BASE HEADER

Preferred Options 2025

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio BDW Trading Limited

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?

ID sylw: 102302

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Draft Policy Direction 27 prioritises the protection of heritage assets, ensuring development conserves their significance. SG18 is a stronger option than SG19 as it has fewer direct or indirect heritage impacts, while SG19 will trigger significant infrastructure upgrades, including modifications to Clopton Bridge which would risk its historic integrity.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 102306

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

BDW generally supports the chapter and has provided comment to the detailed policy directions. However, any design-based requirements should allow sufficient flexibility, whereby overarching design codes should set a flexible framework for site-specific design policies. A careful approach to densities should be undertaken, whereby flexibility is key to ensuring that each site is assessed on a case-by-case basis.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-29-Pollution?

ID sylw: 102352

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

In summary, Draft Policy Direction 29 provides a robust framework to address pollution concerns, ensuring that new developments contribute positively to environmental sustainability and public health.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-30- Health Impact Assessment for Major Development?

ID sylw: 102362

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy lacks clear criteria for when a Health Impact Assessment (HIA) is required, potentially leading to inconsistent screening, unnecessary burdens on developers, or insufficient scrutiny of impactful developments. Without defined thresholds or triggers, the HIA screening process could delay applications, increase uncertainty, strain LPA resources, and risk ineffective implementation, making the policy less effective in delivering meaningful health benefits.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Healthy, Safe, and Inclusive South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 102367

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The chapter seeks to deliver a healthy, safe and inclusive South Warwickshire, which is welcomed, and outlines strategies to enhance community well-being through policies addressing pollution control and the implementation of Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) for major developments. These measures aim to mitigate environmental hazards and ensure that new developments contribute positively to public health. The emphasis on comprehensive pollution management and the requirement for HIAs reflect a proactive approach to fostering healthier, safer, and more inclusive communities. Comments are provided to the specific policy directions.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?

ID sylw: 102395

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy should prioritise development proposals with access to public transport, walking, and cycling routes, aligning with the NPPF, to reduce travel needs and promote sustainable modes of transport. The policy could be expanded to support sites with existing sustainable transport links, such as the site at Cophams Hill and its proximity to a railway station, particularly where reduced car dependency can be achieved.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?

ID sylw: 102396

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy direction is generally welcomed. The provision of EV charging facilities, particularly fast-charge stations, should be afforded significant positive weighting when assessing development proposals in light of the environmental and community benefits.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?

ID sylw: 102400

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy direction is generally welcomed. When wording the detailed related policies, a level of flexibility should be afforded with a positively worded approach to support active and low-carbon transport journeys.

For sites such as land at Cophams Hill, its proximity to existing transport infrastructure, including major road networks and potential freight corridors, offers a strategic advantage. Policies should be supportive of sites that can accommodate sustainable transport options. This approach not only adheres to the NPPF but also fosters a cohesive integration of transport and land use planning, promoting sustainable growth and community well-being.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 102417

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

BDW broadly supports the proposals in the "A Well-Connected South Warwickshire" chapter, particularly Draft Policy Directions 31, 32 and 33. The development at Cophams Hill aligns with these policies by prioritising sustainable transport options, such as access to railway stations and bus services, reducing car dependency. The inclusion of EV charging facilities and encouragement of active transport further supports sustainability, while the Smart Cities policy promotes energy-efficient systems and digital infrastructure, enhancing quality of life and sustainability. These policies provide a solid framework for sustainable growth, helping ensure sites such as Cophams Hill will contribute to South Warwickshire’s long-term objectives.

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-36 - Protection of Sites, Habitats and Species?

ID sylw: 102424

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: BDW Trading Limited

Asiant : Knight Frank LLP

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The policy ensures that biodiversity and ecological assets are safeguarded while allowing for responsible development. For sites like Cophams Hill, where existing habitats, hedgerows are present, this policy will ensure that appropriate mitigation and enhancement measures are implemented. It supports evidence-based ecological planning, ensuring that development integrates with and enhances local biodiversity rather than causing net harm.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.