Yes

No further comments.

Yes

No further comments.

Yes

Agree with Pt1 selection of policies . No further comments.

Yes

Agreed as appropriate. No further comment.

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

Yes

Agreed as appropriate

No further comments. But see submitted comments separately regarding Q-I2, as below; NWBC Response – Recommend Option I2a: Set out infrastructure requirements for all scales, types and location of development - Although strategic sites do require specific focus/addressing in infrastructure terms, the wider impact of multiple smaller developments must not be ignored and can and will ultimately have similar scale infrastructure and service impacts to the specific large strategic proposals. NWBC Response – Agree that all identified options need to be used to address infrastructure requirements and delivery including; 1. On-site directly by the infrastructure provider as a requirement of an individual planning permission – e.g. digital communications, energy, water, roads, cycleways, access to public transport 2. On-site incorporated into the design of the development by the developer – e.g. renewable and low carbon energy, green infrastructure, affordable housing, design quality 3. Off-site through the provision of financial developer contributions to pay for the provision of infrastructure to be provided elsewhere – e.g. education, health facilities, biodiversity restoration

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd

dewiswyd