BASE HEADER

Potential Settlement Question C1

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 211 i 240 o 284

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105503

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Peter Richard Jarvis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I formally object to the proposed development of settlement C1, Chessetts Wood Road Lapworth (Ref 615) and the cumulative impact of developments around Lapworth and Hockley Heath due to significant impact on the area's beauty, historic properties, and local tourism. Increased traffic and pollution would degrade infrastructure and harm local businesses. The development would lead to light and noise pollution, require new bridges over canals, and exacerbate issues with limited gas supply and sewage systems. Lapworth train station is already inadequate, lacking bus services, and the local school cannot accommodate more children. Additionally, the disruption to wildlife is a serious concern.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105507

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Robin Johnson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I have several concerns about Kingswood as a new settlement site and infill site 235. The narrow roads, particularly during peak times, create congestion, while existing services like gas, mobile signal, water supply, sewage, and power are inadequate. The train service is unreliable with few connections, and local amenities, including the doctor’s surgery and schools, are already at capacity. The area’s countryside and wildlife are valuable and should not be compromised. Additionally, the Swallowfield site faces flooding and traffic risks. Overall, I believe Kingswood cannot support new housing developments due to these limitations.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105542

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Draper

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I find the proposed New Settlement C1 to be completely unsuitable and unsustainable. Building 5000 houses would devastate local wildlife, habitats, and farmland, while also creating more pollution and traffic hazards. The loss of vital wildlife corridors and ancient trees would disrupt ecosystems and agricultural communities. Rather than sacrificing the countryside, I believe we should focus on regenerating urban areas and addressing the issue of empty homes. The necessary infrastructure is lacking, and the plans do not consider essential services, such as burial facilities. This project would significantly harm both the environment and existing residents.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105545

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Pauline Watson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the proposal to develop potential settlement C1. This is a large area of green belt land, which would merge Kingswood and Rowington into a massive housing estate. This will harm the rural diversity and destroy wildlife habitats. The area lacks essential services, including a regular bus service, sufficient railway capacity, and adequate local healthcare and education facilities. Additionally, there are limited job opportunities, forcing residents to rely on vehicles for travel, which will increase traffic, pollution, and carbon emissions, contradicting the Government's net zero carbon commitment.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105572

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Alexander Hargie

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I believe B1 and C1 should be preserved as valuable green belt countryside, not developed for housing. Key concerns include the unsuitability of the B4439 as an access road due to its narrowness and dangerous bends, the lack of existing infrastructure to support increased traffic, and the capacity limits at Hatton station. Development would harm local wildlife habitats and lead to significant loss of agricultural land, including a vital dairy farm. Additionally, local healthcare, education, and community facilities are inadequate for any population growth, making these sites unsuitable for a new town.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105574

Derbyniwyd: 27/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Adrian Burke

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to including the C1 and B1 sites in the South Warwickshire Local Plan, particularly the C1 site, which I find deeply flawed. The proposal to develop Green Belt land for residential purposes is impractical and lacks rational consideration. The C1 site could add significant traffic to already congested roads, with inadequate infrastructure and dangerous access routes. Environmental impacts on local wildlife and the necessity for public services further complicate this development. I urge the council to remove both sites from the plan to avoid disastrous consequences.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105589

Derbyniwyd: 01/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Christine Doolan

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As a Rowington resident, I object to the proposed New Settlement location C1 Land South of Kingswood due to significant concerns. Developing this site will result in the loss of Green Belt land, negatively impacting public health, biodiversity, and food security. Flood risks are heightened, and current infrastructure, including roads and schools, is already overstretched. Moreover, the area's cultural heritage, linked to historical sites, will suffer. I find the South Warwickshire Local Plan difficult to navigate, limiting public engagement. I urge planners to reject this proposal based on these critical issues.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105616

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Cllr Eileen Edwards

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

C1 – Land south of Kingswood – SUPPORT - capacity 4960 homes: proposed new settlement has excellent rail connections to Birmingham, Solihull, Warwick and Leamington via Lapworth Station and is ranked the best performing option for transport and accessibility.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105719

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Marina McQuade

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As a resident of Rowington Green, I object strongly to the housing proposal for the C1 site south of Kingswood in Lapworth. This development threatens the environment, rural green belt, and local infrastructure. I've seen a decline in local services, including healthcare and schools, which cannot support a sixfold population increase. Additionally, Lapworth station and roads are inadequate, posing safety risks. The area is rich in wildlife and historical significance, which would be lost. I urge the Council to prioritise urban infill and repurpose empty buildings rather than destroy our beautiful countryside. Please reconsider this proposal.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105725

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Gaffey

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to proposed New Settlement C1, Call for Sites Ref IDs 115, 610, 677 and 733 in Rowington, Ref IDs 30, 31, 53, 88, 161, 169, 205, 235, 278, 513, 514, 581, 596, 615, 649, 714 and 761 in Lapworth, and Strategic Growth Location 24 in Hockley Heath.

My objections are based on the following considerations:

1. Development scale
2. Road infrastructure and traffic
3. Water, power, sewer and stormwater, and mobile phone infrastructure
4. Major investment required to upgrade Lapworth rail capacity
5. Development near historic buildings
6. School capacity
7. Health service capacity (GP and hospitals)
8. Impact on existing amenity

The proposals are inappropriate development in the green belt. They would create precedent and further challenges in surrounding areas by opportunistic developers. The sites proposed are not sustainable and would be detrimental to locals and visitors who enjoy the amenity of Rowington, Lapworth, and Shrewley.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105739

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Joan Shepherd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am aware that it is necessary for more housing developments. However I think it is vital that each area is considered for its suitability within the surrounding area, and for the people who will be living there.

I think there are considerable problems for the proposed development C1 between Lapworth and Rowington

Namely:-

This area is green belt agricultural land.
The infrastructure is completely inadequate for so such a great increase in population.
Transport:- the roads are already congested.
Lapworth station on the Chiltern Line, which runs at capacity, has only parking for 16 cars.
The present bus service would be totally inadequate.
Anybody living here would to their own transport.
Other major areas where amenities would be inadequate are; schooling, doctor's surgeries, access to shops, availability for social live - pubs etc.
Basic supplies - Electricity, there is no gas, water - these are at times lacking now.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105740

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Phil Smith

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As a Lapworth resident, I have significant objections to the proposed development at site C1. It threatens the Green Belt's purpose, adding pressure on inadequate local infrastructure like roads and schools, which cannot accommodate more residents. Environmental concerns arise due to potential harm to local biodiversity and a Canal Conservation Area. Additionally, the deliverability of the site is questionable without clear infrastructure plans. Finally, the development's scale could disrupt the community's character and needs. I urge the planning committee to reconsider this proposal in favour of more suitable alternatives.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105743

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Penelope Ostins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly object to the proposed housing developments in Hatton, Lapworth, and Rowington. The recent homes in Hatton are struggling to sell, raising questions about the need for more. Building on green belt land threatens wildlife habitats, essential for pollination and food production. Roads are already congested and dangerous, with limited public transport and no capacity for infrastructure expansion. Our local healthcare and schools are at capacity, and the area's appeal for outdoor activities would diminish. I urge reconsideration of existing properties instead of developing green belt land.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105754

Derbyniwyd: 28/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs wendy` evans

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am against the development due to
Transportation and Accessibility

Poor Connectivity: Rural areas may have limited public transportation and are often more isolated from urban centres. The lack of connectivity to jobs, schools, or amenities can make it less attractive for people to live in these areas.
Distance from Urban Centres: If the area is far from major cities or employment hubs, it may be harder to attract potential homeowners or tenants.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105798

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Barry Young

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object to the inclusion of Site C1 in the Plan as it the development will lead to unsustainable increase in the population altering the rural setting permanently. There will be strain on infrastructure such as public transport, rail services, gas, mobile phone coverage provision and the GP surgery. The construction activities will have an impact biodiversity and their habitats, large canal conservation areas, ancient woodlands, historical sites and agricultural land for food production. The site is a green belt that plays crucial role in preventing urban sprawl and maintain rural character.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105816

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Joan Shepherd

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The area is greenbelt agricultural land. The infrastructure is inadequate and roads are congested. Bus services are totally inadequate which leads to more reliance on the car. Train car parking is insufficient. Amenities such as schools, doctors surgeries, shops and pubs are in inadequate. Basic supplies such as gas, water are in appropriate in the area.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105826

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Hannah Brooks

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We are devastated to hear of proposals to introduce a new dwelling on the edge of Lapworth that could see the population increase to 6 times its current level.

Lapworth is a huge asset to the wider area, a destination that attracts footfall to its canals, pubs and walks purely on the basis of its beauty and tranquility. This proposed build surrounding Lapworth, along with other proposed expansions around Hockley Heath and infill sites in the area will ruin this location and its surrounding areas - driving out the very people who volunteer and care for the parish and community currently. From litter-picking to community shows and fayres, these will all disappear with the very 'village' people that you will drive out from this expansion. Ourselves included.

It is already a challenge to get our children into the available nearby nurseries, Lapworth preschool and school - forcing hard working parents to have to consider private options we can't afford. The GP surgery is a huge asset to the village although it is already flagged as red for being on the verge of being unable to cope with the current parish population's needs.

I do realise that it is non negotiable for Warwick District Council to build their share of 300,000 new houses a year - however you do not have to choose your 'star' of the show locations such as Lapworth with its natural beauty, green belt farmland, equestrian facilities, proud village life and community to do this. You will destroy the very essence of what makes Warwickshire the very county it is.

We are currently selling our house and relocating in large part due to this potential impact, however we feel very strongly that Lapworth should not be ruined even after we are gone. We want to continue to live the village life, and fear that Lapworth is no longer that and might as well be an extension of Shirley and other nearby but less peaceful countryside locations in the future. You have already negatively impacted our ability to sell a house with these current proposals being made, to which we are highly upset and feel unfairly chastised for previously loving and caring for Lapworth. You may be interested to know that reasons cited or not wanting to purchase in Lapworth (as it currently is) include these proposed plans, 'too many houses already', the lack of reasonable train times, an over prescribed school and no bus services. All of these will become 6x more under pressure/lacking if the proposals are approved rendering Lapworth an undesirable location for all.

From two late 30s parents with children - we beg you to reconsider the impact these plans will have to our lives, the beauty of Lapworth and the future generations who deserve to be able to grow up in a beautiful village of Lapworth as it is. Please consider the people that have loved and cared for this currently beautiful Lapworth parish - a rare gem and asset to the county Warwickshire.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105831

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kathlyn Craig

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am writing to formally object to the inclusion of the following Strategic Growth Area/
proposed New Settlement location within the South Warwickshire Local plan.
C1 - Land south of Kingswood
My personal interest in this Strategic Growth/ New Settlement site is:
I am a resident of Lapworth, with an in-depth knowledge of the area
The grounds for objection to this Strategic Growth Area/ proposed New Settlement
location within the South Warwickshire Local plan is as follows:
Lapworth is spread along a collection of narrow country lanes, with only a very small area right
in the centre of the village having pavements or street lights. There are narrow, steep canal
bridges, blind junctions, and many areas where the roads flood frequently. The introduction of a
large number of extra cars would cause a danger to residents, walkers, cyclists, and horse
riders, and to the children walking to and from the village primary school. Facilities in Lapworth
are limited. The railway station, built in Victorian times, has a very infrequent service, and would
require a huge amount of investment to improve tracks, rolling stock, signalling, platforms, and
passenger facilities to bring them up to a level to deal with extra passengers, and step-free
access would have to be provided. The car park there is very small with no room to be
enlarged, and the village has no regular bus service. It would be necessary to build secondary
and primary schools, a GP Surgery, Dental surgery, retail outlets, and employment opportunities
before houses were built, as the existing facilities would be totally inadequate. Lapworth has a
small village shop, an off-licence/Post Office, a petrol station, and a shop selling tiles. The GP
surgery is at full capacity, there is no Dental surgery, and the primary school could not absorb a
large number of children. Water supply, sewerage, drainage and electricity supply are all
inadequate for the size of the existing village, even before any expansion. To improve transport
systems, upgrade utilities, and provide the additional education/employment/retail/health
facilities, would require vast amounts of investment, which would need to be funded by
Government. The site is of course situated in the Green Belt. This land was so designated in
order to ensure a continuing divide between areas of built-up development, to provide everyone
with an opportunity to enjoy nature, to protect wildlife, and to keep open wildlife corridors.

In conclusion, I believe these objections are important because:
Lapworth is unable to sustain such a large number of new residents, possibly 6 or 7 times more
that the existing population of the village. Such a level of investment would be needed to
improve road, transport, education, retail, and utilities, as to make the scheme unviable. The
character of the village would be irrevocably changed, and the Green Belt compromised, to the
detriment of all.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105835

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Anita Young

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Lapworth development-

My objections to the proposed development are as follows:-

Destruction of green belt land ( once destroyed can never be reinstated.
Increased risk of flooding. Lapworth village already suffers from substantial flooding including my own garden.
Dr’s surgery already at capacity.
School functioning at capacity.
Railway and car park unable to cope with increased numbers.
Road infrastructure inadequate for increased volume.
Lack of pavements thus dangerous for pedestrians.
Please ensure by objections are noted and included in future discussions.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105843

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Beesley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In addition to opposing this specific development, I strongly object to the sheer scale of
development proposals across Lapworth. The village is facing an overwhelming number of new
housing plans that threaten to erode its rural character and unique charm. Lapworth is a village,
and it must remain a village - not be gradually transformed into an overdeveloped suburb.
Excessive development will put immense pressure on local infrastructure, roads, and services,
permanently altering the community we cherish. We must protect our countryside and ensure
that any future development is proportionate and respectful of the village’s character.

In conclusion, I believe these objections are important because:
Traffic Safety Risks – Chessetts Wood Road is already dangerous; more traffic will increase
accidents.Overdevelopment – 20 dwellings are excessive and out of scale, ruining rural views.
Strain on Services – Roads, schools, and healthcare can’t support more housing.Threat to
Village Identity – Lapworth must remain a village, not an overdeveloped suburb.Call for
Responsible Planning – Development must be sustainable and respect the community.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105844

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Sandra Bowen

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I wish to object to the potential C1 development in Lapworth and Rowington .

I do so on the grounds that we are risking taking away important green belt and the agricultural land within it .

The local roads in the wider area could not support a development of the scale outlined and there is no rail infrastructure to support the scheme either .

The C1 development would impose a massive strain on existing facilities eg schools and medical practices .

The impact on the environment and on important conservation and heritage aspects is also profound .

I would prefer to see brownfield development near or in existing conurbations

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105925

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: David Yewdall

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Lapworth is a huge asset to the wider area, a destination that attracts footfall to its canals, pubs and walks purely on the basis of its beauty and tranquility. This proposed build surrounding Lapworth, along with other proposed expansions around Hockley Heath and infill sites in the area will ruin this location and its surrounding areas - driving out the very people who volunteer and care for the parish and community currently. From litter-picking to community shows and fayres, these will all disappear with the very 'village' people that you will drive out from this expansion. Ourselves included.

It is already a challenge to get our children into the available nearby nurseries, Lapworth preschool and school - forcing hard working parents to have to consider private options we can't afford. The GP surgery is a huge asset to the village although it is already flagged as red for being on the verge of being unable to cope with the current parish population's needs.

I do realise that it is non negotiable for Warwick District Council to build their share of 300,000 new houses a year - however you do not have to choose your 'star' of the show locations such as Lapworth with its natural beauty, green belt farmland, equestrian facilities, proud village life and community to do this. You will destroy the very essence of what makes Warwickshire the very county it is.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105954

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Nicole Kirsch

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Hi there I have lived in Lapworth for many years I m so very concerned about the building plans.
The rd to the school on station lane is May hem every morning and every afternoon with dropping of and picking up children .
The Doctors in Lapworth is already at full capacity and just can’t take on ant more

Daily I hear horns going and aggressive shouting as cars nearly or actually do collide with one other over the canal bridge. The roads are very narrow the extra traffic will be ridiculous. The narrow lanes can’t cope with the traffic now.
I strongly want to object to any building projects with in Lapworth as the infrastructure is just not there to cope with it.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105956

Derbyniwyd: 16/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Thomas Webster

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

These irreversible changes will impact the following:
Impact on Natural Landscape: High Sensitivity: The proposed development south of Kingswood is in an area with high landscape sensitivity. This means that the natural beauty and character of the landscape could be significantly altered by large-scale development. You can argue that the development would lead to the loss of valuable natural landscapes that are currently enjoyed by residents and visitors alike.
Noise and Air Pollution: New developments are likely to increase traffic, leading to higher levels of noise and air pollution. This could disrupt the peaceful environment that current residents moved to Kingswood to enjoy. You can request detailed air and noise impact assessments to understand the full implications of the development.

[Redacted point - respondent cites immigration as a burden on homes and school places]

I understand your concerns about the potential demographic changes and their impact on the local community. Here are some points you might consider when raising objections:
. Integration Challenges: Large-scale developments can lead to rapid demographic changes, which might challenge community cohesion.
. Community Safety: With changes in demographics, there might be concerns about community safety. You can request that the local council implements measures to ensure that the area remains safe for all residents, including children attending local schools.
. Consultation and Transparency: Emphasize the importance of involving the local community in planning decisions. Transparency in how decisions are made and who will benefit from new developments is crucial to maintaining trust and ensuring that developments meet the needs of all residents.

These development changes will deeply affect the physical, environmental, mental and financial state of the local community and area forever. Aswell their own safety. The entire majority of the local community, residents of Kingswood and Lapworth/Hockley heath area already deeply oppose this top down decision from the unpopular Labour Starmer Government in Westminster.
We never wanted this, we did not nor currently do consent to this top down decision at all.
I respectfully request that planners and councillors refuse the allocation proposal for the site(s) referenced, based on the reasons provided.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 105969

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Carol Bloor

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

C1 Settlement – Objection Summary - the local infrastructure is already overloaded, additional housing on this level would create major issues and would not be viable – see examples below
• A34 – there are frequent issues on the A34 in Hockley Heath with daily traffic jams/junction hold ups during rush hour/school pick up. There have been many accidents resulting in traffic calming measures/cameras being necessary.
• M42 is the key motorway to the area and despite measures over the years including widening and conversion to a smart motorway – the sheer volume of traffic continues to cause regular issues.
• Rail - The Chiltern Line experiences frequent issues, delays and cancellations with station parking at Lapworth and Dorridge already over capacity – to increase pressure on this line is not viable.
• Community - Significant additional housing has already been approved on Stripes Hill, Knowle the impact of which will create increased pressure on the shops and services in Knowle and Dorridge. Parking in both these villages is already at capacity. With Knowle high street regularly at a traffic standstill.
• Water & Sewage Networks – As a resident of Lapworth we already experience issues as the sewers and local water treatment facilities are decades old and, in some places, already not fit purpose –Without a major investment and development of the water network – additional housing at scale could not be supported.
• Flooding – During winter months it is often difficult to leave the area as many local roads are seriously flooded. including - Old Warwick Road, Chessetts Wood Road, Grange Road, Chapel Lane – flooding reasons are complicated but often caused by field run off /no drainage capacity/ground saturation/water table levels etc – Meadow Lane experiences garage flooding as the water table rises, with heavy rain, and seeps in through the floor – Any housing development would hugely increase impervious surfaces in the area which could be catastrophic to both existing and new home owners.
• Other services – As a resident of Lapworth I have no access to the gas main, experience regular power cuts and my mobile phone signal is intermittent at best – in short this area does not have an adequate infrastructure to cope with the current population and considering adding 1000’s of new houses is negligent and would be detrimental to all.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106003

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Gerd Kimber

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I object 100% to this abuse of our countryside, everywhere- Lapworth included.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106010

Derbyniwyd: 02/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Claire OReilly

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is recognized that small-scale development to address local needs may occur outside of
designated Priority Areas, and Kingswood is one such location being considered. The potential
development sites in Kingswood are currently within Green Belt areas. Development of these sites
will only be considered if there are clear sustainability advantages, which would serve as the basis
for demonstrating exceptional circumstances to justify removing the land from the Green Belt. The
main criterion for this decision will be whether these sustainability benefits exist, supported by
relevant evidence to assess various factors. While supporting documents already provide a range of
evidence, it is recommended to supplement this with input from local residents about how the
village operates in practice. The detailed concerns outlined below address key issues raised by the
evidence regarding the land east of Station Lane.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106023

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Adam Gillott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

1.Area is of outstanding beauty with wildlife, Kingfishers, Foxes, Badgers which we would be killing their natural habitat.
2.The Old Warwick Road is already very busy as it is, there clearly isn't the infrastructure for another 7,000 houses.
3.The canals and local walkways are beautiful, where will all the waste water go apart from into the canals killing local fish and birds.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106046

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Rob Mackin

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

As someone who works in Lapworth, I am extremely concerned about the proposed development of over 7,000 new homes in the area. I strongly oppose this plan due to the lack of adequate transport infrastructure, the strain on public services, and the overall negative impact it will have on both workers and residents.

Transport and Traffic Disruption

The transport links serving Lapworth are already insufficient. The roads are narrow, often congested, and unsuitable for the massive increase in traffic that this development will bring. The Council’s own assessment marks local and strategic highway capacity as a major issue, highlighting the severe risks associated with such large-scale development​. Without major investment in transport solutions—something this plan does not guarantee—commuting will become even more difficult and unsafe.

Overloaded Public Services

Lapworth and its surrounding areas lack the medical facilities, schools, and retail provisions to support thousands of new residents. GP surgeries already have long waiting times, and local schools are nearing capacity​. The proposed development risks stretching these services beyond breaking point, leaving both new and existing residents without the support they need.

Loss of Community Character

Lapworth has a unique identity—a balance of rural peace and community life. Rapid overdevelopment will destroy this, turning it into an overpopulated extension of larger urban areas rather than the thriving village it should remain.

This proposal does not serve the best interests of Lapworth’s workers or residents, and I urge the Council to reject it.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 106060

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Cousins

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I am greatly concerned at the proposals to enlarge Lapworth village.
The village is at the junction of 3 canals so which ever way you approach it you have to cross a canal using one of the 5 bridges some of which are very old brick-built structures in poor condition
Added to this is the presence of a very low and narrow railway bridge.
Station Lane is narrow with and lined with protected Oak trees and lacks a pavement for part of its length despite being a walking route to the school.
All these factors make the village wholly unsuitable for the amount of traffic which will occur if the village is enlarged.