BASE HEADER

Potential Settlement Question BW

Yn dangos sylwadau a ffurflenni 181 i 210 o 1064

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88682

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Zoltan Sagi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed development will , in effect, merge the villages of Bearley, Wilmcote and Pathlow therefore this will not be a 'new' settlement.
The proposal will be building on some land which is best and most versdatile.
The settlement will harm the conservation areas and heritage village centres of both Wilmcote and Bearley due to inevitable urban sprawl

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88723

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Lane

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

These are historical communities dating back to at least Shakespear's time which will be overwhelmed by new communities many times larger than they currently are. This will inevitably destroy these existing communities, replacing them with small towns. The infrastructure and delays in supporting facilities will mean the new communities are likely to be built and lived in well before they can be supported with the right facilities such as GP surgeries, shops, local transport, schools.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88766

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Jean Harris

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I OBJECT on the following grounds:
• this is unnecessary development on the green belt
• it will damage biodiversity, green spaces and wildlife habitats and break down wildlife corridors
• the local infrastructure cannot cope with the thousands of new vehicles these houses will bring
• local schools, medical facilities, utilities and water supply will not be able to cope and new facilities will not be available in time.
There is NO justification for a development of this scale in this location
forcing inappropriate expansion on rural villages. Development MUST be sustainable and respect the character of existing communities.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88768

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Sue

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A big development would seriously undermine our green belt village centres.
The foundations of Wilmcote’s important cultural heritage site, Mary Arden’s Farm, could be destabilised by the increase in traffic.
There is difficulty accessing the A3400 from the Wilmcote junction now. More cars would make it almost impossible. Wilmcote is a rat run at busy times. Cars cutting between A46 and A3400, it causes problems on Church Road, and Station Road particularly where there is very little off-street parking.
Enormous pressure on local hospitals and GP’s. railway station has no parking. Floods
regularly in the fields south of Featherbed Lane.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88770

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Emma Bird

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposal for 6,800 new homes in Bearley would have significant negative impacts. It would destroy local Green Belt land, harm biodiversity/wildlife, and replace our beautiful & special countryside with urban sprawl. Increased flooding risks, loss of trees and wildlife, and reduced green space would also follow. Local roads & villages would face more traffic and congestion. The development would also increase air and noise pollution, strain local services like GP surgeries, schools and overload infrastructure like water and sewer systems. Ultimately, it would damage precious farmland and the countryside, and put unnecessary pressure on the local community.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88774

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Kirstie Morgan

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The flooding risk to the local area and surrounding villages will be greatly increased, e.g. Aston Cantlow, Newnham. The infrastructure will not be able to cope with increased traffic levels, Stratford is already hard enough to get to and through. The new settlement will eventually join up/ribbon to Stratford and ruin the local villages and ruin the village history. Crime will most likely increase therefore needing further services such as policing. Warwick hospital is the closest A&E hospital which is already over run, this will increase further putting lives at risk.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88776

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Zoe Osborn

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Traffic is already terrible going north to Henley and south to Stratford, many more vehicles will bring this area to a standstill. Traffic will then cut through the local villages which are not equipped to take any extra vehicles. The trains are infrequent and unreliable.
Wildlife I have sighted in the proposed area include deer, muntjac, hares, bats and woodpeckers.
Flooding on and in the locale around the A3400 is a regular occurrence, with so much building and no land to soak up the water, where will the storm water go?

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88780

Derbyniwyd: 17/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Carl Jones

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This plan constitutes unnecessary development, risking pedestrian safety, damaging biodiversity, increasing pollution and noise, destroying woodland meadows and hedges. Increased traffic and demmand on public amenities and services will cause unnecessary pressure on the Stratford and surrounding area community.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88805

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jane Hajduk

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This will only cause devastation to our historical village, the surrounding nature, and increase the congestion to an area that is experiencing over-crowding due to poorly thought-out housing developments already in the area. This MUST NOT happen to Wilmcote area.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88807

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Abbie Daw

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Infrastructure cannot cope
Flooding
We want to be a village that’s why we live here
Traffic will be ridiculous
Roads will be more dangerous for the children as people will speed more
Current house prices will fall
Emergency services will take longer to get out to us due to increased volume of cars on the road

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88867

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Ms Helena Flisowski

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Additional traffic A3400 causing major congestion and bottleneck Bearley and Henley ( impact on grade 2 building in Henley) major tailbacks towards Stratford increasing vehicles cutting through Wilmcote ( over inadequate canal bridges, resent subsidence railwaybridge )to A46 and lanes towards Birmingham/Evesham/Redditch. Accident hotspots Ridgeway . Cars/lorries affect structural integrity of grade 2 listed houses. Wilmcote and Bearley feature conservation areas, historical villages. settlement Impact on tourism. Settlement is green belt farm land , settlement leading to potential merging with Stratford . Water/waste management structures inadequate for size of settlement, localised flooding . GP surgeries and other infrastructure not adequate.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88871

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Stephen Aylott

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Bearley plan creates ribbon development from Henley to almost Stratford. This tourist route would become an urban corridor rather than one visitors can enjoy for its beautiful scenery. The green belt provides a corridor for wildlife and I have observed herds of deer and other wildlife on the proposed site. The area along the A3400 also experiences regular flooding in winter months. The roads in the area are already notoriously crowded and this would be significantly worse. Facilities exist in Stratford so why not spread these houses on the edge of the town rather than building a new town.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88877

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Janis Cauthery

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This would totally change two community minded villages and would adversely impact on the infrastructure of Stratford Upon Avon . It is a ridiculous number of houses to be considering to be built in this area

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88882

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Andrew Walsh-Waring

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Dear Sir

I formally object to this proposal ,

members of the council have pecuniary interest in this development not been disclosed or explained.

Impact on the existing communities, effect on the wildlife

no improvements and consideration on impact on the area f the additional infrastructure required to increase in population up to 24,000 The land is marshy, low lying and subject to flooding

in and around Stratford , a number of disused brownfield sites should be developed first before Greenbelt development considered, councillors to manage these sites first, prior greenbelt development
Yours

Andrew Walsh-Waring

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88883

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Melissa Nesbitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Wilmcote resident 25 years, seen enormous amount of development and new housing in area. Understand we need development but we have had so much leaving infrastructure of roads etc unable to cope. Traffic jams, access to SOA town unacceptable without 6700 more homes added.
We have flooding. Village used as ‘rat run’ for cars trying to access Bham road from houses built on Ridgeway etc.
We are an important tourist destination but tourism will be killed as we are swallowed up into a ‘Settlement’ and become one large housing estate.
Just horrified at the plans!!!

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88886

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Jacqueline Sims

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Insufficient infrastructure to expand housing in Stratford. Building near to historic sites will negatively impact tourism.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88889

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Malcolm Saggers

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

I strongly oppose the selection of the proposed Wilmcote/Bearley/Pathlow site based on several issues which I elaborate in the attached submission.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88892

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Caroline Walsh-Wsring

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It will adversely affect the landscape, wildlife, nature, traffic issues, air, light and noise pollution. Be detrimental to existing infrastructure and the proposed area is clearly floodplain. Plus destroying the peaceful and restful nature of the area essential to the mental health of all. Green belt land was created to protect us, these developments are ugly and unsustainable creating ghettoes of people who care little for the countryside way of life and our environment. Traffic in the surrounding areas is already dangerous, quiet country lanes will become worse cut throughs to A46, M40 causing further danger to wildlife and humans.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88893

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr CHARLES MICHAEL MOGG

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

* The proposed development creates an urban sprawl contra to Green Belt and conservation planning.

* It will irreparably undermine the village setting of the Mary Arden unique heritage site and risk damage from 1000% increase in local potential vehicle traffic.

* The only accessible strategic Road (A3400) is already subject to bottle necks north at Henley and south at the A46 Bishopton roundabout. upgrading of these bottle necks and the necessary duelling of the A3400 would cost prohibitive hundreds of millions of pounds which is not available from Government or in any meaningful size from private developers

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88898

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Richard Hannis

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

· Safety on A3400 splitting proposed development (previous fatalities).
· Loss of green belt and surrounding Bearley destroys village rural nature, access to green spaces, wildlife corridors and biodiversity
· Railway station little used due to limited car parking (blind access), long walk from village, poor service (single line)
· Increased habitation needs increased Accident and Emergency capacity. (recent Warwick Hospital Emergency)
· Traffic to the M40 northbound access constricted in Henley In Arden
· Traffic into Stratford already congested
· Access to the M40 southbound via Snitterfield, - minor road into fast traffic
· Utilities & sewage capacity?

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88900

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Chris Harrison

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Increase in traffic volumes.
Picturesque area, green belt and protected conservation area lost.
Increased traffic would create more accidents the level of which is already high.
Flooding dramatically increased.
Increased noise and air pollution.
The development would create huge urban sprawl close to stratford which the council has always objected to and resisted strongly.
The biodiversity of the area would be totally destroyed.
The development would dramatically change Bearley and the surrounding communities, which stratford council has protected from overdevelopment for many many years, and should still be resisted to allow such a beautiful rural area to be maintained.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88903

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Rebecca Boazman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

So much development over past years creating traffic and the infrastructure of our roads at breaking point.
I live in a historic village which will be destroyed as we are engulfed into a housing estate with even more traffic and pollution and will kill the tourism. A34 is already under pressure. Queue to get anywhere near SOA.
Local area flooding will increase as more houses put pressure on the environment.
Have to queue to leave village at peak times as more cars from new developments, using it as a rat run to access A34.
And sewage problem already! Horrified!

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88907

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mrs Debra Wilson

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Increased pollution
Destruction green belt/wildlife
Increased traffic which is already a problem!
Doctors/dentist/hospitals already full
Flooding increase, already a problem
Infrastructure not sustain proposed size of ‘settlement’
Inadequate public transport
Heavy machinery impact stability/structure Mary Arden Farm!
Tourism will be impacted as who want to visit a housing estate
Access into SOA will be gridlocked, already chaos trying to get into town.
Wilmcote already being used as a cut through
Light pollution will impact our village
We experience regular power cuts which will only get worse!
Appalled at prospect being proposed !

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88909

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Miss Isobel Kynoch

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Enviromental destruction!
Mary Arden Farm impacted from heavy machinery. Also reduced tourism as Wilmcote engulfed in housing estate.
Countryside/wildlife destroyed.
We have so much flooding locally already which will get worse.
Roads are falling apart as it is and so much congestion which will massively increase!
A3400 will not cope and A46 will be impacted.
Doctors etc already full capacity.
Pollution will increase, we will turn into an unattractive town just full of cars and houses and traffic!
We are a historical area which should be respected and maintained!!!

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88911

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr John Singleton

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This site is green belt and being farmed. It has no good transport links except the railway station. Few journeys are made to and from the station. Reasons include:- 1. Not many trains go down this line each day and half of them do not stop. 2. With no parking near the station passengers have to walk from the village or, from the other direction, on the road. (Dangerously). 3. If going south it is easier and quicker to drive to Warwick Parkway and get on there. The result is most trains are nearly empty and run at a loss.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88913

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Thomas Meyrick

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Totally inappropriate. A large area of green belt land that will create a settlement the size of Stratford approximately a mile from Stratford upon Avon. Bearley train station is single track and is not usable for commuting. Most local roads are small lanes and would not be able to cope with increased traffic. Would destroy local biodiversity and remove wildlife corridors. Makes far more sense to place development on the edge of existing large towns with proper facilities and travel links. Loss of protected hedgerows, woodland and meadows. Existing traffic issues and flooding would be made worse.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88915

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Jack Boazman

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Trying to get to work with traffic out of village across SOA already chaotic so can only get worse, road infrastructure will not cope.
Concerned about impact on Mary Arden Farm structure being affected and tourism will die.
Roads and cars cannot cope with planned housing!
Concerned about environmental impact, pollution and wildlife! Destruction of such large area of countryside being replaced by such large ‘settlement’.
I’m appalled at this planned enormous development which will negatively impact all of SOA as well as the area around Wilmcote!
Sewage is already an issue!
No positives at all!!!

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88916

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr David Blake

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No account has been taken of the provision access to the site other than rural lanes, or access to services such as shops with are located over 4 miles away on heavily congested roads and junctions with little or no provision for improvement.in addion the addition of 6000 homes will severely impact local roads.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88917

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Michael Mayer

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The proposed 6,800 new homes in Bearley would harm the local area in several ways: It would damage Green Belt land, disrupt biodiversity, and replace our beautiful countryside with urban development. There would be increased flooding risk, loss of trees and wildlife, and much higher traffic in surrounding villages. Local infrastructure like childcare, healthcare, roads are already overstretched, and pollution levels, including noise and air, would be expected to worsen. The project would permanently erase valuable farmland and natural l and picturesque spaces that we can never get back once it’s gone. No good can come of this for locals.

No

Preferred Options 2025

ID sylw: 88920

Derbyniwyd: 18/02/2025

Ymatebydd: Mr Paul Nesbitt

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Road infrastructure already unsustainable without more housing/cars!
Wilmcote bridge/embankments already weak.
Traffic from village along A34/3400/46 too overcrowded now!
Noise/air pollution will be at unacceptable levels.
No parking for cars using Wilmcote station.
We need to encourage tourism not put people off by sitting amid a huge housing development and traffic jams.
We have high levels of flooding which can only get worse.
Huge impact on the environment and wildlife!
Sewage infrastructure/communication and Power infastructure is already struggling without adding such a huge ‘settlement’ to it.
Hugely opposed to the disruption and detestation it would cause!!!