BASE HEADER

Preferred Options for Sites

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options for Sites

GT12 Land north of Westham Lane, Barford (green)

ID sylw: 64272

Derbyniwyd: 05/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Almost half the site consists of storm overflow and pollution pond/ditch systems constructed as part of the Barford Bypass works. Not available for other development without compromising integrity of drainage of Bypass and pollution protection of river.
Open area of Avon valley, close to river with spectacular views along/across valley.
Popular north-south tourist route.
Location would under no circumstances be granted permission for development for domestic/other use. Would contravene planning guidelines to which councils normally work.
Alien development in rural landscape.
Alongside busy 60 mph A-road. Noise levels quite unpleasant.
Close alongside a large storm overflow and pollution pond containing deep standing water with steep banks.
Close to the river containing several deep pools and swift currents: dangerous location for children.
CPO would be needed which would be contested

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options for Sites

GTalt12 Land at Barford By-Pass (green)

ID sylw: 64273

Derbyniwyd: 05/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Almost half the site consists of storm overflow and pollution pond/ditch systems constructed as part of the Barford Bypass works. Not available for other development without compromising integrity of drainage of Bypass and pollution protection of river.
Open area of Avon valley, close to river with spectacular views along/across valley.
Popular north-south tourist route.
Location would under no circumstances be granted permission for development for domestic/other use. Would contravene planning guidelines to which councils normally work.
Alien development in rural landscape.
Alongside busy 60 mph A-road. Noise levels quite unpleasant.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options for Sites

7. Sites summary table

ID sylw: 64506

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

GT03
Agree with Council's decision.

GT13
It has been through the legal process and probably should not be challenged.

GT14
A very small site/contribution to solution so probably not worth pursuing.

GT16
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GT17
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GT18
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GT20
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GTalt4
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GTalt 5
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GTalt 10
Agree - an unsuitable proposal.

GTalt 13
Agreed - unsuitable proposal.

GTalt15
Agreed but justifications are unconvincing.

GTalt18
Agreed - unsuitable proposal.

GTalt19
Agreed but justifications are unconvincing.

GTalt20
Agreed but justifications are unconvincing.

GTalt21
Agreed but justifications are unconvincing.

GTalt22
Agreed but justifications are unconvincing and could have been an ideal site given existing uses.

GTalt23
Agreed but justifications are unconvincing.

Sylw

Preferred Options for Sites

6. Criteria

ID sylw: 64868

Derbyniwyd: 05/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Understand the need for the process but disappointed with lack of detail and justification for sites and the amount of erroneous information - both last year and in the current document. There is a lack of consistency and it is noted that the Council use one site characteristic in support of a site but use that exact same characteristic against another site eg noise, prominence in the landscape. The SA's assessments appear to be minimally objective.

Concerned about Council's willingness to rely on CPO powers which will render most sites financially unviable and undeliverable in the timetable required.

The cost implications of each site need to be considered as part of the process.

Limiting the number of pitches per site increases the number of sites and if this is done for site management reasons it reinforces local residents concerns about such sites. With 5 -15 pitches the norm, the Council should be able to accommodate 31 pitches on 2-3 sites.

Sites chosen seem to be focused on Barford and will blight one of the best villages in the country.

Siskin Drive and Gateway area sites should continue to be vigorously explored.

Note that as part of the duty to co-operate Stratford DC have a site at Blackhill.

Atodiadau:

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options for Sites

7. Sites summary table

ID sylw: 65097

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

GT01
Should be included as AMBER (at least) and progressed.
investigate/elucidate/address any issues on this site.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low.
Houses are already immediately adjacent to A46 elsewhere.
Can negotiate the design access.

GT07
Should be 'Amber'
Should challenge Green Belt paradigm
Issues possibly overstated: Coventry is NOT a busy or noisy airport anymore; access is clearly possible

GT07
Should be 'Amber'
Should challenge Green Belt paradigm
Issues possibly overstated: Coventry is NOT a busy or noisy airport anymore; access is clearly possible

GT09
Should be an 'Amber' site and although probably not popular with either Barford or Bishops Tachbrook villages it needs further evaluation.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low-medium.

GT10
Should be an 'Green' site and although probably not popular with either Barford or Bishops Tachbrook villages it needs to be more thoroughly evaluated.
Access issues are grossly overstated and landfill part of the site would not be required for this development.
Impact of noise from M40 not likely to be any worse than parts of Bishops Tachbrook.
Sensitivity of existing use markedly overstated.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low-medium.

GTalt 6
Perhaps it should be considered for and integrated properly.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be medium.

GTalt7
It seems to only have been rejected on Green Belt issues. This should be a 'Green' site.
Impact on local character would be no worse than GT12 and no more difficult to achieve access than GT08.
Covenant on site can be overcome in the 'public interest'.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low - medium.

GTalt08
Should be 'Amber' and considered further.
Allocation from employment use can change especially as we are in a time of flux with Local Plan.
They can be integrated/adjacent to industrial areas.
Recent planning permission for GTalt01 seems to have been disregarded, so maybe not an issue here either?
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be medium.

GTalt9
Should be 'Amber' and considered further.
Allocation from employment use can change especially as we are in a time of flux with Local Plan.
Sites can be integrated/adjacent to other uses.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be medium.

Gtalt11
Should be considered further and marked as 'Amber'
In many ways this could be an ideal "wider location/area of search"
Gypsies and travellers could meet site's rural based employment allocation.
Already significant residential numbers in the vicinity.
If intensification of access and issue here then it calls into question many other sites.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low.

Gtalt14
There is housing and employment use very near this location.
Smells from the sewage works are probably overstated.
WDC should review all sites on East of Stratford Road from Longbridge through to the conventional Stratford Road houses - this area would be an ideal site and is set back and screened to protect from the tourist route.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be medium.

GTalt16
Should be included as 'amber' (at least) and progressed.
Need to investigate/elucidate/address Green Belt issue.
This would be the very best opportunity to integrate gypsy and traveller requirements into a bigger scheme.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low - medium.

GTalt17
Should be included as 'Amber' and progressed
There is housing and employment use very near this location and so is another good opportunity to integrate gypsies and travellers in a planned manner
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low - medium.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options for Sites

GT02 Land abutting the Fosse Way close to A425 junction

ID sylw: 65098

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Few locals impacted.
Close to roundabout on derestricted road with SLOW traffic.
Not prominent in landscape.
Agricultural land less valuable than other sites eg Barford.
Services available within 3 miles.
Could take maximum site numbers acceptable (15).
Public protest at earlier stages was out of proportion to impact.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low-medium.
Consider it an ideal site.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options for Sites

GT04 Land at Harbury Lane/Fosse Way (green)

ID sylw: 65099

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Will become available when the football club moves.
Minimal impact on residents.
Services available within 3 miles.
Harbury Lane whilst busy is accessible as demonstrated by current site use and others on the road
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low once the site is vacated.

Sylw

Preferred Options for Sites

GT05 Land at Tachbrook Hill Farm (green)

ID sylw: 65100

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Not an ideal site, so should be 'amber' but the noise much less than on A429.
Services in Bishops Tachbrook very close at hand.
Site and highway access good.
Probably not popular with either Barford or Bishops Tachbrook though.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be medium - high.

Gwrthwynebu

Preferred Options for Sites

GT06 Land at Park Farm/Spinney Farm (amber)

ID sylw: 65101

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Should be a 'Red' site as it is probably NOT popular with either Barford or Bishops Tachbrook.
Given proximity to castle and tourist route, it will be very prominent in landscape.
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be medium.

Cefnogi

Preferred Options for Sites

GT08 Depot west side of Cubbington Heath Farm (amber)

ID sylw: 65102

Derbyniwyd: 02/05/2014

Ymatebydd: Barford, Sherbourne and Wasperton Joint Parish Council

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This could be a good site and should be a 'Green' site.
Should challenge Green Belt paradigm and progress.
Former use will have no real impact on the proposal.
Impact on wildlife will be no greater than any other site
Close to HS2 but so are thousands of houses.
Ground water risks are manageable.
Access onto a modest volume, modest speed road is possible.
Within 3 miles of services
Gypsy and travellers may well prefer this sort of location as it is more remote than other sites.
WCC owned and so available
Costs/mitigation/compensation would be low once vacated.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.