BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio BDW Trading Limited
Chwilio o’r newyddOther
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
ID sylw: 102198
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
While the draft policy aligns with the intent of reducing carbon emissions, BDW does not fully agree with it, particularly where it exceeds existing national standards. Exceeding national policies is likely to increase construction costs and potentially rendering projects unviable and unaffordable. To maintain consistency and avoid hindering development, local policies should align with national regulations, such as Building Regulations (Part L) and Future Homes Standard, which ensure achievable targets for energy efficiency and carbon reduction.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 24- Embodied carbon?
ID sylw: 102204
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The policy focuses on reducing embodied carbon in new developments by encouraging the reuse of existing building materials and adopting circular economy principles. This approach aligns with the NPPF, in relation to mitigating climate change through sustainable construction practices.
However, it should be noted that the proposed 'Part Z' amendment, advocating for the inclusion of embodied carbon considerations in Building Regulations, whilst not yet enacted into law, may provide alternative measures. Therefore, the SWLP's policy on embodied carbon should be worded in a way to ensure consistency with emerging Building Regulations amendments to avoid unnecessarily exceeding these.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy G- Climate Resilient Design?
ID sylw: 102209
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The draft policy seeks to ensure that new development and changes to existing buildings are resilient and flexible to future changes in climate, focusing on adaptability to future climate impacts. The approach aligns with the NPPF which advocates for proactive strategies to mitigate and adapt to climate change.
However, care should be taken to avoid exceeding Building Regulations, for example in relation to overheating risks in new residential development, unless there is robust evidence that demonstrates that this is justifiable and a necessity.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-H- Water Efficiency?
ID sylw: 102221
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The Environmental Improvement Plan 2023 Action 7 calls for a review of Building Regulations on water efficiency, reuse, and drainage, proposing a standard of 105 litres per person per day (l/p/d), or 100 l/p/d in areas of serious water stress. The 2021 Water Stressed Areas Classification identifies Severn Trent’s region as stressed, but the data is outdated. Severn Trent’s 2024 draft water resources management plan targets 110 l/p/d by 2050. Robust up-to-date evidence should be provided to justify stricter requirements of 100 l/p/d. Furthermore, it is recommended to align to Building Regulations in line with national requirements.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- I- Water Supply and Wastewater Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 102233
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The NPPF emphasises the necessity for sufficient infrastructure to meet the demands of new developments. While it's acknowledged that an adequate water supply is essential, it's expected that water providers, such as Severn Trent, undertake requisite upgrades to guarantee reliable services. Policy wording should expect for water providers to enhance their infrastructure in areas of growth.
However, sites which adjoin existing built-up areas with accessible infrastructure, such as the site at Cophams Hill, should be preferred due to existing infrastructure.
Directing development solely based on current water infrastructure investment is neither justifiable nor acceptable, especially for new settlements.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
ID sylw: 102252
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
Draft Policy J – Reducing Flood Risk aligns with the NPPF 2024, promoting a sequential approach to direct development away from high-risk flood zones. At Cophams Hill, development is primarily located in Flood Zone 1, while higher-risk areas are designated for open spaces and water management features, in line with the policy. The proposals incorporate Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) to manage surface water runoff, ensuring flood risk is mitigated and the development remains sustainable and resilient.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- K- Multifunctional Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS)?
ID sylw: 102270
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The policy requires all developments incorporate SuDS to manage surface water runoff effectively, aligning with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2024, which requires major developments to include sustainable drainage systems unless there is clear evidence that this would be inappropriate.
This is supported and Cophams Hill will integrate multifunctional SuDS not only to manage surface water runoff but also enhance biodiversity, improve water quality, and provide recreational spaces. This approach ensures that the development contributes positively to the local environment and community, aligning with sustainable development principles.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Climate Resilient and Net Zero Carbon South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.
ID sylw: 102277
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The chapter align with the councils' 2019 climate emergency declarations, outlining a comprehensive strategy to achieve net zero carbon emissions by 2050. Key initiatives include promoting large-scale renewable energy generation, implementing net zero carbon building standards, enhancing energy efficiency in existing buildings, and integrating climate-resilient design principles. To strengthen this chapter, it is recommended to provide clearer policies based on robust evidence. Ensuring these policies are actionable and supported by robust evidence is crucial for achieving South Warwickshire's climate resilience and sustainability goals.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
ID sylw: 102291
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
BDW supports the strategic design principles in the SWLP, aligning with the National Design Guide and NPPF to promote sustainable, community-focused development. The proposed Cophams Hill project exemplifies the 20-minute neighbourhood concept, integrating essential services within walking or cycling distance to reduce car dependence, enhance local economies, and foster social connections.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
ID sylw: 102299
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited
Asiant : Knight Frank LLP
The draft policy proposes four types of design codes: area-wide and densification codes are intended for adoption alongside the SWLP, while the site-specific and settlement-specific codes will be developed during the plan period. Introducing a separate densification code could add complexity and potentially conflict with other considerations, such as environmental and heritage impacts. Focusing on site-specific codes may provide the required flexibility, ensuring that density decisions align with the unique context of each development. Additionally, developing multiple codes simultaneously could strain resources and delay planning applications, whereby interim guidelines during the preparation of comprehensive codes may help mitigate potential delays.