BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Chwilio o’r newyddNo
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG21 Question
ID sylw: 104222
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG23 Question
ID sylw: 104224
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Strategic Growth Location SG24 Question
ID sylw: 104226
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 1 - Meeting South Warwickshire's Sustainable Development Requirements?
ID sylw: 104245
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
The proposed increase in housing in both Warwick and Stratford Districts will place a significant burden on already pressured healthcare services. This is a serious concern to SWFT and if not fully mitigated will put existing services at risk.
We therefore strongly support statements in the plan requiring full mitigation of significant negative impacts on healthcare services from new proposed developments, as well as the high priority given to healthy, sustainable communities.
However, the urban development of green belt land is not something SWFT would support as a priority for development, as this comes at the expense of long-term sustainability.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you have any comments on a specific site proposal or the HELAA results?
ID sylw: 104281
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
We have included specific comments in the developments below related to individual locations, however the following general points apply to all of the locations so that SWFT are able to continue to deliver safe services for South Warwickshire residents.
- requirement for investment in healthcare infrastructure and services, including NHS Trusts and primary care
- requirement for investment in transport infrastructure
- ensure no detrimental impact on inequalities
- SWFT would not support prioritisation of development on green belt land or woodlands unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A1
ID sylw: 104287
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development includes woodland areas and is on green belt land we would suggest this site should not be a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question A2
ID sylw: 104292
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development includes woodland areas and is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question B1
ID sylw: 104297
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
No
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question C1
ID sylw: 104302
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
As this development is on green belt land, we would not support this site as a priority for development, unless there were significant steps taken to avoid or mitigate any loss of biodiversity and carbon sequestration/climate change mitigation.
This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Potential Settlement Question E1
ID sylw: 104304
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
This site does not have close access to an existing community healthcare property and will therefore require more significant infrastructure investment to support sufficient provision of out of hospital services for any significant size of development.