BASE HEADER

Strategic Growth Location SG24 Question

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 331 i 360 o 576

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105399

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Liam Ritchie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the proposed development of up to 5000 houses at Hockley Heath. I am a lifelong resident and 20-year-old student and I believe the village lacks the necessary infrastructure for such a large project. It is concerning that local authorities would consider building on greenbelt land, which is vital for wildlife such as birds, hedgehogs, and deer. This plan contradicts claims about environmental protection and sustainability. Once the greenbelt is lost, it cannot be restored, and we should focus on utilising existing buildings or brownfield sites instead.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105400

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Slater

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the development at Hockley Heath (SG24) due to several reasons. The land is part of the Green Belt and should only be developed in exceptional circumstances. The proposed development contradicts SMBC’s local plan, which allows only small-scale projects. It would worsen traffic congestion on the A34, posing safety risks, and fundamentally change Hockley Heath's rural character. Additionally, the area lacks necessary facilities for a growing population, has drainage issues, and would negatively affect local wildlife and residents' wellbeing due to the loss of green space.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105401

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Marc Slater

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the development at Hockley Heath (SG24) due to several reasons. The land is part of the Green Belt and should only be developed in exceptional circumstances. The proposed development contradicts SMBC’s local plan, which allows only small-scale projects. It would worsen traffic congestion on the A34, posing safety risks, and fundamentally change Hockley Heath's rural character. Additionally, the area lacks necessary facilities for a growing population, has drainage issues, and would negatively affect local wildlife and residents' wellbeing due to the loss of green space.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105403

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs B L Thomas

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the SWLP as a long-term resident of Hockley Heath. I believe the proposed development is excessive and threatens our village's identity and cohesion. SG24 disregards the Solihull Local Plan, fails to justify Green Belt release, and overlooks better alternatives. The proposal would harm local biodiversity, overstretch infrastructure, and ignore existing flooding risks. Overall, SG24 cannot proceed as it stands, as it conflicts with sustainable development principles and would irreparably damage our community, environment, and quality of life.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105404

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sara White

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the SWLP due to its excessive overdevelopment, which disregards local plans and community needs. This proposal threatens green belt land without demonstrating exceptional circumstances, neglects sustainable alternatives, and poses significant risks to biodiversity and local infrastructure. Hockley Heath is already struggling with traffic, education, and healthcare demands, and the proposed development would exacerbate these issues. Moreover, the flooding risks and sustainability principles are not adequately addressed. We are concerned that this area was chosen only as it is the furthest possible area away from Stratford.
This plan is unsustainable and harmful to our community, and I urge reconsideration of its implications.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105405

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mark White

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the SWLP due to its excessive overdevelopment, which disregards local plans and community needs. This proposal threatens green belt land without demonstrating exceptional circumstances, neglects sustainable alternatives, and poses significant risks to biodiversity and local infrastructure. Hockley Heath is already struggling with traffic, education, and healthcare demands, and the proposed development would exacerbate these issues. Moreover, the flooding risks and sustainability principles are not adequately addressed. We are concerned that this area was chosen only as it is the furthest possible area away from Stratford.
This plan is unsustainable and harmful to our community, and I urge reconsideration of its implications.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105406

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs sarah wood

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am formally objecting to policy SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan due to several key concerns. Living on the border of Lapworth and Hockley Heath for nearly 20 years, I believe the proposed development threatens the green belt, disrupting local ecosystems and community wellbeing. The environmental impact is significant, including increased air pollution and loss of wildlife habitats. Additionally, the area’s infrastructure is already strained, with inadequate roads and no capacity for increased population in schools or healthcare. I urge that SG24 be removed from the plan entirely.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105410

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Kevin Barnes

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am concerned about the use of Green Belt land for developments, as this country struggles with food production and relies heavily on expensive imports. The valuable farmland supports diverse wildlife, including deer, badgers, foxes, and various birds, which are vital for our ecosystem. The tree-lined hedges also mitigate noise and pollution from nearby motorways. Additionally, there is a lack of infrastructure for essential services, such as GP surgeries, and the current narrow lanes cannot handle increased traffic. I see no evidence of significant employment opportunities being generated in this area.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105411

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Brett Hopkins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the Solihull Local Plan as a long-time resident of Hockley Heath. I am concerned about the scale of the proposed development, which threatens the village's unique identity and character. The Solihull Plan states that only small-scale development is suitable for Hockley Heath, making SG24 inappropriate. This plan risks irreversible damage to the green belt and fails to meet criteria for its release. I urge a thorough review of alternative sites before any decision is made, as the consequences will be detrimental and permanent.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105415

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Guy Jackson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am writing to express my family's deep concern regarding the proposed increase of Hockley Heath from approximately 700 to around 5000 homes. This expansion would destroy the village's character and overwhelm local infrastructure, resulting in a busier and noisier environment. While I recognise the need for more housing, I urge a more thoughtful approach that complements the existing village layout with fewer homes and support for nature and the community. I suggest distributing housing demands across various towns to avoid overwhelming any single area. A revised, smaller plan prioritising the environment is essential.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105417

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Andrew R Massey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the inclusion of Hockley Heath in SG24 as a growth area in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. The proposal disregards the area's greenbelt status and would threaten natural habitats and drainage, exacerbating flooding issues. Local infrastructure is already under strain, with inadequate health services, schools, and public transport. Increased housing would worsen traffic congestion and safety risks on local roads. Without proper infrastructure considerations, the plan is unsustainable. The Solihull plan, recently withdrawn, suggested only a modest development of 100 houses in this area is feasible, highlighting the need for informed planning.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105418

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ann L Massey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the inclusion of Hockley Heath Group SG24 as a Strategic Growth Location in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. The village's infrastructure cannot support large-scale development, which would harm its character. Flooding has worsened, and the existing sewage system is insufficient, with improvements not expected until 2039. Traffic congestion is already problematic, compounded by limited public transport and inadequate school places. Local amenities are scarce, and environmental impacts must be considered. I urge decision-makers to reject the inclusion of SG24 in any future development plans.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105420

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stuart McKay

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I wish to object to the proposed development (SG24) in Hockley Heath. There are existing surface water drainage issues that would worsen with further development. The site is in the Green Belt, which should only be developed in exceptional circumstances. The development contradicts the Solihull MBC local plan, which permits only small developments. It would increase traffic on the A34 and harm wildlife and biodiversity. Additionally, it would change Hockley Heath's character negatively and the village lacks the necessary infrastructure to support such a development. It is unacceptable that you are placing this development on the edge of your boundary. The costs for education and health will impact Council Tax payers in Solihull and this is unfair.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105427

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Jayne Stoddart

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I oppose the proposed development at Hockley Heath, which seeks to increase the village's size from 700 homes to 5,000, a 700% increase. This plan contradicts Solihull MBC's local policy that permits only small-scale development. The added traffic from 4,000 new homes would worsen congestion, especially during M42 issues, and increase CO2 emissions, raising accident risks on Aylesbury Road. Furthermore, the burden of services would fall on Solihull, which has already opposed this plan, potentially causing disputes between councils. This proposal threatens our quality of life.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105431

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Thomas Waters

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed increase of homes in our village from 700 to 7000, which would devastate our community and the surrounding green belt. My concerns include the lack of infrastructure for schooling and healthcare, and potential accidents and pollution from increased traffic on the already congested A34. The proposals contradict Solihull's MBC local plan, which supports only small-scale development. Additionally, the proposal would exacerbate existing flooding issues and threaten local wildlife. It would ultimately transformi our village into a small town, which I find unacceptable.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105441

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Davis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I would like to confirm my objection to the proposed SG24 plans to the Hockley Heath village.
All of the earmarked land is on Green Belt, which should only be built on in exceptional circumstances.
The development is completely at odds with Solihull MBC’s local plan which states that only small-scale development is appropriate for Hockley Heath.
The village does not have the infrastructure in terms of education, health and transport to sustain a development of this size, let alone the environmental impact to the local wildlife.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105443

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Showell

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the SWLP as a resident of Hockley Heath for 19 years. I chose this rural area for my family due to its identity and proximity to nature, which would be compromised by the proposed development. The plans disregard the community's pride and the detrimental effects on mental health and safety. The loss of Green Belt land and farmland is unacceptable, especially given local flooding issues. Our already stressed transport and services cannot accommodate the proposed housing. These developments would burden our community without adequate provisions for education and healthcare.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105455

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Batchelor

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hockley Heath is a rural village surrounded by green belt land, with 800 households. I support proportional development to maintain its character, but recent and proposed plans threaten this balance. The area faces surface water flooding issues, and while a small site for development exists, it should not extend further into open fields. Current amenities are limited, with a busy road and an oversubscribed primary school. I believe that further development by Warwickshire Council will unfairly burden the residents of Solihull and compromise the village's integrity.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105462

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Brian Crompton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hockley Heath is a small village with limited amenities, including two general stores, a pub, and a small school, but lacks a doctors' surgery and chemist. The Solihull MBC Local Plan allows only small-scale development, yet the proposed SG24 sites are on Green Belt land, which would worsen traffic congestion and increase accident risks. The village lacks infrastructure to support the SWLP Plan, and additional costs for services would fall on residents. I believe that over-development would destroy Hockley Heath's village character and should prevent merging with nearby communities.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105466

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Loretta Birt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the proposal for over 4000 homes on Green Belt land in Hockley Heath. Having lived here for 18 years, I believe the current infrastructure cannot support such a large development, which would change the village's character. Hockley Heath Academy is already oversubscribed and lacks the capacity for additional children. We have no local doctors’ surgery, making it difficult to accommodate more residents. Additionally, the village faces surface water drainage issues, and traffic on the A34 is already congested. I hope my objections are considered.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105468

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Derek May

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the proposed planning application for area SG24, which threatens Hockley Heath and lacks justification. I hold Stratford-on-Avon and Warwick District Council accountable for pushing proposals to the edge of their districts, prioritising appeasement of their voters over local interests, and dismissing concerns raised by residents. The plans contradict Solihull's local plan, which only allows small-scale development, and would burden local infrastructure already at capacity. The erosion of green belt land harms biodiversity and community wellbeing, and I demand that these developments be stopped immediately. This approach is profit-driven and neglects the rights and quality of life of Hockley Heath residents

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105469

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joanna Brayshaw

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally object to the SG24 proposal for Hockley Heath, where I have lived for 20 years. This excessive development threatens our village's character, undermines community cohesion, and disregards the Solihull Plan's guidelines for small-scale development. It inappropriately encroaches on green belt land without demonstrating the required exceptional circumstances. The proposal would harm local biodiversity, worsen air quality, and lacks necessary infrastructure for roads, schools, and healthcare. Additionally, it ignores flooding risks and breaches sustainability principles. The unsustainable nature of SG24 would irreparably damage Hockley Heath's character, environment, infrastructure, and quality of life.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105470

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Tom Ritchie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly object to the proposed development in Hockley Heath. Having lived here my entire life, I value the green spaces for recreation and believed they were protected as greenbelt land. I recognise the importance of safeguarding the environment and ecosystems. Building on this land would destroy wildlife habitats, exacerbate flooding issues, and worsen public transport, which is already inadequate. Such developments would not only face wide community opposition but would also change our areas forever. I urge you to prioritise brownfield sites and reject these proposals promptly.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105486

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Steven Brueton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As a long-time resident of Hockley Heath, I am deeply concerned about the proposed development of up to 2,875 new homes, which could drastically alter our village's character and strain our limited infrastructure. Our healthcare, education, and transport services are already inadequate, and additional pressure on local amenities could diminish our community's well-being. Environmental concerns, such as the loss of green belt land and increased flooding risks, further compound these issues. The rapid growth would erode our community identity and threaten our historical heritage. I urge you to reconsider this proposal for the future of Hockley Heath.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105487

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kathryn Burrows

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am writing to oppose the SWLP SG24 plan Hockley Heath for the following reasons:

There is no doctors surgery in Hockley Heath and Dorridge Surgery would not cope with more patients
Hockley Heath infant and junior school would be affected
We already have regular issues with water pressure and quality
Problems with flooding /drainage on certain roads
Any problems on the M42 traffic is diverted onto ,the already busy Stratford Road, through Hockley Heath onto the M40.

I presume there are no plans to build a doctor’s surgery or school in the Warwickshire side of the proposed development? These need to be in place before any housing is considered.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105498

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Anna Hutton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. As a Hockley Heath resident for 11 years, I believe the proposed scale of development threatens our village identity and community cohesion. SG24 lacks justification under the Solihull Local Plan and would cause irreversible harm to the green belt and local biodiversity. There are significant infrastructure concerns, as existing services are already stretched. The proposal also ignores flooding risks and sustainability principles. In its current form, SG24 cannot be considered a strategic growth location without further review and alternatives.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105499

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: John and Shirley Ibbotson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I wish to register my objection to the proposed development concerning SG24, particularly the plan to increase Hockley Heath's homes from 700 to 5,000. This sevenfold increase would lead to severe issues, including exacerbated flooding, loss of Green Belt land, and congestion on the A3400. The local plan supports only small-scale development, and the village lacks the necessary infrastructure to support such growth. Additionally, the development would harm wildlife, alter Hockley Heath's character, and create potential disputes over service provision between Solihull MBC and the South Warwickshire Councils.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105500

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jacqueline Allen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the proposed development in Hockley Heath for plot SG24. While I recognise the need for housing, the number of properties planned will negatively impact the village. The development encroaches on green belt land, leading to irreversible wildlife loss. Additionally, local roads, including Stratford Road, cannot handle the increased traffic, especially given existing issues with the M40 and M42 motorways. During heavy rainfall, Stratford Road frequently floods. The village also lacks sufficient schooling, public transport, and health services to support this development. Please consider my objection.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105502

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Nikki Greening

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I oppose the inclusion of SG24 in the SWLP as it threatens the local character of Hockley Heath, and our community ties. The scale of development is excessive and undermines our village identity. SG24 lacks proper consideration of the Solihull Local Plan, ignores viable brownfield alternatives, and fails to address environmental and biodiversity impacts. Infrastructure planning is insufficient, and flooding risks are neglected. Overall, SG24's development is unsustainable and would irreparably damage our quality of life. I urge a comprehensive review of the plan before proceeding.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105504

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Richard Jarvis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally object to the proposed development of settlement C1, Chessetts Wood Road Lapworth (Ref 615) and the cumulative impact of developments around Lapworth and Hockley Heath due to significant impact on the area's beauty, historic properties, and local tourism. Increased traffic and pollution would degrade infrastructure and harm local businesses. The development would lead to light and noise pollution, require new bridges over canals, and exacerbate issues with limited gas supply and sewage systems. Lapworth train station is already inadequate, lacking bus services, and the local school cannot accommodate more children. Additionally, the disruption to wildlife is a serious concern.