BASE HEADER

Preferred Options 2025

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?

ID sylw: 100775

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The HELAA constraint score of 38.5 for the site Ref ID 134 is inaccurately and unfairly derived from a flawed assessment and the total score should be lower, indicating a more favourable site.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?

ID sylw: 100853

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We do not support the use of the term “small scale”. The SWLP Part 1 should support “proportionate” development within and adjacent to existing settlements.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?

ID sylw: 100857

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We are concerned with the lack of detail and the refences within the draft Policy and the HEDNA is out of date.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?

ID sylw: 100862

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Councils should actively engage with site promotors to understand potential infrastructure opportunities and constraints in order to assist in establishing the most appropriate development sites and their policy requirements ahead of the publication of the Pre-Submission SWLP.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?

ID sylw: 100869

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is no detail in the draft policy on the density levels that will be sought in any particular area or location. Density levels should be realistic and should consider net to gross ratios.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?

ID sylw: 100875

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The housing requirement should be greater than the minimum Standard Method figure to help ensure that affordable housing requirements are met and we reserve the right to comment further.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?

ID sylw: 100880

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We have concerns relating to the evidence base used to justify the NDDS requirements of Draft Policy A and further viability work needs to be completed.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- B- Providing Custom and Self Building Housing Plots?

ID sylw: 100886

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We do not support the proposal that 5% of all plots on large housing sites are made available for custom and self-build homes. There is no evidence to suggest that there is this level of demand for self and custom-build plots in such large clusters or that that they will be deliverable.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?

ID sylw: 100891

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Whilst there is an identified need for further GTAA pitches there are a number of issues associated with requiring sites of 500 dwellings or more to provide gypsy and traveller sites.

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?

ID sylw: 100896

Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Vistry Strategic Land - Wellesbourne

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The Part A policy requirement needs to be viability tested in order to see if it is achievable. Sufficient grid capacity for battery storage will be required, which may not be available in all locations

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.