BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio William Davis Limited
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 97670
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
The Vision should recognise that there are unmet development needs outside of South Warwickshire that may need to be met within South Warwickshire. A Strategic Objective should also be to meet any unmet housing needs from communities elsewhere that cannot meet their needs, where it is practical and consistent with achieving sustainable development. This would align the strategic objective with the ‘positively prepared’ test of soundness.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG17 Question
ID sylw: 97672
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
William Davis Limited support the identification of SG17 as a SGL. Development of at least part of SG17 should be carried forward to the Publication version of the SWLP, reflecting Shipston-on-Stour’s role in supporting the Spatial Growth Strategy. SG17 performs well in the Sustainability Appraisal. Land west of Shipston-on-Stour including Land at Furze Hull Road is the least constrained and thus the most suitable area of the town for growth. Land at Furze Hill Road be included as an allocation in the SWLP for circa 120 dwellings in isolation, or as part of a comprehensive extension to Shipston-on-Stour.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG22 Question
ID sylw: 97678
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
William Davis Limited support growth in Studley given its role as a Main Rural Centre and its alignment with the Spatial Growth Strategy. However, object to the omission of land east of Studley being considered as part of the Studley SGL, including Land at Holt Farm.
It is not clear from the evidence how SG22 has been selected instead of, or without inclusion of, Land at Holt Farm, with specific reference to the Green Belt Review Stage 1 and HELAA B.
William Davis Limited therefore requests that Land at Holt Farm be allocated in the SWLP for circa 255 dwellings.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 97692
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
The South Warwickshire Councils must continually review the Local Housing Need up to adoption, they must consider an increased higher housing need, implement a 5% lapse rate to account for unimplemented commitments, and reassess the existing commitments and windfall allowance as outlined.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 97695
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
Vision Document submitted in support of Land off Furze Road, Shipston-on-Stour (331).
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 97697
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
Concept Masterplan and Heritage Statement submitted in support of Land oat Holt Farm, Studley (332).
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?
ID sylw: 97703
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
It is imperative that the SWLP adequately considers accommodating unmet housing needs arising from outside of South Warwickshire. There are significant unmet needs arising from the GBBCHMA which require attention, and potential unmet needs arising from Coventry which should be taken account of accordingly. There is also potential for unmet needs arising from Cotswold District, Redditch Borough and Solihull Metropolitan Borough which should be considered. Failure to do so would render the SWLP not positively prepared nor effective and thus unsound in line with Paragraph 36 a) and c) of the NPPF.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?
ID sylw: 97705
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
Development proposals should endeavour to deliver the infrastructure set out in the transport strategies outlined, but the SWC’s must acknowledge the ability and need for strategic scale sites to deliver infrastructure that is considered important to a local community but not formally identified within an IDP or other transport strategy. Regarding infrastructure requirements for strategic allocations, the SWCs should collaborate with those bringing the site’s forward to understand site-specific requirements. Allocations with overly onerous infrastructure requirements may delay the delivery of sites due to viability or feasibility concerns. Requirements for infrastructure should not undermine the deliverability of the plan.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?
ID sylw: 97708
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
The principle of Draft Policy Direction 8 is acceptable. The SWLP should ensure that policies regarding density align with Paragraphs 129 and 130 of the Framework, particularly local market conditions and viability (Paragraph 129b). Any density policy within the SWLP should acknowledge the impact that evidence-based housing needs.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 97709
Derbyniwyd: 05/03/2025
Ymatebydd: William Davis Limited
Asiant : Marrons
William Davis Limited want to highlight the directive from Matthew Pennycook MP to the Planning Inspectorate issued in July 2024 which is clear around the level of pragmatism to be given to Local Plan Examinations. This has already impacted a number of Local Plans which have been withdrawn for Examination, including nearby Solihull. It is therefore imperative that the Regulation 19 SWLP is sufficiently robust, taking into account the concerns raised by William Davis Limited in these representations, and is considered ready for Examination as highlighted by Section 20(2) of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.