No

ID sylw: 98209

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Christopher Bird

No "exceptional circumstances" for greenbelt use, other sites are less challenged with better infrastructure (water, electricity, sewage, drainage, education, healthcare). Precious historic villages, countryside and quality farmland, full of wildlife, is unsuitable for housing development. We should not be degrading & urbanising this

No

ID sylw: 98351

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Daine Davis

This area is far too small to form the basis of a self-contained sustainable location. It is in the green belt with no "exceptional circumstances"

No

ID sylw: 98353

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julie Weston Smith

Green belt will be destroyed and never regained denying local communities access to the countryside which is crucial for people's well-being and mental-health. The visual impact from the historic site of Baddesley Clinton and on the character of the area will be catastrophic. Local roads will be overloaded with traffic and safety will be compromised. New residents will travel away from the area for employment, school, and leisure increasing traffic and carbon emissions. Noise and light pollution will be massively increased affecting local residents and wildlife. Local services including the school, doctors surgery and railway station will be unable to cope.

No

ID sylw: 98386

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Thompson

A housing development on this scale will change this green belt location for ever. The proposed plan merges Rowington and Lapworth into one substantial town. It essentially changes two villages into one town. The local area will not be green belt and the local environment changes irreparably. The back of Rowington Green will be a huge housing estate - not what existing residents expected when buying or renting properties in a green belt area. The increase in traffic volumes would be huge. Whilst modest developments in the area are understandable, the scale of the proposed development (C1) is not.

No

ID sylw: 98474

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elizabeth Baines

C1 is adjacent to Lapworth, a small rural village with limited existing infrastructure and public transport links. Although there is a railway station, parking at the station is extremely limited and the train service is quite restricted. Station Lane is only has partial pavement and any increase in traffic through this area could result in increased collisions.

No

ID sylw: 98498

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Smith

support the C1 development.
The existing road network is predominently narrow, winding country lanes, frequently used by farm traffic, cyclists and horses. Many have no pavements. Canal bridges are narrow and the railway bridge at Lapworth is too low for a double decker bus. The Old Warwick Rd. would require considerable development at the junctions of the A3400 and the A4177. To enable the road system to support the C1 development would incur huge cost and years of disruption to the local community.
The bus service is very infrequent and would take a long time to get to employment centres.

Yes

ID sylw: 98567

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Bradley

I grew up in this area and feel that it would be perfectly suited to a new settlement due to its excellent links to transport infrastructure, especially Lapworth station.

No

ID sylw: 98699

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janet Smith

ew Settlement C1 South of Kingswood
I would like to register my objection to the planning of 7,000 new homes in the New Settlement C1
South of Kingswood and would recommend that the proposal be rejected for the following reasons:
Environment
All of the land designated for development falls within the Green Belt, which exists specifically to
prevent urban sprawl, preserve the character of rural communities, and protect valuable green space
from permanent loss. Once developed, this land cannot be restored, resulting in an irreversible impact
on the landscape and environment. Green spaces are essential not only for biodiversity but also for
public well-being, with extensive evidence showing their critical role in supporting mental health by
reducing stress, improving mood, and encouraging physical activity. Losing this Green Belt land would
deprive both current and future generations of these benefits."
Listed Buildings
The C1 proposal includes listed buildings that are protected due to their historical/architectural
significance. Any large-scale development could disrupt the character and setting of these buildings.
The construction process could also lead to structural damage due to vibrations, changes in drainage or
increased traffic to the area.
Canal Conservation Area
The C1 proposal includes a canal with conservation status, which is protected for its historical,
ecological, and recreational value. This development threatens the tranquility and scenic beauty of the
canal. It will also harm wildlife habitats, and increase pollution risks. The character of the area, which
attracts walkers, narrow boats which are used for homes and pleasure, nature enthusiasts will be
permanently altered reducing the value as a community and tourism beauty spot asset.
Ancient Woodland – Rowington Coppice
Ancient Woodlands such as Rowing Coppice are irreplaceable ecosystems that have existed for
centuries. They support diverse wildlife, including rare and protected species. The C1
development will lead to habitat destruction, pollution, and disruption to the delicate ecological
balance. Additionally, the Woodland Trust and other conservation bodies oppose developments
that threaten these unique habitats.
Historical Sites – A site such as Harborough Banks Iron Age Hill Fort is of archaeological
importance and any development risks disturbing buried artefacts, damaging the site’s integrity, and
diminishing its cultural value. Protecting such sites is crucial for maintaining the historical identity of the
village and respecting its past.
Wildlife
The local wildlife would be significantly affected by the C1 proposal. Species that rely on
hedgerows, woodlands, and open fields for survival may lose their habitats. Increased noise, light
pollution, and human activity could drive away sensitive species. Protected species such as bats, newts
etc. are present providing strong legal grounds to oppose development.
Agricultural Land
The C1 proposal area consists of predominantly Grade 3 land with some Grade 2 pockets, which means
it is valuable for food production/solar energy. Developing on such land would reduce solar power/local
food-growing potential and contribute to the national decline in agricultural land availability. Once built
on, farmland cannot be restored
The proposed development site is owned by more than 10 separate parties, which presents significant
legal and logistical challenges. Multiple landowners increase the risk of disputes, delays, and potential
failure to secure all necessary agreements, which could result in an incomplete or fragmented
development and leaving the community with years of disruption and no guaranteed outcome.
Preserving, this land for long-term sustainability and food security is essential.
Railway
Severely Limited Parking at the Station – The village train station has only 16 parking spaces with no
room for expansion. With a proposed tripling of the village’s size, demand for station parking will far
exceed capacity, leading to congestion, unsafe roadside parking, and discouraging rail use—
contradicting sustainable transport goals. Without sufficient parking residents would be forced to rely
on cars (if affordable) increasing carbon emissions.
Rail Service Already at Capacity and Infrequent – The current train service is infrequent and already
operating at capacity. Without significant investment in infrastructure, which Network Rail have
confirmed independently this has not been planned or budgeted for, there is no realistic way to
accommodate the thousands of additional residents who would rely on public transport. The
cancellation of HS2 North has also removed any prospect of shifting capacity onto a new line.
Lack of Step-Free Access – There is no step-free access for northbound trains, making travel inaccessible
for elderly residents, people with disabilities, and parents with pushchairs. Network Rail has confirmed
that no upgrades are planned for the foreseeable future, meaning that an increased population will
face persistent accessibility barriers.
Road Network is Inadequate
The local road network is entirely unsuitable for a development of this scale due to its narrow, winding
layout, frequent use by farm vehicles and horse riders, and the absence of pavements on most roads.
The village was never designed to accommodate high volumes of traffic, and the introduction of
thousands of additional residents would result in years of roadworks leading to severe disruption during
construction, congestion (particularly on Old Warwick Road and Hockley Road, which already experience
bottlenecks at peak times), increased pollution and road safety risks, as more
Canal and Railway Bridges Pose Major Obstacles
Several key infrastructure barriers make the area fundamentally unsuitable for large-scale development:
 The low railway bridge in Kingswood cannot accommodate double-decker buses, restricting the
ability to introduce new or expanded public transport services to mitigate car reliance.
 Multiple canal bridges would require costly upgrades or replacement to handle increased traffic,
further delaying and complicating infrastructure readiness.
Existing Junctions Are Already Dangerous
 The Hockley Heath junction on the A3400 (Stratford Road) is already a hazardous area, with a
complex mix of high-speed traffic, cars entering and exiting car parks, and pedestrians
navigating a busy crossing. Increased traffic from 7,000 new homes would make this junction
even more dangerous, raising the likelihood of accidents
Essential Services Cannot Support Large-Scale Development
Electricity Supply is Unreliable
The village already experiences frequent power cuts, indicating an overstretched electricity grid. The
South Warwickshire Local Plan (SWLP) promotes air source heat pumps for new developments, which
demand significant energy infrastructure upgrades. Without major investment, residents—both new
and existing—would face even more frequent outages and unreliable supply.
No Mains Gas Infrastructure
The area lacks a mains gas supply, meaning all homes rely on electricity, oil, or LPG. Adding thousands
of new homes would increase strain on electricity supply, further compounding energy challenges.
Retrofitting gas infrastructure is neither planned nor cost-effective, making this an unrealistic location
for sustainable, large-scale housing.
Water Supply and Sewage Capacity Uncertain
A development of this scale would require a substantial increase in water supply and sewage treatment
capacity. Key concerns include:
 Where will the additional water supply come from? The region already faces water scarcity
issues, and further development would place a major strain on existing resources.
 Sewage treatment capacity is unknown. Without significant upgrades to existing facilities, local
systems could become overwhelmed, leading to environmental pollution and health hazards.
Poor Mobile Phone Coverage
Mobile phone signal in the village is already unreliable, raising questions about whether infrastructure
could cope with thousands of new users. No evidence has been presented that mobile networks are
prepared for this level of expansion, meaning both current and new residents could face connectivity
issues, particularly in emergencies.
Lack of Local Employment Opportunities
A development of 7,000 new homes would add thousands of working-age residents, yet Lapworth and
its surrounding areas do not have the necessary employment opportunities to support them. The local
economy is largely rural and service-based, offering limited job prospects, meaning the vast majority of
new residents would have to commute elsewhere for work.
A large-scale development should be located where there is nearby employment, reducing the need for
unsustainable commuter travel. Lapworth does not meet this basic requirement.
Inadequate Healthcare Services
The local healthcare infrastructure is already at breaking point and cannot support a sudden population
increase:
 Lapworth Surgery is already full, struggling to accommodate existing residents.
 Hockley Heath does not have a doctor’s surgery, meaning new residents would overwhelm
nearby healthcare facilities.
 Hatton has already seen significant new development, further straining local GP and healthcare
services.
 Limited dental provision in the area would make access to routine and emergency care even
more difficult.
Without a clear plan—and funded commitments—for significant investment in new medical facilities,
the development would severely compromise access to essential healthcare for both new and existing
residents.
Education Facilities Cannot Support Large Population Growth
The proposal would require one new secondary school and three to four new primary schools
to accommodate the expected increase in families. However:
Lapworth Primary School has some space but would not be able to accommodate demand
without significant expansion. There is no room to expand on the current site.
Henley High School has some capacity for expansion, but doubling its size would require substantial
investment, planning, and infrastructure upgrades.
Without a confirmed and fully funded plan for education expansion, this proposal would put immense
pressure on local schools, forcing families to travel further for school places—further increasing traffic
congestion and pollution.
Lapworth does not have the employment opportunities, healthcare services, or education
infrastructure to support a threefold increase in population. Instead of sustainable development, this
proposal would create an unsustainable commuter belt, overwhelming already stretched services and
worsening transport and environmental issues

No

ID sylw: 98751

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neil King

It will have a huge negative impact on the local community, developing some of the most beautiful rural land that contains highly significant historic features, such as canals and National Trust properties. It will forever change the whole character of the village, which contains insufficient infrastructure, amenities, and public services. Many of the roads are small country lanes, which would become crowded and dangerous to motorists and the many walkers who use the lanes. Green belt land of this beauty and historical importance should be preserved not just for residents but the wider community who regularly visit and future generations.

No

ID sylw: 98761

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Claire Riddell

I formally object to the proposed C1 development and infill in Lapworth and Rowington due to several concerns. The introduction of approximately 7,000 new homes would adversely alter the village’s rural charm and lead to the loss of green spaces. The impact on light, noise, rubbish, and traffic pollution is significant, with the potential for over 11,000 new residents overwhelming existing infrastructure and services. There has been no demonstrated need for such development in these areas. I urge the council to explore alternative sites that preserve local character and sustainability.

No

ID sylw: 98772

Derbyniwyd: 06/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ginny Murphy

I formally object to the proposed development of 6,000 new dwellings in Lapworth, Kingswood, and Rowington as outlined in the South Warwickshire Local Plan. I have significant concerns regarding inadequate infrastructure and transport issues, strain on educational facilities, environmental impacts from the loss of Green Belt land, questionable deliverability, and the threat to the rural character of the area. While I understand the need for housing, this proposal exceeds the area's capacity and poses unacceptable risks. I urge the planning authorities to reconsider in favour of more sustainable developments.

No

ID sylw: 98842

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Julie Kirke

The proposal would have a significant and negative impact on the environment and character of the area, leading to loss of green belt land which is vital for sustaining wildlife and biodiversity, as well as people's connection to nature for mental health and wellbeing. There is insufficient infrastructure to support this development. Not least, new road and transport networks would be required, which would further alter the rural character of the village, and road safety would be compromised. The increased population would also require additional funding for healthcare and educational facilities, which are already overstretched.

No

ID sylw: 98874

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Benjamin Gardner

In summary, C1 South Kingswood is entirely unsuitable for the proposed housing development. The infrastructure would not cope and the area should be protected.

No

ID sylw: 98897

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Grace Gardner

Reference: C1 - South Kingswood

I would like to express my concern and disapproval for the call for sites in the South Warwick area. It is to my understanding that arrangements are being made for 7,000 houses to be mass produced in locations such as Shrewley, Rowington and Hatton. These locations are not suitable for thousands of houses. The demand on the narrow roads, the lack of pavements, the local surgery practices and schools (already at max capacity), the already cramped railway stations (particularly Lapworth and Hatton) and the wildlife and woodlands would be devastating.

No

ID sylw: 98907

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lindsay Gardner

Reference C1 South KingsWood:

It is my concern that this proposed development on this beautiful Green belt is going to have a big impact in many different areas. I feel this area of British beauty with its nature life and no light pollution will all be lost. We pride ourselves in looking after our waterways and woodland. Our roads can just about cope with the volume of traffic we have, our beautifully placed Train Stations will not cope with extra footfall. The disruption on trying to build more housing will the catastrophic for the local wildlife.

No

ID sylw: 98911

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

A number of observations are made including:
• No submissions to bring forward land within the identified new settlement were made into Stages 1 and 2 of the Call for Sites.
• It would clearly be possible to expand Kingswood in a way that would be higher performing through those sites submitted into the Call for Sites including the land to the east of Station Lane.
• Expansion at a scale commensurate with the existing settlement could be achieved much faster , and more sustainably, than through the new settlement designation.

No

ID sylw: 99003

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Adam Bolton

The site is next to a motorway and a (soon to be busier with freight) railway line, both of which are very noisy.
The infrastructure does not exist to accommodate such a large increase in population.
This is greenbelt, not brown/grey.
This is an ecologically sensitive area and would require extensive surveys before any further steps were taken.
The whole area is prone to waterlogging and concreting over it could be disastrous.
Finally this development would destroy a large area of an already damaged county, would only create profit for developers, and would be shameful vandalism on a grand scale.

No

ID sylw: 99031

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Roger Parsons

I am commenting on C1 development. Lapworth is a rural village and should remain so.
It does not have the infrastructure to support the proposed large development.
We have no gas, few pavements, narrow roads, small railway station with a very low bridge and two canals.
The Grand Union and the Stratford canals have many narrow road bridges.
Before any development is created we need more schools, GP's, shops etc.
We have one junior school, and one small village shop.
Surely there must be more appropriate sites with better amenities closer to Solihull and Warwick and their amenities than Lapworth

No

ID sylw: 99099

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Nurton Developments (Lapworth) Ltd

Asiant : Chave Planning

In summary, NDL does not agree with proposed New Settlement Location C1 being considered for inclusion within the plan and contends that, instead, Kingswood should receive proportionate growth of 150 dwellings at HELAA site 235 (Swallowfield).

No

ID sylw: 99249

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jonathan Rawlings

There should not be any development on the Green Belt.

No

ID sylw: 99800

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs LUCY FIRTH

There is not enough local schools, doctors, shops, or public transport for an increase of population in this area.
Old warwick Road has many cyclists, horse riders and ramblers, and cannot cope with an increase in traffic.
The area is green belt, and for most the residents living in Rowington and Lapworth, we all need the open spaces for our mental wellbeing.
We have the union canal with lots of wildlife, and a development of this scale will harm this.
The green belt area at Kingswood is also farming land, with sheep and cows. Again, this will create irreversible harm!

No

ID sylw: 99861

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Cheryl French

Insufficient infrastructure, unsuitable local roads, doctors surgery, school, very little public transport and completely spoil the rural area which is enjoyed by narrowboats, walkers and cyclists.

No

ID sylw: 100098

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lorraine Grocott

NA

No

ID sylw: 100449

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr SIMON FIRTH

The reasons for my objection are as follows: Irreparable damage to Green Belt, conservation areas and farmland. Insufficient infrastructure to cope with proposed development. Old Warwick Road cannot cope with the increase in traffic. Lack of regular public transport. Increase of light and noise pollution in a rural area. Insufficient utilities, no mainline gas. Rowington is a rare, peaceful village which relies on community and nature, once lost it cannot be recovered. Our Green Belt area is full of open spaces and is essential to our mental well being. Do not look for solutions to urban problems in the countryside.

No

ID sylw: 100666

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lucy Marsden

I strongly object to the potential new settlement C1 Land South of Kingswood.
This settlement is entirely Green Belt Land in open countryside, between two rural villages with canals and footpaths including a conservation area, ancient woodland, local wildlife sites and borders a National Trust property.
The local infrastructure (local roads not capable of supporting the level of additional traffic, small rural railway station, GP surgery, small village shops/post office, local village school and local utilities) is entirely inadequate for supporting an additional 5000 homes. The significant investment to infrastructure required would surely not be financially to deliver.

No

ID sylw: 100685

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Joshua Marsden

I strongly object to C1 Land South of Kingswood.
This is inappropriate development of the Green Belt and would significantly harm the visual amenities and rural character of the local area which includes productive agricultural land, footpaths and canals including a conservation area, local wildlife sites and neighbouring a National Trust Property.
The transport links (rail and roads are rural) and local amenities including village shop/post office, GP surgery, local primary school would not be able to support the additional proposed 5000 new homes and would require significant investment and seriously question the viability of this proposal.

Yes

ID sylw: 100768

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Doug Wallace

N/A

No

ID sylw: 100800

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Thomas Smith

After looking through the consultation processes. I fail to see how this area can be seen as a sensible choice especially compared with some of the other options available.

1. The NPPF says that land should only be removed from the green belt in exceptional circumstances. Other options contain much better road links so even all things being equal the green belt must be protected.

2. Secondly 30% of the proposed area also contains a conservation area between and including the two canals which should be protected.

No

ID sylw: 100872

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Ness Archer

5000 more houses in Lapworth? The suggestion is abhorrent. Living in the village I experience power cuts and frequent loss of water supply, I walk lanes that have no footpaths and no lighting and when driving to shopping venues I encounter fast cars driving around meandering bends forcing one into the verge. The infrastructure of our area is sadly lacking for the population in situ at present, without the massive expansion touted! The train service at Lapworth is poor, there is no station building and few parking slots and would need a massive upgrade to cope with more users.

No

ID sylw: 100924

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Kirsty Mcmullen

Infrastructure is not in place, completely overwhelming the roads in surrounding villages. Utter disregard for local wildlife and loss of farming land. No local schools, insufficient NHS provision locally. Land borders local conservation zones such as the one we are under - Canal Conservation. The integrity of the local ecosystems which are carefully nurtured will be destroyed.