BASE HEADER
Publication Draft
Chwilio sylwadau
Canlyniadau chwilio Kenilworth Town Council
Chwilio o’r newyddCefnogi
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Vision for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33908
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
We agree with the Preferred Version but do not feel that the Preferred Options implement that vision as far as Kenilworth is concerned.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy for Warwick District to 2026?
ID sylw: 33909
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
We agree with the Preferred Growth Strategy but feel that again the Preferred Options do not carry out these sentiments in relation particularly to the Green Belt at Thickthorn and Kings Hill.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree with the Strategic Objectives for Warwick District?
ID sylw: 33910
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
Again the Strategy Objectives are a proper aim, but as far as set out in our general response we have grave doubts regarding the effects on Kenilworth.
Sylw
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new employment land?
ID sylw: 33911
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
As far as Kenilworth is concerned we do not feel that Thickthorn is appropriate as it is Green Belt.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
(iii) Land at Thickthorn, Kenilworth
ID sylw: 33912
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
We would not wish to see development of this site which is in the Green Belt. If it was to proceed a very careful and balanced planning brief would be required for the whole area before any development is allowed. Further, it should be in the THIRD stage.
Sylw
Publication Draft
(iv) Land at Kings Hill, south of Green Lane, Finham
ID sylw: 33913
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
We understood that this area was for housing and would not feel that it should be in any way industrial. It is essential in any event that no development should take place thereon until such time as the developments in Coventry are complete.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for Rural Communities?
ID sylw: 33914
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
Kings Hill is a grave incursion into the Green Belt and should not be included until development is complete. We are, however, supportive of the decision not to develop in the area between the Town and Coventry and would support the Districts decision not to develop in the area of Burton Green.
Gwrthwynebu
Publication Draft
Do you agree that the Council has identified all reasonable options for the location of new housing?
ID sylw: 33915
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
We are concerned that development is proposed in the Green Belt prior to the use of all other available land.
Cefnogi
Publication Draft
(i) Land at Former Ford Foundry, Leamington
ID sylw: 33923
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
Supports location
Sylw
Publication Draft
(ii) Land at Station Approach, Leamington
ID sylw: 33924
Derbyniwyd: 28/09/2009
Ymatebydd: Kenilworth Town Council
Supports location
