BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
ID sylw: 99294
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We have concerns relating to the evidence base used to justify the NDDS requirements of Draft Policy A. Viability testing work needs to be completed.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?
ID sylw: 99298
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
There is no evidence to suggest that there is this level of demand for self and custom-build plots in such large clusters or that that they will be deliverable.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
ID sylw: 99304
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
There is no credible evidence to support the Councils proposed approach to GTAA provision.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
ID sylw: 99313
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The policy requirement needs to be viability tested in order to see if it is achievable.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- J- Reducing Flood Risk?
ID sylw: 99315
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Draft Policy J largely reiterates the guidance contained in the NPPF and PPG on Flood Risk and the Sequential Test. It is unnecessary to repeat national policy in the SWLP. The SWLP should simply direct the reader to the NPPF and PPG which is likely to be updated during the course of the plan period.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-25- Strategic Design Principles?
ID sylw: 99317
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We support the design principles identified in Draft Policy Direction 25. However, it is noted that this is a “Policy Direction” that will be refined into a full draft policy in the Pre-Submission SWLP. It is, therefore, uncertain what the practical implications of the design principles will be at the present time. It is consequently difficult to comment further on the suitability or otherwise of a strategic design policy given the lack of detail and we reserve the right to comment on this at a later stage.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-26- Design Codes?
ID sylw: 99323
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Design Codes should be developed in conjunction with the developers of the new settlements and strategic allocations.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-38 - Biodiversity Net Gain?
ID sylw: 99327
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
We are generally supportive of requirements of Draft Policy Direction 38, however, it is noted that the Policy makes reference to the SWLP exploring evidence to seek higher percentage of BNG than the statutory 10% requirement. There is no national policy requirement for this. It is without basis. Any proposal of this nature must be viability tested.
BNG provision can have significant implications on the viability of development sites and their capacity. We object to any proposal to seek greater than 10% BNG.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-40 Green and Blue Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 99328
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
Draft Policy Direction 40 has the potential to add additional development costs that must be factored into a viability assessment produced with the Pre-Submission SWLP. In order for this Policy to be included in the SWLP the Councils must have an understanding of the impact of this Policy on scheme density, the net to gross development ratio of schemes, and the overall scheme costs.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 43c- Open Spaces?
ID sylw: 99332
Derbyniwyd: 06/03/2025
Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne
The suggestion that that when this is not possible contributions will be required to enhance or provide new open spaces within 400m of development is inappropriate.
