BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Tanworth Residents Association
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the Vision and Strategic Objectives: South Warwickshire 2050 chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 88995
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
1) As "Growth" is fortuitously mentioned first must we assume that the Objectives are in descending order of importance? If not, what relative weight will be given to them - if there is a conflict between two or more?
2) Re the need for sustainability why is there no mention of rail in Objective 3 or statement that further development of the existing lines would be desirable? The line via Henley and the main line south through Warwick could be extended to Long Marston and beyond and there is an existing spur to Kineton/Gaydon with good access north and south.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG22 Question
ID sylw: 89003
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
Our neighbouring local authority has already built up to the county line. It is relying on Warwickshire to avoid urban sprawl through us maintaining our Green Belt protection. None of the Northern cluster of proposed sites SG22, 23 or 24 should be developed until other options outside Green Belt have been exhausted elsewhere in South Warwickshire.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG23 Question
ID sylw: 89005
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
Our neighbouring local authorities have already built up to the county line. They are relying on Warwickshire to avoid urban sprawl through us maintaining our Green Belt protection. None of the Northern cluster of proposed sites SG22, 23 or 24 should be developed until other options outside Green Belt have been exhausted elsewhere in South Warwickshire.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG24 Question
ID sylw: 89006
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
Solihull MBC has already built up to the county line. It is relying on Warwickshire to avoid urban sprawl through us maintaining our Green Belt protection. None of the Northern cluster of proposed sites SG22, 23 or 24 should be developed until other options outside Green Belt have been exhausted elsewhere in South Warwickshire.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 89012
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
It needs the addition of a clear statement that the Green Belt north of Henley will be protected at all costs. New settlements or expanded existing settlements will only be considered when all available sites elsewhere have been exhausted.
Given the proximity of Redditch, Bromsgrove, Birmingham and Solihull, the need for more and more houses must not override the avoidance of urban sprawl that this part of Green Belt provides.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 89095
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
A2 South of Tanworth/ A1 East of Wood End / C1 South of Kingswood (Lapworth)
All these sites are in very open countryside and Green Belt. Tanworth village is a discrete Conservation Area. There is little existing infrastructure and that is already overstretched. All are in a unique part of the West Midlands Green Belt under extreme pressure from aggressively expanding Redditch, Birmingham and Solihull. The M42, the M40 and the two railway lines via Henley and Warwick may be superficially attractive to planners, but they are already represent threats to many of the other Strategic Objectives set out above.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A1
ID sylw: 89109
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
A1 South of Tanworth
This site is in very open countryside and Green Belt. Tanworth village is a discrete Conservation Area that attracts many weekend visitors . There is little existing infrastructure and that is already overstretched. This is a unique part of the West Midlands Green Belt under extreme pressure from agressively expanding Redditch, Birmingham and Solihull. The M42 and the railway line to Henley may be superficially attractive to planners, but they also represent threats to many of your stated Strategic Objectives 1, 3, 7, 8 and 9.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A2
ID sylw: 89114
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
A2 East of Wood End Station near Tanworth
This site is in very open countryside and Green Belt. Nearby Tanworth village is a discrete Conservation Area that has attracted many weekend visitors . There is little existing infrastructure and that is already overstretched. This is a unique part of the West Midlands Green Belt under extreme pressure from aggressively expanding Redditch, Birmingham and Solihull. The M42 and the railway line to Henley may be superficially attractive to planners, but they also represent threats to many of your stated Strategic Objectives 1, 3, 7, 8 and 9.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question E1
ID sylw: 89121
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
This is an existing development site capable of further expansion. A renewed financial case needs to be made for restoring the railway the few kilometres north to Stratford - thus providing through access to Birmingham and London via the existing line to Honeybourne.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG13 Question
ID sylw: 89122
Derbyniwyd: 19/02/2025
Ymatebydd: Tanworth Residents Association
This is an already identified development area with local employment opportunities at JLR, etc and unsurpassed connections to the M40 and mainline rail through the existing spur to Kineton.
A financial case needs to be made to government and/or Great British Railways to build the few kilometres needed to reach Jaguar, improve the junction and build a new station. See Chiltern Railway's successful Project Evergreen to Oxford.