No

ID sylw: 95441

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gordon Ashley

This area already overdeveloped with recent additions. Road structure cannot take more traffic. road from Bishops to M40 already over capacity particularly early & late in the day. GP surgeries in area already over subscribed & difficult to get appointments. Lack of hospital capacity in surrounding area. Area is being urbanized & loss of charter of landscape.
No rail connections. Local services such as water & sewerage already under pressure with regular flooding.
Local schools under pressure. Impact on current residents of visual appearance of area.

Yes

ID sylw: 95463

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Hannah Molloy

Better to put an isolated hole in the Green Belt near transport links than induce sprawl of larger towns towards each other.

No

ID sylw: 95596

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bishops Itchington Parish Council

Poor for public transport and active travel.
Poor local road network.
Local schools oversubscribed.
Part of the site is subject to frequent flooding.
Infrastructure inadequate regarding domestic water supply.
See attachment for more information in section F2

Yes

ID sylw: 95648

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ian Clarke

Potential for a new railway station

No

ID sylw: 95825

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I do not agree with this site being included in the plan. My reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP, with which I broadly agree.

No

ID sylw: 96070

Derbyniwyd: 04/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Joanna Taylor

It is not clear how this proposal would meet the requirements for a new settlement. For example provide most of the day to day needs within the settlement. Currently there are insufficient facilities in the dippers Bridge, Bishops Itchington, Harbury area to meet the needs in terms of doctors, schools, shops, leisure activities. Meaning that residents have to go to Southam. The settlement would likely be the size that Southam was a few years ago before the extensive building there. It is not clear how this would fit into the site as the mainline train also runs through this area.

No

ID sylw: 96289

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Southam Town Council

We agree that this site is less suitable.

No

ID sylw: 96291

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Matthew Burns

This site will cause massive environmental damage to both the land that it is being built upon as well as in Bishop's Itchington, which will be turned into a cut through for anyone building and living in the new settlement. Should you build a new bypass for Bishop's Itchington that too will cause significant local harm. Please invest in somewhere we need, like in our schools, not in a new settlement thatcno one in the local area wants

Yes

ID sylw: 96401

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Bearley Parish Council

The SWLP has 12 sites, 5 of these are Green Belt land and seven are non-Green Belt land. These seven non-Green Belt land sites have room between them for 46,500 dwellings. This includes Deppers Bridge The existence of these sites means that there are no ‘exceptional circumstances’ to develop any Green Belt site.

In order to comply with the National Planning Policy Framework 2024, all for these non-Green Belt sites such as Deppers Bridge should be developed before any Green Belt site.

Yes

ID sylw: 96433

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Dr Guy Esnouf

All non Green Belt sites should be developed first!

Other

ID sylw: 96783

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Alcester Town Council

Alcester Town Council, Arrow with Weethley Parish Council, Kinwarton Parish Council, Wixford Parish Council and Great Alne Parish Council (together referred to as Alcester Parishes Group or ‘APG’) has no comment.

Yes

ID sylw: 96801

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Richard Le Page

Site not in Green Belt

Yes

ID sylw: 96946

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Margaret Jeffery

Not in Green Belt

No

ID sylw: 97307

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Carl Holloway

Too Small for Sustainability: At 4,840 dwellings (242 ha), F2 falls short of the 6,000-dwelling minimum needed for a self-sustaining settlement, undermining the SWLP’s vision.
Threat to Biodiversity: Its "Red" rating for high-value habitats risks significant environmental harm, conflicting with biodiversity goals.
Poor Transport Links: Rated "Amber" overall, with no suitable HGV routes, F2 cannot support sustainable connectivity, unlike better-connected sites.
Weak Employment Prospects: Employment potential is "below benchmark" due to access issues, limiting local job opportunities.
Education Challenges: No nearby expandable schools exist, requiring costly new infrastructure and transport, adding complexity.

Yes

ID sylw: 97501

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Lisa Donovan

All sites outside the green belt have to be developed first, before green belt sites

No

ID sylw: 97540

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Ellie Salmon

This development will have a significant detrimental impact to biodiversity, heritage sites, rural character, the local community of Southam & BI and associated villages. There has already seen considerable house building in the area. The site lacks all the necessary infrastructure to support such a development. There is no integrated transport infrastructure, no railway station, dependency upon motor vehicles. J12 has become increasingly busy as is the B4451 and associated roads, BI passing traffic often creates congestion and is not designed to handle the requirements from this development. Ancient wood Itchington Holt and is inhabitants will be severely impacted.

Yes

ID sylw: 97816

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Gary Jeffery

N/A

No

ID sylw: 98038

Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Joan Barlow

F2 location is not suitable for a new settlement. I have seen this low lying area flood regularly all of my life. Local infrastructure cannot cope with more houses, therefore more cars, roads, schools and medical, water services, constant problems now, approx 500 houses here have been built over the last few years. I have seen new housing estates built on natural flood plains causing flood/insurance issues for homeowners. With climate change more sinkholes, road damage etc likely to occur. Ditches, brooks, rivers, during certain weather conditions, will always flow out to flood plains and the sea, coastal erosion follows

No

ID sylw: 98048

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jake Salmon

This development will have a significant detrimental impact to biodiversity, heritage sites, rural character, the local community of Southam & BI and associated villages. There has already seen considerable house building in the area. The site lacks all the necessary infrastructure to support such a development. There is no integrated transport infrastructure, no railway station, dependancy upon motor vehicles. J12 has become increasingly busy as is the B4451 and associated roads, BI passing traffic often creates congestion and is not designed to handle the requirements from this development. Ancient wood Itchington Holt and is inhabitants will be severely impacted.

No

ID sylw: 98283

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Holly Farm Business Park

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

No Call for Sites submissions. Why is it included?

No

ID sylw: 98339

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Liverton

Insufficient infrastructure ie schools, medical & shopping facilities. Also local roads can not take anymore traffic.
Localised flooding of the river at Deppers Bridge needs consideration

No

ID sylw: 98862

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline West

1. It is considerably below the minimum size for sustainability (and existing map includes land take from conservation area!).
2. Rail access is unlikely
3. Needs major road access to be built BEFORE development to prevent damage to listed buildings in Ladbroke and unsafe use of existing roads nearby
4. Anti-sustainable by taking agricultural land out of food production
5. Damages rather than protects historic setting of Ladbroke and its ability to diversify tourism in South Warwickshire (sustainable, slow tourism away from the hot spots)
6. Damages rather than protects existing natural heritage (landscape, wildlife etc)
7. Flooding issues

No

ID sylw: 98917

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: (1) AG Family Trust 2024 & (2) N. Holdsworth

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

No Call for Sites submissions. Why is it included?

No

ID sylw: 99048

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Keri Bettis

The roads are unsuitable and already over capacity.
Local facilities will be unable to cope with significant extra capacity.
There is already a problem with flooding on the land and surrounding area.
It would be detrimental to the local wildlife, which desperately needs to be looked after.
There are no amenities.
Deppers Bridge already has HS2 and a railway line and housing would be a further blight on the countryside.
There are more suitable sites put forward in the plan that would be sustainable and not on green belt.

No

ID sylw: 99265

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Summers Holdings Ltd

Asiant : The Tyler Parkes Partnership Ltd

It does not contain any Call for Sites submissions - why is it included?

No

ID sylw: 99431

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Diane Wilson

See previous comments

No

ID sylw: 99491

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Tibbles

The area is completely rural, with poor access to existing Road Networks, Transportation hubs, Healthcare facilities and Education establishments. A development of this scale would overwhelm the local road networks and requires significant investment in all areas of basic services such as Water, Sewage & Power (no gas supply!) There are insufficient primary and secondary schools to serve the population, let alone with a significantly increased population, there is insufficient Healthcare provision both for basic GP services and hospitals - The nearest hospitals have insufficient capacity already. Emergency services such as Police, Fire and Ambulances are many miles away.

No

ID sylw: 99518

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Gillian Padgham

Not sustainable so does not meet with the Strategic Objectives of the Plan. Lack of infrastructure and a clear plan to provide this, lack of employment opportunities.

No

ID sylw: 99605

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

I note that it is annotated as ‘less suitable’ in the consultation. My reasons are primarily that it is not in conformance with Strategic Objectives of the SWLP (S01, So2, S03,S04, S05, S06, S09, S011and S012) with which I broadly agree. I reference those objectives:

Yes

ID sylw: 99706

Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Peter Delve

Under the National planning policy framework (NPPF) 2024 (see paragraph 144) it states development on green belt is only permitted where exceptional circumstances are fully evidenced are justified. On the basis that 46,500 homes are available via 7 of the proposed new settlement sites (E1, F1, F2, F3, G1, X1 and X2) which aren’t on green belt land. Therefore these should take preference to all other new settlement locations.