BASE HEADER

Preferred Options 2025

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Kineton Parish Council

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 2 - Potential New Settlements?

ID sylw: 94777

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no further comment

No

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 3- Small Scale Development, Settlement Boundaries and Infill Development?

ID sylw: 94782

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Reviewing and updating Settlement Boundaries MUST BE carried out in consultation with the Neighbourhood Development Plan holder

Sites adjacent to the BUAB would be permitted based on a threshold which is to “be determined” and linked to the Priority Area ranking. These criteria are far too weak and totally unacceptable. The Policy as drafted would encourage unwelcome, unwarranted developer-attention and totally weaken the rationale for Settlement Boundaries

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 4- Accommodating Growth Needs Arising from Outside South Warwickshire?

ID sylw: 94783

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Possibly, but the order of delivery should release the reserve sites closest to the relevant conurbation first.
Eg to accommodate housing need from Coventry available sites nearest to Coventry should be released first irrespective of whether they are least favoured by developers. The Policy should not be used as an excuse by developers to pick up the “low hanging fruit”

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 5- Infrastructure Requirements and Delivery?

ID sylw: 94787

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Broadly yes BUT “in certain circumstances” “where proven” “necessary and viable” are all far too weak for policy wording. These phrases appear in the text below the DPD box. Developers will use every opportunity to avoid delivering infrastructure ahead of development. Where infrastructure is appropriate it must be funded and delivered ahead of commencement of construction (and/or demolition). If necessary financial bonds should be provided by the developer

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 6- Safeguarding land for transport proposals?

ID sylw: 94791

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Safeguarded land also needs to be included for the relief road around the west/north west of Kineton the need for which was proven in a Consultants’ report and given to WCC in 2019

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 7- Green Belt?

ID sylw: 94793

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no further comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-8- Density?

ID sylw: 94795

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no further comment

Yes

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 9 - Using Brownfield Land for Development?

ID sylw: 94796

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

no further comment

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you broadly support the proposals in the Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements chapter? If you have any additional points to raise with regards to this chapter please include them here.

ID sylw: 94799

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

broadly supportive ONLY IF specific comments offered above are accepted and supported.

How has Kineton been identified as a Priority 1 area for development? Is it because it is a MRC? The rationale for it not appearing under any significant category for housing or business development needs to be clarified, otherwise developers will use the classification as an excuse for imposing unwarranted/unjustified development. In later policy statements the reference to “edge of Priority 1” opportunities further reinforces our concern

Other

Preferred Options 2025

Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?

ID sylw: 94800

Derbyniwyd: 03/03/2025

Ymatebydd: Kineton Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Yes, but with the caveat that evidence needs to be gathered on housing needs of all residents, not just those needing affordable housing

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.