No

ID sylw: 106136

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Gary Cramp

This is a large complex development to be dropped into a rural area. To sustain it would require
a number of primary schools, probably a secondary school a major upgrade of the Old Warwick
Road to provide safe access to the site together with a new medical centre and some shops.
The public transport in the area is very poor so all journeys to and from the development would
be by car putting a large strain on the existing road network.
It would take out a large area of greenbelt and effectively form one large conurbation of
Lapworth and Rowington.
The area enclosed a large area of ancient woodland Rowington Coppice which could be lost
during development.
There also seems to be a dearth of owners putting up land for development of this scheme
which to me demonstrates the lack of local support for it. All of the above in my opinion leads to
plot C1 not meeting the sustainability criteria to justify the destruction of so much green belt. I
therefore urge the planning committee to remove C1 from the SWLP.
I believe the my objections to the two developments C1 and 53 above are important because
the are unsustainable without increasing the local infrastructure massively and consequently
changing the villages of Lapworth and Rowington beyond any recognition of what they are now.
I believe that the type of housing will be expensive and unaffordable for a lot of the local
population.
I respectfully request that planners and councillors refuse the allocation proposal for
the site(s) referenced, based on the reasons provided.

No

ID sylw: 106161

Derbyniwyd: 26/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Jenny Fish

I am absolutely appalled at your proposed plan to build so many houses in our area!

Firstly: our infrastructure would certainly not support so many houses being proposed.

We have only one Doctor’s surgery with two Doctors and they are not taking new patients.

The school in Lapworth does not have the capacity to educate any more pupils.

There are no nearby shops or places for youngsters to go for entertainment.

The Old Warwick Road is already a dangerous road with so many serious bends and there have been fatalities and constant accidents on it.
The surrounding lanes would not cope with the huge increase of traffic that people would need to have to transport themselves as there is very little public transport.

You really should build on designated Brown areas and not ruin the beautiful country areas.
To build in the countryside hedges are pulled out and wildlife suffers hugely. You would utterly ruin a beautiful area if you insist on such a plan.

No

ID sylw: 106235

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Maria Johnson

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of 6,000 homes on site C1 as
outlined in the South Warwickshire Local Plan (SWLP). My objections are based on several key
concerns:Impact on Green Belt: Site C1 is located within the Green Belt, which serves as a
crucial buffer against urban sprawl. The development would undermine the integrity of the Green
Belt, which is intended to preserve the character of rural communities and prevent the merging
of towns.Environmental Concerns: The development poses significant risks to local biodiversity.
Site C1 is home to various species of flora and fauna that could be adversely affected by largescale
construction. The loss of natural habitats would be detrimental to the local
ecosystem.Infrastructure Strain: The current infrastructure in the area is not equipped to handle
the influx of residents that 6,000 new homes would bring. This includes roads, public transport,
schools, and healthcare facilities, which are already under pressure.Flood Risk: Site C1 is in a
flood-prone area, and further development could exacerbate flooding risks. The increased
surface runoff from new constructions could lead to more frequent and severe flooding events,
impacting existing residents.Lack of Sustainability: The proposed development does not align
with sustainable development principles. There is insufficient emphasis on renewable energy,
sustainable transport options, and green building practices.I urge the planning committee to
reconsider the inclusion of site C1 in the SWLP and explore alternative sites that do not
compromise the Green Belt or the well-being of existing communities.

No

ID sylw: 106313

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Wheeler

i object to potential developments at sites B1 and C1 - both will have a massive adverse impact on the local environment, including landscape character; species and habitats; amenity; agricultural land use and local heritage, that cannot be satisfactorily mitigated. Any development of those areas brings about an unimaginable impact on local infrastructure including but not limited to road access. For all the ideas of sustainable development and transport, another 6,000 cars on local roads that are already congested at busy times will be catastrophic. Why is development not focussed on brownfield sites and infill within existing built up areas?

No

ID sylw: 106346

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Abigail Cockayne

First and foremost, I am deeply concerned about the environmental consequences of this development. The proposed site is located in an area of Green Belt land and farmland, which is vital for biodiversity and local wildlife. This development would result in the permanent loss of important habitats, including the ancient woodland of Rowington Coppice, which is home to various species, and disruption to essential wildlife corridors, particularly along the canal and railway. The increase in traffic, noise, and light pollution would further degrade the natural environment, affecting species such as skylarks, which rely on these spaces for survival.
Additionally, the service frequency from Lapworth station is currently inadequate, and there is limited capacity to improve it. Significant investment would be needed to upgrade the tracks, rolling stock, signalling, platforms, and passenger facilities, as well as provide step-free access. With access to the station limited to country lanes and no regular bus services available, the development would only exacerbate the existing transport challenges.
The proposed development also fails to account for the necessary infrastructure to support a significant population increase. The car park at Lapworth station is already too small, and there is no room for expansion. The minimum threshold for a new settlement is 6,000 dwellings, which would require the development of new schools, healthcare facilities, and employment opportunities. However, the current proposal falls below this threshold, raising concerns about the strain it would place on local services, including Lapworth Surgery, which is already flagged red for GP-to-patient ratio, and Lapworth School, which may struggle to accommodate additional students.
In addition to the environmental and infrastructure concerns, the development would cause disruption to conservation areas, including Canal Conservation Areas and listed buildings such as Kingswood Manor House. The impact on local roads and junctions would also be significant, requiring improvements to roads like B4439 Old Warwick Road and Wharf Lane, and the construction of new bridges over the canals. This would result in years of roadworks, increased traffic on smaller roads, and further strain on already stretched local services.
The environmental damage caused by the development cannot be ignored. The proposal would contribute to the further urbanization of a vital Green Belt area, undermining its value in protecting the natural landscape and wildlife. The additional traffic and pollution would further compromise the quality of life for existing residents and the local environment.
In conclusion, I strongly urge the council to reconsider this application in light of the serious concerns regarding the environmental impact, the lack of adequate infrastructure, and the strain on local services. I believe that any future housing developments should prioritise sustainability, the preservation of Green Belt land, and appropriate provisions for infrastructure and services.

No

ID sylw: 106363

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Katherine Ridley

I live in Rowington / Lapworth. I’m objecting to the proposal to build 7 thousand new houses in the area. It will totally change the area and greatly have an adverse effect on living and working conditions. There are no plans for an extra GP surgery, school or relief road into Warwick. The loss of ancient woodland and the effect it’ll have on Baddesley Clinton will be huge. Lapworth will become a town not a village in the country side and it will be lost forever with no thought about schools, surgeries, congested roads. If you’ve been on the Birmingham road into Warwick and the motorways you’ll realise it can’t take anymore traffic! There is no thought being put into the plan - just a knee jerk reaction to governments requirement to build more housing.
Please note my objection.

No

ID sylw: 106378

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Zara Ridley

I am writing today to object the plan to build 7,000 new houses around the village.
I believe that lapworth would heavily lack the infrastructure to hold the estimated 15,000 new people it may bring, putting immense pressure on something that only just works well enough at its current rate of use. The local GP would not be able to take the new patients as finding appointments can already be hard enough for people already settled around and the local schools are already crowded the estimated increase of 1750 children will not help the situation anymore. The impacts of the environment would also be incredibly damaging, impacting further habitats and possible increase to flooding and loss of the woodland we are supposed to be saving. I think this would be completely unacceptable.

No

ID sylw: 106431

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Iain Maclean

As a long-term (20+ years) owner-occupier resident of Lapworth, I do not agree with the proposed new settlement location at C1 - Land to the south of Kingswood - being considered for inclusion with the plan, for the following three reasons.


1.INFRASTRUCTURE - ROADS:

The main current access road into Lapworth and to the area identified as C1 on the SWLP is by the B4439, known as the Old Warwick Road.

This is a semi-rural, two lane road which runs from its junction with the A3400 Startford Road at Hockley Heath in the west, to the A4177 Warwick Road near Hatton in the east, for a distance of about 7 miles.

The road is relatively narrow in places, and it has mostly farmed land or residential properties with a few commercial premises at the road edge at many locations on both sides of the road. There are few pavements or areas for pedestrians to walk safely along its length.

As currently configured, the B4439 will not be able to accommodate the significant increase in traffic movements which will arise from the addition of the many new dwellings proposed in the SWLP.

The road is already frequently congested at both ends, especially during morning and late afternoon peak periods.

There is little scope to widen or straighten the road along most of its length without compulsory purchase orders for existing housing and farm land.

The roads infrastructure is therefore unsuitable to support the developments proposed in C1 in the plan.


2.INFRASTRUCTURE - DRAINAGE & FLOODING:

Flooding regularly occurs during and immediately after periods of even moderate rainfall at key locations along the length of the B4439, especially adjacent to the area identified as C1 on the SWLP.

The existing drainage structure is not capable of safely removing excess water after rainfall.

This is exacerbated by the run-off from adjacent farmed land and the non-permeable nature of other developments at the edge of the B4439, creating volumes of standing / stagnant water.

When this occurs, the depth of this standing water makes parts of the B4439 impassable to most cars.

This means that small unclassified single track lanes are used by large volumes of existing through traffic trying to avoid the flooded areas.

The development of new dwellings and the non-permeable nature of much of the land on which these will be developed will increase the level of flooding in Lapworth.

The drainage infrastructure is therefore unsuitable to support the developments proposed in C1 in the plan.


3. INFRASTRUCTURE - ELECRICITY SUPPLY:

The electricity supply in Lapworth is adversely impacted by intermittent interruptions of supply.

When an unplanned electricity outage occurs, the present infrastructure is unable to provide alternative supply routes to meet an increased demand for supply, especially so in the parts of Lapworth adjacent to the area identified as C1 on the SWLP..

These interruptions and outages are more common in the late autumn and winter months, when heavy wind and rain occur, but can occur at any times throughout the year.

This means that many existing residents are without power, usually during the time when it is needed most to help heat and light their homes, sometimes for protracted periods.

It also impacts (i.e., turns off) the limited street lighting in parts of the village, and this is also some of the area identified as C1 on the SWLP.

Further demands placed on the existing electricity infrastructure will only make this situation worse.

The electricity infrastructure is therefore unsuitable to support the developments proposed in C1 in the plan.

No

ID sylw: 106463

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mike Sperrey

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of 6,000 homes on sites C1 and B1 as outlined in the South Warwickshire Local Plan (SWLP). My objections are based on several key concerns:
Impact on Green Belt Land:
Both Sites are located on designated Green Belt land. The development would lead to the irreversible loss of this protected area, which serves as a crucial buff er against urban sprawl. The Green Belt Review Stage 1 has not suffi ciently justifi ed the "exceptional circumstances" required to release this land for development, and there are other proposed sites that are not within the Green Belt
Loss of valuable Agricultural land:
Preserving England’s agricultural land is crucial for food security, environmental sustainability, and rural economies. With increasing pressure from urban development, maintaining farmland ensures a stable domestic food supply, reducing reliance on imports and enhancing national resilience.
Agricultural land also plays a vital role in carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and fl ood management. Once lost to development, it is almost impossible to restore, threatening future generations' ability to produce food and maintain ecological balance. Protecting farmland is essential for sustaining both the economy and the environment.
Environmental Concerns:
The development poses signifi cant risks to local biodiversity.
The proposed development includes Rowington Coppice; an ancient woodland.
Rowington Coppice is home to various protected species, and the destruction would disrupt their natural habitats. The environmental assessments provided do not adequately address these impacts or propose suffi cient mitigation measures.
Infrastructure Strain:
The local infrastructure, including roads, schools, and healthcare facilities, is already grappling with the existing demands of the community. The addition of 6,000 homes would undoubtedly amplify these issues, potentially leading to a cascade of negative consequences.
Traffi c Congestion: The infl ux of new residents would inevitably result in a signifi cant increase in traffi c. Roads, particularly those leading to and from the development, would experience heightened congestion, especially during peak hours. This would not only lead to frustration and delays for commuters but also hamper the ability of emergency services to respond promptly to incidents. The
resulting gridlock could have life-threatening implications in critical situations.
School Overcrowding: The local schools are already operating at or near capacity. The sudden infl ux of families with school-age children would strain the system further. Overcrowded classrooms would lead to a diminished quality of education, as teachers struggle to provide individual attention and resources are stretched thin. This could have long-term consequences for the educational attainment and future prospects of the children in the community.
Healthcare Strain: The healthcare facilities in the area are already experiencing high demand. The addition of thousands of new residents would place an even greater burden on the system. Patients would likely face longer wait times for appointments, procedures, and emergency care. This could lead to delayed diagnoses and treatments, potentially jeopardizing the health and well-being of the community.
B4439 "Old Warwick Road" Bottleneck: Both proposed development sites (B1 and C1) are solely reliant on the B4439 "Old Warwick Road" for access. This road is already notorious for its congestion at both ends (Hockley Heath and Hatton) during rush hour, where waits exceeding 20 minutes are becoming the norm rather than the exception. The additional traffi c generated by 6,000 new homes would exacerbate this issue, turning the road into a major bottleneck. This would not only inconvenience residents but also have a ripple eff ect on the surrounding areas, as traffi c diverts to alternative routes, causing congestion and disruption elsewhere.
Environmental Impact: The increased traffi c congestion resulting from the development would also contribute to higher carbon emissions, negatively impacting air quality and the environment. This would be further compounded by the strain on public transportation systems, potentially leading to greater reliance on private vehicles.
Emergency Services: The increased traffi c congestion and road blockages would also hinder the ability of emergency services to respond eff ectively to incidents. Delays in reaching those in need could have devastating consequences, particularly in cases where every second counts.
Overall, the strain on the local infrastructure resulting from the addition of 6,000 new homes would have a signifi cant and detrimental impact on the quality of life for existing and new residents alike.
Reduced Access due to fl ooding:
The Old Warwick Road is regularly closed due to rainwater fl ooding near The Boot Inn, and also at the edge of Rowington at the Hatton side. This often paralyses movement in, or out of Rowington.
Sustainability Issues: The proposed site is not in close proximity to essential services and public transport links, which contradicts the sustainability goals outlined in the SWLP.
The railway station at Lapworth is confi rmed to be at capacity in terms of frequency of trains, and the length of train stock, so additional capacity cannot be found. In addition there are just 16 car-parking spaces, with no ability to expand this. This would likely result in increased car dependency, further contributing to carbon emissions and undermining eff orts to promote sustainable living.
Community Impact: The scale of the proposed development is disproportionate to the existing community, potentially altering the character and social fabric of the area. The consultation process has not adequately engaged with local residents to address these concerns.
In light of these points, I urge the planning committee to reconsider the inclusion of sites B1 and C1 in the SWLP. I believe that alternative sites with less environmental and community impact should be explored.

No

ID sylw: 106492

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mira Balac

I am writing to formally object to the proposed development of new housing in Lapworth and Rowington (C1)
Destruction of Green Belt/Environmental impact
There are an extraordinary number of houses proposed to be built in current green belt land. There is much more suitable land which could be used for such extensive developments eg:
1. Land adjacent to motorways where significant environmental impact has already been absorbed and where there would be much better access to the road networks etc for the increased population
2. Grey fields sites – there are many empty buildings in town and city centres . Again the environmental impact on these properties has been absorbed and it would be good to rejuvenate these areas which have much better transport links and access to facilities such as doctors etc
3. The large number of properties will increase pollution and be detrimental the health of local residents. There has already been extensive environmental disruption locally due to HS2.
It’s virtually impossible to get a skilled tradesman for a small project, therefore the creation of large scale housing in light of skills hostages will result in poor quality housing. Destroying green belt to provide volume, low quality housing undermines long term sustainability.
Additional Concerns
In addition I wish to object on the basis of the following concerns:
1. The character of the area which has many buildings dating back to medieval times will be destroyed and this will impact on local businesses and the livelihoods of local people
2. The infrastructure in these areas, including roads, schools, and healthcare facilities, is already under strain and cannot support the additional population that these developments would bring.
3. The scale of the proposed developments is disproportionate to the size of the existing communities in Lapworth and Rowington. This could lead to a loss of community identity and cohesion, as well as increased traffic and noise pollution, which would detract from the quality of life for current residents.


In conclusion, I urge the council to reconsider these proposals and explore alternative solutions that do not compromise the integrity of our local environment and community. I appreciate your attention to these concerns and look forward to your response.

No

ID sylw: 106731

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sue Beard

I object to the C1 new settlement. It will result in loss of prime agricultural land. It is all Green Belt, designed to protect the countryside and prevent merging of towns and villages. Food security is important given climate change and disruptive world events. The proposed settlement would destroy ancient woodland and hedges, and the habitats of many insects and animals. Farmland is an important wildlife corridor. When links are broken, wildlife declines due to lack of breeding partners. Warwickshire Wildlife Trust is concerned by the impacts of large-scale house building.

Water, sewage and electrical infrastructure are struggling and couldn't cope with these proposals. The local train stations are at full capacity, with no plans to increase train numbers or parking levels. Hospitals would be swamped and send residents miles to the next-nearest facility. Highly-rated GP surgeries would be replaced with much larger facilities, resulting in loss of the doctor-patient relationship. Local schools would be overwhelmed. Country lanes and narrow bridges couldn't deal with the extra cars and delivery vans, leading to more bottlenecks and accidents. Lanes in the area flood and concreting over land will make this worse.

There is an estate being built in Hatton opposite the Shell Garage and another one in Barford. There have been difficulties in selling these properties. Why is it necessary to build so many new dwellings in the area? Births and deaths are virtually equal. There are at least 700,000 empty houses, and numerous shops and offices that could be converted.

No

ID sylw: 106746

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Mark Horton

Roads
Many roads in the area are single lane and unlit, posing safety risks. The low railway bridge in Kingswood cannot accommodate larger vehicles such as double-deckers, and multiple canal bridges would require upgrades or replacement. Furthermore, the majority of roads lack pavements, making them unsafe for pedestrians. There is also significant congestion at peak times, especially at both ends of Old Warwick Road/Hockley Road (Hockley Heath and Hatton).

Services
The area experiences frequent power cuts, and significant investment is needed to support new dwellings with air source heat pumps, as stated in the SWLP. There is no mains gas available in the area. Additionally, there are concerns about the water supply and sewage treatment, as it is unclear how these services will be managed for the new development. Mobile phone coverage is already
poor, and it is uncertain if the networks can handle the additional capacity.

Railway
The current car park is limited to 16 spaces with no room for expansion, which is insufficient for the expected increase in residents. The railway service is already at capacity with infrequent service, and increasing capacity would require major investment, which is unlikely due to the cancellation of HS2 north. Additionally, there is no step-free access for northbound trains, and Network Rail has confirmed that future spending plans do not include improvements for Lapworth.

Environment
The environmental impact of such a large development needs careful consideration, including biodiversity, climate resilience, and sustainability.

No

ID sylw: 106752

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Robert Jay

This is a Green Belt, containing a canal Conservation Area & the Rowington Coppice ancient woodland site, all of which needs protecting.

We only have a small railway station in Lapworth & the line is already at full capacity. Only 16 or 18 car parking spaces surrounded by residential dwellings so it is a totally unsuitable site for rail travel for additional numbers + only have 2 bus a week!

Low railway bridge in Kingwood so no double decker buses could pass.

Insufficient infrastructure available e.g. GP surgeries (already at full capacity)

One hairdressers & two shops (one doubles up as a post office)

A lot of land is agricultural - generally Grade 3, with areas of Grade 2 so very important for crops - not to mention that the wildlife needs protecting. No gas mains out here!

No

ID sylw: 106755

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: P Beauchamp

No further comment supplied.

No

ID sylw: 106757

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Linda Cousins

My concerns are as follows:-
Impact on Green Belt Land
Site C1 is located on designated Green Belt land. Exceptional circumstances must be demonstrated to justify the release of GB land. I would like to know what the exceptional circumstances are in this case, and how you have come to the decision that it is acceptable to overturn a historical decision to make this GB land. I have grave concerns about the detrimental impact on the local environment and biodiversity if this land is built on.

Disastrous for the Infrastructure
The addition of 6000 homes would impact hugely on the existing infrastructure. The roads could not cope with the great increase in traffic that would result from this development. On every access road into the village there is a bridge, and there are 3 canal bridges in particular that are totally unsuited to a large volume of traffic. The road from Lapworth through Rowington, to reach the A46, M40 and Warwick and Leamington Spa is very winding and narrow in places. The increased demand on Schools and healthcare facilities would be way beyond what they could cope with in their present forms.

Environmental
There would be a threat to wildlife habitats, and pollution would increase significantly from the extra traffic generated. The environmental assessment provided does not adequately address these concerns nor propose sufficient mitigation measures.

Community Impact
The large scale of the proposed development is not in keeping with the character of the existing community. It risks destroying the rural nature of the area, which is valued by residents and by the many visitors who come to enjoy the canals, footpaths, and two National Trust properties.

Questionable deliverability
According to the SWLP's own assessment, the deliverability of the site is questionable. This raises concerns about the feasibility and long-term sustainability of the proposed development.

I therefore urge the Planning Committee to reconsider the inclusion of the site C1 in the SWLP, and explore alternative sites that do not destroy the Green Belt and are more aligned with sustainable development principles.

No

ID sylw: 106758

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Martin Wollerton

I would like to raise my concerns on several points regarding the infill areas of the plan specifically concerning the land running adjacent to the Grand Union Canal and Swallowfield Equestrian Centre, Rising Lane. The proposed development would be on land which I believe to be unsuitable, due to drainage constraints and the proximity to the canal and canal basin, which is a natural conduit for wildlife and tourists alike.
Currently, there are problems with poorly maintained drainage, storm water and sewage effluent in an ever changing climate. It is questionable if the infrastructure could cope with this additional housing, in the proposed development on these low lying areas of Kingswood.
Finally, with the proposed increase in housing and car traffic (average of two cars per household), together with existing farm/commercial traffic, and with little or no additional employment in the area, this would become a dormant area for the community to larger population areas ie Birmingham, Warwick, Coventry centres and it is for certain that these cannot be achieved using the 20 minute rule for commuting proposes.

No

ID sylw: 106774

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Elaine Bacon

As a longstanding resident of Lapworth, who lives very close to the site C1 , on the South Warwickshire Local plan, it is disappointing to think that the Green Belt is being destroyed and with it the character of the area. There will be disruption to all the wildlife that makes this area beautiful.
The site does also not have the infrastructure to service a development of this size.
The Doctors ( Lapworth surgery) is full and so is the small primary school in Station lane. The railway station has limitations such as a very small carpark with only one disabled parking space and very few trains stopping there. This is not even adequate for the current population. Warwick Parkway and Leamington are much larger and could cope with an increased population.
Lapworth has very limited shops even for the current population.
The utilities in the area are majorly stretched currently. The water system constantly has problems with leakage and Severn Trent appear to be unable to solve these issues even with the current level of housing.
The frequent electricity issues such as many power cuts would suggest that companies would be stretched and unable to cope with even a small number of extra houses let alone a very large development.
Telephone reception in the Lapworth area is barely usable as it stands.

Areas that would be more suitable for a large scale development would be ones that have the infrastructure already in place such as South Leamington and also the Long Marston Airfield.

The Green belt is precious and there are many better areas that would be more suitable for a large development of houses, where there are main roads, multiple varieties of shops and areas for parks, large schools and activities for the younger generations.
Our countryside and heritage should be preserved.

No

ID sylw: 106777

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Nicola Everall

The entire development is located on Green Belt land, which is protected by longstanding planning policy designed to prevent urban sprawl and retain the openness of the countryside.
The land is made up of open countryside, canals and footpaths situated between Lapworth and Rowington, which are both rural villages with limited amenities and transport servicing the area.
There are 7 properties that are Listed (with several more in very close proximity) within the defined area of the proposed settlement and borders a National Trust Property at Baddesley Clinton.
Within the settlement area there is also a large section around the canals designated as a conservation area, an area of ancient woodland and several local wildlife sites.
This would be inappropriate development of the Green Belt.
The visual impact of the development would have a significant impact on the character of the local rural area.
It is stated in the SWLP that in meeting the sustainable development needs, a minimum threshold size for a new settlement is 6,000 dwellings (approx. 375 ha) and it is considered that a settlement of 10,000 dwellings (approx. 625 ha) would more effectively achieve a truly self-sustaining settlement, where residents could meet their daily needs (including schools, shops, health care provision, employment opportunities and leisure facilities including outdoor space).
The proposed settlement is too small at only c. 248 ha (2nd smallest of all the 12 proposed settlements) and would accommodate <5,000 dwellings and not large enough to achieve a self-sustaining development.
The current local amenity infrastructure in terms of the GP Surgery, a small village shop and off licence/post office, village primary school or other community assets is wholly inadequate to accommodate such a development in the area if any new development is not self-sustaining.
One of the major considerations for proposing this new settlement is due to its proximity to Lapworth Railway Station and rail corridor. Yet this is a small rural station with only 16 parking spaces (+2 Disabled) and two platforms which is not suitable for servicing 5,000 new dwellings, with a lack of apparent land available in the immediate vicinity for expansion.
The current public bus service provision to local towns is very limited (once or twice a week at most).
The road infrastructure in the immediate vicinity would not be able to cope with the volume of additional traffic from increased bus services or additional cars.
There are already concerns with the B4439 Old Warwick Road which is the only road travelling through the centre of the proposed settlement. It is narrow and undulating with many blind spots/bends and no pavements.
A recent application to the County Council to make a provision for a school bus stop at the Rowington Green end of the settlement area was rejected due lack of visibility for children crossing the road and insufficient space at the side for the school bus to leave the road for collection/drop off.
The steep hill and sharp bends around Rowington Church on the B4439 Old Warwick Road leading to/from the proposed settlement to the south has been a source of concern from residents for many years, with Rowington Parish Council only recently securing signage to slow traffic down.
The rest of the local roads off the B4439 Old Warwick Road surrounding the proposed settlement are all narrow country lanes with many sections not wide enough for two cars to pass.
Any attempts to widen both the B4439 Old Warwick Road or surrounding country lanes would inevitably result in the necessary removal of long-established hedgerows and trees which would have a further detrimental impact on the character of the area.
Due to its rural location, public services are again wholly inadequate to support this development and would need significant investment in infrastructure.
The water supply for existing residents needs local pumping stations to maintain pressure.
The overhead electrical cabling and supply suffers occasional power cuts already, presumably due to existing capacity constraints.
Multiple houses in the immediate vicinity (particularly down the rural lanes) do not have access to public drains for removal of waste and rely on their own treatment plants/septic tanks, demonstrating the investment that would be required to significantly upgrade the current facilities for accommodating this development.
The B4439 Old Warwick Road occasionally suffers from surface water flooding from the surrounding fields, due to insufficient or blocked drainage. The local country lanes surrounding the proposed settlement have no drainage at all and rely on ditches. Development of the land will only likely worsen this problem considerably, without major investment, with the surface water having nowhere to go.

No

ID sylw: 106778

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kassie Chana

I wish to formally object to the proposed new settlement location at ‘Land South of Kingswood’ (Reference C1); I believe the site is entirely undevelopable and unsuitable. My concerns relate to a range of issues, including land ownership, the Green Belt designation, infrastructure limitations, environmental impacts, and the potential harm to heritage assets. I have summarised and expanded on these key concerns below:

.Land Ownership & Viability:
The issue of land assembly is crucial. With over 25 different landowners in the proposed settlement area and none of them currently willing to submit land for development, the feasibility of this site being developed becomes highly questionable. For the site to be considered "developable," the NPPF requires there to be a reasonable prospect that it will be available and could be viably developed. Since the land has not been made available, this would suggest the site is not suitable or developable for housing at this time.
.Green Belt Considerations:
The fact that 'Land South of Kingswood' lies within the Green Belt is a significant concern. According to the NPPF, Green Belt boundaries should only be altered in exceptional circumstances, which need to be fully evidenced and justified. There are other alternative sites for new settlements that are not in the Green Belt, making it difficult to justify the need to release this land for development. The Green Belt assessment further highlights the site's contribution to safeguarding the countryside, adding weight to the argument against its development.
.Infrastructure & Accessibility:
The infrastructure in the Kingswood area, especially transportation links, seems insufficient to support a large-scale new settlement. The Old Warwick Road, which is the main access route to the village, has several limitations, including narrow bridges and restricted access for high-sided vehicles. The need for extensive new infrastructure to connect the site to the broader transportation network, including the railway and canals, makes the development even more challenging. Additionally, the remote location of the site relative to the strategic road network and major employment centers would hinder its accessibility and long-term sustainability.
.Sustainability and Transport Links:
The proposed site’s limited connection to public transport options—especially with the train station in Lapworth offering infrequent services and limited parking—raises concerns about the sustainability of the development. With no nearby bus services and a reliance on private cars for commuting, this would contribute to increased traffic and environmental degradation. The site’s location, combined with a lack of infrastructure to support walking or cycling, compounds these issues.
.Visual and Environmental Impact:
The undulating topography of the site is a significant concern, as the elevation variance could cause substantial visual harm to the landscape. Additionally, the proximity of Baddesley Clinton, a Grade 1 Listed Building, and its historic grounds would result in considerable harm to the setting of this heritage asset, which is irreplaceable and protected.
.School Capacity and Local Amenities:
The local school at Lapworth is already oversubscribed, meaning there may be insufficient capacity to accommodate the children from a new settlement. The lack of capacity in schools, along with the potential need for additional educational facilities, further complicates the feasibility of the development. Moreover, the proposed settlement’s demand on local infrastructure, including roads and community services, could overwhelm the existing provision, leading to further strain on the local area.
.Traffic & Local Safety:
One of the more immediate concerns is the impact on local roads and safety. With limited public transport options, an increase in car use would likely exacerbate traffic issues. The narrow country roads, which are not designed for high volumes of traffic, would pose significant risks to pedestrians, cyclists, and children in particular.

Given all of these concerns, it seems that there are strong arguments against the viability of the 'Land South of Kingswood' site for development. The lack of land availability, infrastructure deficits, Green Belt status, environmental harm, and potential impacts on the local community and heritage assets all contribute to the case for reconsidering this location. Additionally, other non-Green Belt sites seem to offer more suitable alternatives for the housing need.

No

ID sylw: 106793

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ravin Naik

1. Impact on Green Belt: Site C1 is located within an area that contributes significantly to the Green Belt. The Green Belt Review Stage 1 indicates that this site plays a crucial role in preventing urban sprawl and maintaining the character of the countryside.
2. Sustainability Concerns:
Although Site C1 is noted for its proximity to educational facilities, only 17% of the settlement area is within a sustainable distance to a primary school. This limited accessibility could lead to increased traffic congestion and reliance on private vehicles, contradicting sustainability goals.
3. Infrastructure Strain: The proposed development of 6,000 homes would place an immense strain on existing infrastructure, including roads, public transport, sewage and local services.
4. Environmental Impact: The development poses a risk to local biodiversity and natural habitats. The area is home to various species that could be adversely affected by construction and increased human activity.
5. Community Impact: The scale of the proposed development is disproportionate to the existing community, potentially altering the character and social fabric of the area. This could lead to a loss of community identity and cohesion.

No

ID sylw: 106804

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mike Wiseman

Green Belt land defines the character of village settlements and the loss of the villages with a large development such as C1, will create sprawl into important Green Belt land which maintains village settlements while providing a balanced lifestyle for people to enjoy green spaces.
We are of the opinion that there are better site options available, for example the proposals at Hatton. An approach to make available more sites as smaller developments, rather than one body of land area would be a better solution and negotiate the concerns raised better. Additionally, increasing existing towns could be a better solution where they are better equipped for further expansion; Stratford on Avon being a good example.
The inclusion of site C1 in its entirety will have an irreversible devastating impact to the character and purpose of the surrounding area of Lapworth and Rowington and we thus formerly object to its proposal in the strongest terms. The loss of important farmland to support central Government vision to provide sustainable solutions to feeding the country will also be a lost opportunity.
There is evidence of a distinct lack of resources to support a large development area suggested in C1 and expansion or creation of new, will have further impact on the road infrastructure. There are better options than C1, for example in the Hatton area that could contribute to the housing requirements that the Council seeks to achieve.
We respectfully reiterate our strong objection to the selection of C1 as an option for the satisfaction of housing needs and urge the Council to consider either smaller site development, expansion of existing towns or appropriateness of other options put forward.

No

ID sylw: 106875

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Graham Hames

The infrastructure is not in place to cope with major development
1) Pavement & lighting on Old Warwick Road
2) Railway capacity is at maximum, no chance of increase for many years
3) No sufficient power supply, regular outages already
4) Water supply & sewage inadequate
5) Traffic congestion in Hockley Heath and Warwick bad already
6) Reduces availability of countryside
7) Why should we take Coventry overspill. Use brownfield sites in Coventry!

Other

ID sylw: 106882

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Birmingham International Airport Ltd

It has been noted the SWLP’s potential new settlement C1-Land south of Kingswood may be within this 15km radius of the airport. Therefore, when considering these, the Councils need to review the Airport’s Tall Building Policy and to determine how this may impact any proposed development within these areas. It is also requested that reference is made to aerodrome safeguarding and statutory consultation with the Airport within corresponding policy requirements and pre-application advice guidance, should this strategic location be carried forward within the Regulation 19 version of the SWLP.

Other

ID sylw: 106934

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Historic England

POTENTIAL OBJECTION: we reiterate our comments made at I&O stage:

“In relation to the potential locations for new settlements, we consider that location C1 Kingswood/Lapworth is especially sensitive, given that it lies between the Grade I Packwood House and Grade II* RPG to the west and the Grade I Baddesley Clinton House and Grade II RPG and SM to the east, both with many other Grade II listed buildings and structures also present. The area is also characterised by canal infrastructure and just to the south of the settlement of Kingswood is the junction of the Grand Union Canal and the Stratford-upon-Avon Canal, with a number of listed structures associated with the canals, such as locks, bridges and cottages. Historic England would therefore have concerns about the impact on the historic environment of a new settlement of around 6,000 dwellings in this location”.

No SMs in site, but Baddesley Clinton as noted on the north edge. Also close to Harborough Banks Iron Age hillfort (non-designated, regionally important) which encloses the west part of the existing Kingswood settlement, and its setting would be the west part of the proposal.

Recommend: Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) prior to allocation. However, we consider that this is potentially the most sensitive location of the 12 new settlement locations being consulted on and would prefer this not to be carried forward into the Reg 19 Plan.

No

ID sylw: 107103

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Carol Regan

Ref C1
Land South of Kingswood - Object. This is greenbelt land, farming land.

We have no pavements for walking children to school, which is full to capacity now (junior school, children of senior age have to be bussed as is at the moment).

The road could not cope with the extra traffic.

Lapworth Railway Station has only 16 parking spaces & limited train which stop.

Also there is no local employment.

No

ID sylw: 107111

Derbyniwyd: 01/02/2025

Ymatebydd: David Ollis

While the draft document asks the right questions about impacts of potential development and everyone agrees there is a need for more housing, the document does not identify appropriate areas. C1 Kingswood is green belt and development would cause destruction of woodland, agricultural land, and wildlife. The need should be met by infill development. These proposals will effectively swamp the existing village. Local roads are completely inadequate to access this development so further road building would be required outside the development area itself, causing further destruction and permanently altering the character of the area. Lapworth Station has insufficient parking and is only accessible by a narrow residential lane. It is unsuited for a major increase in use. The area between the Stratford and Grand Union canals is low lying and prone to flooding. The north eastern area is close to the historic Baddesley Clinton House, a National Trust Property, and to the Heart of England Way. The section of the Stratford Canal affected is also under the care of the National Trust as an area of natural beauty. Numerous farms and residential houses would be engulfed by a semi-urban environment.

No

ID sylw: 107122

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Wood

My concerns relate to both the major proposal for Ref C1 and to the “Call for sites”, sites that have been identified.
My concerns relate to:
1. Inadequacy of the local infrastructure in terms of
a) Roads-which are very rural in nature and have restricted width and majority lack pavements for pedestrians. There is lack of street lighting and there are some dangerous junctions.
b. Rail – the rail line through Lapworth is already at capacity and would be unable to cope with any increase in traffic, more frequent stops etc.
c. Bus – the bus services to and from Lapworth are virtually non-existent with only a handful of services a week.
d. Doctors Surgery – the Lapworth surgery is at capacity and any increase in population numbers will very much be to the detriment of the existing residents of the area.
e. Energy Supplies – There is no gas in Lapworth. The Electricity supplies are currently inadequate and largely over ground resulting in many power outages being experienced by the residents of Lapworth in any one year.
f. School/Education provision – there is only a primary school, with secondary school pupils having to commute to Warwick, Henley in Arden, Stratford or Solihull. School buses/coaches often have to pick-up and drop pupils at inadequate and dangerous locations.
g. Warwick Hospital – already running at capacity
2. Impact on the Warwickshire Canal Conservation corridors – several of the sites including the main site C1 are bounded on at least one side by either the Grand Union or Stratford Canals.
3. Flooding – There are many locations within the area that experience flooding of the highway during inclement weather and this can only be exacerbated by the consequential increase in hard surfaces caused by increased housing.
4. I am not sure that the proposed Local Plan fully embraces the principle of access to the countryside by the retention of Greenbelt
5. Impact on historical property –

No

ID sylw: 107169

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard McDonaugh

I write again to stress the importance of the Green Belt, especially the Lapworth, Kingswood area and proposed development site C1.

The land between two National Trust properties is important both for wildlife and for mental health/wellbeing benefits. Prime agricultural land will be essential in future for feeding our ever-growing population, particularly given the impacts of climate change. Every piece of land will be required to help us become food self sufficient.

Infrastructure is at its limits due to creeping infill building in recent years. We suffer from flooding, sewage leaks, power cuts, and occasional low water pressure. Lapworth Surgery and Kingswood School are at full capacity with very limited parking. Lapworth railway station has inadequate parking caused by house building.

Roads cannot cope with heavy traffic causing noise, fumes, and pollution. Large vans and lorries squash verges and spread mud over road surfaces which makes driving dangerous.

It is estimated there are one million empty properties. If these were utilized there would be no need for destruction of the country side. More building will not solve the housing crisis, only intensify the demand. Crime will spread from the cities and quality of life will be lowered for all.

No

ID sylw: 107399

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Lapworth Parish Council

The Parish Council has strong concerns about the viability of settlement C1 aligning
with the 20-minute neighbourhood policy due to:
• Poor transport infrastructure - no regular bus service, an infrequent, freight based rail service with minimal parking and no north-bound step-free access at the station.
• Narrow, winding roads with high hedgerows and virtually no lighting on many and hardly any pavements.
• The low railway bridge and narrow canal bridges.
• Significant traffic and parking issues.
• Challenges relating to the nearly full Lapworth Primary School.
• The extra burden on healthcare at the already near-capacity Lapworth Surgery.
• The environmental impact (including to heritage sites such as Kingswood Canal
Basin, Harborough Banks Iron Age Hill Fort and a priest tunnel running from Baddesley Clinton to the Manor House). The canal is protected under the Warwick District Canal Conservation Area (Civic Amenities Act of 1967).
• The area already suffers from frequent power cuts and bad flooding - many parts of Kingswood and Lapworth have no sewers or storm drains. There is already a strain on water supplies which is necessitating an upgrade to satisfy current demand. Any significant development in this area will surely require additional extensive works.
• There is no mains gas supply to Lapworth and houses are dependent on oil and electricity (or occasionally gas cannister). The requirement for a new development is air-sourced heat pumps which will place extra demand on the existing power supply.
• Limited local employment.

Yes

ID sylw: 107439

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Moreton Morrell Parish Council

capacity 4960 homes: proposed new settlement has excellent rail connections to Birmingham, Solihull, Warwick and Leamington via Lapworth Station and is ranked the best performing option for transport and accessibility.