Other

ID sylw: 88713

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jerry Corless

N/A

No

ID sylw: 88754

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: John Ciriani

The area would join up existing areas and make the quality of life worse for all concerned . We do not want to live in a city or sprawling urban area.

Yes

ID sylw: 88926

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Nicholls

This site has multiple challenges facing it, and wouldn't be a practical choice for a new collection of houses. Access to it is on a narrow country lane and a narrow farm lane, surrounded on all sides by a working farm. Over and above this, I don't think the local infrastructure is sufficient for new houses. We have semi-regular power cuts in nearby Dugard Place, and electricity infrastructure isn't enough to feed in solar generation. Broadband is sub 40Mbps in our area. Water and waste supplies have been the subject of many recent repair works by Severn Trent Water.

No

ID sylw: 88929

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Joanne Bailey

It is already difficult to be able to access the B4100 from the B4087 & regularly queuing on the A429 beyond Barford from the Warwick roundabout adding to this both with proposed new settlement, and possible new gravel site & UoW Innovation campus development already in discussion - it would become an absolute nightmare.
Lack of rail connectivity would not assist.
Yet further urbanisation of villages when already options to extend existing urban developments in existence.
Loss of good quality land.

Yes

ID sylw: 88944

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr STEVEN BLIWERT

This area is more appropriate from an infrastructure point of view particularly transport infrastructure.

Yes

ID sylw: 88982

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Robert Eynon

Its proximity to key roads and the greater options for infrastructure developments in leamington versus Warwick/Hatton make this a more suitable solution

No

ID sylw: 88996

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Stratford upon Avon District Council

The gap between Wellesbourne and Leamington is extremely important. This settlement particularly if it was implemented with SG9 and 10 would extend Leamington southwards to an unacceptable degree.
If a new motorway junction is to be produced associated with this settlement it should have no connection south west of the motorway. This would only introduce more traffic towards Wellesbourne. A link road from here to Stratford would be expensive, intrusive and completely undesirable. Much better to improve Longbridge still further and upgrade the A46 westwards.

No

ID sylw: 89051

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Alison Lusty

Summary of severe adverse effects on the local area (see detailed comments):
• Loss of significant residential and locality amenity.
• Loss of character of this area of South Warwickshire.
• Effective creation of a suburban fringe leading to loss of existing strong communities and destroying the character of villages.
• Over-development in an area that is already experiencing pressure on the highways infrastructure.
• Lack of public transport options in the area.
• Highways (A425, A452, A429) are already unable to cope with current levels of traffic.
• Local infrastructure is already stretched.

Yes

ID sylw: 89084

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Alison Walker

Area provides good road connections, especially with the proposed new access to the M42. The proposal does not seek to subsume existing smaller settlements and is therefore consistent with planning policy

No

ID sylw: 89308

Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025

Ymatebydd: L B

A New Settlement here would create a massive increase in traffic on surrounding road which are already busy. It would merge in with all the existing developments around Warwick and Leamington and become a huge urban area without countryside. The proposed quarry by Barford will increase traffic congestion without further development in this area. Barford and Wellesbourne risk becoming part of Warwick and Leamington urbanisation.

No

ID sylw: 89340

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah Vaughan

Traffic would be the main issue here as the current road infrastructure is already unable to cope with the new developments taking place at Warwick Gates.

No

ID sylw: 89343

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Sarah Vaughan

Barford only has one public footpath for access to the countryside and it is a dead end. The proposed residential site 712 for 80 houses will take away the one and only footpath residents have access to. Any proposed infill sites and extended developments into the surrounding countryside MUST include new footpaths and new access to the remaining countryside. I would like to see a proposal to introduce more access and public footpaths to green spaces.

No

ID sylw: 89378

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Allan Murdoch

I do not agree for the following reasons: Loss of valuable agricultural land, Will create serious congestion aroiund Warwick and Leamington. Both towns are already badly congested and any further develoment will create major traffic chaos at peak times. It is already designated as an area of particular beauty. The area has an abundance of wild life such as badgers, newts, fallow deer, owls. sparrow hawks, buzzards.
The development will add to the pollution in this area.

No

ID sylw: 89381

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Elizabeth Murdoch

The congestion caused by such a development would bring traffic chaos during peak traffic times, e.g school times, start and end of working day. Prime agricultural land would be destroyed. Variety of wildlife, including badgers, owls, buzzards newts, etc., etc. would be disturbed. Historic trees would have to be removed. Pollution levels caused by extra vehicle traffic would rise.

Yes

ID sylw: 89544

Derbyniwyd: 20/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emily Carleton

Non greenbelt so yes it's fine

No

ID sylw: 89971

Derbyniwyd: 22/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ray Bradshaw

Completely out of proportion. Proposed X1 site is bigger than Wellesbourne!

Yes

ID sylw: 90168

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hugh Darwen

Together with site X2, I believe this non-green belt area would be suitable for the development of a new settlement. The motorway is close by and there could be provision for a new junction. There is also room for building the necessary new hospital and schools. Nearby Leamington Spa railway station can be rebuilt or refurbished as needed. Building on X1 and X2 would minimise the impact on the character and biodiversity of south Warwickshire, compared with some other sites that have been offered.

Yes

ID sylw: 90307

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Elisabeth Darwen

Development at location X1 together with X2 is likely to result in less of a negative impact on South Warwickshire than would occur with the development of many of the other sites proposed. Access to the motorway network with room for a new junction possible. Close to Leamington Spa Station. Space for houses, schools and a new hospital.

No

ID sylw: 90329

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Hedley Cooper

X1 combined with SG09 and SG10 would be the first major development south of the M40, which is a natural barrier to the urban sprawl of Warwick and Leamington. If this takes place the undulating rural landscape will be destroyed, and over time it will be inevitable that Barford become encompassed by the Warwick/Leamington conurbation changing the nature of this part of South Warwickshire which should be resisted and removed form the local plan.

Yes

ID sylw: 90532

Derbyniwyd: 23/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Neal Soutter

If we need to build the number of houses put forward by the government then X1 is in a better location for development due to its close proximity to M40 junctions and Leamington. It also has the advantage of not being Green Belt.

Other

ID sylw: 90616

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Ben Ranner

Whilst broadly in favor of the settlements approach, this option cannot provide affordable housing with good transport facilities, being as it is entirely reliant on cars for access to services, employment and education (strategic objective 2). The lack of provision of access to rail or to active travel options prevents anything but powered transportation, but this is hampered by a lack of road network to take drivers south from the X1 development (strategic objective 3).

Further concerns are around encroachment on rural communities (strategic objective 5), surface water flooding and impediment of the landscape and natural environment (strategic objectives 7&8)

Yes

ID sylw: 90639

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Alice Smith

Wellesbourne is the perfect brownfield site for inclusion in the SWLP preferred options.

No

ID sylw: 90666

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ellie Lees

Inappropriate development within the green belt. It seems ridiculous to have a green belt if that doesn't mean anything! There's not enough consideration to public services either and how this will impact everyone else. It's hard enough to get a GP appointment as it is.

Yes

ID sylw: 90710

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Averil Stewart

keep new development close to road infrastructure opportunites like motorways is far more sensible

Yes

ID sylw: 90739

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr James Edge

Development would benefit from all the road improvements which have taken place on Europa way.

No

ID sylw: 90742

Derbyniwyd: 10/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Lori Herbert

I wish to formally object to the proposals for sites SG09, SG10, and X1. I have significant concerns about flooding due to developments on floodplain land, particularly impacting Barford and Wasperton villages. Expanding beyond the M40 threatens the character of historic villages and may lead to overdevelopment. Additionally, I oppose the loss of greenbelt land and the focus on larger housing over affordable options, often bought by investors rather than locals. Infrastructure, including road access and community facilities, must be prioritised before any further development. Without these considerations, I cannot support the proposed developments

No

ID sylw: 90784

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Bond

I object to the proposed site X1, east of Barford on several grounds;

This is inappropriate development in the Green Belt on a large scale which will have a detrimental impact on the village of Barford. There would be no or insufficient infrastructure such as a Doctor’s surgery, shops, or schools.

It would have a big impact on local traffic with the volume of additional traffic accessing an already busy Barford bypass. If the gravel extraction project goes ahead on an adjacent site the effect on local traffic with lorry movements would give major safety and traffic management problems.

No

ID sylw: 90789

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Maxine Mayer

Much of the land required will never be put forward. There are huge numbers of land owners and house owners that would be required to secure access and it needs an upgrade to J14 of M40. The site has been incorrectly risk assessed - documentation will be sent separately. It will adversely affect the Barford conservation area, the site is a high flood risk, environmentally very sensitive and the sand and gravel will need to be extracted. The site is BMV and currently in food production.

No

ID sylw: 90873

Derbyniwyd: 24/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Keir Greenwood

The first question only gives answers but not the question. Yes/no/other what?

I cannot support this application.Barford is a small village which already suffers from too much traffic at too high a speed. The increase in traffic volume and noise generated by this many houses close by will erode the peace in the village and as a resident on the high Street, the noise will be disruptive. We have a toddler and a construction site so close to the village will pollute local air quality whilst putting pressure on limited local services.

Yes

ID sylw: 91070

Derbyniwyd: 25/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Julian Brown

Yes, ideal location to take some of the pressure from Leamington and Warwick for housing whilst providing new settlement and new outdoors for people. Good location for serving numerous business hubs