BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Hill Residential
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?
ID sylw: 102437
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential agree with this policy, subject to comments.
In accordance with Draft Policy I, flood risk and drainage deliverables should include water quality assessments in line with methods outlined in the CIRIA SuDs Manual, such as the simple index approach.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
ID sylw: 102438
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential agree with this policy, subject to comments.
It is largely consistent with the NPPF.
The classification ‘future flood management’ should be defined by the policy. It is important early engagement with the LLFA and EA confirms if any land within a site has been identified as being required for future flood management, otherwise this could become a significant constraint later on in the process.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- I- Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 102439
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential agree with this policy, subject to comments.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency?
ID sylw: 102440
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential supports the reduction of water demand through water efficiency measures. The requirements for enhanced water efficiency requirements beyond the requirements of the Building Regulations need to be appropriately evidenced. While Hill Residential is broadly supportive, it is recommended the Council give further consideration to the technical feasibility and costs of this policy as part of the next stage of plan preparation to ensure any proposals are feasible and viable.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design?
ID sylw: 102442
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential supports the consideration of climate change and resilience in the design of new development. As part of new design we give consideration to preventing overheating through application of the cooling hierarchy as noted, focussing on passive design measures in the first instance. This can include design, orientation and tree planting.
The application of any specific targets which go beyond the requirements of the Building Regulations or national guidance needs to be fully considered as part of the plan evidence base and viability assessment.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 24- Embodied carbon?
ID sylw: 102443
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential supports the need to measure and reduce the embodied carbon of development. However, the requirements of this policy will require further consideration to ensure that they are feasible and viable. Hill Residential would recommend that the approach set out in the Warwick Net Zero DPD and supporting SPD is followed, this requires the consideration and reduction of upfront embodied carbon, without setting a specific target at this stage. The application of specific targets needs to be fully considered as part of the Plan evidence base and viability assessment.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
ID sylw: 102445
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential supports the transition to delivering Net Zero development (as demonstrated by the separate call for sites submission for ‘Hatton Villages’), however there are concerns over elements of the policy as currently drafted, which go against national Government guidance, have design implications which have not been thought through, and will have viability issues not yet considered. Below a number of key issues have been identified and are considered. It is recommended that the plan considers the approach and policies set out in the Warwick District Council Net Zero DPD which requires development to achieve Net Zero Carbon in operation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-F- Decentralised Energy Systems?
ID sylw: 102446
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill supports the need to utilise low carbon heating for new development. However, further consideration needs to be given to the feasibility and suitability of including requirements for decentralised energy systems to provide heating and cooling.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-17- A Low carbon Economy?
ID sylw: 102447
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Hill Residential supports the need for new development to reduce carbon emissions and incorporate climate resilience measures.
The anticipated requirements of the 2025 Future Building Standards and Building Regulations will require new development and significant refurbishment of development to improve energy efficiency and incorporate low carbon renewable energy generation.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
ID sylw: 102448
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Hill Residential
Asiant : Turley
Any policy regarding the size of homes should be consistent with national policy.
