BASE HEADER
Preferred Options 2025
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Chwilio o’r newyddYes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 10- Providing the Right Tenure and Type of Homes?
ID sylw: 104381
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
We strongly support the increased provision of affordable housing, both from the perspective of NHS staff who are unable to afford homes in the districts where they work, and also to support patients who are living in unsuitable accommodation.
We would seek further dialogue with the Councils on potential ways to ensure that new communities are designed in a way that is attractive and convenient as well as affordable for working-age people and families who wish to live and work within the district, in recognition of the need for more healthcare professionals working in the districts to deliver services.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy- A- Providing the Right Size of Homes?
ID sylw: 104383
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
We support the proposal to increase the supply of houses meeting accessible living standards that are sized for additional equipment. This should facilitate discharge from hospital into suitable accommodation for those with impaired access and reduced mobility, so would support patient flow and efficiency improvements for acute health services.
We would seek assurance that local demographic needs will be considered and factored into the types and designs of all developments proposed e.g. aging population and resident students.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-11- Meeting the Accommodation Needs of Gypsies, Travellers, Travelling Showpeople and Boat Dwellers?
ID sylw: 104388
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
We welcome proposals to safeguard and protect vulnerable communities who often struggle to access services. This is important in addressing systemic inequalities.
Other
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-16-Airfields?
ID sylw: 104392
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
We would seek clarity in respect of the environmental impact of supporting the development of airfields, on both a localised and national scale, with increasing focus on improving air quality and reducing emissions to mitigate future effects of climate change.
We would seek assurance that the development of the site and the long-term change in use, factoring in the aeroplanes using the airport, would have no detrimental impact on local air quality and would not create additional unmitigated greenhouse gas emissions.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-17- A Low carbon Economy?
ID sylw: 104396
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Broadly speaking, SWFT is supportive of the policy but more specific and detailed actions need to be laid out as to how this will be achieved with time specific deadlines.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy D: Large Scale Renewable Energy Generation and Storage?
ID sylw: 104399
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Yes, broadly agree and the approach seems sound and well thought out. However, it should be noted the biodiversity aspect is crucial, especially as it can directly affect community health and environmental resilience. More emphasis on ensuring green spaces and biodiversity is not affected and how, as well as the inclusion of green infrastructure, such as tree planting or wildlife corridors, alongside renewable energy schemes would provide a more holistic approach to addressing biodiversity.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-E- Protecting Large Scale Existing Renewable Energy Infrastructure?
ID sylw: 104401
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Yes, supportive of the principle of protecting large-scale renewable energy infrastructure, particularly given the NHS’s own Net Zero ambitions. If an NHS site is adjacent to existing renewable energy infrastructure, it will be important to ensure that hospital expansion or other healthcare developments are not unintentionally restricted.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy-F- Decentralised Energy Systems?
ID sylw: 104404
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Agree with the broad principle, however it is surprising to see gas fired heating and cooling still included (albeit as a last option) when so much funding is being dedicated to decarbonise heating. This seems to go against current government policy and NHS approach.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction-22- Net Zero Carbon Buildings?
ID sylw: 104406
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Yes, the approach is broadly supported. However, please see below key considerations:
• The NHS Trust strongly supports measures that align with the NHS's own Net Zero and sustainability goals, particularly those that reduce long-term operational energy costs and enhance resilience.
• The emphasis on both operational and embodied carbon reductions is welcome.
• The commitment to the Future Homes Standard (FHS) and Future Buildings Standard (FBS) is supported, provided that the approach remains flexible and evidence-based.
• Mechanical ventilation should only be installed when passive ventilation is not suitable.
Yes
Preferred Options 2025
Do you agree with the approach laid out in Draft Policy Direction 23- Reducing Energy Consumption in Existing Buildings?
ID sylw: 104407
Derbyniwyd: 07/03/2025
Ymatebydd: South Warwickshire Foundation trust
Yes, the broad approach is agreed on with the note that non-residential buildings should either remain operational during the retrofit or services moved to an alternative and suitable location.