BASE HEADER

Publication Draft

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Gallagher Estates

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

DS13 Allocation of Land for a Country Park

ID sylw: 66798

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The NPPG (Design) emphasises the importance of having a system of open and green spaces and that these can make an important contribution to the quality of an area. The allocation of land for a country park adjoining the Tach Brook is commensurate with the NPPG objective and significantly exceeds the open space requirements generated by the development proposals. The Background Document accompanying the representations includes an illustrative development framework plan which shows how the site at Lower Heathcote Farm can contribute to the provision of the country park. A wider strategic development framework Plan is also provided showing how the country park can continue to the east of the Lower Heathcote Farm site as part of the south of Harbury Lane strategic site allocation. The park, as envisaged in paragraph 2.59 of the Plan, can offer an informal recreational area and provide wildlife and biodiversity links to the wider agricultural landscape to the south.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

DS15 Comprehensive Development of Strategic Sites

ID sylw: 66799

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Land at Lower Heathcote Farm (part of the South of Harbury Lane proposed allocation) can come forward for development early, delivering housing in a manner consistent with the objective of boosting supply and making a contribution to the 5 year housing land supply. The requirement for either development briefs or master plans to be approved by the Local Authority creates a risk that unnecessary delay will prevail. Clarity is provided to bring forward sites through other policies in the plan therefore the requirement for master plans and briefs is not necessary. There are mechanisms in place to ensure that the necessary infrastructure is delivered through the application process and the proposals map is clear about what infrastructure is required and where without the need for a master plan. Policy DM1 assists this. In summary, there are policies and mechanisms in place to ensure the delivery of infrastructure on the strategic sites and that high quality and integrated development is delivered.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

DS20 Accommodating Housing Need Arising from Outside the District

ID sylw: 66800

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

We are encouraged that Warwick District Council recognises its statutory obligations with regard to the Duty to Co-operate with neighbouring authorities in the preparation of their Local Plan in order to maximise its effectiveness with regard to strategic planning matters. We do, however, reserve our position on whether the District Council has effectively discharged that Duty and look forward to considering this matter further on publication of the necessary attendant evidence based information

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

PC0 Prosperous Communities

ID sylw: 66801

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

This policy provision is supported, however there is a concern that the Plan is not effectively balancing housing and employment growth as currently drafted. In order to help support economic growth and meet the projected target (11.6% employment jobs growth) for Warwick District over the plan period, there needs to be an increase in the population, in particular the working population. Using the Chelmer model it is considered that a housing requirement of circa 18,043 dwellings is needed to fulfil economic potential.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

H0 Housing

ID sylw: 66802

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

No objection is raised to this policy suffice to say that it adds little to Strategic Policy DS2 of the Plan which is very similar in its drafting. As set out in responding to Policy DS2 we support the Council's policy intent to provide, in full, for the Objectively Assessed Need for housing in the District. This is commensurate with the NPPF, paragraph 47. We are, however, concerned that in practice the housing requirement figure contained within the Plan at Policy DS6 (12,860 new dwellings 2011 to 2029 as derived from the SHMA) is insufficient to meet the full, objectively assessed need for housing. Please refer to our objections to Policy DS6 and the accompanying Housing Background Paper for further information.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

BE2 Developing Strategic Housing Sites

ID sylw: 66803

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Policy BE2 is similar in intent and drafting to Policy DS15 in requiring the preparation of development briefs for the proposed strategic sites. It is therefore repetitious. Notwithstanding this, as set out in response to Policy DS15, it is considered that the need for development briefs introduces an additional layer of unnecessary development plan making. We propose Policy BE2 be deleted.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

TR2 Traffic Generation

ID sylw: 66804

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

Policy TR2 is concerned to ensure that the implications of large scale development, in respect of traffic movements and impact, is assessed. This is an approach which is consistent with the NPPF, particularly paragraph 32. In this regard the Background Documents provided for both the site at Lower Heathcote Farm and South of Gallows Hill (provided separately) demonstrate that both of the sites can be accommodated on the highway network without unacceptable adverse impact and that suitable accesses can be achieved. Indeed, a full Transport Assessment (TA) has been submitted for each of these sites in association with the planning applications currently before the Local Planning Authority. The TA demonstrates that, with mitigation as appropriate, the developments (either in isolation or combination) should not be prevented from coming forward and are commensurate with the provisions of NPPF, paragraph 32.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Cefnogi

Publication Draft

TR5 Safeguarding for Transport Infrastructure

ID sylw: 66805

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is noted that the Proposals Map defines, in broad terms, an area of search for a park and ride to the south of Warwick. The proposed development at Lower Heathcote Farm (part of South of Harbury Lane strategic site) and the Omission Site proposal at South of Gallows Hill / West of Europa Way do not prevent the park and ride being delivered in the future. This is consistent with Policy TR5.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

HS1 Healthy, Safe and Inclusive Communities

ID sylw: 66806

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

6.4 The content of this policy is noted. It is the case, however, that all elements of this policy are already included within other draft policies of the Plan. By way of example, providing homes to meet needs of older people is covered in Policy H0, contributing to the development of high quality, safe and convenient cycling and walking network is addressed in Policy BE1 and minimising the potential for crime and anti social behaviour is covered in proposed Policy HS7. It is therefore not clear what the policy adds to the Plan in terms of effectiveness. The Council are therefore invited to consider whether it is necessary to retain this policy in the Plan.

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Gwrthwynebu

Publication Draft

HS3 Local Green Space

ID sylw: 66807

Derbyniwyd: 26/06/2014

Ymatebydd: Gallagher Estates

Asiant : Pegasus Group

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Heb nodi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Heb nodi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

It is clear from the NPPF and NPPG that the designation or otherwise of Local Green Spaces is a matter directly applicable to a Neighbourhood Plan and not the District Council's Local Plan. HS3 is not appropriate for inclusion in the plan. It is not clear how the Council can support the principle of Local Green Spaces without knowing the detail of them and the extent to which they meet the strict requirements of the NPPF and NPPG. Indeed, paragraph 77 of the NPPF is clear that the designation will not be appropriate for most green areas or open space

Testun llawn:

see attached.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut I ddefnyddio’r system ac I wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.