BASE HEADER

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Chwilio sylwadau

Canlyniadau chwilio Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Chwilio o’r newydd Chwilio o’r newydd

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 18 - paras 2.82 to 2.87

ID sylw: 68389

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Asiant : Mr Niall Crabb

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

At 2.83, it is stated that other known issues will be resolved by way of a Plan Review. If the issue is known about it should be resolved NOW and certainly as part of the current Examination of the Plan, including its soundness.
This particularly applies to the area South of Coventry where, apart from the need for flexibility to meet unmet demand, the allocated sites are not believed to be based on objective analysis. Land at Cryfield/Gibbet Hill is available to meet demand and should not be ignored for a subsequent Review with less public input.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 20 - DS NEW1

ID sylw: 68391

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Asiant : Mr Niall Crabb

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

A further Review of the developable land south of Coventry is being proposed within 5 years in order to meet demand seems to be already accepted so it should not be postponed.
It is believed that the current choice of allocated sites is not based on objective and transparent analysis so the most appropriate course of action would be to have a full analysis of ALL the proposed sites in this area NOW, as part of the New Plan's Examination in Public.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 22 - Policy DS NEW2

ID sylw: 68392

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Asiant : Mr Niall Crabb

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The principle of safeguarding land for future development is sound. Whilst land at Cryfield Grange / South of Gibbet Hill Road is considered to be suitable for allocation now, if this is not deemed appropriate, than it is considered that it should be identified as Safeguarded Land.
It directly adjoins: existing development; the University development; proposed development land in Coventry; and, other than Green Belt, is not affected by any suitability criteria used to define future development land.

Cefnogi

Proposed Modifications January 2016

Mod 23 - Paras New2.1 to New2.3

ID sylw: 68393

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Asiant : Mr Niall Crabb

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

The principles of the policy are accepted as safeguarding land for future development is sound. Whilst land at Cryfield Grange / South of Gibbet Hill Road (referred to in the Representation on Modification 22) is considered to be suitable for allocation now, if this is not deemed appropriate, than it is considered that it should be identified as Safeguarded Land.
It directly adjoins: existing development; the University development; proposed development land in Coventry; and, other than Green Belt, is not affected by any suitability criteria used to define future development land.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

H43 - Kings Hill Lane

ID sylw: 68394

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Asiant : Mr Niall Crabb

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is no material negative difference in the Sustainability Appraisal Report on Cryfield, in comparison to Kings Hill, that should result in it not being allocated.

It is suggested that this proves that the Appraisal which has been used to allocate new sites is not fully objective because it has not been subject to proper public debate on the pros and cons of allocated and non-allocated sites.

It is suggested that this should be undertaken as part of the reconvened Examination, in order to ensure that all possible (and suitable) sites have been properly appraised.

Gwrthwynebu

Proposed Modifications January 2016

H42 - Westwood Heath

ID sylw: 68395

Derbyniwyd: 22/04/2016

Ymatebydd: Cryfield Land (Kenilworth) Ltd

Asiant : Mr Niall Crabb

Cydymffurfio â’r gyfraith? Nac Ydi

Cadarn? Nac Ydi

Dyletswydd i gydweithredu? Nac Ydi

Crynodeb o'r Gynrychiolaeth:

There is no material negative difference between Cryfield and Westwood Heath. Cryfield/Gibbet is not allocated as apparently the larger strategic sites would support a greater range of services. As Westwood Heath would provide only 14% more homes, why is it allocated in preference to Cryfield/Gibbet?
The Appraisal for allocating new sites is not fully objective and has not been subject to proper public debate on the pros and cons of allocated/non-allocated sites.

Cryfield/Gibbet is preferred by the Parish Council.

A full appraisal should be undertaken as part of the Examination to ensure that all possible (and suitable) sites have been properly appraised.

Am gyfarwyddiadau ar sut i ddefnyddio’r system ac i wneud sylwadau, gwelwch ein canllaw cymorth.