing any advantage to the existing residents. The purchasers of the new houses would pay their council tax to Warwickshire but use many of the facilities provided to the village by Solihull. The school in Hockley Heath is already full and their is no room for expansion without losing playground or playing field space. It is already difficult to get a GP appointment at the Dorridge surgery as there is no surgery or pharmacy in Hockley Heath. It appears that we will lose a large area of farmland, have all the noise, dirt and inconvenience of these large developments and have no gain.

I would not be opposed to to new housing if it would mean any additional facilities for the village but this is not the case.

No

ID sylw: 106053

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Carole Ebbutt

Firstly I’d like to say that it was abominable that there were no representatives from Warwick Council at the meeting in Hockley Heath last Thursday. Does this mean that they are already recognising the flaws in their plans and were not willing to make their case?
The idea of increasing the size of Hockley Heath by 600% is ludicrous and to add insult to injury it is on the borders of Solihull, which means that they are expecting Solihull tax payers to bear the brunt of the cost of medical and educational expenses of these new residents.
The education system in this area would collapse as there are not enough schools, at any age level, for the population at the moment.
The water plain is high as it is, in this area, and frequently floods the fields. Would large housing estates push this water elsewhere creating even worse floods?
The area already lacks medical services with no A & E at Solihull and overloaded GPs. How will it cope with at least 10,000 more patients?
How will it cope with the mental health of all these people, new and old residents, that will definitely suffer mental problems from all the above.

No

ID sylw: 106055

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: James Hull

I am just writing a quick email to oppose the proposed development in our village. We have been residents in Hockley Heath for 15 years and have loved it. We feel the village is already struggling with traffic issues and the school has already become busier with the new development in Blythe Valley so goodness knows how it will cope with the new 4000 plus new homes which are being proposed.

We understand the need for growth but the sheer size of this development is surely out of the question. I hope you will consider this carefully and not just give the go ahead to meet targets as this is our village and we will have to live with this decision for the rest of our lives. I would hate for the village to become over run as they just aren’t the amenities to cover this amount of houses.

No

ID sylw: 106056

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mitesh Solanki

I would like to oppose and express my concerns over SG24 and the plan introduce a vast number of new houses to Hockley Heath.

List of reasons for my disapproval

1) Increase in traffic.
2) Increase in noise and pollution.
3) With more cars become more parking issues.
4) Taking away more Greenland and impact on Nature Conservation.
5) Big strain on local services such doctors, dentists, pharmacies. These are already limited.
6) Where will all the extra children go for schools both primary and secondary. It is not good enough just to introduce a new primary school, there must be consideration for secondary school places.
7) The drainage is already poor in the local area, with more houses, it puts more strain on drainage and increases flooding.
8) Which council will be paying for the extra services needed, like bin collections and road repairs?

No

ID sylw: 106058

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Leah Elliot

I have lived in this area all my life, attending the [redacted] school and [redacted] School in Solihull. From my experience, I can attest that our schools are already struggling to accommodate the increasing number of pupils. This development would significantly impact existing pupils and their education.

During my university years, I had to transfer my GP services to a local practice near my university. After completing my degree, I found it impossible to transfer back to my previous GP services due to their capacity issues and had to relocate to [redacted] GP services. This already highlights the strain on our existing local healthcare services.

I regularly use the local bus and rail services, which are often poor and frequently cancelled. A significant increase in passenger numbers would overwhelm our already struggling transport network.

I have always enjoyed living in Hockley Heath village. I cherish walking my dog in the surrounding countryside and appreciating the wildlife in the fields and public footpaths. This development would be a huge detriment to our local area.

I sincerely wish for Hockley Heath to remain a village and urge you to reconsider the proposed development.

No

ID sylw: 106064

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Orla Kennelley

SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106065

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Thomas Kennelly

SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106077

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr GREG MCDOUGALL

Infrastructure - Hockley Heath is historically poorly served by infrastructure. The village has no rail provision (the closest station is Dorridge, with its own parking issues). There is limited bus provision (513 - one a Mon-Fri, A7 - one per hour, X20 hourly weekdays). Greenbelt development requires significant affordable housing provision, and there is little or no provision for public access to economical travel. Car-focussed development will add to traffic issues, and I doubt a development surrounding such a poorly served area would be compatible with your net zero aspirations.
Primary & Secondary Care - Hockley Heath has no GP or pharmacy and the nearest GP practices are Dorridge (2.4 miles), Lapworth (2.7 miles) and Tanworth in Arden (3.2 miles). There is one NHS dental practice in Hockley Heath which serves the local community, but already runs 4 clinics and is very busy. The nearest Pharmacies are Dorridge (2.3 miles) or Cheswick Green (2.8 miles). There is no emergency department at Solihull Hospital and the nearest Emergency Departments are Warwick Hospital (13 miles) or Heartlands Hospital (12 miles). Warwick Hospital is a small district general hospital with circa 380 beds, this would not support such an increase in population locally.
Education - I have serious concerns regarding school capacity, and the impact of SG24. There is only one Primary School in Hockley Heath and the nearest High School is Arden Academy, Knowle (3.2 miles) for 11–18-year-olds and Tudor Grange Academy, Solihull (5.2 miles) for 11–18-year-olds

No

ID sylw: 106084

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106085

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Sam Ostler

SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106088

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Annabelle Pace-Burr

Reference: Objection to Hockley Heath SG24

We have been residents of Hockley Heath for eight years and I am extremely concerned about the scale of the development being proposed and the flawed reasoning behind selecting SG24 as a strategic growth location.

1. Green Belt and Environmental Impact
The proposed site encroaches on the Green Belt, with no exceptional circumstances to justify its release. Developing this land would cause irreversible environmental damage, including the loss of vital green space and increased flood risks due to the removal of natural drainage areas.

2. Strain on Infrastructure and Local Services
Hockley Heath does not have the necessary infrastructure to accommodate a development of this scale. Secondary schools in the surrounding area are already oversubscribed, and there is no clear plan to expand capacity. New residents would likely have to travel long distances to secure school places. The village has limited shops/leisure facilities and community services. A development of this size would place unsustainable pressure on existing services, negatively impacting both new and current residents.

3. Traffic Congestion and Road Safety
The A3400 and surrounding roads are already heavily congested, particularly when there are issues on the M40 and M42. This development would significantly increase traffic levels, worsening congestion and raising serious road safety concerns. Additionally, many of the affected roads (including School Road, Spring Lane, Cut Throat Lane) are narrow and unsuitable for higher traffic volumes. Road widening would require compulsory purchase of private land, which has not been properly planned for or addressed.

4. Flooding and Drainage Risks
Hockley Heath already experiences severe surface water flooding, particularly along key routes such as A3400, School Road and Spring Lane. The existing drainage system is inadequate, and SG24 would only worsen the problem by increasing impermeable surfaces and placing additional pressure on already strained infrastructure.

5. Village Identity and Strategic Planning Conflicts
Hockley Heath is a small rural village with a distinct character. Large-scale development would permanently alter the identity of Hockley Heath. Additionally, the failure to coordinate with Solihull Council is a major concern. Whilst this plan falls under South Warwickshire’s jurisdiction, it is Solihull’s infrastructure (schools, healthcare services, and transport networks) that would bear the burden. Solihull Council has already expressed opposition to this development, highlighting the financial and logistical strain it would place on its resources.

6. Lack of Economic Justification
Hockley Heath is not a major employment hub, meaning most new residents would need to commute to work. This contradicts national sustainability objectives by increasing car dependency and contributing to higher carbon emissions. The SWLP has also failed to provide evidence that this development would deliver meaningful local economic benefits. The justification for choosing SG24 over more suitable alternatives appears flawed and lacks transparency.

Conclusion
Hockley Heath is entirely inappropriate for large scale development. The South Warwickshire Local Plan must prioritise sustainable and well planned growth, and SG24 fails to meet these standards. This proposal would cause irreversible damage to the village’s character, environment and infrastructure while contradicting both national and local planning policies.

I urge the council to remove SG24 from the South Warwickshire Local Plan and instead focus on more suitable, sustainable locations for housing development.

No

ID sylw: 106089

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rhyan Pace-Burr

Below are my main reasons for opposing this proposal:

1. Impact on village identity and lack of coordination with Solihull Council
Hockley Heath is a small rural village with a distinct character, and large scale development would fundamentally alter its identity. While this plan falls under South Warwickshire’s jurisdiction, it is Solihull’s infrastructure (including schools, healthcare, and transport) that would bear much of the burden. Solihull Council has already expressed opposition to this proposal, highlighting the financial and logistical strain it would place on its resources.

2. Strain on infrastructure and local services
Hockley Heath does not have the infrastructure to support such large scale development with our local Secondary schools already oversubscribed, with no clear expansion plans. The village also has limitations with existing shops and healthcare/leisure services. A development of this size would overwhelm these existing services, reducing the quality of life for both current and future residents.

3. Traffic congestion and road safety
The A3400 and surrounding roads already experience high congestion. Additional housing would dramatically increase traffic, worsening congestion and raising safety concerns. Roads such as School Road and Spring Lane are too narrow to support higher traffic volumes, and any necessary widening could require compulsory purchase of private land, which has not been properly addressed.

4. Flooding and drainage risks
Hockley Heath already suffers from severe surface water flooding, particularly along the A3400, School Road and Spring Lane. The existing drainage infrastructure is inadequate, and increasing impermeable surfaces through development would only worsen the problem, putting homes and roads at greater risk.

5. Green Belt and environmental impact
The proposed site encroaches on protected Green Belt land, and there are no exceptional circumstances to justify why this should be destroyed. Developing this area would lead to the permanent loss of valuable green space and biodiversity, while also increasing flood risks due to the removal of natural drainage.

Hockley Heath is completely unsuitable for large scale development. SG24 fails to meet the criteria of sustainable and well planned growth. This proposal would cause lasting harm to the village’s character, environment, and infrastructure while conflicting with both national and local planning policies.

I strongly urge the council to exclude SG24 from the South Warwickshire Local Plan and focus on more appropriate locations that can support future housing growth without placing undue strain on infrastructure/services and the environment.

No

ID sylw: 106090

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Harry Owen

Hockley Heath is a distinct rural village with a strong sense of community. Large-scale developments such as this threaten to erode its unique character, turning it into yet another overdeveloped suburban sprawl. I had understood that the National Planning Policy Framework places great emphasis on preserving existing settlements, yet this proposal appears to disregard that principle entirely.

Healthcare services in the area are already under considerable strain. GP surgeries, hospitals, and emergency services are stretched to their limits, with long waiting times and inadequate resources. The proposal fails to outline how the additional demand for healthcare will be addressed, leaving both current and future residents without sufficient support.

The local schools are already over-subscribed, and there are no clear plans in place to expand educational facilities to accommodate the influx of families this development would bring. Without significant investment in education, local children will be forced to travel further afield, increasing transport demand and disrupting family life.

The local road network is already at full capacity, particularly along the A34, which suffers severe congestion during motorway diversions. The additional traffic generated by this development would lead to gridlock, reduced road safety, and increased air pollution. There is no indication that adequate upgrades or mitigation measures will be in place before construction begins, further exacerbating existing problems.

Hockley Heath currently suffers from limited public transport links. The proposal does not include any commitment to improving bus or rail services, leaving future residents reliant on private vehicles. Without reliable public transport, congestion will increase, negatively affecting both existing and new residents.

The Green Belt was established to prevent unchecked urban expansion and promote responsible planning. Surely there are other non-Green Belt sites within South Warwickshire that can accommodate new housing developments without sacrificing protected land. Alternatives must be thoroughly explored before resorting to the destruction of Green Belt land.

The loss of Green Belt land undermines the principles of sustainable development and climate resilience. Wildlife habitats will be irreparably harmed, leading to a loss of biodiversity. The removal of natural drainage systems will increase the risk of flooding, an issue that already affects parts of Hockley Heath. Any further deterioration would represent a failure in responsible planning.

There seems to be no firm commitment to ensuring that essential infrastructure improvements will be delivered before construction starts. Without a guaranteed plan to enhance transport, healthcare, and education, this development is neither viable nor responsible and will have long-term negative consequences.

It seems that Warwickshire would be placing the burdens of overpopulation, congestion, and strained resources on Hockley Heath and Solihull, with no clear benefits for the local community, making this an unfair and irresponsible proposal.

For these reasons, I strongly urge the rejection of the South Warwickshire Local Plan SG24. The proposal is unsustainable, detrimental to local infrastructure, and will permanently damage the character of Hockley Heath. Development must be approached in a way that prioritises sustainable growth, preserves Green Belt land, and ensures that the necessary infrastructure is in place before any construction begins.

No

ID sylw: 106091

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Neil Padget

The infrastructure around the village struggles to support what we already have in terms of residents. We do not have a GP practice, there is no other medical resources. Other GP practices in local villages cannot cope now let alone with an significant increase in population.
There is only a small primary school that could not cope with the numbers of children that would need schooling.
There is no access to a secondary school without ‘laid on’ transport or parents using their motor vehicles. The journey to Tudor Grange or other similar schools in the Solihull area is difficult generally using the country lanes and there is no way there is sufficient parking or access at the schools to cope with the influx of children.
Children already have to get up so early in the are to get to school, that this is damaging for their health and wellbeing
The proposed developments appear to be in South Warwickshire, but the burden of the population for schooling, transport, health and refuse collection in particular would fall to Solihull MBC who have already opposed it. They are fully aware that they could not provide the services necessary to support this level of development.
There are no municipal leisure facilities for miles
The small road network could not cope. If up to 4000 new homes were built this is likely to see the private car usage go up by approximately 8000
they are all narrow B roads, other than the A3400 which would be extremely dangerous
Aylesbury Rd, B4101 has two significant almost 90° bends and an S bend, where there is already invisibility onto the road from properties.
The increase in pollution would be significant
people would have no choice but to use private vehicles because there is ineffective private transport and in particular buses.
The public transfer links do not support the existing population, and the use of buses would choke up the whole village, increase pollution and be extremely dangerous for pedestrians and cyclists
The A3400 Stratford Road already has 30 mile an hour average speed check traffic calming because it is so dangerous
the A3400 Stratford Rd already floods on a regular basis
to use public transport into the city of Birmingham, people would have to use Dorridge railway station which can only be accessed from Hockley Heath by road and there is not sufficient parking to cope. Dorridge in itself is a small village that is under 20 mile an hour traffic calming and it would be highly dangerous to have the extra private car traffic.
There is no train access from Hockley Heath
the electricity supply is often disrupted for residents now and could not cope with the additional requirements
the land is green belt and the whole point of that is that it only should be built upon in exceptional circumstances
any small disruption on the M40/M42 creates significant traffic increase as people use the A34 as a ‘cut through’, increasing pollution risk of accident, danger to pedestrian.
The wildlife would be affected, as a resident, I see foxes, badgers, Deer, Hedgehogs regularly in the fields where the planned development is, therefore significantly reducing their habitat
around the Aylesbury Road area there is very significant numbers of bird species, and whose restriction in numbers would be devastating. I regularly see buzzards, peregrines and other hawks, a full range of Tits, such as BlueTits, ColeTits, Long tailed Tits, Great tits along with, Sparrows, Thrush, Robin, blackbird, greater Spotted and green wood peckers, Nuthatch, green finch, Green finch, gold finch, bull finch, chaffinch, Siskin. The area is a bird motorway.
The development would be harmful for all this wildlife and impact on biodiversity.
The whole area is a fine area for countryside walking helping the well-being and in particular the mental health of the local residents
It would be a disaster to start to close the gap between Dorridge and Hockley Heath villages
The construction traffic could not be restricted from using B roads with the hazard and disruption significant.
There would be a reduction in countryside views which benefit us all.
The ‘Millenium Way’ would be affected negatively as the whole point of it was to travers through the countryside

No

ID sylw: 106092

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Georgia Dempsey

SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106099

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ruth Polson

1. Surface Water Drainage Issues
o NPPF Paragraph 170 requires developments to avoid areas at highest risk of flooding and ensure they do not exacerbate surface water issues. Current
drainage problems in Hockley Heath highlight the unsuitability of large-scale development without substantial infrastructure improvements.

2. Lack of Secondary School Provision
NPPF Paragraph 20 emphasises the need for adequate education infrastructure to support development. Hockley Heath lacks a secondary school, and neighbouring schools are already at capacity, making it unsustainable to meet the educational needs of an additional 2,000 households.

3. Poor Public Transport Links
o NPPF Paragraph 109 encourages development in areas with sustainable transport links. Hockley Heath is not close to a train station and has limited public transport, increasing reliance on cars and contravening the aim to
promote sustainable travel.

4. Character of the Village

o NPPF Paragraph 135 highlights that developments should reflect local character and enhance the area. A large-scale development would fundamentally alter the character of Hockley Heath, a small village, undermining
its distinctiveness and rural identity.

5. Maintaining a Green Buffer
o NPPF Paragraph 143 mentions the importance of strategic policies that help manage patterns of development while safeguarding green spaces. Keeping a
green buffer between Dorridge and Hockley Heath prevents urban sprawl and protects the individual identities of these settlements.

6. Contradiction with SMBC’s Local Plan
o Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council (SMBC) determined that only small-scale development is appropriate for Hockley Heath. Overriding this decision undermines local planning authority evidence and contradicts NPPF Paragraph 15, which encourages plans to be shaped by local needs.

7. Traffic Congestion and Road Safety
o NPPF Paragraph 110 states that developments should ensure safe and suitable access for all users. A development of this size will significantly increase traffic
on the A3400 and surrounding roads, worsening congestion and raising safety concerns in a village already experiencing issues with speeding and heavy vehicles.

8. Biodiversity and Environmental Impact
o NPPF Paragraph 8 requires developments to minimise impacts on biodiversity and provide net gains where possible. The proposed site risks harming wildlife
habitats in and around the village, failing to meet this requirement.

9. Lack of Economic Justification
o NPPF Paragraph 86 supports development that contributes to local economic growth. Hockley Heath is not a major employment centre, meaning most new
residents would commute, adding strain to transport infrastructure and working against sustainable development goals.

10. Community Opposition and Consultation
NPPF Paragraph 16 advocates for effective consultation and local community involvement. Highlighting the strong local opposition to the proposals could influence decision-makers, especially at this consultation stage.

11. Inappropriate Scale of Development
• NPPF Paragraph 20 states that strategic policies should set out an appropriate scale, pattern, and form of development. Building over 2,000 homes in Hockley Heath, a small village, is disproportionate to its current size and infrastructure, putting undue strain on
local services and facilities.

12. Limited Local Amenities
• Hockley Heath currently has very few local amenities, such as shops, healthcare facilities, or leisure services, to support a significant population increase. NPPF
Paragraph 98 stresses the importance of ensuring communities have access to facilities to promote health and well-being.

13. Lack of Sustainable Employment Opportunities
• The village does not have enough local employment opportunities to sustain a large residential development. NPPF Paragraph 86 encourages developments in rural areas to support sustainable economic growth, which is not evident in the SG24 proposal.

14. Landscape Sensitivity
• Hockley Heath lies within a semi-rural area with a high-quality landscape that contributes to its character. NPPF Paragraph 187 gives special consideration to
landscapes that play an important role in defining the identity of an area, even outside designated protected zones.

15. Heritage and Conservation
• The area around Hockley Heath has historic buildings and conservation areas that could be impacted by large-scale development. NPPF Paragraph 202 requires the
consideration of heritage assets and their setting, ensuring they are preserved for future

No

ID sylw: 106103

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John Reynolds

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 106104

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Katie Trethewey

I write with dismay and concern regarding the proposals for 5000 additional homes to be built in Hockley Heath, area SG24.

My main concern is with drainage. I have been homeowner of the above address for only 18 months, but in that short time have seen the main Stratford Road (A3400) in Hockley Heath, along with our service road, flood at least 4 times in heavy rain. This has caused the drainage system to overload, backflow, and we have subsequently had raw sewage flood into our patio and garden each time. This is under review by Severn Trent, but no solution has yet been reached. I am aware that other neighbours have also had this issue. This is a clearly unacceptable health risk, which will only be made worse if more homes are constructed in the area, putting pressure on an already overloaded sewerage/drainage system that cannot cope. Even without the sewage issue, the frequent flooding itself is bad enough. Our house, and several of our neighbours' houses, have had to have flood protection measures installed as part of a scheme funded by Solihull MBC. The frequency of extreme weather events will increase with climate change - we have already seen that - and this will also impact on the issue.

I am additionally concerned about the impact on local services. There is not the infrastructure in place in terms of things like health, education, and transport, to sustain this size of development. Traffic congestion on the A34 will also become worse, which is already a problem, particularly during rush hours or when there are problems on the M40/M42.

Given that Solihull MBC have opposed the development and have stated on their Local Plan that only small-scale development is appropriate for Hockley Heath, and given that they will bear the burden of the new population in terms of schools, transport, health, and other services, it is grossly unfair and inappropriate for South Warwickshire Council to proceed with these plans, and it will surely lead to funding disputes in the future.

No

ID sylw: 106105

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Philip Vollans

Hockley Heath village already has surface water drainage issues and the Stratford Road floods regularly during heavy rain. The proposed development areas also flood and there are limited options for proper drainage and further development would worsen this problem. The relevant consideration is that effecting the flood areas by a large scale development would also damage the biodiversity and natural soak aways presently in existence. Houses that back onto the land already carry a large amount of the run-off from the land, which would be worsened by the development and threaten the homes already part of Hockley Heath.

- All of the earmarked land is on Green Belt, which is only to be built on in exceptional circumstances. The exceptional threshold has not been reached. The Government explicitly focussed in its manifesto about developing brown field sites. This does not align with election promises or the overriding obligation to protect Green Belt land. There are a number of brownfield sites which can be considered across Warwickshire which have not even been considered.

- The land identified for development has not taken into consideration that these are not only nesting sites for owls including, Barn Owls but also that they are ground where deer freely roam. The restriction of habitat not only would disrupt the natural hunting grounds of Barn Owls but also restrict the deer in their territory forcing them to cross roads more regularly causing a direct conflict between vehicles and wildlife. The development would harm wildlife and impact on biodiversity. There have been multiple car accidents with deer in Hockley Heath recently, this is only likely to increase with increased traffic and removes vast swathes of their remaining habitat. The loss of green space would also impact the wellbeing of existing residents, by removing the green spaces that are regularly used by local residents.

- There are implied easements across the land identified which has been utilised in excess of 21 years in relation to dog walkers, local schools, scouting associations and natural foragers. Were the development to proceed then it is more likely than not Warwickshire would have to address each of these implied easements in due course. The council is hereby given formal notice of the implied easement of the land as otherwise referred to and as such the council is formally invited to identify to whom interested parties should make themselves known to.

-Solihull MBC already had a local plan that states only a small-scale development is appropriate for Hockley Heath. The proposed plan, even if one section of the proposed development, would dwarf Hockley Heath and double the size of its current development, which the local area does not have the infrastructure to deal with. Hockley heath has only a few shops and falls under the control of Solihull Borough Council. In placing the development literally on the border of the council’s control, they would require Solihull Borough Council to have the entirety of the responsibility of any infrastructure.

- There are already issues with traffic on the A34 and Aylesbury Road. The development would significantly increase traffic. All proposed developments would need to access the A34, significantly increasing the accident risk. Sometimes it is impossible to get onto the A34 from the Aylesbury Road or Old Warwick Road. There is simply no infrastructure available that would alleviate this.

- The proposed development would fundamentally alter the character of Hockley Heath and undermine its distinctiveness and rural identity. The community is an integral part of why we moved here and this would remove a distinctive part of the benefit of living in this part of the world.

- The proposed development would put more pressure on the already stretched infrastructure, including schools and transport, particularly given the size of the development. The burden of the new population for schooling, transport, health, refuse collection would fall to Solihull, who have already opposed it. It is likely to ongoing disputes between the councils over future funding. This cannot be an efficient way of working cross counsel. Furthermore, it would fall under the responsibility of Warwick Hospital. Warwick Hospital is struggling to find enough beds available even on weekdays, with extensive waiting hours and the overwhelming nature of patients.

No

ID sylw: 106107

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Steven Welch

I accept the need for sustainable and affordable housing development locally.
The extent of planned changes would change significantly the nature of Hockley Heath as a place to live
Some of the earmarked areas, north of Aylesbury Road and south of Spring Lane ar areas which we currently use for walking, and some of the areas between School Road and Soring Lane are currently agricultural
Are there sufficient infrastructure plans in place to support the development? The Stratford Road and surrounding areas are frequently flooded during common moderate rainfall, and this will worsen without improved drainage if demand is increased
I am concerned that the extent of the planned housing would overwhelm the available infrastructure and change the fundamental nature of the location

No

ID sylw: 106111

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Fran Burton

Development would change the character of our rural village.
The number of homes planned (5000) would put considerable pressure on already stretched medical services i.e. Doctors, Pharmacies and Hospitals.
Our transport is limited to an hourly bus to both Solihull and Stratford.
Where will young children go to school, as Hockley Heath has limited places. My children were able to transfer to the same senior school in Solihull with their friends from the Infant school in Hockley Heath. If all these homes were built children would have to be scattered to numerous junior/senior schools in the area and not have the benefit of, not only travelling with their friends but spending time at lessons, sports etc with them. The transport of children to different schools would make sharing transport difficult. Surely the children being together is better for their mental health and wellbeing.
The recent winter has caused flooding in the village which has included both surface and foul water problems.
Having lived in Hockley Heath for 50 years it is never a surprise that our water is off whilst repairs are being made. This is a fairly regular occurrence. Also electricity is affected so that I have lanterns situated in several places both up and downstairs to cover these eventualities. Obviously another 5000 houses will put a tremendous strain on our infrastructure.
Rural village like Hockley Heath is where most of us moved to for the benefits of countryside, wildlife, fresh air, less traffic and the inevitable fuel emissions.

No

ID sylw: 106131

Derbyniwyd: 21/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stephen Elliot

I am writing to formally express my objection to the proposed building development SG24 around Hockley Heath. As a concerned resident, I believe that this development poses significant challenges and risks to our community, which I would like to outline below:

1. Traffic and Road Safety: The proposed development will lead to a substantial increase in traffic volume, exacerbating existing congestion issues. The access to main roads through the village is already limited and unsafe, and the influx of vehicles will only heighten the risk of accidents and endanger pedestrians.
2. Environmental Concerns: The development threatens to destroy ancient woodland, hedgerows, and trees, which are vital habitats for local wildlife, including birds, deer, and bats. The loss of these natural areas will have a detrimental impact on biodiversity and the environment.
3. Air Quality and Emissions: With the anticipated rise in traffic, there will be a corresponding increase in car emissions, leading to dangerous levels of air pollution that could adversely affect the health of residents.
4. Healthcare Services: Our local medical facilities are already overstretched, with the doctor's surgery and dentist appointments requiring over four weeks of waiting time. The development will further strain these services, making it even more challenging for residents to access necessary healthcare.
5. Transport Connectivity: Hockley Heath lacks adequate public transport options, with no train station and poor bus services. This development will worsen the existing transport connectivity issues, making it difficult for residents to commute efficiently.
6. Educational Facilities: The local primary and secondary schools are currently unable to accommodate a significant increase in student numbers. This proposed development would place an unsustainable burden on our educational infrastructure.
7. Flooding and Infrastructure: The Stratford Road already experiences regular flooding which impacts the surrounding housing and additional development will exacerbate this issue, leading to worsening property damage and safety hazards.
8. Community and Wellbeing: The transformation of our small village into a town, will disrupt the sense of belonging and community that all our local residents cherish. The loss of countryside and natural beauty will negatively impact mental health and wellbeing.

I would urge the council to reconsider the proposed development SG24. It is crucial to preserve the character and quality of life in Hockley Heath for current and future generations.

No

ID sylw: 106135

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Lesley Allison

I am writing to oppose the SWLP - section SG24 - Hockley Heath
This area is most unsuitable for the following reasons:
The infrastructure cannot cope with this excessive extra amount of homes, the traffic is already heavy at peak times and the recent development of 7000 homes on Blythe Valley has made it worse.
There is no plan to build a new primary school, and the secondary school catchment area will be affected.
There is no doctors' surgery in Hockley Heath and the surgery at Dorridge could not accommodate the extra patients.
The environmental affects are being ignored - building on green belt will increase the flooding problems already being experienced. The extra pollution could be detrimental to residents' health.
The road surfacing is already in a poor condition, building extra homes will only make this problem worse. As a cyclist the country lanes will become busier and increased pot holes will make it more hazardous.
Orchard Road is used as a cut through to avoid the A34 and is very busy at school starting times, putting children at risk, this will only get busier.
This section of the M42 is already one of the busiest in the country, we should be working to improve this problem not adding to it. Often at rush hour (and other times) the traffic diverts off the very congested M42 through Hockley Heath bringing it to standstill.
New homes should be built in a less congested area and should be more affordable for young people.

No

ID sylw: 106150

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Rebecca Green

Responsibility for additional education, healthcare, transport, refuse collection burdens resulting from this development would fall on Solihull MBC. They have objected to these plans and so ongoing disputes between Solihull and the South Warwickshire Councils are likely if this proceeds. Solihull's local plan advocates only small-scale development. Hockley Heath has poor water drainage and Stratford Road is prone to heavy flooding. The development would negatively impact wildlife and biodiversity. The loss of green space would negatively impact existing residents. The A34 is already congested, particularly when the M40 & M42 have issues. The proposed developments would need to access the A34 which would increase accident risk. Development would damage the rural identity of Hockley Heath and the land is Green Belt which should only be built on if there are no practical alternatives.

No

ID sylw: 106153

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kevin Gold

Good morning I strongly disagree with the development in Hockley Heath Solihull due to more risks of flooding and adding to even more traffic from Aylesbury Road Stratford road leading to the M42 motorway which is at most always congested also this would impact greatly harm wild life on the green belt schools doctors surgery’s and refuge collections

No

ID sylw: 106163

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ryan Langman

I formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan (SWLP) due to its excessive scale and flawed justification as a strategic growth location. This proposal threatens the character of Hockley Heath and disregards the Solihull Local Plan, which supports only small-scale development. SG24 also risks irreversible harm to green belt land, local biodiversity, and infrastructure, while ignoring viable alternatives. Additionally, it overlooks existing flooding issues and fails to meet sustainability principles. The current format of SG24 cannot proceed without a thorough review of its impacts and alternatives.

No

ID sylw: 106170

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Gorana Law

The scale and scope of the proposed development would fundamentally alter the character of Hockley Heath, undermining its distinct rural identity. The development is completely at odds with Solihull MBC's local plan which states that only small-scale development is appropriate for Hockley Heath.

More importantly, our village does not have the infrastructure in terms of education, health and transport to sustain a development of this size. Although the development falls within South Warwickshire, the burden of the new population in terms of schooling, transport, health and refuse collection would fall to Solihull, who have already opposed it. Hockley Heath is already facing issues with some of the council services mentioned above. Adding more residential homes without the additional supporting services (especially secondary school places and GP practices) would make an already bad situation much worse.

As far as the roads and transport go, Hockley Heath already has surface water drainage issues and the Stratford Road (A34) floods regularly during heavy rain. Further development would worsen this problem, as it would significantly increase traffic on the A34, which is already congested, particularly when there are problems on the M40/M42. All proposed developments would need to access the A34, significantly increasing the accident risk.

On a different note, all the land that is proposed to be developed is on the Green Belt, which should only be built on in exceptional circumstances. The new development would harm wildlife, limit biodiversity and the loss of green space would have a significant negative impact on the wellbeing of existing residents.