BASE HEADER

Preferred Options 2025

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?

ID sylw: 103533

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is recommended that the SWLP team should lead on the production of the settlement specific design codes (with inputs from Neighbourhood Planning Groups) and these should come forward at the same time as the SWLP with the focus on enabling housing delivery as soon as possible.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction- 27 Protecting and Enhancing Heritage Assets/ the Historic Environment?

ID sylw: 103560

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough recommends that Draft Policy Direction 27 is reviewed and amended in the context of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990 and the Chapter 16 of the NPPF prior to consultation on the regulation 19 version of the Plan.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 103572

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Designed and Beautiful South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-31- Sustainable Transport Accessibility?

ID sylw: 103591

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough consider that further details are required on what “access for all” comprises, including possible examples, to give clarity to applicants and decision makers.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-32- Electric Vehicle (EV) Infrastructure Strategy?

ID sylw: 103612

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough broadly support the approach within Draft Policy Direction 32, and note that Part S of the Building Regulations sets out the requirements for EV charging in new developments. Any EV Infrastructure Strategy should align with Building Regulations and national policy.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-33- Road, Travel, Employment, and Freight?

ID sylw: 103632

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 33 and welcome that the policy direction aligns with the NPPF.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-35- Smart Cities?

ID sylw: 103646

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough supports Draft Policy Direction 35 in principle, specifically in relation to all new residential developments including appropriate wired and wireless infrastructure to provide high speed internet access. However, it is considered that sufficient flexibility should be built-in to the policy to allow for future changes and feasibility considerations.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 103660

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough are broadly supportive of the proposals in the ‘A Well-Connected South Warwickshire chapter’. However, it is important to ensure that the policy wording correctly reflects the NPPF and statutory duties.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-37- Local Nature Recovery Strategy?

ID sylw: 103673

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough support the preparation of the Local Nature Recovery Strategy (LNRS) (in line with the Environment Act 2021), and welcome the opportunity to review and comment on the LNRS once prepared.

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?

ID sylw: 103688

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Richborough - Plough Lane, Bishop's Itchington

Asiant : Turley

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Richborough broadly support the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 38 in that it aligns with current national policy/legislation.

There is some concern regarding the reference to “or any higher percentage mandated through local or national policy/legislation” and it is considered that any proposal to increase the level of BNG beyond national policy should be tested as it may impact delivery and viability.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.