No

ID sylw: 105720

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alex Morgan

I formally object to the proposed SG24 development in Hockley Heath, where I have lived for over 40 years. This development threatens local wildlife, greenbelt land, and the village's identity. The existing infrastructure, including schools and healthcare, is already at capacity and cannot accommodate the additional strain from SG24. The local road network is insufficient for increased traffic, exacerbating congestion and pollution. Additionally, flooding and power supply issues remain unaddressed. I urge South Warwickshire to reconsider this proposal, as it does not align with the Solihull local plan for only small-scale developments.

No

ID sylw: 105721

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Higgins

I strongly oppose the proposed development at SG24, as the village lacks adequate amenities and infrastructure, which are already overstretched. Adding 5000 homes would fundamentally alter the community and eliminate the rural character of the village. Local schools are full, and there are no health facilities, while traffic congestion is severe. The area also faces flooding issues, with outdated drainage systems. Furthermore, the environmental impact on local wildlife is concerning. Any development of this scale should consider its effects on local communities and involve collaboration with relevant authorities.

No

ID sylw: 105726

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Michelle Morgan

Summary: I formally object to the proposed SG24 development in Hockley Heath, where I have lived for over 40 years. This development threatens local wildlife, greenbelt land, and the village's identity. The existing infrastructure, including schools and healthcare, is already at capacity and cannot accommodate the additional strain from SG24. The local road network is insufficient for increased traffic, exacerbating congestion and pollution. Additionally, flooding and power supply issues remain unaddressed. I urge South Warwickshire to reconsider this proposal, as it does not align with the Solihull local plan for only small-scale developments.

No

ID sylw: 105727

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jeanette M Bean

I wish to formally object to the proposed development in Hockley Heath. The village is already facing surface water drainage issues, and additional development would exacerbate this problem and negatively affect new homes. The existing infrastructure cannot support such a large development, and it would significantly increase traffic on the congested A3400, raising accident risks. This development contradicts Solihull MBC's local plan, which permits only small-scale projects. Additionally, the land is on Green Belt, which should be protected, and the burden of increased population services would unfairly fall on Solihull.

No

ID sylw: 105729

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Joanne Price

I am formally objecting to the South Warwickshire Local Plan affecting Hockley Heath. This plan threatens to change our village's character and worsening traffic issues. It already poses traffic problems due to the M42 being one end and the M40 the other so we are essentially a cut through to gain access to the motorways and other developments such as Blythe Valley. Also, there is no public transport with direct access to Birmingham, the buses to Solihull only run every half hour and on a Sunday there is a reduced timetable – not sufficient enough public transport to accommodate up to 5000 homes. The demand for education would exceed supply, with waiting lists already prevalent in local schools. Additionally, the plan would devastate wildlife and green belt land, undermining our agricultural self-sufficiency. While I support small developments, I oppose building on green belt land when brownfield sites are available. For these reasons and more, I strongly object to the Hockley Heath SG24 plan.

No

ID sylw: 105759

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Heidi Charles

As a resident of Hockley Heath for eight years, I have serious concerns about the proposed housing plan for our village. We chose this area for its rural setting and community, which I believe will be destroyed by the planned development. Issues such as flooding, inadequate infrastructure, increased traffic, pollution, and harm to wildlife are significant. Furthermore, the proposed land is green belt, and the council has indicated that only small-scale development is suitable. I urge a reconsideration of these proposals to protect our village's character and wellbeing.

No

ID sylw: 105785

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Bates

I live in Hockley Heath and often face long delays when turning right onto the A3400 due to traffic, especially from motorists cutting through. The area is at risk of being overwhelmed by housing development, with over 2000 homes proposed, which is disproportionate to its size and infrastructure. Hockley Heath lacks sufficient transport links, making reliance on cars inevitable. Additionally, the proposed developments threaten local wildlife and the rural landscape, directly contradicting guidelines aimed at protecting biodiversity and the countryside. I urge Warwick council to consider my views in their housing plans.

No

ID sylw: 105791

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Marion Obrien

Hockley Heath, primarily in Solihull, faces significant challenges from Warwick District Council's plan to release green belt land for development. This would increase the village’s size dramatically, adding approximately 10,000 residents, which threatens its community feel and character. The existing infrastructure is inadequate, lacking essential facilities like a doctor's surgery and sufficient schools. The development would exacerbate traffic congestion and pollution, impacting road safety and the environment. Furthermore, the lack of communication from Warwick Council to local residents is concerning, as it undermines the community’s ability to voice their opposition to such plans.

No

ID sylw: 105794

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Gillian Packwood

I totally oppose the development on this location as it will lead to increased water drainage problem on Stratford Road and increase traffic on A34. I am against the encroachment of green belt and loss of green space will be detrimental to residents of Hockley Health and will change the rural identity of the area. The surgery and pharmacy at Dorridge are at capacity and will not cope with increased number of residents. I support Solihull Council's Local Plan and decision to oppose this development.

No

ID sylw: 105795

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Linda Parker

Although I agree with the principle of providing more homes, I do not agree that South Warwickshire should build close to the boundary of Solihull with no promise to provide infrastructure to support the growth. Local people have to use medical facilities at Dorridge as the local facilities are overstretched. Local school is already struggling to accommodate local children. The suggested area is a green belt and the development will impact wildlife and increase pollution and traffic. Solihull Council and local residents both oppose the scheme, so please reconsider.

No

ID sylw: 105805

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Steve Showell

I am writing to oppose the inclusion of SG24 as it will lead to overdevelopment which is excessive and disproportionate eroding village identity. Each site in SG24 is a greenbelt and development on this site will lead to irreversible destruction of the greenbelt and will have wide ranging impact on the character, environment and biodiversity. There is lack of infrastructure to support the already stretched roads, schools and healthcare facilities. There are significant flooding and drainage issues associated with the site.
The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

No

ID sylw: 105806

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Frederic Stokes

I am writing to express my strong concerns regarding the proposed housing development in and around Hockley Heath (SG24). I firmly believe that this project would have a detrimental impact on our community.

Firstly, the proposed development is simply too large for our area. The resulting increase in population density would place excessive strain on our already overburdened infrastructure, leading to heightened traffic congestion, noise pollution, and additional pressure on essential public services such as schools and GP surgeries.
The construction of this development would cause significant environmental damage, destroying natural habitats and putting local wildlife at high risk.
In light of these concerns, I strongly urge you to reconsider this proposed development in order to preserve the well-being of our community and environment.

No

ID sylw: 105807

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Janet Woodcock

I have grave concerns that this will jeventually become a massive new town, merging with Dorridge and Birmingham.

Of particular concern to me is the irreplaceable damage this will cause to the local environment that will be devastated by being buried under tons of bricks and mortar, never to see the light of day, a total travesty. What provision will be made to preserve mature woodland and all the flaura and fauna it supports?

The developments can only serve to add to a growing problem in and around the village, flooding, not only surface water but effluence from the sewer system can also be spewed up from the drains. We also suffer from a cold water supply issue relating to very low pressure that can last for days.

Traffic in and around the village is often snarled up when there are motorway problems with vehicles, including massive articulated vehicles painstakingly slowly clogging up the village adding to the existing pollution and poor air quality. As there is little in the way of public transport locally, no doubt that each of the new dwellings will have at least two cars so access onto the existing road network can only cause further congestion adding to the pollution levels.

Local amenities are scant and will not support the planned influx of 1,000’s of new residents, will South Warwickshire be responsible for building new schools, doctors surgeries, pharmacies etc, local hospitals are also full to overflowing, have you any plans in that respect, they’ve certainly not been published.

No

ID sylw: 105811

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart Davies

I object to SG24 as it will lead to congestion on the roads and risk of more accidents as the existing roads will be overwhelmed with traffic. There is a lack of basic local amenities such as post office, doctors, pharmacy, and a bank. Lack of railway station will make travel to work infeasible. The schools in the area are at capacity. The development will lead to loss of wildlife and will have detrimental impact on the character and beauty of rural area. The area suffers from issues of surface water and drainage. It will lead to loss of green belt and will be burden on Solihull Council.

No

ID sylw: 105813

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Simon Drinkwater

The development is at odds with Solihull's Local plan which only allows small scale development on the site. The proposed development will put pressure on Solihull's schools, transport, health and refuse collection service. The village suffers from water drainage and flooding issues and is in greenbelt. This development would significantly increase traffic on the A34 as all residents will need access to A34, which already is congested, particularly when there are problems on the M40/M42. The development would harm wildlife and impact on biodiversity. The loss of green space would also impact significantly on the wellbeing of existing residents.
The village does not have the infrastructure in terms of education, health and transport to sustain a development of this size.

No

ID sylw: 105819

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Charles Wilson

I object to SG24 as the land is green belt and should not be built upon. The development will have negative impact on wildlife and biodiversity and the existing residents well being will suffer due to loss of green space. The flooding and drainage issues will be exacerbated by development. The proposed development would lead to significant increase in traffic on A34. The educational, health and transport infrastructure will not be able to cope with the additional development and will need to be provided by Solihull Council who have already opposed the plans. The local character and distinctiveness of Hockley Heath will be lost.

No

ID sylw: 105823

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kevin Salsbury

I have reviewed the recent proposals for large scale housing plans in the local areas and would like to oppose such plans for the following reasons.

Firstly, this is predominantly Green Belt land, that has been protected for the good of the local people, visitors to the area, the environment, wildlife and biodiversity.

Our roads already struggle to cope with levels of surface water and damage due to high volumes of traffic. The slightest problem on local motorways lead to local roads being gridlocked. Additional housing will not help with water levels but will certainly increase volumes of traffic.

Hockley Heath is a lovely area to live in and to visit, but will become lost in the middle of a major development if this goes ahead. It is certainly at odds with Solihull MBC's local plan for small-scale developments appropriate to the area.

The additional population within the local area will require infrastructure that does not currently exist, such as education, doctors, dentists, and suitable transport systems.

I also have a concern that a major increase in local population will increase the ongoing worry following the closure of A&E at Solihull Hospital.

No

ID sylw: 105838

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Baker

Re: Objection to Hockley Heath SG24 being included in the SWLP

I am a local Hockley Heath resident, having lived in the village for over 25 years and want to express my concern and objection to several elements of the SWLP


• Scale of Proposed Development and Solihull \ South Warwickshire alignment

The scale of the proposed allocation is excessive around what is currently a small village and the proposal if adopted would have a hugely detrimental impact on everyone who lives in the village and would destroy the character of the village

Hockley Heath is in Solihull but is surrounded on all sides by South Warwickshire yet SG24 is not aligned with the Solihull Local Plan which states that Hockley Heath is only suitable for small scale development.

It is critical that the SWLP and Solihull Local Plan are aligned as they need to work in harmony and my concern is that SWLP are committing to Infrastructure costs that will fall on Solihull Council that do not support them and the village, and its residents would suffer.

• Significant flooding and drainage risks ignored

Hockley Heath already experiences severe surface water flooding, in particular down the Stratford Road which is the main road through the village and also the surrounding country lanes and the existing drainage infrastructure is already inadequate and unsuitable for large scale development

• Transport, Health and Education

The roads around Hockley Heath are increasingly busy and grid locked when there are issues on the Motorway and bus services and intermittent and poor and any large-scale development would make this worse

We only have a small local school which is already at capacity and the Doctors surgery is already very busy - the Village cannot support any more people without supporting infrastructure which does not seem to have been thought out


• Green Belt Erosion

Hockley Heath is surrounded by Countryside and the proposal fails to demonstrate the 'exceptional circumstances' required for Green Belt release and I am sure that there are much better alternatives than swamping a small village with a huge development and destroying its character for people who have lived here for years

No

ID sylw: 105839

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elaine Bird

Re: Objection to Proposed Development at Site SG24, Hockley Heath

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development at site SG24, Hockley Heath, as outlined in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. I am a local Hockley Heath resident, having lived in the village for over 15 years.
Having reviewed the various consultation documents and technical details, it is clear that there are other sites and settlements that perform MUCH better than those selected at SG24 and they have not been reviewed in the correct manner nor in fullness.

Some of my concerns are listed below (not exhaustive);

1. Significant flooding and drainage risks - Hockley Heath currently experiences severe surface water flooding, particularly along the main routes which will be required to serve SG24; School Road, Spring Lane, Cut Throat Lane and A3400 Stratford Road. The existing drainage infrastructure is insufficient to support additional development. The SWLP has not updated flood risk assessments to reflect the current challenges, has not provided a clear drainage mitigation strategy (and some particularly for the SG24 developments, are on waterlogged land), and has not considered the cumulative impact of adding impermeable surfaces to already high-risk flood zones.

2.The proximity of SG24 to local heritage sites ( canal conservation area, listed buildings etc) could potentially harm the setting and surroundings of these culturally significant areas. The development could lead to a loss of character and historical value, which is irreplaceable.

3. The current infrastructure and the future Solihull planning proposals in Hockley Heath (which is a major impact on our village as it is- to public services /transport links etc ) will not support the increased population density that further new homes would bring. I am concerned about the adequacy of transport links, a railway that can not accommodate any more traffic , lack of public transport , single track roads and the lack of pavement in some areas, constraints on local primary school and secondary school capacity and excess travel needs getting to any other primary and secondary schools within the Warwickshire catchment will add to more congestion of the roads. The access to GPs, dentists, hospitals, local amenities, and public services to accommodate such growth without significant investment and planning, and the area is already beyond national guidance for travel times to hospitals and A&E services is a great concern added by the fact that you have a very similar site less than 3 miles down the road at Blythe Valley (with no obvious signs of any these points having been considered). M40 J16 was deliberately limited to only being able to exit southbound and enter northbound to stop the A3400 becoming a 'rat run') etc.

4. Each individual site that makes up SG24 requires inappropriate development and threatens the integrity of the Green Belt, which serves as a vital buffer against urban sprawl, The Solihull Plan was very clear that Hockley Heath is only suitable for small scale development - SG24 is the opposite to this and should not be permitted to proceed in its current large-scale quantum, it must not be considered in isolation away from the Solihull Plan and must have a Solihull Council engagement and agreement. The loss of green spaces would not only affect the local ecosystem but also diminish the quality of life for current residents who rely on these areas.


In conclusion, I urge the planning committee to reconsider the proposed development at SG24, Hockley Heath, due to the significant environmental, cultural, and infrastructural concerns outlined above. I believe that alternative sites with less impact should be explored to meet housing needs without compromising the unique character and sustainability of our community.
Thank you for considering my objections.

No

ID sylw: 105855

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alison Hall

The development will change the character of Hockley Heath village. The infrastructure including school, doctor surgery,[pharmacy is at capacity. The bus service is insufficient. The development will exacerbate the flooding problem. There will be detrimental impact on the environment and species and their habitats.
The new development should be required to provide a park as it will provide space for people to relax and will have a positive impact on people's physical and mental health. It will also help prevent urban sprawl and will help against climate change.

No

ID sylw: 105870

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Zoe Greenfield

The village has surface drainage issues which will be made worse with more development. The site is in green belt and at odds with Solihull's local plan. The development will increase traffic on A34. It will have detrimental impact on the area's wildlife and biodiversity and loss of green space will be detrimental to well being of the residents. The character and local distinctiveness of the area will be lost. There is lack of infrastructure in terms of schools, transport, health and refuse collection which will fall on Solihull MBC who have already opposed the development. The houses will not be affordable to first time buyers.

No

ID sylw: 105871

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Patsy Browne-Hope

I am objecting to SG24 being included in the SWLP as it cannot accommodate the proposed amount of growth as it will be very disproportionate to the existing village. The justification to release Green belt is very weak. Infrastructure such as roads, schools, GP surgeries and hospitals are already overburdened and will not be able to support the proposed growth. The area suffers from significant surface water flooding. The site contains ecologically sensitive areas. The village can accommodate modest, well integrated growth but the proposals put forward are beyond what the infrastructure, environment and community can support.

No

ID sylw: 105876

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sarah Denslow

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 105877

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Tom Denslow

SG24 cannot proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth; however, many of the plans, policies and frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or been applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.
Crucially, although the development falls within South Warwickshire, the burden of the newly-required infrastructure will fall to Solihull who have already opposed such development, deeming Hockley Heath unsuitable for such growth. This is clearly unfair and will likely lead to costly disputes between Councils in the future.

No

ID sylw: 105878

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Claire Harman

I object to SG24 being included in the Plan as it will lead to a small village being over developed and is against SMBC's commitment to preserve its rural identity. The green belt needs to be protected and countryside should be saved from encroachment. The village lacks adequate infrastructure to sustain growth and lacks a train station which will lead to kore cars increasing congestion on the roads. It is prone to surface water drainage issues which will be exacerbated without proper infrastructure. The provision of infrastructure will fall on Solihull MBC who have already opposed the development.

No

ID sylw: 105881

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mike Parker

Hockley Heath is in Solihull, but Warwick are investigating the possibility of building houses on various green belt sites right up to the village boundary! Solihull MBC's local plan only calls for small scale development. There would undoubtably be disputes over the funding of services for the area.

I'm not opposed to appropriate development, & support the government's policy in principle of increased housing. However for the suggested development to go ahead without any providing extra infrastructure, is totally unacceptable. In particular, Hockley Heath has no GP, & no secondary school. The local primary school is already struggling with extra demand within the borough. This lack of school places will be exacerbated by the government imposition of VAT on public schools. We have a few retail shops, which are totally insufficient in providing the anticipated demand.

It is the government's intention to build on brown & grey belt first. Have any such sites been identified in Hockley Heath? The sites suggested are on green belt, which will have major environmental consequences. Wild life will be adversely affected. Some areas are already affected by flooding, which will require significant cost to control. Extra traffic will increase pollution, congerstion & road accidents, particularly on the A3400. Residents health & wellbing would also be adversly affected.

In conclusion, Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council, Hockley Heath Parish Council & local residents all oppose this proposal.

No

ID sylw: 105884

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dave Seal

SG24 can not proceed as a strategic growth location in its current format
SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 105896

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Roger Smith

Nifer y bobl: 2

The additional development will put pressure on already low water pressure. The sewer system will not be able to cope. More traffic congestion on Stratford Road and Aylesbury Road leading to more pollution. Development will worsen the surface water flooding. Doctors' surgery and dentist will not be able to serve the new residents. Schools will not be able to accommodate more children. Public transport is poor and more people will put more pressure on the already stretched service leading to more cars and pollution. There will be irreversible loss to the wildlife and the village status of Hockley Heath will change forever.

No

ID sylw: 105897

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Simon Sinclair

SG24 inclusion as a strategic growth centre can NOT proceed in its current format within the South Warwickshire Local Plan. We recognise that Hockley Heath has some facilities and can take on a small level of growth, however many of the plans, policies, frameworks have not been reviewed in enough detail or applied correctly. The unsustainable overdevelopment proposed under SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath’s character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life. It fails to demonstrate exceptional circumstances for Green Belt release, ignores significant viable alternatives and lacks the essential infrastructure planning required for sustainable development.

There are many other issues that arise due to the inappropriate selection of the sites. They represent further significant legal, environmental, sustainability and H&S issues which must be reviewed prior to agreeing the SWLP. SWLP have an obligation to deliver housing and release sites in the most sustainable way, which cannot be achieved via the current SWLP as there are clearly much better performing settlements.

No

ID sylw: 105899

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Fiona Shields

I am writing to formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 within the SWLP. I am a local Hockley Heath resident and have lived in the village for 2 years.
The scale of the proposal is excessive and disproportionate to the local area.
I feel Hockley Heath would only be suitable for a small scale plan which is the complete opposite to the SG24 plan. This plan will destroy the local area , wildlife and green belt. The infrastructure of the village is not suitable for this size proposal.
School Road which suffers constant flooding, side road erosion, a country lane that already is put under pressure with local traffic. The main Stratford Road once again is already stretched.
The local amenities do not allow for further expansion.
My biggest concern is the damaging effect on the wildlife. We have a family of deers that reside in land adjacent to us and roam over proposed land sites..
There are much more suitable sites that will not totally destroy and overwhelm like the SG24 will to Hockley Heath.